Home A simple closed-form model to accurately calculate the electromechanical coupling coefficient of CMUTs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A simple closed-form model to accurately calculate the electromechanical coupling coefficient of CMUTs

  • Sazzadur Chowdhury

    Sazzadur Chowdhury is a professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Windsor and is the director of the MEMS lab in the University. Dr. Chowdhury’s team is dedicated to advance the state-of-the-art in diagnostic medical imaging through advanced ultrasound transducers and solid state radar based tomography for low cost more accurate detection of medical conditions at an early stage when they are easier to cure. Dr. Chowdhury recently received a CFI grant to develop nanotechnology based bio-inspired smart surfaces for more effective drug delivery. His research team is also working to develop advanced sensors for automotive collision avoidance, highway safety, and border security. He is a professional engineer in the province of Ontario and a member of IEEE. He owns 10 USA and Canadian patents in the areas of MEMS based ultrasonic transducers and radars. He published 70 peer reviewed research papers. Dr. Chowdhury received University of Windsor Award for Excellence in Scholarship, Research and Creative Activity in 2015–2019, 2009, 2007, and 2005.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2021

Abstract

A simple highly accurate closed-form model to calculate the electromechanical coupling coefficient of a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) is presented. The model exploits the electrostatic spring softening phenomenon to derive an expression for the energy converted from electrical to mechanical domain and includes the nonlinear change of the CMUT diaphragm stiffness during large deflections. The model has been validated by comparing the model predicted values with experimental results published elsewhere along with the results predicted by some existing models. The comparison shows that the model predicted values are in excellent agreement with experimental results. The model also enables one to quantify the effects of residual stress, bending, and nonlinear stretching of the diaphragm on the transduction efficiency of CMUTs without any computationally intensive finite element analysis method. The model resolves the ambiguity of the absence of electrostatic spring softening effect in some existing models.

Zusammenfassung

Es wird ein einfaches, hochgenaues geschlossenes Modell zur Berechnung des elektromechanischen Kopplungskoeffizienten eines kapazitiven mikrobearbeiteten Ultraschallwandlers (CMUT) vorgestellt. Das Modell nutzt das Phänomen der elektrostatischen Federerweichung, um einen Ausdruck für die Energie abzuleiten, die von einem elektrischen in einen mechanischen Bereich umgewandelt wird, und schließt die nichtlineare Änderung der CMUT-Membransteifigkeit bei großen Auslenkungen ein. Das Modell wurde validiert, indem die prognostizierten Modellwerte mit den an anderer Stelle veröffentlichten experimentellen Ergebnissen verglichen wurden, zusammen mit den Ergebnissen, die von einigen vorhandenen Modellen prognostiziert wurden. Der Vergleich zeigt, dass die modellprognostizierten Werte in hervorragender Übereinstimmung mit den Versuchsergebnissen sind. Das Modell ermöglicht es auch, die Auswirkungen von Restspannung, Biegung und nichtlinearer Dehnung der Membran auf die Transduktionseffizienz von CMUTs ohne rechenintensive Finite-Elemente-Analysemethoden zu quantifizieren. Das Modell löst die Mehrdeutigkeit des Fehlens eines elektrostatischen Federweichungseffekts in einigen vorhandenen Modellen.

Award Identifier / Grant number: RGPIN 293218

Funding statement: This research work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)’s discovery grant number RGPIN 293218.

About the author

Sazzadur Chowdhury

Sazzadur Chowdhury is a professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Windsor and is the director of the MEMS lab in the University. Dr. Chowdhury’s team is dedicated to advance the state-of-the-art in diagnostic medical imaging through advanced ultrasound transducers and solid state radar based tomography for low cost more accurate detection of medical conditions at an early stage when they are easier to cure. Dr. Chowdhury recently received a CFI grant to develop nanotechnology based bio-inspired smart surfaces for more effective drug delivery. His research team is also working to develop advanced sensors for automotive collision avoidance, highway safety, and border security. He is a professional engineer in the province of Ontario and a member of IEEE. He owns 10 USA and Canadian patents in the areas of MEMS based ultrasonic transducers and radars. He published 70 peer reviewed research papers. Dr. Chowdhury received University of Windsor Award for Excellence in Scholarship, Research and Creative Activity in 2015–2019, 2009, 2007, and 2005.

Acknowledgment

The authors also greatly acknowledge the generous support provided by CMC Microsystems Canada, Angstrom Engineering, Kitchener, ON, and IntelliSense Software Corporation of Woburn, MA.

  1. Conflict of interest: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest with any third party or person.

References

1. Brenner K, Ergun A, Firouzi K, Rasmussen M, Stedman Q, Khuri–Yakub B (2019) Advances in capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. Micromachines, 10 (2): 1–27, DOI: 10.3390/mi10020152.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Klemm M, Acoustic Simulation and Characterization of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kinsler L, Frey A, Coppens A, Sanders J, Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

4. Caronti A, Carotenuto R, Pappalardo M (2003) Electromechanical coupling factor of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 113 (1): 279–288, DOI: 10.1121/1.1527958.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Yaralioglu G, Ergun A, Bayram B, Hæggström E, Khuri-Yakub B (2003) Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 50 (4): 449–456, DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1197968.Search in Google Scholar

6. Buigas M, Espinosa F, Schmitz G, Ameijeiras I, Masegosa P, Domınguez M (2005) Electro-acoustical characterization procedure for cMUTs. Ultrasonics, 43 (5): 383–390, DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Bellared F, Lardiès J, Bourbon G, Moal P, Walter V, Berthillier M (2016) Characterization of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. Microsystem Technologies, 22: 593–601, DOI: 10.1007/s00542-015-2619-z.Search in Google Scholar

8. Patat F, Teston F, Felix N, Certon D. A simple distributed model for cMUT [micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers]. In: IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Montreal, Canada, August 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Zhang X, Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (CMUTs) on Glass Substrates for Next–Generation Medical Imaging and Beyond. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

10. Canney M, Bailey M, Crum L. (2008) Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: A combined measurement and modeling approach. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 124 (4): 2406–2420, DOI: 10.1121/1.2967836.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Pirouz A, Degertekin F (2019) An analysis method for capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) energy conversion during large signal operation. Sensors, 19 (4): 1–14, DOI:10.3390/s19040876.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Senturia S, Microsystems Design, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell, MA, USA, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

13. Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Kriege S, Theory of Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1959.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ladabaum I, Jin X, Soh H, Atalar A, Khuri-Yakub B (1998) Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 45 (3): 678–690, DOI: 10.1109/58.677612.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Daigle M, Corcos J, Wu K (2007) An analytical solution to circular touch mode capacitor. IEEE Sensors, 7 (4): 7502–7505, DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2007.891996.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gad-El-Haq M, The MEMS Handbook, second Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wang W, Lin R, Ren Y (2004) Design and fabrication of high sensitive microphone diaphragm using deep corrugation technique. Microsystem Technologies, 10 (2): 142–146, DOI: 10.1007/s00542-003-0322-y.Search in Google Scholar

18. Maadi M, Zemp R (2019) A nonlinear lumped equivalent circuit model for a single uncollapsed square CMUT cell. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 66 (8): 1340–1351, DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2914608.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-05-01
Accepted: 2021-10-01
Published Online: 2021-10-20
Published in Print: 2021-11-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/teme-2021-0080/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button