Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
-
Marco Ercoles
Published/Copyright:
October 1, 2014
Abstract: Even if no ancient commentaries on Aeschylus are preserved, there is evidence that they did exist: this is collected and discussed in the first part of this work. Particularly interesting is the possibility of a Late Antique hypomnema on PV still surviving in the Middle-Byzantine age: it could be the same as the hypomnema implied by some misplaced lemmas among the Medicean scholia on PV, probably the remaining traces of a wrong transcription.
Published Online: 2014-10-1
Published in Print: 2014-10-1
© De Gruyter 2014
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography
