Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis
-
Charlotte Hommerberg
Charlotte Hommerberg received her PhD in English linguistics from Linnaeus University, Sweden, in 2011, and is currently employed at Linnaeus University as Associate Professor and Researcher in English linguistics. Her research interests involve consumerism discourse, multimodality, English as a lingua franca in higher education, and communication in palliative cancer care. Her publications include a monograph titled
Persuasiveness in the Discourse of Wine: The Rhetoric of Robert Parker .
Abstract
Recent years have seen a rapid influx of reviews in the field of different aesthetic and consumption domains, which is indicative of the importance assigned by present-day society to what we choose to experience and consume. Given their prevalence, there is a need to find an adequate analytic framework which allows insightful understanding of the discursive construction of such reviews. This paper aims to propose such a framework by combining tools from the Appraisal model with ideas from argumentation theory. The combined methodology is demonstrated using one text from a corpus of wine reviews written by the extraordinarily influential wine critic Robert Parker. The analysis takes into consideration both meanings that are internal to the text and meanings that are text-external, so-called world knowledge. I argue that the technique of reconstruction adopted from argumentation theory helps to highlight and explain how the appraisal works in the text. The findings are generalizable to the extent that the methodology can be used for any type of review text, especially in the domain of present-day luxury consumption, which is not overtly argumentative but which can still be found to have an assessment-basis format that leads its readers toward a certain worldview that they are invited to co-construct and see as rational.
About the author
Charlotte Hommerberg received her PhD in English linguistics from Linnaeus University, Sweden, in 2011, and is currently employed at Linnaeus University as Associate Professor and Researcher in English linguistics. Her research interests involve consumerism discourse, multimodality, English as a lingua franca in higher education, and communication in palliative cancer care. Her publications include a monograph titled Persuasiveness in the Discourse of Wine: The Rhetoric of Robert Parker.
References
Aristotle. 2007. On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse. Translated and commented by G.Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion talk across corpora. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230285712Search in Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan & ElizabethStokoe. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Caballero, Rosario. 2007. Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics39. 2095–2114.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005Search in Google Scholar
Charters, Steve. 2007. On the evaluation of wine quality. In BarrySmith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 157–182. Oxford: Signal Books.Search in Google Scholar
Don, Alexanne. 2009. Legitimating tenor relationships: Affiliation and alignment in written interaction. Linguistics and the Human Sciences5(3). 1–23.10.1558/lhs.v5i3.303Search in Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo & CharlotteHommerberg. Forthcoming. Bridging discourse and corpus approaches: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions.Search in Google Scholar
Gasparotto, Laure & DenisSaverot. 2012. Pourquoi les bordeaux ont atteint des prix délirants. Le Monde, 30 May. http://www.lemonde.fr/a-la-une/article/2012/05/30/pourquoi-les-bordeaux-ont-atteint-des-prix-delirants_1709704_3208.html (accessed 9 May 2013).Search in Google Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte. 2011. Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte & AlexanneDon. 2015. Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language22. 2.10.1075/fol.22.2.01homSearch in Google Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte & MariaLindgren. 2014. The construction of knowledge, values and identities in present-day consumerism discourses – The case of perfume reviews. Paper presented at the International Conference on Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, ELTE, Loránd Eötvös University, 1–3 September.Search in Google Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte & CaritaParadis. 2014. Constructing credibility through representations in the discourse of wine. Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In DylanGlynn & MetteSjölin (eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity. Stance strategies in discourse and narration, 211–238. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hood, Sue. 2008. Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meanings in processes of change. Linguistics and Education19(4). 351–365.10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003Search in Google Scholar
Hood, Sue & James RMartin. 2007. Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In RukaiyaHasan, ChristianMatthiessen & JonathanWebster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, vol. 2, 737–762. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, Michael. 2000. Some discourse patterns and signaling of the assessment–basis relation. In MikeScott & GeoffThompson (eds.), Patterns of text. In Honour of Michael Hoey, 159–192. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.107.09jorSearch in Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, Martin. 2006. Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of appraisal. In GeoffThompson & SusanHunston (eds.), System and corpus. Exploring connections, 269–292. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Langewiesche, William. 2000. The million-dollar nose. The Atlantic Monthly Dec. 42–70. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/12/the-million-dollar-nose/378450/ (accessed 30 November 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1975. Talking about wine. Language51(4). 901–923.10.2307/412700Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1990. As American as apple pie – and sushi and bagels: The semiotics of food and drink. In ThomasSebeok & JeanUmiker-Sebeok (eds.), Recent developments in theory and history. The semantic web 1990, 389–401. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110851809-017Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 2007. Can wines be brawny? In BarrySmith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 127–140. Oxford: Signal Books.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James R & PeterWhite. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
McCoy, Elin. 2005. The emperor of wine: The rise of Robert M. Parker Jr. And the reign of American taste. New York: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Read, Jonathan & JohnCarroll. 2012. Annotating expressions of appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation46. 421–477.10.1007/s10579-010-9135-7Search in Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter. 2006. Consumerism in world history: The global transformation of desire. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203969885Search in Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & MartaCarretero. 2012. Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences6(1–3). 275–295.10.1558/lhs.v6i1-3.275Search in Google Scholar
Tindale, Christopher. 2004. Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans, RobGrootendorst & Francisca SnoeckHenkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
White, Peter R R. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse23(2). 259–284.10.1515/text.2003.011Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Supervision at the outline stage: introducing and encountering issues of sustainable development through academic writing assignments
- Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis
- Member accounts in the assessment of professional competence
- Stance taking in Japanese Newspaper discourse: the use and non-use of Copulas da and dearu
- Test taker-initiated repairs in an English oral proficiency exam for international teaching assistants
- Pragmatic verbal repetition: review and application of a new method of quantification
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Supervision at the outline stage: introducing and encountering issues of sustainable development through academic writing assignments
- Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis
- Member accounts in the assessment of professional competence
- Stance taking in Japanese Newspaper discourse: the use and non-use of Copulas da and dearu
- Test taker-initiated repairs in an English oral proficiency exam for international teaching assistants
- Pragmatic verbal repetition: review and application of a new method of quantification
