Abstract: The aim of the contribution is to present the factual data about the main collections of scholia to the Greek mathematical treatises (Elements, Almagest, the so-called “little astronomy”), along with an analysis of their types, function, and organization within the textual space of the ancient codex. On the basis of these factual data, an assessment is provided of the extent to which these collections may provide a clear-cut answer to the long-standing problem of the origins of the running commentaries that some medieval manuscripts present as sets of scholia.
Published Online: 2014-10-1
Published in Print: 2014-10-1
© De Gruyter 2014
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography