Startseite Laplacian spectrum of comaximal graph of the ring ℤn
Artikel Open Access

Laplacian spectrum of comaximal graph of the ring ℤn

  • Subarsha Banerjee EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. März 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we study the interplay between the structural and spectral properties of the comaximal graph Γ(Zn) of the ring Zn for n>2. We first determine the structure of Γ(Zn) and deduce some of its properties. We then use the structure of Γ(Zn) to deduce the Laplacian eigenvalues of Γ(Zn) for various n. We show that Γ(Zn) is Laplacian integral for n=pαqβ, where p,q are primes and α,β are non-negative integers and hence calculate the number of spanning trees of Γ(Zn) for n=pαqβ. The algebraic and vertex connectivity of Γ(Zn) have been shown to be equal for all n. An upper bound on the second largest Laplacian eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) has been obtained, and a necessary and sufficient condition for its equality has also been determined. Finally, we discuss the multiplicity of the Laplacian spectral radius and the multiplicity of the algebraic connectivity of Γ(Zn). We then investigate some properties and vertex connectivity of an induced subgraph of Γ(Zn). Some problems have been discussed at the end of this paper for further research.

MSC 2010: 05C25; 05C50

1 Introduction

Let G be a finite simple undirected graph with vertex set V(G)={v1,v2,,vn}. If two vertices v1,v2 are adjacent, we denote it by vivj. The join of two graphs G1=(V1,E1) and G2=(V2,E2) denoted by G1G2 is a graph obtained from G1 and G2 by joining each vertex of G1 to all vertices of G2. The union of two graphs G1=(V1,E1) and G2=(V2,E2) denoted by G1G2 is a graph with vertex set V=V1V2 and edge set E=E1E2. The adjacency matrix of G denoted by A(G)=(aij) is an n×n matrix defined as aij=1 when vivj and 0 otherwise. The Laplacian matrix L(G) of G is defined as L(G)=D(G)A(G), where A(G) is the adjacency matrix of G and D(G) is the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees. Since the matrix L(G) is a real, symmetric, and a positive semi-definite matrix, all its eigenvalues are real and non-negative. Also 0 is an eigenvalue of L(G) with eigenvector [1,1,1,,1]T whose multiplicity equals the number of connected components in the graph G. Let the eigenvalues of L(G) be denoted by λ1λ2λn1λn=0. The largest eigenvalue λ1 is known as the spectral radius of G, and the second smallest eigenvalue λn1 is known as the algebraic connectivity of G. Also λn1>0 if and only if G is connected. The term algebraic connectivity was given by Fiedler in [1]. A separating set in a connected graph G is a set SV(G) such that V(G)S has more than one connected component. The vertex connectivity of G denoted by κ(G) is defined as κ(G)=min{S:Sis a separating set ofG}. The papers [1] and [2] list several interesting properties of λn1 and κ. Readers may refer to [3] for a survey on the Laplacian matrix of a graph G. A graph G is called Laplacian integral if all the eigenvalues of L(G) are integers. We follow [4] for definitions of standard terms in graph theory.

Let R be a commutative ring with unity 10. The comaximal graph of a ring R denoted by Γ(R) was introduced by Sharma and Bhatwadekar in [5]. The vertices of Γ(R) are the elements of the ring R, and two distinct vertices x,y of Γ(R) are adjacent if and only if Rx+Ry=R. They proved that R is a finite ring if and only if the chromatic number of Γ(R) denoted by χ(Γ(R)) is finite. It was further shown that χ(Γ(R)) satisfies χ(Γ(R))=t+l, where t denotes the number of maximal ideals of R and l denotes the number of units of R. A lot of research has been done on the comaximal graph of a ring R over the last few decades. For some literature on Γ(R), readers may refer to the works [6,7] and [8]. In this paper, the Laplacian spectrum of the comaximal graph of the finite ring Zn, denoted by Γ(Zn), has been studied for various n. In Section 2, we provide the preliminary theorems that have been used throughout the paper. In Section 3, we discuss the structure of Γ(Zn) and investigate some structural properties of Γ(Zn) and find the characteristic polynomial of Γ(Zn) for n>2. We then explicitly determine the spectrum of Γ(Zn) for n=pαqβ, where p,q are distinct primes and α,β are non-negative integers and conclude that Γ(Zn) is Laplacian integral for n=pαqβ. In Section 4, we discuss the vertex and the algebraic connectivity of Γ(Zn). In Section 5, we find an upper bound on the second largest eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) and determine a necessary and sufficient condition when it attains its bounds. We use it to determine the multiplicity of the spectral radius of Γ(Zn). We also determine the multiplicity of the algebraic connectivity of Γ(Zn). In Section 6, we study an induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) formed by the non-zero non-unit elements of Zn. Finally, in Section 7, we provide some problems for further research.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we will provide some preliminary theorems that will be required in our subsequent sections. Throughout this paper by eigenvalues and characteristic polynomial of a given graph G, we shall mean the eigenvalues and characteristic polynomial of the Laplacian matrix L(G) of G. Also, the characteristic polynomial and the multiset of eigenvalues of G have been denoted by μ(G,x) and σ(G), respectively. Thus, λi(G) shall denote the ith eigenvalue of L(G).

Theorem 2.1

[4, Theorem 1.2.18] A graphGis bipartite if and only if it has no odd cycle.

Theorem 2.2

[9, Corollary 3.7] LetG1G2denote the join of two graphsG1andG2. Then,

μ(G1G2,x)=x(xn1n2)(xn1)(xn2)μ(G1,xn2)μ(G2,xn1),
wheren1andn2are orders ofG1 and G2respectively.

Theorem 2.3

[9, Theorem 3.1] LetGbe the disjoint union of the graphsG1,G2,,Gk. Then,

μ(G,x)=i=1kμ(Gi,x).

Theorem 2.4

[9, Theorem 2.2] IfGis a simple graph onnvertices, then the largest eigenvalueλ1ofGsatisfiesλ1n, where the equality holds if and only if its complementG¯is disconnected.

Definition 2.5

[10, Definition 3.9.1] Given a graph G with vertex set V(G), a partition V(G)=V1V2Vk is said to be an equitable partition of G if every vertex in Vi has the same number of neighbors bij in Vj where 1i,jk.

Theorem 2.6

[11, Theorem 2.1] LetGbe a non-complete, connected graph onnvertices. Thenκ(G)=λn1(G)if and only ifGcan be written asG=G1G2, whereG1is a disconnected graph onnκ(G)vertices andG2is a graph onκ(G)vertices withλn1(G2)2κ(G)n.

Definition 2.7

[12, see p. 15] Let H be a graph with vertex set V(H)={1,2,,k}. Let Gi be disjoint graphs of order ni with vertex sets V(Gi), where 1ik. The H-join of graphs G1,G2,,Gk denoted by H[G1,G2,,Gk] is formed by taking the graphs Gi and any two vertices viGi and vjGj are adjacent if i is adjacent to j in H.

Theorem 2.8

[13, Theorem 8] Let us consider a family ofkgraphsGjof ordernj, withj{1,2,,k}having Laplacian spectrumσ(Gj). IfHis a graph such thatV(H)={1,2,,k}, then the Laplacian spectrum ofH[G1,G2,,Gk]is given by

σ(H[G1,G2,,Gk])=j=1k(Nj+σ(Gj){0})σ(M),
where
(1)M=N1ρ1,2ρ1,kρ1,kN2ρ2,kρ1,kρ2,kNk,

ρa,b=ρb,a=nanbifabE(H)0otherwiseandNj=iNH(j)niifNH(j)0otherwise.

Here, NH(j)={i:ijE(H)}.

3 Structure of Γ(Zn)

We denote the elements of the ring Zn by {0,1,2,,n2,n1}. If xZn, then x will denote the ideal generated by x. We follow [14] for standard definitions in ring theory.

In this section, we describe the structure of Γ(Zn). We show that Γ(Zn) can be expressed as the join and union of certain induced subgraphs of Γ(Zn). We then investigate the Laplacian spectra of Γ(Zn) for various n. We first find an equivalent condition for adjacency of two vertices in Γ(Zn).

By using the adjacency criterion for any two vertices in Γ(R), we find that two vertices vi,vjΓ(Zn) are adjacent if and only if Znvi+Znvj=Zn. Now since Zn is a principal ideal ring (PIR), so Znvi=vi=gcd(vi,n). Since sum of two ideals is again an ideal, so the adjacency criterion in Γ(Zn) becomes the following:

(2)viis adjacent tovjinΓ(Zn)gcd(vi,vj,n)=1.

We have V(Γ(Zn))=ST, where S={a:gcd(a,n)=1} and T=ZnS. Clearly, for all vS, deg(v)=n1, and deg(0)=φ(n). Let G1 denote the induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) on the set S and G2 denote the induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) on the set T. We have,

Γ(Zn)=G1G2Kφ(n)G2.

Again, if we let G2 to be the induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) on the set T{0}, then

(3)Γ(Zn)Kφ(n)G2Kφ(n)(G2K1).

We can make the following observations as applications of equation (3).

Proposition 3.1

Γ(Zn)is complete if and only ifnis prime.

Proof

Using equation (3), Γ(Zn) is complete if and only if K1G2 is complete. Now K1G2 is complete if and only if G2 is a null graph. Now, G2 is a null graph if and only if every non-zero element in Zn is a unit, which in turn implies that Zn is a field. Now since Zn is a field if and only if n is a prime, we conclude that Γ(Zn) is complete if and only if n is a prime number.□

Proposition 3.2

Ifn>2, thenΓ(Zn)is not bipartite.

Proof

Since n3, so φ(n)2. We take v1,v2Kφ(n), and v3G2K1. By using equation (3), we find that v1v2v3v1 forms a cycle of length 3. By using Theorem 2.1, we conclude that Γ(Zn) is not bipartite.□

Theorem 3.3

The characteristic polynomial ofΓ(Zn)isμ(Γ(Zn))=x(xn)φ(n)μ(G2,xφ(n)), whereG2is given by equation (3).

Proof

By using equation (3) and Theorems 2.2 and 2.3, we obtain,

(4)μ(Γ(Zn))=μ(G1G2)=μ(Kφ(n)G2)=x(xn)(xφ(n))(x(nφ(n)))μ(Kφ(n),x(nφ(n)))μ(G2,xφ(n))=x(xn)(xφ(n))(x(nφ(n)))(x(nφ(n)))(xn)φ(n)1μ(G2,xφ(n))=x(xn)φ(n)(xφ(n))μ(G2,xφ(n))=x(xn)φ(n)μ(G2,xφ(n)).

The following observations about μ(Γ(Zn)) are evident:

Corollary 3.4

Ifn>2, thennis an eigenvalue ofΓ(Zn)with multiplicity at leastφ(n).

Corollary 3.5

Ifn=p, wherepis a prime number, thenpand 0 are eigenvalues ofΓ(Zn)with multiplicityp1and 1, respectively.

From equation (4) of Theorem 3.3, we find that the eigenvalues of Γ(Zn) are known if the spectrum of G2 given in equation (3) is completely determined. We thus proceed to study the graph G2 in more detail.

3.1 Structure of G2

Let n=p1α1p2α2pkαk be a prime factorization of n, where p1<p2<<pk are primes and αi are positive integers. We say that d is a proper divisor of n if d divides n and d{1,n}. The total number of positive divisors of n equals (α1+1)(α2+1)(αk+1). The total number of proper positive divisors of n will be given by w=(α1+1)(α2+1)(αk+1)2.

Let d1<d2<<dw be the set of all proper divisors of n arranged in increasing order. For each di, where 1iw, we define

(5)Adi={x:gcd(x,n)=di}.

Any element of Adi is of the form zdi, where gcdz,ndi=1 and hence the number of elements of Adi is φndi. Thus, Adi=φndi. Clearly, V(G2)=i=1wAdi.

Lemma 3.6

xiAdiis adjacent toxjAdjif and only ifgcd(di,dj)=1.

Proof

Assume that xiAdi is adjacent to xjAdj. Using equation (2), xi adjacent to xj implies that either gcd(xi,xj)=1 or gcd(xi,xj) is a unit in Zn. We consider the following two cases:

  1. gcd(xi,xj)=1. Let gcd(di,dj)=d, then ddi,ddj. Since gcd(xi,n)=di and gcd(xj,n)=dj, we have dixi and djxj, which in turn implies that dxi and dxj. Again since gcd(xi,xj)=1, d=1 and hence gcd(di,dj)=1.

  2. gcd(xi,xj) is a unit in Zn. Let gcd(xi,xj)=a which is a unit in Zn and hence, gcd(a,n)=1. Let gcd(di,dj)=d, then ddi,ddj. Since gcd(xi,n)=di and gcd(xj,n)=dj, we have dixi,din and djxj,djn, which in turn implies that dxi, dxj and dn. Since gcd(xi,xj)=a, da. Since gcd(a,n)=1, from the facts that da and dn, it follows that d=1. Hence, gcd(di,dj)=1.

Thus if xiAdi is adjacent to xjAdj, then gcd(di,dj)=1.

Conversely, we now assume that gcd(di,dj)=1. Let d=gcd(xi,xj). We claim that either d=1 or d is a unit in Zn. Assume the contrary, then d>1 and d is not a unit in Zn, which implies d(>1) divides n.

Ifd=gcd(xi,xj),thendxi,dxj(dxi,dn)and(dxj,dn)ddi=gcd(xi,n)andddj=gcd(xj,n)dgcd(di,dj)=1,which is a contradiction.

Thus, either d=1 or d is a unit in Zn, and hence, xi+xj=d=Zn which implies by equation (2) that xiAdi is adjacent to xj in Adj.□

Lemma 3.7

IfviAdiis adjacent tovjAdjfor someij, thenviis adjacent tovjfor allvjAdj.

Proof

Let viAdi is adjacent to vjAdj for some ij, then using Lemma 3.6gcd(di,dj)=1. Let vjvj be another member of Vj, then gcd(vj,n)=dj. Using the fact that gcd(di,dj)=1 and Lemma 3.6, we conclude that vj is adjacent to vi.□

Lemma 3.8

No two members of the setAdiare adjacent.

Proof

If vi,vjAdi, then gcd(vi,n)=gcd(vj,n)=di. Using Lemma 3.6, the proof follows.□

If viAdi, using Lemma 3.7, we observe that the number of neighbors of vi in Adj, where ji is fixed, i.e., either the number of neighbors of vi in Adj equals 0 or Adj. Also using Lemma 3.8, the number of neighbors of vi in Adi equals 0 for all 1iw. If we denote Vi=Adi, where 1iw, then using Definition 2.5, we find that V1V2Vw is an equitable partition of graph G2.

Thus, we have the following theorem:

Theorem 3.9

For anyn2, the induced subgraphG2ofΓ(Zn)with vertex setV(G2)has an equitable partition asV(G2)=i=1wAdi, wherewdenotes the total number of positive proper divisors ofnand the setsAdihave been defined as in equation (5).

Using Theorems 3.9 and 2.7, it is evident that G2 is the H-join of the graphs Gdi, where Gdi is the induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) on Adi, and H can be obtained as follows:

Construction of H:

V(H)={di:1iw,wherediis a positive proper divisor ofn}. The vertices di,dj are adjacent in H if and only if gcd(di,dj)=1. Thus, E(H)={didj:gcd(di,dj)=1}.

We use Theorem 2.8 to determine the spectrum of G2. We find that G2 is the H- join of Gdi, where Gdi is a null graph on φndi vertices. Hence, σ(Gdi)={0}. Also,

NH(dj)={di:gcd(di,dj)=1},

and hence,

Ndj=diNH(dj)ni=di:gcd(di,dj)=1φndi.

Moreover, ndi=φndi, where 1iw.

Figure 1 HH for n=pqrn=pqr.
Figure 1

H for n=pqr.

Example 3.10

If n=pqr, where p,q,andr, are primes with p<q<r, then the proper positive divisors of n are p,q,r,pq,pr,qr. Using the construction of H given earlier, we find that G2 is the H join of Gp,Gq,Gr,Gpq,Gpr,Gqr, where H is given by Figure 1.

Now we have,

(6)Np=φpqrq+φpqrr+φpqrqr=φ(pr)+φ(pq)+φ(p)=(p1)(r1)+(p1)(q1)+(p1)=(p1){r1+q1+1}=(p1)(q+r1).Similarly,Nq=(q1)(p+r1),Nr=(r1)(p+q1)Npq=(p1)(q1),Npr=(p1)(r1)andNqr=(q1)(r1).

Also

(7)np=(q1)(r1),nq=(p1)(r1),nr=(p1)(q1)npq=r1,npr=q1,nqr=p1.

Using Theorem 2.8, we find that the eigenvalues of G2 are (p1)(q+r1) with multiplicity qrrq, (q1)(p+r1) with multiplicity prrp, (r1)(p+q1) with multiplicity pqpq, (p1)(q1) with multiplicity r2, (p1)(r1) with multiplicity q2, and (q1)(r1) with multiplicity p2 and remaining eigenvalues are the eigenvalues of 6×6 matrix M (equation (1)) whose entries can be determined from equations (6) and (7).

We now find the spectrum of Γ(Zn) for n=pαqβ, where p,q are primes, and α,β are nonnegative integers.

Theorem 3.11

Whenn=pm, wherepis a prime andm>1is a positive integer, then the eigenvalues ofΓ(Zn)arenwith multiplicityφ(n), φ(n)with multiplicitynφ(n)1and 0 with multiplicity 1.

Proof

When p is a prime and m>1 is a positive integer, the proper divisors of pm are p,p2,p3,,pm2,pm1. We partition the vertex set V(G2) of G2 as V1,V2,,Vm2,Vm1, where Vi=Api={x:gcd(x,n)=pi}.

Since gcd(pi,pj)=pmin{i,j}1, using Lemmas 3.6 and 3.8, we find that xiVi is not adjacent to xjVj for all 1i,jm1.

Thus, no two vertices in the graph G2 are adjacent and hence G2=K¯nφ(n)1. By using equation (4), we obtain μ(Γ(Zn))=x(xn)φ(n)(xφ(n))nφ(n)1.

Theorem 3.12

Ifn=pαqβ, wherep,qare primes withp<qandα,βare positive integers, then the eigenvalues ofΓ(Zn)arenwith multiplicityφ(n), (t+1)(p1)+φ(n)with multiplicity(t+1)(q1)1, (t+1)(q1)+φ(n)with multiplicity(t+1)(p1)1, φ(n)with multiplicityt+1, and(t+1)(p+q2)+φ(n),0each with multiplicity 1, wheret=pα1qβ11.

Figure 2 G2{G}_{2} for n=pαqβn={p}^{\alpha }{q}^{\beta }.
Figure 2

G2 for n=pαqβ.

Proof

If n=pαqβ where p,q are primes with p<q and α,β are positive integers, then the proper divisors of n are piqj, where 0iα, 0jβ with i+j{0,α+β}. We partition the vertex set V(G2) as follows:

(8)V(G2)=(ApAp2Apα)(AqAq2Aqβ)(j=1βApqj)(j=1βAp2qj)(j=1β1Apαqj).

If 1iα, 1jβ, then gcd(pi,qj)=1. Using Lemmas 3.6 and 3.7, we find that every vertex of Api is adjacent to every vertex of Aqj.

Also Lemma 3.6 indicates that if 1iα, 1jβ with i+jα+β, then no vertex of Apiqj is adjacent to any other vertex of G2. If we draw the graph G2 with the vertex partitions as given in equation (8), it looks like Figure 2. (A solid line in the figure indicates that each vertex of Adi is adjacent to each vertex of Adj. No line between two nodes Adi and Adj indicates that no vertex of Adi is adjacent to any vertex of Adj.)

Let G21 be the induced subgraph of G2 on the set ApAp2Apα and G22 be the induced subgraph of G2 on the set AqAq2Aqβ.

Now the number of elements in ApAp2Apα is i=1αApi. Hence,

(9)i=1αApi=Ap+Ap2++Apα=φ(pα1qβ)+φ(pα2qβ)++φ(qβ)=pα111pqβ11q+pα211pqβ11q++p11pqβ11q+qβ11q=qβ11q11p{p+p2++pα1}+qβ11q=qβ11q11pp(pα11)p1+qβ11q=qβ11q(pα11+1)=qβ1pα1(q1).

Again the number of elements in the set AqAq2Aqβ is i=1βAqi. By using similar calculations as in equation (9), we find that

(10)i=1βAqi=pα1qβ1(p1).

The vertices of G2 that are not adjacent to any other vertex in G2 are the members of the set (j=1βApqj)(j=1βAp2qj)(j=1β1Apαqj). By using equations (9) and (10), the number of such vertices denoted by t equals

t=pαqβφ(pαqβ)1pα1qβ1(p1)pα1qβ1(q1)=pαqβ1pα1qβ1{(p1)(q1)+p1+q1}=pαqβ1pα1qβ1(pq1)=pα1qβ11.

Clearly, the induced subgraph of G2 on pα1qβ11 vertices is a null graph. Since every vertex of the graph G21 is adjacent to every vertex of the graph G22 and the remaining vertices of G2 are not adjacent to any other vertex, the following is evident

(11)G2=(G21G22)K¯t.

By using equations (9) and (10) and Theorem 2.2, we obtain

(12)μ((G21G22),x)=x(xpα1qβ1(q1))pα1qβ1(p1)1(xpα1qβ1(p1))pα1qβ1(q1)1(x(pα1qβ1(p+q2))).

By using Theorem 2.3, equations (11) and (12) we obtain,

(13)μ(G2,x)=xt×μ((G21G22),x)=xt+1(xpα1qβ1(q1))pα1qβ1(p1)1(xpα1qβ1(p1))pα1qβ1(q1)1(x(pα1qβ1(p+q2))).

By using equation (13) in equation (4), we have

μ(Γ(Zn),x)=x(xn)φ(n)μ(G2,xφ(n))=x(xn)φ(n)(xφ(n))t+1(xpα1qβ1(q1)φ(n))pα1qβ1(p1)1×(xpα1qβ1(p1)φ(n))pα1qβ1(q1)1(x(pα1qβ1(p+q2)φ(n))).

Thus, the eigenvalues of Γ(Zn) are n with multiplicity φ(n), (t+1)(p1)+φ(n) with multiplicity (t+1)(q1)1, (t+1)(q1)+φ(n) with multiplicity (t+1)(p1)1, φ(n) with multiplicity t+1, and (t+1)(p+q2)+φ(n),0 each with multiplicity 1.□

By using Corollary 3.5 and Theorems 3.11 and 3.12, the following is evident.

Theorem 3.13

Ifn=pαqβ, wherep,qare primes andα,βare non-negative integers, thenΓ(Zn)is Laplacian integral.

By using Theorem 3.12 and Kirchhoff’s matrix tree theorem [10], we have

Theorem 3.14

Ifn=pαqβ, wherep,qare primes andα,βare non-negative integers, then the number of spanning trees ofΓ(Zn)is expressed as follows:

st(Γ(Zn))=((t+1)pq)t(p1)(q1)((t+1)q(p1))(t+1)(q1)1((t+1)p(q1))(t+1)(p1)1×((t+1)(p1)(q1))t+1((t+1)(pq1))wheret=pα1qβ11.

4 Algebraic connectivity and vertex connectivity of Γ(Zn)

In this section, we investigate the algebraic connectivity (λn1) and vertex connectivity (κ) of Γ(Zn) for any n>2. We also show that λn1 and κ are equal for any n>2.

Lemma 4.1

Ifn>2, thenφ(n)is an eigenvalue ofΓ(Zn)with multiplicity at least 1.

Proof

Since 0 is always an eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of a given graph G, so the Laplacian matrix of the graph G2 also has 0 as an eigenvalue. By using equation (4), xφ(n) is a factor of μ(G2,xφ(n)), which in turn implies

(14)μ(Γ(Zn),x)=x(xn)φ(n)μ(G2,xφ(n))=x(xn)φ(n)(xφ(n))g(xφ(n)),

where g(x) is a polynomial of degree nφ(n)2. Hence, φ(n) is an eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) with multiplicity at least 1.□

Theorem 4.2

λn1(Γ(Zn))=φ(n).

Proof

Using Lemma 4.1, φ(n) is an eigenvalue of Γ(Zn). Since the smallest root of the polynomial g(xφ(n)) in equation (14) is φ(n) and 0<φ(n)<n, we conclude that the second smallest root of μ(Γ(Zn),x) is φ(n), which implies that λn1(Γ(Zn))=φ(n).□

Theorem 4.3

For alln>2, κ(Γ(Zn))=λn1(Γ(Zn))=φ(n).

Proof

By using equation (3), we find that Γ(Zn)=(G2K1)Kφ(n). If we take G1=G2K1 and G2=Kφ(n), we find that G1 is a disconnected graph on nφ(n) vertices and G2 is a graph on φ(n) vertices. Clearly, λn1(G2)=λn1(Kφ(n))=φ(n). We find that if we assume κ(Γ(Zn))=φ(n), then all the conditions of Theorem 2.6 along with the inequality λn1(G2)2κ(G)n are satisfied. Hence, we conclude that κ(Γ(Zn))=λn1(Γ(Zn))=φ(n).□

5 Largest and second largest eigenvalue of Γ(Zn)

In this section, we discuss the second largest eigenvalue λ2 of Γ(Zn), which in turn helps us to find certain information about the largest eigenvalue λ1 of Γ(Zn).

We first study the connectivity of G2.

Theorem 5.1

The graphG2is connected if and only ifnis a product of distinct primes.

Proof

Let n=p1α1p2α2pmαm, where pi are distinct primes and αi are positive integers, 1im.

We first assume that G2 is connected. To show that n is a product of distinct primes, we prove that αi=1 for all 1im. Assume the contrary that αi>1 for at least one i. Without loss of generality, we take α1>1. We consider the vertex a=p1p2p3pm of G2. Clearly, a0 as α1>1. Consider any other vertex of G2 say w. Since V(G2)=i=1wAdi, where Adi has been defined in equation (5), wAdi for some positive proper divisor di of n. Thus, gcd(w,n)=di. Also aAp1p2p3pm. Since gcd(di,p1p2p3pm)1, by using Lemma 3.6, we conclude that w is not adjacent to a. Since w is arbitrary, we find that the vertex aG2 is not adjacent to any other vertex of G2, which contradicts the fact that G2 is connected. Hence, our assumption that α1>1 is false. Thus, αi=1 for all 1im, which proves that n is a product of distinct primes.

Conversely, we assume that n is a product of distinct primes. To show that G2 is connected, we choose two arbitrary distinct vertices xi,xjG2. Then, xiAdi and xjAdj for some proper positive divisor di,dj of n. We consider the following two cases, which may arise.

  1. gcd(di,dj)=1

    Using Lemma 3.6, xi and xj are adjacent in G2.

  2. gcd(di,dj)1

    Since gcd(di,dj)1, di,dj have a prime factor in common. Since n is a product of distinct primes, so there exists a prime factor p1 of n such that gcd(di,p1)=1. Also it is possible to choose another prime factor p2p1 of n such that gcd(dj,p2)=1. Since gcd(p1,p2)=1, if we choose xp1Ap1 and xp2Ap2, then xp1 is adjacent to xp2. Thus, using Lemma 3.6, we obtain a path of length 3 from xi to xj given by xixp1xp2xj.

By combining cases 1 and 2, we find that any two vertices of G2 are either adjacent or there exists a path between them, which implies that G2 is connected when n is a product of distinct primes.

Thus, G2 is connected if and only if n is a product of distinct primes.□

We now investigate the connectivity of G¯2 when n is a product of distinct primes.

When n is a product of two distinct primes, i.e., n=pq, then n has only two distinct proper positive divisors namely p and q. Thus V(G2)=ApAq. Since gcd(p,q)=1, using Lemma 3.6, G2 becomes as shown in Figure 3.

(Here, the solid line indicates that each vertex of Ap is adjacent to each vertex of Aq).

Clearly, G¯2 is disconnected when n=pq.

In the next theorem, we investigate the connectivity of G¯2 when n is a product of more than two distinct primes.

Theorem 5.2

Ifnis a product of more than two distinct primes, thenG¯2is connected.

Proof

Let n=p1p2p3pm, where pi are distinct primes and m>2. Let xi,xj be two distinct vertices of G¯2. Then, xiAdi and xjAdj, where di,dj are positive proper divisors of n. We consider the following two cases:

  1. gcd(di,dj)1.

    Using Lemma 3.6, xiAdi is not adjacent to xjAdj in G2, which implies that xiAdi is adjacent to xjAdj in G¯2.

  2. gcd(di,dj)=1

    Using Lemma 3.6, xiAdi is not adjacent to xjAdj in G2. Let p1 be a prime factor of di and p2 be a prime factor of dj. Since n is a product of more than two distinct primes, so p1p2 is a positive proper divisor of n. Hence, using Lemma 3.6, there exists yAp1p2 such that xi,xj are not adjacent to y in G2. Thus, y is adjacent to both xi and xj in G¯2, and hence, there exists a path of length 2 given by xiyxj from xi to xj in G¯2.

Combining cases 1 and 2, we find that any two vertices of G¯2 are either adjacent or there exists a path between them which implies that G¯2 is connected when n is a product of more than two distinct primes.□

Theorem 5.3

λ2(Γ(Zn))n1, where equality holds if and only ifnis a product of two distinct primes.

Proof

Let λ1(G2) denote the largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of G2. By using equation (4) of Theorem 3.3, it is evident that the second largest eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) is the largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of G2, which implies

λ2(Γ(Zn))=λ1(G2)+φ(n).

Since G2 is a graph on nφ(n)1 vertices, using Theorem 2.4, we have λ1(G2)nφ(n)1, where equality holds if and only if G is connected and G¯2 is disconnected.

By using Theorems 5.1 and 5.2, we find that G2 is connected if and only if n is a product of distinct primes and G¯2 is disconnected if n is a product of two primes. Thus,

λ2(Γ(Zn))=λ1(G2)+φ(n)(nφ(n)1)+φ(n)=n1,

where equality holds if and only if n is a product of two primes.□

Theorem 5.4

For anyn>2, λ1(Γ(Zn))=nhas multiplicity exactlyφ(n).

Proof

By using Theorem 5.3, λ2(Γ(Zn))n1. Thus, from equation (4) of Theorem 3.3, we conclude that λ1=n has multiplicity exactly φ(n).□

Theorem 5.5

Ifn=i=1mpiαi, wherepiare distinct primes andαiare positive integers, thenφ(n)is an eigenvalue ofΓ(Zn)with multiplicityni=1mpi.

Proof

Let us first assume that n is a product of distinct primes, i.e., n=p1p2pm. By using Lemma 5.1, G2 is connected, and hence, 0 is an eigenvalue of L(G2) with multiplicity 1, which in turn using equation (4) implies that φ(n) is an eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) with multiplicity 1. Since ni=1mpi=1, the theorem holds true.

We now assume that n is not a product of distinct primes, i.e., αi>1 for at least one 1im. The set of vertices of G2 in p1p2pm{0} are not adjacent to any other vertex in G2. Since the set p1p2pm{0} has ni=1mpi1 elements, the graph G2 has ni=1mpi connected components. Hence, 0 is an eigenvalue of L(G2) with multiplicity ni=1mpi, which in turn using equation (4) implies that φ(n) is an eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) with multiplicity ni=1mpi.□

6 Properties of G2

In this section, we discuss some properties of G2 defined in equation (3), which is an induced subgraph of Γ(Zn). In the next theorem, we find the values of n for which G2 is bipartite.

Theorem 6.1

G2is bipartite if and only ifn=pαqβ, wherep,qare primes andα,βare positive integers.

Figure 3 G2{G}_{2} when n=pqn=pq.
Figure 3

G2 when n=pq.

Proof

If n=pαqβ, the positive proper divisors of n are p,p2,,pα1,pα, q,q2,,qβ1,qβ, and piqj, where, 1iα,1jβ,i+jα+β.

Since G2 is the induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) on the set T{0} and T{0}=diAdi, where di is a positive proper divisor of n, by using Lemma 3.6, we find that any vertex xApi, where 1iα is adjacent to every vertex of Aqj, where 1jβ (Figure 4).

Also the vertices in the sets Apiqj where 1iα,1jβ,i+jα+β are isolated.[1]

By using the aforementioned information, we partition the vertex set of G2 in the following way:

Let C be the set containing those vertices of Γ(Zn), which belong to Api, where 1iα and let D be the set consisting of those vertices of Γ(Zn), which belong to the sets Aqj, where 1jβ. We also put the remaining vertices of Γ(Zn), which belong to G2 in either C or D according to our wish.

Thus, G2=CD and for any edge xy in G, either xC,yD or xD,yC, which implies that G2 is bipartite.

Conversely, suppose that prime decomposition of n has more than two prime factors. Let n=i=1mpiαi, where pi are distinct primes and αi are positive integers. Let us further assume that m3.

We consider the vertices p1,p2, and p3 of Γ(Zn). Since gcd(pi,n)=pi1 for all 1i3, we find that pi are vertices of G2.

Clearly, piApi for all 1i3. By using Lemma 3.6, we find that pi’s are adjacent to each other and hence form a triangle. Thus, when m3, G2 contains a 3-cycle. By using Theorem 2.1, we conclude that G2 is not bipartite. Thus, G2 is not bipartite when the prime decomposition of n has more than two prime factors.

Hence, G2 is bipartite if and only if n=pαqβ, where p,q are primes and α,β are positive integers and the result follows.□

We now discuss the vertex connectivity of G2. Since G2 is connected if and only if n is a product of distinct primes, we discuss κ(G2) when n=p1p2pm, where pi, 1im are distinct primes. We first give an example to illustrate κ(G2).

Example 6.2

Suppose n=3×5×7. Consider the vertex 15 in G2. Consider the set 7{0}={7k:1k14}. We notice that 15 is adjacent only to the following vertices {7,14,28,49,56,77,91,98}. Thus, the set {7,14,28,49,56,77,91,98} is a separating set of G2.

The elements of the set {7,14,28,49,56,77,91,98} are of the form {7k:1k14,gcd(k,14)=1}. We find that κ(G2)8=φ(15).

We prove the aforementioned formally in the following theorem:

Theorem 6.3

Ifn=p1p2pm, thenκ(G2)φ(p1p2p3pm1).

Proof

We first verify the result when n is a product of two distinct primes. The graph of G2 when n is a product of two distinct primes has been shown in Figure 3. If n=p1p2, then G2 is the join of two disconnected graphs having vertex sets as Ap1 and Ap2, and hence, κ(G2)=min{V1,V2}=min{p11,p21}=p11=φ(p1), and hence, our result holds.

When n=i=1mpi where m>2, then the vertex p1p2pm1 of the graph G2 is adjacent only to those members a of the set pm{0} such that gcd(a,p1p2pm1)=1. The number of those elements a such that gcd(a,p1p2pk1)=1 equals φ(p1p2pm1). Since the vertices a for which gcd(a,p1p2pm1)=1 becomes a separating set of the graph G2, the result follows.□

Figure 4 Figure showing the adjacency between vertices of Api{A}_{{p}^{i}} and Aqj{A}_{{q}^{j}}.
Figure 4

Figure showing the adjacency between vertices of Api and Aqj.

7 Problems

In this section, we pose some problems for further research.

By using Theorem 3.13, we observe that Γ(Zn) is Laplacian integral for pαqβ, where p,q are primes and α,β are non-negative integers. Since it is quite motivating to find those graphs that are Laplacian integral, we ask the following:

Problem 7.1

Is it true that Γ(Zn) is Laplacian integral if and only if n=pαqβ, where p,q are primes and α,β are non-negative integers? If not, then find all n such that Γ(Zn) is Laplacian integral.

Again, in Section 6, we have provided an upper bound on the vertex connectivity of the graph G2, which is an induced subgraph of Γ(Zn). Although we have provided an upper bound on κ(G2), the readers are encouraged to calculate the exact value of κ(G2) if possible. Thus, we ask the following:

Problem 7.2

If n=p1p2pm where p1<p2<<pm are primes, find κ(G2).

8 Conclusion

In this paper, we have determined the Laplacian spectrum of the comaximal graph of the ring of integers modulo n, where n2. We first derive some structural properties and then determine an expression for the characteristic polynomial of Γ(Zn). We have also calculated the vertex connectivity and algebraic connectivity of Γ(Zn) and shown them to be equal for all n. An upper bound on the second largest Laplacian eigenvalue of Γ(Zn) has been obtained and a necessary and sufficient condition for its equality has also been determined. We further discuss the multiplicity of the Laplacian spectral radius and the multiplicity of the algebraic connectivity of Γ(Zn). In the end, we discuss the vertex connectivity of an induced subgraph of Γ(Zn) and also provide some problems for further research.

  1. Conflict of interest: Author states no conflict of interest.

  2. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] M. Fiedler, Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak Math. J. 23 (1973), no. 2, 298–305. 10.21136/CMJ.1973.101168Suche in Google Scholar

[2] N. M. M. De Abreu, Old and new results on algebraic connectivity of graphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 423 (2007), no. 1, 53–73. 10.1016/j.laa.2006.08.017Suche in Google Scholar

[3] R. Merris, Laplacian matrices of graphs: a survey, Linear Algebra Appl. 197 (1994), 143–176. 10.1016/0024-3795(94)90486-3Suche in Google Scholar

[4] D. B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, vol. 2, Upper Saddle River, Prentice hall, 2001. Suche in Google Scholar

[5] P. K. Sharma and S. M. Bhatwadekar, A note on graphical representation of rings, J. Algebra 176 (1995), no. 1, 124–127. 10.1006/jabr.1995.1236Suche in Google Scholar

[6] K. Samei, On the comaximal graph of a commutative ring, Canadian Math. Bulletin 57 (2014), no. 2, 413–423. 10.4153/CMB-2013-033-7Suche in Google Scholar

[7] S. M. Moconja and Z. Z. Petrović, On the structure of comaximal graphs of commutative rings with identity, Bulletin Australian Math. Soc. 83 (2011), no. 1, 11–21. 10.1017/S0004972710001875Suche in Google Scholar

[8] H. R. Maimani, M. Salimi, A. Sattari, and S. Yassemi, Comaximal graph of commutative rings, J. Algebra 319 (2008), no. 4, 1801–1808. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

[9] B. Mohar, Y. Alavi, G. Chartrand, and O. R. Oellermann, The Laplacian spectrum of graphs, Graph theory, Combinatorics Appl. 2 (1991), no. 871–898, 12. Suche in Google Scholar

[10] D. M. Cvetković, P. Rowlinson, and S. Simić, An Introduction to the Theory of Graph Spectra, vol. 75, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511801518Suche in Google Scholar

[11] S. J. Kirkland, J. J. Molitierno, M. Neumann, and B. L. Shader, On graphs with equal algebraic and vertex connectivity, Linear Algebra Appl. 341 (2002), no. 1–3, 45–56. 10.1016/S0024-3795(01)00312-3Suche in Google Scholar

[12] A. J. Schwenk, Computing the characteristic polynomial of a graph, Graphs and Combinatorics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1974, pp. 153–172. 10.1007/BFb0066438Suche in Google Scholar

[13] D. M. Cardoso, M. A. A. de Freitas, E. A. Martins, and M. Robbiano, Spectra of graphs obtained by a generalization of the join graph operation, Discrete Math. 313 (2013), no. 5, 733–741. 10.1016/j.disc.2012.10.016Suche in Google Scholar

[14] D. S. Dummit and R. M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991. Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-10
Revised: 2022-02-18
Accepted: 2022-02-21
Published Online: 2022-03-16

© 2022 Subarsha Banerjee, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. On the similarity to nonnegative and Metzler Hessenberg forms
  3. Cospectral constructions for several graph matrices using cousin vertices
  4. Perturbation analysis for the Takagi vector matrix
  5. On eigenvalues of a matrix arising in energy-preserving/dissipative continuous-stage Runge-Kutta methods
  6. Characteristic polynomial, determinant and inverse of a Fibonacci-Sylvester-Kac matrix
  7. Singular matrices that are products of two idempotents or products of two nilpotents
  8. Inverse properties of a class of seven-diagonal (near) Toeplitz matrices
  9. The group inverse of circulant matrices depending on four parameters
  10. Enumeration of some matrices and free linear codes over commutative finite local rings
  11. On some reciprocal matrices with elliptical components of their Kippenhahn curves
  12. The dual of number sequences, Riordan polynomials, and Sheffer polynomials
  13. Combinatorial properties of the enhanced principal rank characteristic sequence over finite fields
  14. Spectra inhabiting the left half-plane that are universally realizable
  15. Matrix Analysis for Continuous-Time Markov Chains
  16. Deficiency indices of block Jacobi matrices and Miura transformation
  17. On idempotent stable range 1 matrices
  18. On the spread of outerplanar graphs
  19. Bounds for the spectral radius of nonnegative matrices and generalized Fibonacci matrices
  20. The explicit formula for Gauss-Jordan elimination applied to flexible systems
  21. Special Issue: Contemporary Spectral Graph Theory
  22. The Aα-spectral radius of complements of bicyclic and tricyclic graphs with n vertices
  23. Graphs with the second signless Laplacian eigenvalue ≤ 4
  24. Eccentricity energy change of complete multipartite graphs due to edge deletion
  25. The minimum number of multiplicity 1 eigenvalues among real symmetric matrices whose graph is a nonlinear tree
  26. Star complements for ±2 in signed graphs
  27. Steiner distance matrix of caterpillar graphs
  28. Laplacian spectrum of comaximal graph of the ring ℤn
  29. The signless Laplacian matrix of hypergraphs
  30. On cospectrality of gain graphs
  31. Regularity-based spectral clustering and mapping the Fiedler-carpet
  32. Energy of a digraph with respect to a VDB topological index
Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/spma-2022-0163/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen