Data-driven modeling in metrology – A short introduction, current developments and future perspectives

References

[1] M. Rüßmann, et al.., “Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries,” BCG, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–89, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. A. K. Bahrin, M. F. Othman, N. H. N. Azli, and M. F. Talib, “Industry 4.0: a review on industrial automation and robotic,” J. Teknol., vol. 78, pp. 6–13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9285.Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. Kandris, C. Nakas, D. Vomvas, and G. Koulouras, “Applications of wireless sensor networks: an up-to-date survey,” Appl. Syst. Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3010014.Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Landaluce, L. Arjona, A. Perallos, F. Falcone, I. Angulo, and F. Muralter, “A review of iot sensing applications and challenges using rfid and wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 9, p. 2495, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092495.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] M. Majid, et al.., “Applications of wireless sensor networks and internet of things frameworks in the industry revolution 4.0: a systematic literature review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 2087, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062087.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] J. Horn Nord, A. Koohang, and J. Paliszkiewicz, “The internet of things: review and theoretical framework,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 133, pp. 97–108, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.014.Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. Chettri and R. Bera, “A comprehensive survey on internet of things (iot) toward 5g wireless systems,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2019.2948888.Search in Google Scholar

[8] P. Kumar Aggarwal, P. Jain, J. Mehta, R. Garg, K. Makar, and P. Chaudhary, Machine Learning, Data Mining, and Big Data Analytics for 5g-Enabled Iot. Blockchain for 5G-Enabled IoT: The New Wave for Industrial Automation, Berlin, Springer, 2021, pp. 351–375.10.1007/978-3-030-67490-8_14Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Boschert and R. Rosen, Digital Twin—the Simulation Aspect. Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers, Cham, Springer, 2016, pp. 59–74.10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5Search in Google Scholar

[10] F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui, “Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,” Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., vol. 94, pp. 3563–3576, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.Search in Google Scholar

[11] G. Shao, S. Jain, C. Laroque, L. H. Lee, P. Lendermann, and O. Rose, “Digital twin for smart manufacturing: the simulation aspect,” in 2019 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 2085–2098.10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004659Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Liu, S. Fang, H. Dong, and C. Xu, “Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 58, pp. 346–361, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017.Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Tercan and T. Meisen, “Machine learning and deep learning based predictive quality in manufacturing: a systematic review,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1879–1905, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01963-8.Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Sanjid Mahammad, “Using ai in dimensional metrology,” in Handbook of Metrology and Applications, Springer, 2023, pp. 1025–1042.10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_51Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. Allaire, Numerical Analysis and Optimization: An Introduction to Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Simulation, Oxford, OUP Oxford, 2007.10.1093/oso/9780199205219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Ghamisi, et al.., “Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing: a comprehensive review of the state of the art,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6–39, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2018.2890023.Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Fayyad, M. A. Jaradat, D. Gruyer, and H. Najjaran, “Deep learning sensor fusion for autonomous vehicle perception and localization: a review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 15, p. 4220, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154220.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] D. Jong Yeong, G. Velasco-Hernandez, J. Barry, and J. Walsh, “Sensor and sensor fusion technology in autonomous vehicles: a review,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 2140, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062140.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] J. Li, et al.., “Deep learning in multimodal remote sensing data fusion: a comprehensive review,” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., vol. 112, 2022, Art. no. 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102926.Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Van Der Schaft, et al.., “Port-Hamiltonian systems theory: an introductory overview,” Found. Trends® Syst. Control, vol. 1, nos. 2–3, pp. 173–378, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1561/2600000002.Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. Rajani and Y. Kleiner, “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: physically based models,” Urban Water, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 151–164, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-0758(01)00032-2.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Y. Xiang, J. S. Arora, and K. Abdel-Malek, “Physics-based modeling and simulation of human walking: a review of optimization-based and other approaches,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 42, pp. 1–23, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0496-8.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Cubillo, S. Perinpanayagam, and M. Esperon-Miguez, “A review of physics-based models in prognostics: application to gears and bearings of rotating machinery,” Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 8, 2016, Art. no. 1687814016664660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016664660.Search in Google Scholar

[24] D. Solomatine, L. M. See, and R. J. Abrahart, Data-driven Modelling: Concepts, Approaches and Experiences. Practical Hydroinformatics: Computational Intelligence and Technological Developments in Water Applications, Berlin, Springer, 2008, pp. 17–30.10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_2Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Arridge, P. Maass, O. Öktem, and C.-B. Schönlieb, “Solving inverse problems using data-driven models,” Acta Numer., vol. 28, pp. 1–174, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962492919000059.Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. Willard, X. Jia, S. Xu, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar, “Integrating physics-based modeling with machine learning: a survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04919, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. Pulpeiro González, K. Ankobea-Ansah, Q. Peng, and C. M. Hall, “On the integration of physics-based and data-driven models for the prediction of gas exchange processes on a modern diesel engine,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, vol. 236, no. 5, pp. 857–871, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211031401.Search in Google Scholar

[28] J. Chen, M. Zhao, X. Wang, C. Richard, and S. Rahardja, “Integration of physics-based and data-driven models for hyperspectral image unmixing: a summary of current methods,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 61–74, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2022.3208987.Search in Google Scholar

[29] D. Placko, et al.., Metrology in Industry: The Key for Quality, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. Rummukainen, “State-of-the-art with regional climate models,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–96, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.8.Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. J. Keeling and K. T. D. Eames, “Networks and epidemic models,” J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 295–307, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] M. Ellis, H. Durand, and P. D. Christofides, “A tutorial review of economic model predictive control methods,” J. Process Control, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1156–1178, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.03.010.Search in Google Scholar

[33] W. Ross Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 1957.Search in Google Scholar

[34] L. von Bertalanffy, “General system theory: foundations, development, applications,” in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-4, 6th ed. New York, IEEE, 1974.10.1109/TSMC.1974.4309376Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. Wiener, Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MIT press, 2019.10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[36] T. Faulwasser, R. Ou, G. Pan, P. Schmitz, and K. Worthmann, “Behavioral theory for stochastic systems? a data-driven journey from willems to wiener and back again,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 55, pp. 92–117, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

[37] J. C. Willems, “The behavioral approach to open and interconnected systems,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 46–99, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2007.4339280.Search in Google Scholar

[38] N. Wiener, “The homogeneous chaos,” Am. J. Math., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 897–936, 1938. https://doi.org/10.2307/2371268.Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. Laner, H. Rechberger, and T. Astrup, “Systematic evaluation of uncertainty in material flow analysis,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 859–870, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12143.Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. Barredo Arrieta, et al.., “Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.Search in Google Scholar

[41] M. Kläs, “Towards identifying and managing sources of uncertainty in ai and machine learning models-an overview,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11669, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Y. Gao, K. Wu, and F. Li, “Analysis on the redundancy of wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, 2003, pp. 108–114.10.1145/941350.941366Search in Google Scholar

[43] D.-I. Curiac, C. Volosencu, D. Pescaru, L. Jurca, and A. Doboli, “Redundancy and its applications in wireless sensor networks: a survey,” WSEAS Trans. Comput., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 705–714, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Tu N. Nguyen and S. Zeadally, “Mobile crowd-sensing applications: data redundancies, challenges, and solutions,” ACM TOIT, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3431502.Search in Google Scholar

[45] S. Ganeriwal, R. Kumar, and M. B. Srivastava, “Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2003, pp. 138–149.10.1145/958491.958508Search in Google Scholar

[46] F. Sivrikaya and B. Yener, “Time synchronization in sensor networks: a survey,” IEEE Netw., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 45–50, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.2004.1316761.Search in Google Scholar

[47] M. Kevin Maggs, S. G. O’keefe, and D. V. Thiel, “Consensus clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2269–2277, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2011.2182045.Search in Google Scholar

[48] A. Ghosh and S. K. Das, “Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Pervasive Mob. Comput., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 303–334, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

[49] G.J. Fan and S.Y. Jin, “Coverage problem in wireless sensor network: a survey,” J. Netw., vol. 5, no. 9, p. 1033, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4304/jnw.5.9.1033-1040.Search in Google Scholar

[50] S. Meguerdichian, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and M. B. Srivastava, “Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks,” in Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No. 01CH37213), vol. 3, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1380–1387.10.1109/INFCOM.2001.916633Search in Google Scholar

[51] S. I. Roumeliotis and G. A. Bekey, “Distributed multirobot localization,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 781–795, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/tra.2002.803461.Search in Google Scholar

[52] N. Boccara and N. Boccara, Modeling Complex Systems, vol. 1, Berlin, Springer, 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-6562-2_1Search in Google Scholar

[53] J. M. Ottino, “Engineering complex systems,” Nature, vol. 427, no. 6973, p. 399, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/427399a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] M. E. J. Newman, “Complex systems: a survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.1440, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Y.-Y. Liu and A.-L. Barabási, “Control principles of complex systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 88, no. 3, 2016, Art. no. 035006. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.88.035006.Search in Google Scholar

[56] S. Thurner, R. Hanel, and P. Klimek, Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018.10.1093/oso/9780198821939.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[57] A. Schilling, et al.., “Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception,” Brain, vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 4809–4825, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad255.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] K. R. Popper, “Science as falsification,” Conjectures and Refutations, vol. 1, pp. 33–39, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Y. Lazebnik, “Can a biologist fix a radio? Or, what i learned while studying apoptosis,” Biochemistry, vol. 69, pp. 1403–1406, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10541-005-0088-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] N. Lazar, “Ockham’s razor,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev:. Comput. Stat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 243–246, 2010.10.1002/wics.75Search in Google Scholar

[61] F. Kozin and H. G. Natke, “System identification techniques,” Struct. Saf., vol. 3, nos. 3–4, pp. 269–316, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(86)90006-8.Search in Google Scholar

[62] L. Ljung, “Perspectives on system identification,” Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

[63] K. J. Keesman and K. J. Keesman, System Identification: An Introduction, vol. 2, Berlin, Springer, 2011.10.1007/978-0-85729-522-4Search in Google Scholar

[64] R. Sacco, G. Guidoboni, and A. Mauri, “Mathematical and physical modeling principles of complex biological systems,” Ocular Fluid Dynamics, vol. 1, pp. 3–20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25886-3_1.Search in Google Scholar

[65] K. D. Sommer, A. Weckenmann, and B. R. L. Siebert, “A systematic approach to the modelling of measurements for uncertainty evaluation,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 13, pp. 052–227, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/13/1/052.Search in Google Scholar

[66] J. P. Bentley, Principles of Measurement Systems, London, Pearson education, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[67] E. O. Doebelin and D. N. Manik, Measurement Systems: Application and Design, New York City, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[68] J. V. Beck and K. A. Woodbury, “Inverse problems and parameter estimation: integration of measurements and analysis,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 839–847, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/9/6/001.Search in Google Scholar

[69] C. W. Groetsch and C. W. Groetsch, Inverse Problems in the Mathematical Sciences, vol. 52, Berlin, Springer, 1993.10.1007/978-3-322-99202-4Search in Google Scholar

[70] P. De Bièvre, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, “The 2012 International Vocabulary of Metrology: “VIM”,” Accred. Qual. Assur., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 26–27, 2012.10.1007/s00769-012-0885-3Search in Google Scholar

[71] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, Genf, Internationale Organisation für Normung, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[72] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, Evaluation of Measurement Data — Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement” — Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method, Genf, Internationale Organisation für Normung, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[73] C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, Philadelphia, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[74] M. Ehmer Khan and F. Khan, “A comparative study of white box, black box and grey box testing techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 12–15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030603.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Z. Yang, et al.., “Investigating grey-box modeling for predictive analytics in smart manufacturing,” in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 58134, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017, Art. no. V02BT03A024.Search in Google Scholar

[76] E. Pintelas, I. E. Livieris, and P. Pintelas, “A grey-box ensemble model exploiting black-box accuracy and white-box intrinsic interpretability,” Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13010017.Search in Google Scholar

[77] O. Lo-Thong, et al.., “Identification of flux checkpoints in a metabolic pathway through white-box, grey-box and black-box modeling approaches,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, Art. no. 13446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70295-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[78] O. Loyola-Gonzalez, “Black-box vs. white-box: understanding their advantages and weaknesses from a practical point of view,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 154096–154113, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2949286.Search in Google Scholar

[79] T. J. Rogers, G. R. Holmes, E. J. Cross, and K. Worden, “On a grey box modelling framework for nonlinear system identification,” in Special Topics in Structural Dynamics, Volume 6: Proceedings of the 35th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2017, Springer, 2017, pp. 167–178.10.1007/978-3-319-53841-9_15Search in Google Scholar

[80] L. Þ. Leifsson, H. Sævarsdóttir, S. Þ. Sigurðsson, and A. Vésteinsson, “Grey-box modeling of an ocean vessel for operational optimization,” Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 923–932, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2008.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

[81] K. Worden, et al.., “Identification of pre-sliding and sliding friction dynamics: grey box and black-box models,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 514–534, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

[82] D. J. Pitchforth, T. J. Rogers, U. T. Tygesen, and E. J. Cross, “Grey-box models for wave loading prediction,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 159, 2021, Art. no. 107741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107741.Search in Google Scholar

[83] R. H. A. Hellsen, G. Z. Angelis, M. J. G. Van de Molengraft, A. G. De Jager, and J. J. Kok, “Grey-box modeling of friction: an experimental case-study,” Eur. J. Control, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 258–267, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0947-3580(00)71134-4.Search in Google Scholar

[84] S. Jialin Pan and Q. Yang, “A survey on transfer learning,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345–1359, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2009.191.Search in Google Scholar

[85] L. Torrey and J. Shavlik, “Transfer learning,” in Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques, IGI global, 2010, pp. 242–264.10.4018/978-1-60566-766-9.ch011Search in Google Scholar

[86] K. Weiss, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D.D. Wang, “A survey of transfer learning,” J. Big Data, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6.Search in Google Scholar

[87] O. Day and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning,” J. Big Data, vol. 4, pp. 1–42, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-017-0089-0.Search in Google Scholar

[88] C. Tan, F. Sun, T. Kong, W. Zhang, C. Yang, and C. Liu, “A survey on deep transfer learning,” CoRR, abs/1808.01974, 2018.10.1007/978-3-030-01424-7_27Search in Google Scholar

[89] F. Zhuang, et al.., “A comprehensive survey on transfer learning,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 43–76, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555.Search in Google Scholar

[90] M. Iman, H. R. Arabnia, and K. Rasheed, “A review of deep transfer learning and recent advancements,” Technologies, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 40, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020040.Search in Google Scholar

[91] Y. Ganin and V. Lempitsky, “Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2015, pp. 1180–1189.Search in Google Scholar

[92] K.-D. Sommer, et al.., “Modelling of networked measuring systems – from white-box models to data based approaches,” arXiv preprint, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.13744.Search in Google Scholar

[93] R. H. Gardner and R.Va O’Neill, “Parameter uncertainty and model predictions: a review of Monte Carlo results,” in Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality, Berlin, Springer, 1983, pp. 245–257.10.1007/978-3-642-82054-0_11Search in Google Scholar

[94] G. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, vol. 4, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1995.10.1109/45.468220Search in Google Scholar

[95] J. Mula, R. Poler, J. P. García-Sabater, and F. C. Lario, “Models for production planning under uncertainty: a review,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 271–285, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

[96] M. Aien, A. Hajebrahimi, and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, “A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 57, pp. 1077–1089, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.070.Search in Google Scholar

[97] C. Jiang, J. Zheng, and X. Han, “Probability-interval hybrid uncertainty analysis for structures with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties: a review,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2485–2502, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1864-4.Search in Google Scholar

[98] E. Acar, G. Bayrak, Y. Jung, I. Lee, P. Ramu, and S. S. Ravichandran, “Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 2909–2945, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03026-7.Search in Google Scholar

[99] K. J. Åström and P. Eykhoff, “System identification—a survey,” Automatica, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–162, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(71)90059-8.Search in Google Scholar

[100] T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Massachusetts, US, Dover Publications, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[101] K. J. Astrom and B. Wittenmark, Adaptive Control, 2nd ed. Boston, Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1994, p. 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[102] G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, and G. M. Ljung, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[103] N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[104] P. Benner, S. Gugercin, and K. Willcox, “A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems,” SIAM Rev., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 483–531, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1137/130932715.Search in Google Scholar

[105] C.-M. Wang and H. Iyer, “Propagation of uncertainties in measurements using generalized inference,” Metrologia, vol. 42, pp. 145–153, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/42/2/010.Search in Google Scholar

[106] M. Wolf, A Modeling Language for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation, New York City, Lulu Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[107] J. Banks, I. I. Carson, B. L. J. S. Nelson, and D. M. Nicol, Discrete-event System Simulation, London, Pearson, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[108] A. Saltelli, et al.., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.10.1002/9780470725184Search in Google Scholar

[109] A. Simpkins, “System identification: theory for the user, (ljung, l.; 1999)[on the shelf],” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 95–96, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2012.2192817.Search in Google Scholar

[110] G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[111] G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell, A. Emami-Naeini, and J. D. Powell, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, vol. 4, Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[112] H. Niemann, Pattern Analysis and Understanding, vol. 4, Berlin, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[113] A. Maier, C. Syben, T. Lasser, and C. Riess, “A gentle introduction to deep learning in medical image processing,” Z. Med. Phys., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 86–101, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.12.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] A. Maier, H. Köstler, M. Heisig, P. Krauss, and S. H. Yang, “Known operator learning and hybrid machine learning in medical imaging—a review of the past, the present, and the future,” Prog. Biomed. Eng., vol. 4, p. 022002, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac5b13.Search in Google Scholar

[115] D. Paulsson, R. Gustavsson, and C.-F. Mandenius, “A soft sensor for bioprocess control based on sequential filtering of metabolic heat signals,” Sensors, vol. 14, pp. 17864–17882, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141017864.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[116] W. Fu, et al.., “Frangi-net,” in Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2018, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2018, pp. 341–346.10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_87Search in Google Scholar

[117] D. Jones, C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, and B. Hicks, “Characterising the Digital Twin: a systematic literature review,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, pp. 36–52, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

[118] S. L. Brunton and J. Nathan Kutz, Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.10.1017/9781108380690Search in Google Scholar

[119] F. Nüske, S. Peitz, P. Friedrich, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Finite-data error bounds for koopman-based prediction and control,” J. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-022-09862-1.Search in Google Scholar

[120] M. Basil and A. Jamieson, “Uncertainty of complex systems by Monte Carlo simulation,” Meas. Control, vol. 32, pp. 16–20, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/002029409903200104.Search in Google Scholar

[121] A. Brando, D. Torres, J. A. Rodríguez-Serrano, and J. Vitrià, “Building uncertainty models on top of black-box predictive apis,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 121344–121356, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3006711.Search in Google Scholar

[122] A. Holzinger, M. Plass, K. Holzinger, G. Cerasela Crisan, C.-M. Pintea, and V. Palade, “A glass-box interactive machine learning approach for solving np-hard problems with the human-in-the-loop,” CoRR, abs/1708.01104, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[123] A. K. Maier, et al.., “Learning with known operators reduces maximum error bounds,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 373–380, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[124] W. Fu, K. Breininger, R. Schaffert, N. Ravikumar, and A. K. Maier, “A divide-and-conquer approach towards understanding deep networks,” CoRR, abs/1907.06194, 2019.10.1007/978-3-030-32239-7_21Search in Google Scholar

[125] J. Ker, L. Wang, J. Rao, and T. Lim, “Deep learning applications in medical image analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 9375–9389, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2788044.Search in Google Scholar

[126] G. Litjens, et al.., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[127] R. S. Sutton, “Adapting bias by gradient descent: an incremental version of delta-bar-delta,” AAAI, vol. 92, pp. 171–176, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[128] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[129] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012, pp. 1097–1105.Search in Google Scholar

[130] M. M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, T. Cohen, and P. Veličković, Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges, arXiv preprint, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[131] R. Selvan and E. B. Dam, “Tensor networks for medical image classification,” in Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, PMLR, 2020, pp. 721–732.Search in Google Scholar

[132] C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, D. Precup, and Y. W. Teh, Eds., PMLR, 2017, pp. 1126–1135.Search in Google Scholar

[133] A. Zhou, T. Knowles, and C. Finn, Meta-learning Symmetries by Reparameterization, Vienna, International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[134] J. Snell, K. Swersky, and R. S. Zemel, Prototypical Networks for Few-Shot Learning, Long Beach, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[135] B. Zoph and V. L. Quoc, Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning, San Juan, International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[136] F. Sung, Y. Yang, L. Zhang, T. Xiang, P. H. S. Torr, and T. M. Hospedales, “Learning to compare: relation network for few-shot learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00131Search in Google Scholar

[137] D. Silver, et al.., “Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] F. Cristian Ghesu, et al.., “Multi-scale deep reinforcement learning for real-time 3d-landmark detection in ct scans,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 41, pp. 176–189, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2017.2782687.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[139] G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, “Physics-informed machine learning,” Nat. Rev. Phys., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 422–440, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5.Search in Google Scholar

[140] Z.-Y. Li, et al.., “Physics-informed neural operator for learning partial differential equations,” ArXiv, abs/2111.03794, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[141] L. Li, et al.., “Kohn-Sham equations as regularizer: building prior knowledge into machine-learned physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 3, 2021, Art. no. 036401. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.126.036401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[142] M. D. Cranmer, R. Xu, P. Battaglia, and S. Ho, “Learning symbolic physics with graph networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05862, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[143] D. Filan, S. Hod, C. Wild, A. Critch, and S. Russell, “Pruned neural networks are surprisingly modular,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04881, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[144] A. K. Maier, et al.., “Learning with known operators reduces maximum error bounds,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 373–380, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0077-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[145] C. Syben, B. Stimpel, J. Lommen, T. Würfl, A. Dörfler, and A. Maier, “Deriving neural network architectures using precision learning: parallel-to-fan beam conversion,” in German Conference on Pattern Recognition (GCPR), 2018.10.1007/978-3-030-12939-2_35Search in Google Scholar

[146] Y. Cheng, et al.., “Analysis and comparison of bayesian methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2018, pp. 1–10, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7509046.Search in Google Scholar

[147] M. Boumans, “Model-based type b uncertainty evaluations of measurement towards more objective evaluation strategies,” Measurement, vol. 46, pp. 3775–3777, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

[148] E. Crawley, “Intelligent structures for aerospace – a technology overview and assessment,” AIAA J., vol. 32, pp. 1689–1699, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12161.Search in Google Scholar

[149] A. F. Frangi, W. J. Niessen, K. L. Vincken, and M. A. Viergever, “Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, W. M. Wells, A. Colchester, and S. Delp, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1998, pp. 130–137.10.1007/BFb0056195Search in Google Scholar

[150] O. Rybakov, D. Stromer, I. Mischewski, and A. Maier, “Segmentation of fat and fascias in canine ultrasound images,” in Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2018, Informatik aktuell, A. Maier, T. M. Deserno, H. Handels, K. H. Maier-Hein, C. Palm, and T. Tolxdorff, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2018, pp. 263–268.10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_69Search in Google Scholar

[151] D. Stromer, et al.., “Browsing through sealed historical manuscripts by using 3-D computed tomography with low-brilliance X-ray sources,” Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. 15335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33685-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[152] A. Longo, S. Morscher, J. Malekzadeh Najafababdi, D. Jüstel, C. Zakian, and V. Ntziachristos, “Assessment of hessian-based frangi vesselness filter in optoacoustic imaging,” Photoacoustics, vol. 20, 2020, Art. no. 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100200.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[153] M. Grieves, Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication, White paper, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[154] Y. Paquot, et al.., “Optoelectronic reservoir computing,” Sci. Rep., vol. 2, 2011, Art. no. 287. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[155] D. Przyczyna, S. Pecqueur, D. Vuillaume, and K. Szaciłowski, “Reservoir computing for sensing – an experimental approach,” ArXiv, abs/2001.04342, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[156] X. Li and Y. Zhu, “Neural networks with transfer learning and frequency decomposition for wind speed prediction with missing data,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1137, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12081137.Search in Google Scholar

[157] O. Bey and M. Chemachema, “Finite-time event-triggered output-feedback adaptive decentralized echo-state network fault-tolerant control for interconnected pure-feedback nonlinear systems with input saturation and external disturbances: a fuzzy control-error approach,” Inf. Sci., vol. 669, p. 120557, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120557.Search in Google Scholar

[158] Y. Xia, W. Guo, and Z. Miao, “Time-varying engineered reservoir for the improved estimation of atom-cavity coupling strength,” Photonics, vol. 10, p. 157, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020157.Search in Google Scholar

[159] K. Nakajima, K. Fujii, M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, and M. Kitagawa, “Boosting computational power through spatial multiplexing in quantum reservoir computing,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, 2018, Art. no. 034021. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.034021.Search in Google Scholar

[160] J. Chen, H. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, “Temporal information processing on noisy quantum computers,” ArXiv, abs/2001.09498, 2020.10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024065Search in Google Scholar

[161] M. Kor, I. Yitmen, and S. Alizadehsalehi, “An investigation for integration of deep learning and digital twins towards construction 4.0,” Smart Sustain. Built Environ., vol. 12, pp. 461–487, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-08-2021-0148.Search in Google Scholar