Leveraging measurement data quality by adoption of the FAIR guiding principles

References

[1] N. Kumar, G. Kumar, and R. K. Singh, “Big data analytics application for sustainable manufacturing operations: analysis of strategic factors,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 965–989, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-02008-5.Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. N. I. Sarker, Y. Peng, C. Yiran, and R. C. Shouse, “Disaster resilience through big data: way to environmental sustainability,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 51, 2020, Art. no. 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101769.Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. Horvat, H. Kroll, and A. Jäger, “Researching the effects of automation and digitalization on manufacturing companies’ productivity in the early stage of industry 4.0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 39, pp. 886–893, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.401.Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. K. Saggi and S. Jain, “A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation,” Inf. Process. Manage., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 758–790, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.01.010.Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. H. Schmitt, et al.., “Datenstrukturen für eine resiliente Life Cycle Sustainability,” in Empower Green Production. Aachener Werkzeugmaschinen-Kolloquium 2023, Aachen, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Walden, A. Steinbrecher, and M. Marinkovic, “Digital product passports as enabler of the circular economy,” Chem. Ing. Tech., vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1717–1727, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202100121.Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Emonts, P. Dahlem, M. Bodenbenner, B. Montavon, and H. R. Schmitt, “Virtuelle klimatisierung/virtual climatization,” WT Werkstattstech. Online, vol. 111, nos. 11–12, pp. 887–892, 2021. https://doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2021-11-12-117.Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Zheng, J. Lu, S. Sun, and D. Kiritsis, “Decentralized industrial IoT data management based on blockchain and IPFS,” in Advances in Production Management Systems. Towards Smart and Digital Manufacturing, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Ser, vol. 592, B. Lalic, Ed., Cham, Springer International Publishing AG, 2020, pp. 222–229.10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_26Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Tanhua, et al.., “Ocean FAIR data Services,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00440.Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. D. Wilkinson, et al.., “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship,” Sci. Data, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, Art. no. 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] R. Isele and N. Arndt, “Mit semantischer datenverwaltung big data in den griff bekommen,” Wirtsch Inform Manag, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 56–63, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35764-016-0065-z.Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Jacobsen, et al.., “FAIR principles: interpretations and implementation considerations,” Data Intell., vol. 2, nos. 1–2, pp. 10–29, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024.Search in Google Scholar

[13] L. Reiser, L. Harper, M. Freeling, B. Han, and S. Luan, “FAIR: a call to make published data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable,” Mol. Plant, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1105–1108, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.07.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] S. Higgins, “The DCC curation lifecycle model,” Int. J. Digit. Curation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 134–140, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48.Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. J. B. Clarke, et al.., “FAIRshake: toolkit to evaluate the FAIRness of research digital resources,” Cell Syst., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 417–421, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2019.09.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] I. Mader, “Die Welt des Wissens in Organisationen im Wandel,” in Wissensmanagement erfolgreich umsetzen: Praxisleitfaden mit Self-Check, Toolselektionshilfe und Toolbox. ISO 9001:2015 konform, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2023, pp. 9–44.10.1007/978-3-662-66763-7_2Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Aamodt and M. Nygård, “Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge — an AI perspective on their integration,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 191–222, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-023X(95)00017-M.Search in Google Scholar

[18] K. North, Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung. Wissensmanagement gestalten, 6th ed. Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler, 2016.10.1007/978-3-658-11643-9Search in Google Scholar

[19] ISO 8000-2:2022(E), Data Quality – Vocabulary, Standard, Geneva, CH, International Organization for Standardization, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

[20] F. Sidi, et al.., “Data quality: a survey of data quality dimensions,” in 2012 International Conference on Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management, 2012, pp. 300–304.10.1109/InfRKM.2012.6204995Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. W. Wang and D. M. Strong, “Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 5–33, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099.Search in Google Scholar

[22] ISO/IEC 25012:2008(E), Software Engineering — Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) —- Data Quality Model, Standard. Geneva, CH, International Organization for Standardization, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[23] L. Zhang, D. Jeong, and S. Lee, “Data quality management in the internet of Things,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 17, p. 5834, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175834.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] T. Dorst, M. Gruber, A. P. Vedurmudi, D. Hutzschenreuter, S. Eichstädt, and A. Schütze, “A case study on providing FAIR and metrologically traceable data sets,” Acta IMEKO, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i1.1401.Search in Google Scholar

[25] P. de Bièvre, “Metrological traceability is a prerequisite for evaluation of measurement uncertainty,” Accredit. Qual. Assur., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 437–438, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0680-y.Search in Google Scholar

[26] BIPM, et al.., “Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement,” Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM, vol. 100, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[27] VDA Band 5: Mess-u. Prüfprozesse, “German association of the automotive industry e.V. (VDA),” 2021. Available at: https://webshop.vda.de/QMC/en/band-05_072021.Search in Google Scholar

[28] L. Pouchard, “Revisiting the data lifecycle with big data curation,” Int. J. Digit. Curation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 176–192, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.342.Search in Google Scholar

[29] A. H. Wolf and C. Leppla, “Harmonisierung von Datenlebenszyklus-Modellen: Nutzung von Synergien für optimierte Anwendungen im FDM,” in Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement Nr. 2 (November), 2020, pp. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Sinaeepourfard, et al.., “A survey on data lifecycle models: discussions toward the 6Vs challenges,” 2015. Available at: https://www.ac.upc.edu/RR/2015/18.pdf Accessed: Aug. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Ball, Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models, Bath, University of Bath, 2012, p. 14. Available at: https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/review-of-data-management-lifecycle-models Accessed: Mar. 27, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Politze, “A reference architecture and implementation enabling data protection,” in Distributed eLearning and eScience Processes. Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen and Apprimus Verlag, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. Maxwell, “The research lifecycle as a strategic roadmap,” J. Libr. Adm., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 111–123, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1105041.Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Burton and A. Treloar, “Designing for discovery and Re-use: the ‘ANDS data sharing verbs’ approach to service decomposition,” Int. J. Digit. Curation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 44–56, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i3.124.Search in Google Scholar

[35] W. K. Michener and M. B. Jones, “Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science,” Trends Ecol. Evol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 85–93, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] UK Data Service, Research Data Management, UK Data Service, 2024. Available at: https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/learning-hub/research-data-management/ Accessed: Mar. 27, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Data Documentation Initiative, DDI Lifecycle 3.3, 2020. Available at: https://ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Lifecycle/3.3/ Accessed: Mar. 27, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[38] ELIXIR, Research Data Management Kit. A Deliverable from the EU-Funded ELIXIR-CONVERGE Project (Grant Agreement 871075). Research Data Management Kit. A Deliverable from the EU-Funded ELIXIR-CONVERGE Project (Grant Agreement 871075), 2021. Available at: https://rdmkit.elixir-europe.org Accessed: Feb. 18, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. Schmitz and M. Politze, “Forschungsdaten managen – Bausteine für eine dezentrale, forschungsnahe Unterstützung,” o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal/Herausgeber VDB, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 76–91, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2018H3S76-91.Search in Google Scholar

[40] K. McKen, et al.., Research360: Data in the Research Lifecycle, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[41] J. M. Wing, “The data life cycle,” Harv. Data Sci. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2688–8513, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.e26845b4.Search in Google Scholar

[42] F. Berman, et al.., “Realizing the potential of data science,” Commun. ACM, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 67–72, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3188721.Search in Google Scholar

[43] L. Gleim, L. Tirpitz, and S. Decker, “FactStack: interoperable data management and preservation for the web and industry 4.0,” 2021. Available at: http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/35804 Accessed: Feb. 14, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[44] F. Tao, Q. Qi, A. Liu, and A. Kusiak, “Data-driven smart manufacturing,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 48, pp. 157–169, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006.Search in Google Scholar

[45] J. Zhang, et al.., “Best practices in the real-world data life cycle,” PLOS Digit. Health, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022, Art. no. e0000003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] S. Ma, Y. Zhang, J. Lv, S. Ren, H. Yang, and C. Wang, “Data-driven cleaner production Strategy for energy-intensive manufacturing industries: case studies from southern and northern China,” Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 53, 2022, Art. no. 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101684.Search in Google Scholar

[47] L. Sebastian-Coleman, “Chapter 11 – data life cycle processes,” in Meeting the Challenges of Data Quality Management, L. Sebastian-Coleman, Ed., Academic Press, 2022, pp. 257–280.10.1016/B978-0-12-821737-5.00011-0Search in Google Scholar

[48] M. Bodenbenner, M. Benjamin, and R. H. Schmitt, “Model-driven development of interoperable communication interfaces for FAIR sensor Services,” Meas.: Sens., vol. 24, 2022, Art. no. 100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100442.Search in Google Scholar

[49] A. M. Olawoyin, et al.., “Big data management for machine learning from big data,” in Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, L. Barolli, Ed., Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 393–405.10.1007/978-3-031-29056-5_35Search in Google Scholar

[50] K. Möller, “Lifecycle models of data-centric systems and domains,” Semant. Web, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–88, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2012-0060.Search in Google Scholar

[51] W. K. Michener, “Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan,” PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 11, no. 10, 2015, Art. no. e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] TU9-FDM, “Datenmanagementplan,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3974562.Search in Google Scholar

[53] RDMO, GitHub – rdmorganiser/rdmo-Catalog, 2023. Available at: https://github.com/rdmorganiser/rdmo-catalog/tree/master Accessed: Aug. 24, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[54] M. Putnings, H. Neuroth, and J. Neumann, Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, De Gruyter, 2021.10.1515/9783110657807Search in Google Scholar

[55] T. Miksa, S. Oblasser, and A. Rauber, “Automating research data management using machine-actionable data management plans,” ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490396.Search in Google Scholar

[56] S. S. Feger, P. W. Wozniak, L. Lischke, and A. Schmidt, “‘Yes, I comply!,’” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 4, no. CSCW2, pp. 1–26, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415212.Search in Google Scholar

[57] DCC-Digital Curation Centre, DMPonline, 2023. Available at: https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[58] California Digital Library, DMPTool, 2023. Available at: https://dmptool.org/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Data Stewardship Wizard, “Data stewardship wizard,” 2023. Available at: https://ds-wizard.org/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Inist-CNRS, “DMP OPIDoR,” 2023. Available at: https://dmp.opidor.fr/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[61] OpenAIRE AMKE and EUDAT CDI, “Data management plans creator,” 2023. Available at: https://argos.openaire.eu/home Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[62] F1000 Research Ltd, F1000Research — Open Access Publishing Platform — beyond a Research Journal: Open Research Publishing Platform, 2023. Available at: https://f1000research.com/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[63] T. Kvamme, “NSD DMP – enabling long-term preservation and sharing of research data: Norwegian centre for research data adopts RDA DMP common standard for machine-actionable data management plans recommendation,” 2020. Available at: https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/NSD-2.pdf Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Sigma2 and EUDAT2020, EasyDMP, 2023. Available at: https://easydmp.sigma2.no/ Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[65] T. Renner, “Turbo-charging data management plans,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3673058.Search in Google Scholar

[66] I. Mozgova, et al., “Product life cycle oriented data management planning with RDMO at the example of research field data,” E-Science-Tage 2021: Share Your Research Data, 2022. https://doi.org/10.11588/HEIBOOKS.979.C13722.Search in Google Scholar

[67] A. Jacobsen, et al.., “A generic workflow for the data FAIRification process,” Data Intell., vol. 2, nos. 1–2, pp. 56–65, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00028.Search in Google Scholar

[68] J. Riley, Understanding Metadata: What is Metadata, and what Is it for, Baltimore, MD, 2017. Available at: https://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/17446/Understanding%20Metadata.pdf Accessed: Aug. 17, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[69] B. Heinrichs, “Automatic extraction of descriptive metadata to promote the usage of RDM tools,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2022-10071.Search in Google Scholar

[70] T. Wiedenhöfer, et al.., “Document describing a universal and flexible structure for digital calibration certificates (DCC),” 2019. Available at: https://zenodo.org/records/3696567 Accessed: May. 04, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[71] T. Mustapaa, et al.., “Digital metrology for the internet of Things,” in GIoTS, Global IoT Summit, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.10.1109/GIOTS49054.2020.9119603Search in Google Scholar

[72] Y. Fiona Zhao, J. A. Horst, T. R. Kramer, W. Rippey, and R. J. Brown, “Quality information framework – integrating metrology processes,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1301–1308, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120523-3-RO-2023.00113.Search in Google Scholar

[73] QUDT.org, “QUDT CATALOG – quantities, units, dimensions and data types ontologies,” 2023. Available at: https://www.qudt.org/2.1/catalog/qudt-catalog.html Accessed: Nov. 01, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[74] M. Compton, et al.., “The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group,” J. Web Semant., vol. 17, pp. 25–32, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2012.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

[75] A. Haller, et al.., “The modular SSN ontology: a Joint W3C and OGC standard specifying the semantics of sensors, observations, sampling, and actuation,” Semant. Web, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–32, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-180320.Search in Google Scholar

[76] DCMI Metadata Terms, 2020. Available at: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/ Accessed: Nov. 01, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[77] Schema.org Community Group, “Schema.Org,” 2023. Available at: https://schema.org/ Accessed: Nov. 01, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[78] M. Bodenbenner, B. Montavon, and R. H. Schmitt, “FAIR sensor Services – towards sustainable sensor data management,” Meas.: Sens., vol. 18, 2021, Art. no. 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100206.Search in Google Scholar

[79] H. W. Gottinger, Ed., Internet Economics: Models, Mechanisms and Management, Bentham Science Publishers, 2017. Available at: https://www.eurekaselect.com/155199/volume/1 Accessed: Mar. 22, 2024.10.2174/9781681085463117010002Search in Google Scholar

[80] R. H. Schmitt, et al.., “NFDI4Ing – the national research data infrastructure for engineering sciences,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4015201.Search in Google Scholar

[81] Responsible Data Science Initiative, “Responsible data science – fairness – accuracy – confidentiality – transparency,” 2016. Available at: https://redasci.org/ Accessed: Aug. 31, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[82] W. M. P. van der Aalst, M. Bichler, and A. Heinzl, “Responsible data science,” Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 311–313, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0487-z.Search in Google Scholar

[83] T. J. Berners-Lee, “Cool URIs don’t change,” 1998. Available at: https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI Accessed: Aug. 24, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[84] J. Klump and R. Huber, “20 Years of persistent identifiers – which systems are here to stay?” Data Sci. J., vol. 16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-009.Search in Google Scholar

[85] S. Lawrence, et al.., “Persistence of Web references in scientific research,” Computer, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 26–31, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.901164.Search in Google Scholar

[86] European organization for nuclear research and OpenAIRE, “Zenodo,” Zenodo, 2013. https://doi.org/10.25495/7gxk-rd71.Search in Google Scholar

[87] re3data.org, Statistics — re3data.Org, 2023. Available at: https://www.re3data.org/metrics Accessed: Aug. 24, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[88] U. Schwardmann, “Digital objects – FAIR digital objects: which Services are required?” Data Sci. J., vol. 19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-015.Search in Google Scholar

[89] L. Chan, et al.., Budapest Open Access Declaration: BUDAPEST OPEN ACCESS INITIATIVE, Budapest, Hungary, 2002. Available at: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/ Accessed: Aug. 09, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[90] U. Müller, “Standards und best practices im kontext von open access,” Zenodo, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.804529.Search in Google Scholar

[91] J. Catterall and V. Barbour, “Open access initiatives by research active institutions in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: a snapshot of the landscape in 2022,” 2023, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8081167.Search in Google Scholar

[92] Horizon Europe, THE EU RESEARCH& INNOVATION PROGRAMME 2021 –27: Researchand Innovation, 2021. Available at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9224c3b4-f529-4b48-b21b-879c442002a2_en?filename=ec_rtd_he-investing-to-shape-our-future.pdf%7D Accessed: Apr. 05, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[93] RDA, “RDA — research data sharing without barriers,” 2023. Available at: https://www.rd-alliance.org/%7D Accessed: Apr. 08, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[94] N. Hartl, “Statement zum Eckpunktepapier des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) zum Forschungsdatengesetz,” 2024. Available at: https://www.nfdi.de/statement-zum-eckpunktepapier-des-bundesministeriums-fuer-bildung-und-forschung-bmbf-zum-forschungsdatengesetz/%7D Accessed: Apr. 25, 2024.Search in Google Scholar

[95] Creative Commons, What We Do – Creative Commons, 2023. Available at: https://creativecommons.org/about/ Accessed: Aug. 11, 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[96] H. Mehrwald, Das Not Invented Here-Syndrom in Forschung und Entwicklung, Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999.10.1007/978-3-663-08337-5Search in Google Scholar

[97] D. M. Strong, Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang, “Data quality in context,” Commun. ACM, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 103–110, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1145/253769.253804.Search in Google Scholar