Abstract: This article reflects on the subscriptions which, in ms. Venezia, Bi- blioteca Nazionale Marciana, gr. 454 (coll. 822) of the Iliad, mention the ancient sources that were compiled in the apparatus of the scholia, concluding that they might actually not refer at all to the positioning of the exegetic annotations in the margins of the manuscript: hence, they prove not to be conclusive for dating the origins of scholiography.
Published Online: 2014-10-1
Published in Print: 2014-10-1
© De Gruyter 2014
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Foreword
- Introduction: From types to texts
- The history of corpora scholiastica: a series of unfortunate events
- Anything but a marginal question
- Through the warping glass
- Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad
- Aeschylus’ scholia and the hypomnematic tradition: an investigation
- Types, function, and organization of the collections of scholia
- John of Scythopolis’ marginal commentary on the Corpus Dionysiacum
- A very long engagement
- The birth of scholiography: some conclusions and perspectives
- Bibliography