Home Lucus a non lucendo: Enantiosemy in Ancient Latin Lexicography
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lucus a non lucendo: Enantiosemy in Ancient Latin Lexicography

  • Adam Gitner EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 15, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Enantiosemes, words which express opposed meanings (also called auto-antonyms; e.g. altus, which can mean “high” or “low”, or the English “cleave”, which can mean “cut” or “stick together”), present a practical problem for the lexicographer. My paper surveys enantiosemes as they are explicitly discussed by ancient Roman lexicographers and provides a descriptive typology. Roman scholars distinguish between genuine auto-antonyms, which they sometimes call voces mediae (e.g. valetudo for “health” or “sickness”), and cases of etymology by antiphrasis (e.g. lucus a non lucendo), whereby a name is given through some kind of opposition. This latter group of etymologies-by-antiphrasis can be further subdivided between cases of euphemism and irony. The paper concludes with a short lexicon of Latin enantiosemes explicitly discussed by ancient sources.


Article note

The citations of Latin authors in this article follow the TLL Index librorum: https://thesaurus.badw.de/tll-digital/index/a.html.


Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Nicoletta Bruno for organizing an outstanding conference and for editing this contribution. I am also deeply grateful to René Nünlist and Charis Jo, whose comments have made numerous (innumerable?) improvements to this paper.

Bibliography

Abel, C. (1884), Über den Gegensinn der Urworte, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, J.A. (2005), “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology” in: D. Frede/B. Inwood (eds.), Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge, 14–35.10.1017/CBO9780511482526.003Search in Google Scholar

Atherton, C.A. (1999), The Stoics on Ambiguity, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1957), Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik, Berlin.10.1515/9783112741818Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, T. (2021), A Culture of Ambiguity: An Alternative History of Islam, New York.10.7312/baue17064Search in Google Scholar

Bohas, G./Bachmar, K. (2017), L’enantiosémie dans le lexique de l’arabe classique, Louvain.Search in Google Scholar

Finkin, J. (2005), “Enantiodrama: Enantiosemia in Arabic and beyond”, in: Bulletin of SOAS 68, 369–386.10.1017/S0041977X05000212Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1910), “Über den Gegensinn der Urworte”, in: Jahrbuch für psychoanalytische und psychopathologische Forschungen 2, 179–189. [repr. in Gesammelte Werke 8, 214–221].Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, G./Schoell, F. (eds.) (1910), M. Terenti Varronis De lingua Latina quae supersunt, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Holtz, L. (1981), Donat et la tradition de l’ensiegnement grammatical: Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (2016), Reviving Roman Religion: Sacred Trees in the Roman World, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316597859Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, B.D./Pinborg, J. (eds.) (1975), Augustine, De Dialectica: Translated with Introduction and Notes, Dordrecht-Boston.10.1007/978-94-010-1764-0Search in Google Scholar

Justice, D. (1987), The Semantics of Form in Arabic in the Mirror of European Languages, Amsterdam.10.1075/slcs.15Search in Google Scholar

Klégr, A. (2013), “The Limits of Polysemy: Enantiosemy”, in: Linguistica Pragensia 2, 7–23.Search in Google Scholar

Knox, D. (1989), Ironia: Medieval and Renaissance Ideas of Irony, Leiden.10.1163/9789004450875Search in Google Scholar

Lausberg, H. (1960) Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik, München.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G.N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London.Search in Google Scholar

Lepschy, G.C. (1989), “Freud, Abel e gli opposti”, in: G.C. Lepschy, Sulla linguistica moderna, Bologna, 349–378.Search in Google Scholar

Lobeck, Ch.A. (1840), “De antiphrasi et euphemismo schematologiae grammaticae specimen”, in: Acta Societatis Graecae 2, 289–319.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A.A. (2005), “Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine’s De dialectica”, in: D. Frede/B. Inwood (eds.), Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge, 36–55.10.1017/CBO9780511482526.004Search in Google Scholar

Marin, M. (1972), Etimologia κατ’ ἀντίφρασιν, coincidentia oppositorum, doppiezza morale, Bari.Search in Google Scholar

Marin, M. (1985), “La definizione agostiniana di antifrase e la sua fortuna”, in: Augustinianum 25, 329–341.10.5840/agstm1985251/222Search in Google Scholar

Muller, F. (1910), De veterum imprimis Romanorum studiis etymologicis, Utrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. (1875), The Book of Hebrew Roots, By Abu ‘l-Walid Marwan Ibn Janah, Oxford [with corrections by W. Bacher, repr. 1960].Search in Google Scholar

Nöldeke, T. (1910), “Wörter mit Gegensinn (Aḍdād)”, in: T. Nöldeke, Neue Beiträge zur semitischen Sprachwissenschaft, Strassburg, 67–108.10.1515/9783111672458-004Search in Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2009), The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511575891Search in Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2012), “Aristarch und das Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos”, in: M. Meier-Brügger (ed.), Homer, gedeutet durch ein großes Lexikon, Berlin, 193–214.10.1515/9783110292572.193Search in Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2018), “Kontext und Kontextualisierung als Kategorien antiker Literaturerklärung”, in: U. Tischer/A. Forst/U. Gärtner (eds.), Text, Kontext, Kontextualisierung: Moderne Kontextkonzepte und antike Literatur, Hildesheim, 101–118.Search in Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2019), “Aristarchus and Etymology”, in: Glotta 95, 201–226.10.13109/glot.2019.95.1.201Search in Google Scholar

O’Hara, J.J. (2017) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, Ann Arbor, MI.10.3998/mpub.9371709Search in Google Scholar

Oniga, R. (1997), “Sulle etimologie latine per antifrase”, in: Indogermanische Forschungen 102, 230–38.Search in Google Scholar

Ossa-Richardson, A. (2019), A History of Ambiguity, Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691167954.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Petit, D. (2021) “On Enantiosemy in Antiquity and its Modern Outcomes”, in: A. Zucker/C. Le Feuvre (eds.), Ancient and Medieval Greek Etymology: Theory and Practice, I, Berlin, 83–124.10.1515/9783110714876-005Search in Google Scholar

Pococke, E. (1655), Porta Mosis: sive dissertationes aliquot a R. Mose Maimonide, suis in varias Mishnaioth, sive textus Talmudici partes, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Ravin, Y./Leacock, C. (eds.) (2000), Polysemy, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198238423.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rolfe, J.C. (ed.) (1927–1928), The Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius, I–III, London-New York.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, D.A. (ed.) (2001), Quintilian, The Orator’s Education, I–V, Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Schad, S. (2007), A Lexicon of Latin Grammatical Terminology, Pisa-Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Schironi, F. (2018), The Best of the Grammarians, Ann Arbor, MI.10.3998/mpub.8769399Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R.T. (1979), Die Grammatik der Stoiker, revised by Karlheinz Hülser, Braunschweig.10.1007/978-3-663-00224-6Search in Google Scholar

Sluiter, I. (2015), “Ancient Etymology: A Tool for Thinking” in: F. Montanari/S. Matthaios/A. Rengakos (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, II, 896–922.10.1163/9789004281929_018Search in Google Scholar

Steinthal, S. (1890), Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik, I, 2nd ed., Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Uría Varela, J. (1994), “La afectividad como factor de cambio semántico: algunos ejemplos del Latín” in: Actas del VIII Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, I, 797–803, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, M. (2020), Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, Ann Arbor, MI.Search in Google Scholar

West, M.L. (1965), “Tryphon De tropis” in: CQ 15, 230–248.10.1017/S0009838800008892Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-07-15
Published in Print: 2023-07-12

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tc-2023-0005/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button