Startseite A Triangle in the Law-court: Speakers-Opponents-Audiences and the Use of the Imperative
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Triangle in the Law-court: Speakers-Opponents-Audiences and the Use of the Imperative

  • Andreas Serafim EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. November 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper, focusing on and discussing salient passages from the whole corpus of Attic forensic speeches, examines the use and purposes of imperatives for persuasion. The main argument it puts forward is that imperatives should not be seen as an improper, impolite or abrasive means of communication in the law-court, but rather as a decisive and confident way of sustaining a triangular relation between the speaker, his opponent and the audience. The speaker, through the use of imperatives, talks about, and intermittently to, his opponent and conveys messages to the audience about him. These messages, combined with references to religion, patriotism, ancestral glory and the very existence of the polis, give the potential to orations to influence the verdict of the judges and determine the outcome of trials.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Michael Gagarin, Sophia Papaioannou, Millie Gall and the two anonymous referees for their insightful comments on this paper.

This paper is humbly dedicated to the memory of Emeritus Professor Thanassis Nakas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, who passed away unexpectedly in early August 2021.

Imperatives in Attic forensic speeches

Speeches

Occurrences

Aeschines – Against Ctesiphon

101

Against Timarchus

101

The Speech on the Embassy

68

Andocides – Against Alcibiades

4

On His Return

6

On the Mysteries

71

On the Peace

11

Antiphon – On the Choreutes

3

On the Murder of Herodes

21

Prosecution Of The Stepmother For Poisoning

4

Demosthenes – Against Androtion

28

Against Apaturius

13

Against Aphobus 1–3

46

Against Aristocrates

106

Against Aristogeiton 1

32

Against Aristogeiton 2

4

Against Boeotus 1

26

Against Boeotus 2

19

Against Callicles

12

Against Conon

10

Against Dionysodorus

18

Against Eubulides

32

Against Evergus And Mnesibulus

16

Against Lacritus

18

Against Leochares

9

Against Leptines

94

Against Macartatus

40

Against Nausimachus and Xenopeithes

15

Against Olympiodorus

14

Against Onetor 1

14

Against Onetor 2

4

Against Pantaenetus

23

Against Phaenippus

16

Against Phormio

18

Against Spudias

17

Against Theocrines

38

Against Timocrates

68

Against Zenothemis

5

Against Callipus

7

Against Nicostratus

4

Against Polycles

14

Against Timotheus

7

For Phormio

35

On the Crown

109

On the False Embassy

158

On The Trierarchic Crown

2

Against Meidias

75

Against Stephanus 2

16

Against Stephanus 1

45

Dinarchus – Against Aristogiton

4

Against Demosthenes

37

Against Philocles

4

Hyperides – Against Athenogenes

5

Against Demosthenes

3

Against Philippides

4

In Defence of Euxenippus

7

In Defence of Lycophron

5

Isaeus – On the Estate of Dicaeogenes

6

On the Estate of Hagnias

20

On the Estate of Menecles

9

On the Estate of Philoctemon

14

Isocrates – On the Teams of Horses

1

Trapeziticus

8

Against Callimachus

6

Aegineticus

3

Against Lochites

2

Against Euthynus

---

Lycurgus – Against Leocrates

60

Lysias – Accusation of Calumny

2

Against Agoratus

23

Against Alcibiades 1

5

Against Alcibiades 2

2

Against Andocides

12

Against Diogeiton

2

Against Epicrates and his Fellow-envoys

5

Against Eratosthenes

18

Against Ergocles

1

Against Nicomachus

11

Against Pancleon

5

Against Philocrates

---

Against Philon

8

Against Simon

3

Against The Corn-Dealer

5

Against The Subversion of the Ancestral Constitution

---

Against Theomnestus 1

13

Against Theomnestus 2

6

Defence Against a Charge of Subverting the Democracy

2

Defence Against A Charge Of Taking Bribes

5

Defence in the Matter of the Olive Stump

2

For Callias

---

For Polystratus

6

For The Soldier

3

In Defence of Mantitheus

6

On A Wound By Premeditation

3

On the Confiscation of the Property Of The Brother Of Nicias

4

On the Murder of Eratosthenes

12

On the Property of Aristophanes

24

On The Property Of Eraton

5

On The Refusal Of A Pension

2

On the Scrutiny of Evandros

3

Bibliography

Adkins, A.W.H. (1960), Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiou, E. (2010), Der Euagoras des Isokrates. Ein Kommentar, Berlin-New York.10.1515/9783110229899Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiou, E. (2020), Greek Rhetoric of the 4th Oratory BC. The Elixir of Democracy and Individuality, Berlin-Boston.10.1515/9783110560145Suche in Google Scholar

Arena, V. (2007), “Roman Oratorical Invective”, in: W. Dominik/J. Hall (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, Malden, MA, 149–160.10.1002/9780470996485.ch12Suche in Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, MA.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bakker, W.F. (1966), The Greek Imperative. An Investigation into the Aspectual Differences Between the Present and Aorist Imperatives in Greek Prayer from Homer up to the Present Day, Amsterdam.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrios-Lech, P. (2020), “Developments in Politeness from Aristophanes to Menander and Beyond”, in: G. Martin/F. Iurescia/G. Sorrentino/S. Hof (eds.), Pragmatic Approaches to Drama, Leiden-Boston, 234–263.10.1163/9789004440265_012Suche in Google Scholar

Bary, C. (2009), Aspect in Ancient Greek, PhD Diss., Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Suche in Google Scholar

Bers, V. (1985), “Dikastic Thorubos”, in: P.A. Cartledge/F.D. Harvey (eds.), Crux: Essays Presented to G. E. M. de ste Croix on his 75th Birthday, Devon, 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, P./Levinson, C.S. (1978), Universal in Language usage: Politeness Phenomena, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, C.R. (2008), Verbal Aspect and Non-Indicative Verbs: Further Soundings in the Greek of the New Testament, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Carey, C. (2005), “Propaganda and Competition in Athenian Oratory”, in: K.A.E. Enenkeland/I.L. Pfeijffer (eds.), The Manipulative Mode: Political Propaganda in Antiquity. A Collection of Case Studies, Leiden-Boston, 65–100.10.1163/9789047414544_005Suche in Google Scholar

Carey, C. et al. (2008), “Fragments of Hyperides’ Against Diondas from the Archimedes palimpsest”, in: ZPE 165, 1–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. (1997), “Theatricality beyond the Theater. Staging Public Life in the Hellenistic World”, in: Pallas 47, 219–259.10.3406/palla.1997.1477Suche in Google Scholar

Classen, C.J. (1991), “The Speeches in the Courts of Law: A Three-cornered Dialogue”, in: Rhetorica 9, 195–207.10.1525/rh.1991.9.3.195Suche in Google Scholar

Condoravdi, C./Lauer, S. (2012), “Imperatives: Meaning and Illocutionary Force”, in: Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, 37–58.Suche in Google Scholar

Conover, P.J. (1984), “The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perception and Evaluation”, in: The Journal of Politics 46, 760–785.10.2307/2130855Suche in Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2012a), “How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin”, in: CQ 62, 731–748.10.1017/S0009838812000286Suche in Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2012b), “The Rules of Politeness and Latin Request Formulae”, in: P. Probert/A. Willi (eds.), Laws and rules in Indo-European, Oxford, 313–328.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.003.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2016), “Emotional Language and Formulae of Persuasion in Greek Papyrus Letters”, in: E. Sanders/M. Johncock, M. (eds.), Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity, Stuttgart, 237–262.Suche in Google Scholar

Dover, K.J. (1974), Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Oxford.10.2307/324314Suche in Google Scholar

Duncan, A. (2006), Performance and Identity in the Classical World, Cambridge-New York.10.1017/CBO9780511550577Suche in Google Scholar

Easterling, P.A. (1999), “Actors and Voices: Reading between the Lines in Aeschines and Demosthenes”, in: S. Goldhill/R. Osborne (eds.), Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, Cambridge, 154–166.Suche in Google Scholar

Eelen, G. (2001), A Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester.10.4324/9781315760179Suche in Google Scholar

Fanning, B.M. (1990), Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198267294.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J.T. (2006), “Perjury in Ancient Religion and Modern Law: A Comparative Analysis of Perjury in Homer and United States Law”, in: J. Fotopoulos (ed.), The New Testament and Early Christian Literature in Greco- Roman Context: Studies in Honor of David E. Aune, Leiden, 178–197.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, W.W. (1966), Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, London.10.1017/CBO9780511697777Suche in Google Scholar

Griffith-Williams, B. (2013), A Commentary on Selected Speeches of Isaios, Leiden-Boston.10.1163/9789004260184Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2006), The Theatrical Cast of Athens, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298891.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J. (2009), Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters, Oxford-New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Han, C.H. (2000), The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar, PhD Diss., University of Pennsylvania.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddy, L. (2003), “Group Identity and Political Cohesion”, in: D. Sears/L. Huddy/R. Jervis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Oxford, 511–558.10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0155Suche in Google Scholar

Karanika, A. (2014), Voices at Work. Women, Performance and Labor in Ancient Greece, Baltimore.10.1353/book.29442Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufmann, M. (2012), Interpreting imperatives, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-007-2269-9Suche in Google Scholar

Keersmaekers, A./Van Hal, T. (2016), “Aspectual Choice in Greek Imperatives: A Corpus-based Review of Existing Theories”, in: LEC 84,19–51.Suche in Google Scholar

Kotlinska-Toma, A. (2015), Hellenistic Tragedy: Texts, Translations and a Critical Survey, London-New Delhi-New York-Sydney.Suche in Google Scholar

Lamers, H./Rademaker, A. (2007), “Talking about Myself: A Pragmatic Approach to the Use of Aspect Forms in Lysias 12.4–19”, in: CQ 57, 458–476.10.1017/S000983880700050XSuche in Google Scholar

Lau, R. (1989), “Individual and Contextual Influences on Group Identification”, in: Social Psychology Quarterly 52, 220–231.10.2307/2786717Suche in Google Scholar

Lloyd, M. (2004), “The politeness of Achilles”, in: JHS 124, 75–89.10.2307/3246151Suche in Google Scholar

MacDowell, D.M. (ed). (1990), Demosthenes, Against Meidias, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

MacDowell, D.M. (ed). (2000), Demosthenes, On the False Embassy. Oration 19, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, G. (2006), “Forms of Address in Athenian Courts”, in: MH 63, 75–88.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, G. (2009), Divine Talk: Religious Argumentation in Demosthenes, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560226.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, A.H./Gurin, P./Gurin, G./Malanchuk, O. (1981), “Group Consciousness and Political Participation”, in: American Journal of Political Science 25, 494–511.10.2307/2110816Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, C.W.E. (1892), “The Limitation of the Imperative in the Attic Orators”, in: AJPh 13, 399–436.10.2307/288045Suche in Google Scholar

Moran, J. (2016), “Tense, Time, Aspect and the Ancient Greek Verb”, in: Journal of Classics Teaching 17, 58–61.10.1017/S205863101600026XSuche in Google Scholar

Parker, R. (2005), “Law and Religion”, in: M. Gagarin/D. Cohen (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, Cambridge, 61–81.10.1017/CCOL0521818400.004Suche in Google Scholar

Plescia, J. (1970), The Oath and Perjury in Ancient Greece, Tallahassee.Suche in Google Scholar

Pulleyn, S. (1997), Prayer in Greek Religion, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198150886.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, A. (2002), The Syntax and Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek: An Introduction, Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar

Risselada, R. (1993), Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language, Amsterdam.10.1163/9789004408975Suche in Google Scholar

Rouchota, V. (1994), “The Subjunctive in Modern Greek: Dividing the Labour between Semantics and Pragmatics”, in: Journal of Modern Greek Studies 12, 185–201.10.1353/mgs.2010.0319Suche in Google Scholar

Rubinstein, L. (2004), “Stirring up Dicastic Anger”, in: D.L. Cairns/R.A. Knox (eds.), Law, Rhetoric, and Comedy in Classical Athens. Essays in honour of Douglas M. MacDowell. Wales, 187–203.10.2307/j.ctv1n3587r.17Suche in Google Scholar

Rubinstein, L. (2005), “Differentiated Rhetorical Strategies in the Athenian Courts”, in: M. Gagarin/D. Cohen (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, Cambridge, 129–145.10.1017/CCOL0521818400.008Suche in Google Scholar

Schmerling, S. (1982), “How Imperatives Are Special, and How They Aren’t”, in: R. Schneider/K. Tuit/R. Chametsky (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclaratives, Chicago, 202–218.Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1969), Speech Acts, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1975), “Indirect Speech Acts”, in: P. Cole/J.L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, New York, 59–82.10.1017/CBO9780511609213.004Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1976), “The Classification of Illocutionary acts”, in: Language in Society 5, 1–24.10.1017/S0047404500006837Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2015), “Making the Audience: Ekphrasis and Rhetorical Strategy in Demosthenes 18 and 19”, in: CQ 65, 96–108.10.1017/S0009838814000901Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2017), Attic Oratory and Performance, New York-London.10.4324/9781315738451Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2020a), Religious Discourse in Attic Oratory and Politics, New York-London.10.4324/9780203703151Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2020b), “Language and Persuasion in Attic Oratory: Imperatives and Questions”, in: Argos: Journal of the Argentine Association of Classical Studies 41, 1–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2020c), A Commentary on Lysias’ Olympic Oration: Introduction, Translation, Comments, Athens.Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2020d), “ΕΡΩΤΗΣΟΝ ΑΥΤΟΥΣ (Erōtēson autous): Questions, Rhetorical purpose and Hypocrisis in Attic Forensic Oratory”, in: G. Thür/S. Avramovic/A. Katanceviic (eds.), Law, Magic and Oratory, Belgrade, 229–248.Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (2021), “‘I, He, We, You, They’: Addresses to the audience as a means of unity/division in Attic forensic oratory”, in: A. Michalopoulos/A. Serafim/A. Vatri/F. Beneventano della Corte (eds.), The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature, Leiden-Boston, 71–98.10.1515/9783110611168-004Suche in Google Scholar

Serafim, A. (forthcoming), “The Mood of Persuasion: Subjunctives in (the Main Clauses) Attic Oratory”, in: A. Vatri/A. Serafim (eds.), Style and the City: Form and Functions of Language in Attic Oratory.Suche in Google Scholar

Sicking, C.M.J. (1991), “The Distribution of Aorist and Present Tense Stem Forms in Greek, Especially in the Imperative”, in: Glotta 69, 14–43, 154–170.Suche in Google Scholar

Smyth, H.W. (1984), Greek Grammar, Rev. by Gordon M. Messing, Cambridge, MA.Suche in Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1988), “Further Aspects of Polis Religion”, in: AION 10, 259–274.Suche in Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1990), “What is Polis Religion?”, in: O. Murray/S. Price (eds.), The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander, Oxford, 295–322.10.1093/oso/9780198148883.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H./Turner, J.C. (1979), “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict”, in: W.G. Austin/S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Ann Arbor, 33–37.Suche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2002), “Politeness and Formulaicity”, in: Journal of Greek Linguistics 3, 179–201.10.1075/jgl.3.08terSuche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2004), “Testing Brown and Levinson’s Theory in a Corpus of Spontaneous Conversational Data from Cypriot Greek”, in: International Journal of the Sociology of Language 168, 119–134.10.1515/ijsl.2004.027Suche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2005), “An Argument for a Frame-based Approach to Politeness: Evidence from the Use of the Imperative in Cypriot Greek”, in: R. Lakoff/I. Sachiko (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, Amsterdam, 99–116.10.1075/pbns.139.10terSuche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2008), “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness and Rudeness”, in: D. Bousfield/M. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language, Berlin, 45–74.10.1515/9783110208344.1.45Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2011), “And you, the Demos, Made an Uproar: Performance, Mass Audiences, and Text in the Athenian Democracy”, in: A.P.M.H. Lardinois/J.H. Lardinois/M.G.M. van der Poel, Sacred Words: Orality, Literacy, and Religion: Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World, Leiden, 161–187.10.1163/ej.9789004194120.i-415.42Suche in Google Scholar

Whitehead, D. (1983), “Competitive outlay and community profit: Φιλοτιμία in democratic Athens”, in: Classica et Mediaevalia 34, 55–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Willi, A. (2003), The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Wolpert, A. (2003). “Addresses to the jury in the Attic orators”, in: AJPh 124, 537–555.10.1353/ajp.2003.0064Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-13
Published in Print: 2021-11-11

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tc-2021-0013/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen