Home Linguistics & Semiotics Balancing multiple roles through consensus: making revisions in haircutting sessions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Balancing multiple roles through consensus: making revisions in haircutting sessions

  • Sae Oshima

    Sae Oshima received her PhD in Communication Studies at the University of Texas at Austin, and is currently Assistant Professor at the Department of Business Communication at Aarhus University, Denmark. She explores the meanings of professional communication through microanalysis of workplace interactions, including client–professional encounters and internal strategy meetings.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 7, 2014

Abstract

This study demonstrates how participants in haircutting sessions merge different roles during one of the most sensitive moments of an encounter: requesting and/or making revisions to a new cut. During the process of arriving at a consensus of whether or not changes need to be made to the new cut, the stylist and the client negotiate not only the quality of the cut, but also their expected roles. Caring about both the bodies and the minds of customers is an important element in measuring the quality of cosmetological services, a consideration which may oblige stylists to immediately agree with and act upon every client request or concern. However, simply yielding to the customer’s opinions can threaten the stylist’s role as a beauty expert, one who possesses their own professional standards. The analysis reveals that the participants frequently transform revision requests/offers into mutual decisions through a combination of verbal and bodily actions. In doing so, they harmonize the sometimes conflicting responsibilities of “service provider/patron” and “expert/novice.”

About the author

Sae Oshima

Sae Oshima received her PhD in Communication Studies at the University of Texas at Austin, and is currently Assistant Professor at the Department of Business Communication at Aarhus University, Denmark. She explores the meanings of professional communication through microanalysis of workplace interactions, including client–professional encounters and internal strategy meetings.

Appendix: transcript notation

The glossary of transcript symbols given below has been adopted from the descriptions provided by ten Have (1999: 213–214).

[The point of overlap onset
=No “gap” between the two lines, often called latching
(0.0)Elapsed time in silence by tenth of seconds
(.)A tiny “gap” within or between utterances
wordForm of stress, via pitch and/or amplitude
::Prolongation of the immediately prior sound
.A stopping fall in tone
,A continuing intonation
?A rising intonation
↑↓Marked shifts into higher or lower pitch in the utterance part immediately following the arrow
°Relatively quieter utterances than the surrounding talk
> <Speeding up
w(h)ordBreathiness, as in laughter, crying, etc.
(word)Especially dubious hearings
(())Transcriber’s descriptions rather than, or in addition to, transcriptions

References

Asmuß, Birte. 2007. What do people expect from public services? Requests in public service encounters. Hermes38. 6583.10.7146/hjlcb.v20i38.25905Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Carolyn, MichaelEmmison & AlanFirth. 2001. Discovering order in opening sequences in calls to a software helpline. In AlecMcHoul & MarkRapley (eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings, 4156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Paula. 2004. The beauty industry: Gender, culture, pleasure. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203684252Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul, JohnChatwin & SarahCollins. 2001. Conversation analysis: A method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expectations4. 5870.10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00125.xSearch in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & JohnHeritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work, 365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eayrs, Michele A. 1993. Time, trust and hazard: Hairdressers’ symbolic roles. Symbolic Interaction16(1). 1937.10.1525/si.1993.16.1.19Search in Google Scholar

Gimlin, Debra. 1996. Pamela’s place: Power and negotiation in the hair salon. Gender and Society10(5). 505526.10.1177/089124396010005002Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher, SrikantSarangi & StefaanSlembrouck. 1999. The legitimation of the client and the profession: Identities and roles in social work discourse. In SrikantSarangi & CeliaRoberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, 293322. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208375.3.293Search in Google Scholar

Heinemann, Trine. 2007. Professional self-disclosure: When the home help talks about herself. In CatherineKerbrat-Orecchioni & VéroniqueTraverso(eds.), Confidence/Dévoilement de soi dan l’interaction, 325342. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110935103.325Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & AnnaLindström. 1998. Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language & Social Interaction31(3/4). 397438.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & SueSefi. 1992. Dilemmas of advice. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work, 359417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs-Huey, Lanita. 2003. Ladies are seen, not heard: Language socialization in a southern, African American cosmetology school. Anthropology & Education Quarterly34(3). 277299.10.1525/aeq.2003.34.3.277Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Miliann. 2003. The managed hand: The commercialization of bodies and emotions in Korean immigrant-owned nail salons. Gender Society17(6). 820839.10.1177/0891243203257632Search in Google Scholar

Kuroshima, Satomi. 2010. Another look at the service encounter: Progressivity, intersubjectivity, and trust in a Japanese sushi restaurant. Journal of Pragmatics42(3). 856869.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.009Search in Google Scholar

Larsen, Tine. 2013. Dispatching emergency assistance: Callers’ claims of entitlement and call takers’ decisions. Research on Language & Social Interaction46(3). 205230.10.1080/08351813.2013.810401Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Seung-Hee. 2011. Managing nongranting of customers’ requests in commercial service encounters. Research on Language & Social Interaction44(2). 109134.10.1080/08351813.2011.567091Search in Google Scholar

McCracken, Grant. 1996. Big hair. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mirivel, Julien. 2008. The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: Embodied persuasion in medical interaction. Health Communication23. 153170.10.1080/10410230801968203Search in Google Scholar

Peräkylä, Anssi. 1998. Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly61(4). 301320.10.2307/2787032Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey David. 1998. Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor–patient consultations. Human Communication Research25(1). 97123.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00438.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant. 2010. Reconfiguring self/identity/status/role: The case of professional role performance in healthcare encounters. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice7(1). 7595.10.1558/japl.v7i1.75Search in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant & AngusClarke. 2002. Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language & Social Interaction35(2). 139171.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Ursula & PaulaBlack. 2001. Look good, feel better: Beauty therapy as emotional labour. Sociology35(4). 913931.10.1177/0038038501035004007Search in Google Scholar

Steensig, Jakob & PaulDrew. 2008. Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies10(1). 515.10.1177/1461445607085581Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction41(1). 3157.10.1080/08351810701691123Search in Google Scholar

ten Have, Paul. 1999. Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Toerien, Merran & CeliaKitzinger. 2007. Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology41(4). 645662.10.1177/0038038507078918Search in Google Scholar

Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2003. Avoiding providing solutions: Orienting to the ideal of students’ self-directedness in counselling interaction. Discourse Studies5(3). 389414.10.1177/14614456030053005Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2007. Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries. Text & Talk27(1). 107137.10.1515/TEXT.2007.005Search in Google Scholar

Willett, Julie A. 2000. Permanent waves: The making of the American beauty shop. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ylanne-Mcewen, Virpi. 2004. Shifting alignment and negotiating sociality in travel agency discourse. Discourse Studies6(4). 517536.10.1177/1461445604046592Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Don H. 1992. The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In PaulDrew & JohnHeritage (eds.), Talk at work, 418469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-11-7
Published in Print: 2014-11-1

©2014 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2014-0024/html
Scroll to top button