Episodic versus generic eventualities and nominals
-
Meng-Chen Lee
Abstract
This paper proposes an analysis of the DP structure of Chinese in comparison with German and other West Germanic languages, particularly English. The analysis is linked to sentence structure, particularly event structure of the respective languages and the relation between nominal classifiers and sentential tense. Chinese is a language without nominal declension; German is not as other Indo-European languages. Among the inflectional paradigms, German has retained from earlier periods, and developed further, the coding of topicality in terms of familiarity and anaphoricity. While Chinese shares with German clause syntactic topicality, it does so purely in terms of clause-early and clause-late word order. German, by contrast, involves specific positions in the serial middle field to code referential familiarity, anaphoricity, and, above all, weak versus strong referential weight to distinguish, among other functions, specific versus unspecific reference. The categories involved in coding such properties in German are determiners and the declensional morphology of attributes (‘strong’ versus ‘weak’ inflection providing specific reference). This paper investigates the regularities of weak and strong reference in Chinese. The discussion yields insight into the structural coding that Chinese provides instead of what is encoded in German in morphological terms on adjectival attributes and in terms determiners ((in)definite articles and bare nouns). In the course, the discussion around mass versus count nouns and the role of classifiers is brought up and newly evaluated on the basis of the new referential distinctions.
References
Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Mass: MIT Cambridge Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 1997. The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the verbal genitive. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2007. Discourse binding. DP and pronouns in German, Dutch and English. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination. Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 21–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.89.04abrSearch in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2013. Deutsche syntax im sprachenvergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2014a. Thetic sentence at the level of modality – an exercise in modal event quantification. Manuskript Universität München (accessed 5 Juli 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2014b. The upper German differential: Main Austrian-Bavarian versus high-alemannic differences. In Günther Grewendorf & Helmut Weiß (eds.), Bavarian syntax. Contributions to the theory of syntax, 305–335. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.220.11abrSearch in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2018. Valenzdiversifikationen: Was ist thetikvalenz? Studia Germanica Gedanensia 39. 69–90. https://doi.org/10.26881/sgg.2018.39.05.Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 2020. Modality. Syntac, semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139108676Search in Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts. 2014. Advance in weak referentiality. In Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Weak referentiality, 1–16. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.219.01aguSearch in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207491Search in Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, 179–246. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511601.179Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Ping. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics 42(6). 1129–1184. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Guglielmo Cingue & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195136517.013.0007Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 2012. Classifiers and DP. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00109.Search in Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4Search in Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998b. Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506.10.1023/A:1008324218506Search in Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Brenda Laca. 2003. Les noms sans déterminant dans les langues romanes. In Daniel Godard (ed.), Les langues romanes. Problèmes de la phrase simple, 235–279. Paris: Editions CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and selection. On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG. (HIL Dissertation; 32).Search in Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 2004. Adverbs and quantification: Degrees versus frequency. Lingua 117(4). 685–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.04.003.Search in Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar
Fassi-Fehri, Abdelkader. 2003. Nominal classes and parameters across interfaces and levels, with particular reference to Arabic. Rabat: Ms. University Mohammed V/IERA.Search in Google Scholar
Gerstner-Link, Claudia. 1995. Über generizität. Generische nominalausdrücke in singulären und generellen aussagen. München: Fink.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W. 1992. A Greek grammar. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson.Search in Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1980. On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry 11(4). 637–678.Search in Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 2005. Tense, person, and transitivity. In Naomi Erteschik-Shir & Towa Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 89–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 2006. Generic sentences and bare plurals. In Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 219–234. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.95.11gueSearch in Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline & Teun Hoekstra. 1988. T-chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries. In Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Constituent structure, 35–99. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 1988. Die struktur der deutschen nominalphrase. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7(1). 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFSW.1988.7.1.32.Search in Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1998. Science and civilization in China. Vol. 7: Language and logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christoph. 2013. Plurality and subclassification of nouns in classical Chinese. In Dan-Dan Xu (ed.), Plurality and classifiers in languages across China, 121–142. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110293982.121Search in Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1981. On semantic scope. In Frank Heny (ed.), Ambiguities in intensional contexts, 47–81. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-8377-9_2Search in Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 547–593.Search in Google Scholar
Ioup, Georgette. 1977. Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351105.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2012. Comparative syntax. Ms. March 2012. New York University.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Natalie M., Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2013. Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128(2). 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.007.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71. 669–695. https://doi.org/10.2307/415740.Search in Google Scholar
Klimek-Cieschinger, Maria. 2014. Schwach-referentielle Definita? Setzung und schwund des definitartikels. Tagungsvortrag, auf- und abbau des definitartikels im Deutschen – auswirkungen kognitiv-linguistischer prinzipien. Universität Hamburg (04–05. 09. 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1986. Massennomina mit einem exkurs zu aktionsarten. forschungsbericht 177 des sonderforschungsberichts 99. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1991. Massennomina. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics. Ein internationales handbuch der zeitgenössischen forschung. An international handbook of contemporary research, 370–399. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110126969.6.399Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelleanimal (eds.), The generic book, 398–411. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kurita, Yukari. 2014. Nominale quantifikation im Japanischen – eine untersuchung über ihre inhärenz im vergleich zu numbersprachen. Munich: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation LM-University.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Meng-Chen. 2016. Determinatorphrasen im Deutschen und Chinesischen. doctoral dissertation LMU München. Appeared as: 2020. Determinatorphrasen im Deutschen und Chinesischen. Frankfurt & Bern: P. Lang (DaZ und DaF in der Diskussion; 13).10.3726/b16577Search in Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2000. Artikel und aspekt: die grammatischen muster von definitheit. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110825961Search in Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2007. Covert patterns of definiteness/indefiniteness and aspectuality in Old Icelandic, Gothic, and Old High German. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination. Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 73–102. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.89.06leiSearch in Google Scholar
Li, XuPing. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese. The syntax-semantics interface. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110289336Search in Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609–665.Search in Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2005. Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24(1). 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2005.24.1.5.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605789Search in Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 1991. Die deutsche nominalphrase als determinansphrase. In Susan Olsen & Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), DET, COMP und INFL. Zur syntax funktionaler kategorien und grammatischer funktionen, 35–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111353838.35Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338775Search in Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1998. On the history of classifiers in archaic and medieval Chinese. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Chinese linguistics, July 1994. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, 39–66.Search in Google Scholar
Roger-Yun, Soyoung. 2002. Les expressions nominales classificateurs et les propositions à cas multiples du coréen. Paris: Université Paris 3 PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Hooi Ling Soh & Hiroki Nomoto. 2011. Bare classifiers and definiteness: A cross-linguistic investigation. Studies in Language 35. 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.1.10sim.Search in Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy A. 1989. Subjects, specifiers, and X-bar theory. In Mark Baltin & Anthony, Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 232–262. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy A. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Katherine Leffel & Denis Bouchard (eds.), Views on phrase structure, 37–56. Dordecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3196-4_3Search in Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1992. Causatives and accomplishments: The case of Chinese bǎ. Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden University Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 2020. Voice and little v and VO-OV in Chinese languages. Unpublished Ms. Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 2, 167–189. Szeged: Jate.Search in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian, 179–274. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373174_004Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990a. Chinese phrase and the extended X-bar theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990b. A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics 28. 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337.Search in Google Scholar
Unterbeck, Barbara. 1993. Kollektion, numeralklassifikation und transnumerus: eine typologische studie zum Koreanischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1991. Determinantien in der DP. In Susan Olsen & Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), DET, COMP und INFL. Zur syntax funktionaler kategorien und grammatischer funktionen, 15–34. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111353838.15Search in Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus 1997. Salienz und referenz. Der epsilonoperator in der semantik der nominalphrase und anaphorischer pronomen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783050073934Search in Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus & Jaklin Kornfilt. 2005. The case of the direct object in Turkish: Semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Language 9. 3–44.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2012. Numeral classifier structures. National Chung Cheng University. http://www.ccunix.ccu.edu.tw/∼lngnz/ (accessed 28 April 2012).Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Episodic versus generic eventualities and nominals
- Psych predicates in European languages
- Nominal and pronominal gender: Putting Greenberg’s Universal 43 to the test
- Development of contrastive-partitive in colloquial Persian
- Mixed evidence for crosslinguistic dependency length minimization
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Episodic versus generic eventualities and nominals
- Psych predicates in European languages
- Nominal and pronominal gender: Putting Greenberg’s Universal 43 to the test
- Development of contrastive-partitive in colloquial Persian
- Mixed evidence for crosslinguistic dependency length minimization
