Home “Wicked” women in contemporary pop culture: “bad” language and gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie, and Saving Grace
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Wicked” women in contemporary pop culture: “bad” language and gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie, and Saving Grace

  • Monika Bednarek

    Monika Bednarek is Senior Lecturer in Linguistics at The University of Sydney. Her current research focusses on two areas: news discourse and television dialogue. Her most recent publications in these areas include News Discourse (2012, Continuum, with Helen Caple), articles on news values in Discourse & Society (2014) and Discourse, Context, Media (2012, both with Helen Caple) and a chapter on wh-questions in TV dialogue (2014, in the edited volume Discourse & Context).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 13, 2015

Abstract

In this article I discuss “wicked” women in contemporary pop culture, analyzing the language of the “heroines,” or protagonists, of three popular American television series: Weeds, Nurse Jackie, and Saving Grace. All feature female characters who are “flawed” in some way and can be described as “non-conforming,” since they engage in behavior that would be socially and morally condemned – they deal in drugs (Weeds), are addicted to pills (Nurse Jackie), or are alcoholics (Saving Grace). While this has attracted some comment in the mainstream media, such comments are not based on any empirical research and have tended to center on these women’s behavior. In contrast, the approach taken here focuses on their linguistic practices, in particular their use of “bad language,” including taboo words and swearing. The analyses show that all three female protagonists challenge stereotypical expectations about appropriate “feminine” behavior for white heterosexual Anglo-American women through their use of “bad language,” while the impact of such cultural representations depends on a range of factors.

About the author

Monika Bednarek

Monika Bednarek is Senior Lecturer in Linguistics at The University of Sydney. Her current research focusses on two areas: news discourse and television dialogue. Her most recent publications in these areas include News Discourse (2012, Continuum, with Helen Caple), articles on news values in Discourse & Society (2014) and Discourse, Context, Media (2012, both with Helen Caple) and a chapter on wh-questions in TV dialogue (2014, in the edited volume Discourse & Context).

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Deborah Cameron and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on an earlier version of this article.

References

Anderson, Lars & PeterTrudgill. 1990. Bad language. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.). 2012. Language and society in cinematic discourse. [Theme issue]. Multilingua 31(2/3).10.1515/multi-2012-0007Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, Judith. 2006a. Introduction. In JudithBaxter (ed.), Theorising the female voice in public contexts, xiiixviii. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, Judith (ed.). 2006b. Theorising the female voice in public contexts. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2008. “What the hell is wrong with you?” A corpus perspective on evaluation and emotion in contemporary American pop culture. In AhmarMahboob & NaomiKnight (eds.), Questioning linguistics, 95126. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2010. The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Brezina, Vaclav & MiriamMeyerhoff. 2014. Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19. 128.10.1075/ijcl.19.1.01breSearch in Google Scholar

Bubel, Claudia & AlicSpitz. 2006. “One of the last vestiges of gender bias”: The characterization of women through the telling of dirty jokes in Ally McBeal. Humor191. 71104.10.1515/HUMOR.2006.004Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & QiuanaLopez. 2011. Performing blackness, forming whiteness: Linguistic minstrelsy in Hollywood film . Journal of Sociolinguistics15. 680706.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00513.xSearch in Google Scholar

Burton, Graeme. 2000. Talking television: An introduction to the study of television. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2005. Language, gender and sexuality: Current issues and new directions . Applied Linguistics26. 482502.10.1093/applin/ami027Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2006. Theorising the female voice in public contexts. In JudithBaxter (ed.), Theorising the female voice in public contexts, 320. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230522435_1Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2010. Sex/gender, language and the new biologism . Applied Linguistics31. 173192.10.1093/applin/amp022Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah & DonKulick. 2003. Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Connell, Bob. 1987. Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–2015. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (accessed 4 December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Federal Communications Commission. 2004. Memorandum opinion and order in the matter of complaints against various broadcast licensees regarding their airing of the “Golden Globe Awards” program. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-43A1.pdf (accessed 26 June 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Gillota, David. 2012. “People of colors”: Multiethnic humor in Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle and Weeds. The Journal of Popular Culture45. 960978.10.1111/j.1540-5931.2012.00968.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gregori Signes, Carmen. 2007. What do we laugh at? Gender representations in 3rd Rock from the Sun. In JoséSantaemiliaPatriciaBou, SergioMaruenda & GoraZaragoza (eds.), International perspectives on gender and language, 726750. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1990 [1922]. The woman. In DeborahCameron (ed.), The feminist critique of language. A reader, 201220. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1990 [1975]. Extract from Language and woman’s place. In DeborahCameron (ed.), The feminist critique of language. A reader, 221233. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

LaPoe, Victoria, BenjaminLaPoe II & DanielBerkowitz. 2012. Sticking it to the mother myth: Discussing race and gender in Nurse Jackie and HawthoRNe online. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.Search in Google Scholar

Liebling, Heather. 2009. DisGraceful woman? Postfeminism and TNT’s Saving Grace. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago, IL.Search in Google Scholar

Maher, Brittany. 2012. Media under the influence. The Sentinel 13 November. http://www.ksusentinel.com/2012/11/13/media-under-the-influence (accessed 25 June 2013).Search in Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony. 2006. Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony, PaulBaker & AndrewHardie. 2000. Assessing claims about language use with corpus data – Swearing and abuse. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore. Analyses and techniques in describing English, 4555. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004485211_007Search in Google Scholar

Milestone, Katie & AnnekeMeyer. 2012. Gender & popular culture. Cambridge & Malden: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Mullany, Louise. 2007. Gendered discourse in the professional workplace. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230592902Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Bróna. 2010. Corpus and sociolinguistics: Investigating age and gender in female talk. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.38Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, Momoko. 2006. Creating indexicality. Schoolgirl speech in Meiji Japan. In DeborahCameron & DonKulick (eds.), The language and sexuality reader, 270284. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

New York State Nurses Association. 2009. NYSNA responds to “Nurse Jackie” series. http://www.nysna.org/general/communications/nursejackie.htm (accessed 25 June 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Paltridge, Brian, AngelaThomas & JianxinLiu. 2011. Genre, performance and Sex in the City. In RobertaPiazza, MonikaBednarek & FabioRossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse. Approaches to the language of films and television series, 249262. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.16palSearch in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta. 2005. Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584305Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, Roberta. 2007. Anatomising Gilbert Grissom. The structure and function of the televisual character. In MichaelAllen (ed.), Reading CSI. Crime TV under the microscope, 3956. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755696208.ch-003Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 2007. Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203088807Search in Google Scholar

Precht, Kristen. 2006. Gender differences and similarities in stance in informal American conversation. Unpublished manuscript. Ohio: Kent State University. www.kprecht.net/MyWork/Precht%20Gender%202006.pdf (accessed 4 March 2007).Search in Google Scholar

Precht, Kristen. 2008. Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation . Journal of Sociolinguistics12. 89111.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00354.xSearch in Google Scholar

Research and Development Unit for English Studies. 1999–2013. WebCorp. The web as corpus. Birmingham: Birmingham City University. http://www.webcorp.org.uk/live/ (accessed 4 December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Rey, Jennifer M. 2001. Changing gender roles in popular culture: Dialogue in Star Trek episodes from 1966 to 1993. In DouglasBiber & SusanConrad (eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies, 138156. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Kay. 2010. Television dramatic dialogue. A sociolinguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, Ruth. 2012. Sobering reality. The Sydney Morning Herald Spectrum 14–15 January. http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/sobering-reality-20120112-1pvy0.html?skin=text-only (accessed 6 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, Kathleen. 1995. The unruly woman. Gender and the genres of laughter. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1991. Expletives in the London-Lund corpus. In KarinAijmer & BengtAltenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics. Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 239253. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Troutman, Denise. 2006. “They say it’s a man’s world, but you can’t prove that by me”: African American comediennes’ construction of voice in public space. In JudithBaxter (ed.), Theorising the female voice in public contexts, 217239. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230522435_12Search in Google Scholar

Understanding the TV ratings and parental controls. No date. http://www.tvguidelines.org/resources/TV_Parental_Guidelines_Brochure.pdf (accessed 19 November 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-6-13
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2015-0011/html
Scroll to top button