Abstract: Starting from Montana’s definition of scholia as a planned and stratified compilation of marginal notes, this paper discusses the use of aliter and of similar expressions introducing new and different explanations in Latin scholiography, in particular in Tiberius Claudius Donatus’ commentary on Virgil’s Aeneid. Furthermore, some chains of notes in the Virgilian commentaries are taken into consideration, in order to check the several possible connections between these commentaries and single marginal annotations.
Published Online: 2014-10-1
Published in Print: 2014-10-1
© De Gruyter 2014
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography