The interplay between agency and constraint: some departures from the organization of talk in the classroom

References

Arminen, Ikka. 2005. Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Maxwell. 1982. Understanding formality: The categorization and production of “formal” interaction. The British Journal of Sociology33(1). 86–115.10.2307/589338Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina. 2010. “Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk. Discourse Studies12(1). 5–32.10.1177/1461445609346770Search in Google Scholar

Cazden, Courtney. 1986. Classroom discourse. In MerlinWittrock (ed.), The handbook of research on teaching, 432–463. New York: MacMillan Reference Books.Search in Google Scholar

Chalari, Athanasia. 2005. Why Greeks talk at the same time all together: Examining the phenomenon of overlaps in everyday Greek conversations. The 2nd Hellenic observatory PhD symposium on modern Greece: Current social science research on Greece, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 10 June.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings, 268–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & JohnHeritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, Angela. 1991. Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review56(6). 818–835.10.2307/2096258Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Greatbatch, David. 1992. On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings, 268–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Joan Kelly & MeghanWalsh. 2002. Teacher–student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics22. 186–203.10.1017/S0267190502000107Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In MaxwellAtkinson & JohnHeritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & GeoffreyRaymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly68(1). 15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103Search in Google Scholar

Jacknick, Christine. 2011. “But this is writing”: Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language)5(1). 39–54.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In GeneLerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kapellidi, Charikleia. 2013. The organization of talk in school interaction. Discourse Studies15(2). 185–204.10.1177/1461445612471466Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2002. Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction3(3). 277–309.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society1(1). 97–120.10.1017/S0047404500006576Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 1989. Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication53(Spring). 167–177.10.1080/10570318909374298Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes19(1). 111–131.10.1080/01638539109544907Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 2004. Collaborative turn sequences. In GeneLerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 225–256. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.12lerSearch in Google Scholar

Levinson, C. Stephen. 1992. Activity types and language. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Macbeth, Douglas. 2004. The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society33(5). 703–736.10.1017/S0047404504045038Search in Google Scholar

Markee, Numa. 2000. Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410606471Search in Google Scholar

Mazeland, Harrie. 1983. Sprecherwechsel in der Schule. In KonradEhlich & JochenRehbein (eds.), Kommunikation in Schule und Hochschule, 77–101. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

McHoul, Alec. 1978. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society7(2). 183–213.10.1017/S0047404500005522Search in Google Scholar

Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106Search in Google Scholar

Mehan, Hugh. 1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In Teunvan Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3, 115–131. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mori, Junko. 2004. Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. Modern Language Journal88. 536–550.10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2003. Patterns of participation in classroom interaction: Girls’ and boys’ non-compliance in a Greek high school. Linguistics and Education14(1). 123–141.10.1016/S0898-5898(03)00014-7Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In MaxwellAtkinson & JohnHeritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, EmanuelSchegloff & GailJefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4). 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1992a. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97(5). 1295–1345.10.1086/229903Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1992b. On talk and its institutional occasions. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings, 101–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1999. Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies1(4). 405–435.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John & MalcolmCoulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, John. 1987. On the topic of conversation as a speech event. Research on Language and Social Interaction21. 93–114.10.1080/08351818709389286Search in Google Scholar

Wood, David & HeatherWood. 1988. Questioning vs student initiative. In J. Dillon (ed.), Questioning and discussion: A multidisciplinary study, 280–305. Norweed: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar