Startseite The effect of price discrimination on dynamic duopoly games with bounded rationality
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The effect of price discrimination on dynamic duopoly games with bounded rationality

  • Qi-Qing Song EMAIL logo , Wei-li Zhang , Yi-Rong Jiang und Juan Geng
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Dezember 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In a homogenous product market, customers’ different demand elasticities may lead to different prices. This study examined price discrimination’s effect on equilibrium points in Cournot duopoly games by assuming that each firm charges K prices and adjusts its strategies based on bounded rationality. In consideration of price discrimination, two discrete dynamic game systems with 2K variables were introduced for players with homogenous or heterogenous expectations. The stability of the Nash equilibrium point was found to be independent of price discrimination. Given price discrimination, the stability of boundary stationary points for the system with homogenous players is different from that for the system with heterogenous players. Numerical simulations verified the critical point for the system with homogenous players from being stable to its bifurcation.


Corresponding author: Qi-Qing Song, School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11661030

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2016GXNSFAA380059

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2018GXNSFAA281021

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11661030) and Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2016GXNSFAA380059, 2018GXNSFAA281021).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Agiza, H., and A. Elsadany. 2003. “Nonlinear Dynamics in the Cournot Duopoly Game with Heterogeneous Players.” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications 320: 512–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4371(02)01648-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Agiza, H. N., and A. A. Elsadany. 2004. “Chaotic Dynamics in Nonlinear Duopoly Game with Heterogeneous Players.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 149: 843–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0096-3003(03)00190-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Agiza, H. N., A. S. Hegazi, and A. A. Elsadany. 2001. “The Dynamics of Bowley’s Model with Bounded Rationality.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 12: 1705–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0779(00)00021-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Ahmed, E., and H. N. Agiza. 1998. “Dynamics of a Cournot Game with N-Competitors.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 9: 1513–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0779(97)00131-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Andaluz, J., and G. Jarne. 2019. “On Price Stability and the Nature of Product Differentiation.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 29: 741–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0584-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Andaluz, J., A. A. Elsadany, and G. Jarne. 2020. “Dynamic Cournot Oligopoly Game Based on General Isoelastic Demand.” Nonlinear Dynamics 99: 1053–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05333-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Bako, B., and A. Kalecz-Simon. 2012. “Price Discrimination in Asymmetric Cournot Oligopoly.” Economics Letters 116: 301–3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Bischi, G. I., and M. Kopel. 2001. “Equilibrium Selection in a Nonlinear Duopoly Game with Adaptive Expectations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 46: 0–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00188-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Bischi, G. I., and A. Naimzada. 1999. “Global Analysis of a Dynamic Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality.” In Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, 5, edited by J. A. Filar, V. Gaitsgory, and K. Mizukami, 361–85. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1336-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Bovy, J. 2005. Lyapunov Exponents and Strange Attractors in Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Also available at http://astro.utoronto.ca/bovy/undergrad_site/Matlabprograms.htm.Suche in Google Scholar

Cournot, A. 1838. Réserches sur les principles mathemátiques de la théorie de la richesse. Paris: Hachette.Suche in Google Scholar

Dana, R. A., and L. Montrucchio. 1986. “Dynamic Complexity in Duopoly Games.” Journal of Economic Theory 40: 40–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(86)90006-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Du, J. G., Y. Q. Fan, Z. H. Sheng, and Y. Z. Hou. 2013. “Dynamics Analysis and Chaos Control of a Duopoly Game with Heterogeneous Players and Output Limiter.” Economic Modelling 33: 507–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.045.Suche in Google Scholar

Dubiel-Teleszynski, T. 2011. “Nonlinear Dynamics in a Heterogeneous Duopoly Game with Adjusting Players and Diseconomies of Scale.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 16: 296–308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Elaydi, S. 2005. An Introduction to Difference Equations. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Elsadany, A. A. 2010. “Dynamics of a Delayed Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 52: 1479–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.06.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Elsadany, A. A. 2017. “Dynamics of a Cournot Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality Based on Relative Profit Maximization.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 294: 253–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.09.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Fanti, L. 2014. “The Dynamics of a Banking Duopoly with Capital Regulations.” Economic Modelling 37: 340–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Gale, I. 1993. “Price Dispersion in a Market with Advance-Purchases.” Review of Industrial Organization 8: 451–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01024281.Suche in Google Scholar

Guirao, J. L. G., and R. G. Rubio. 2009. “Detecting Simple Dynamics in Cournot-like Models.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 233: 1091–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Guirao, J. L. G., and R. G. Rubio. 2010. “Extensions of Cournot Duopoly: An Applied Mathematical View.” Applied Mathematics Letters 23: 836–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.01.030.Suche in Google Scholar

Guirao, J. L. G., M. A. Lpez, J. Llibre, and R. Martnez. 2012. “A note on the equilibria of an economic model with local competition “à la cournot”.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 236: 3052–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.11.030.Suche in Google Scholar

Hamed, K., and R.-K. Ashkan. 2012. “On the Stability of Quadratic Dynamics in Discrete Time N-Player Cournot Games.” Automatica 48: 1182–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazledine, T. 2006. “Price Discrimination in Cournot–Nash Oligopoly.” Economics Letters 93: 413–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazledine, T. 2010. “Oligopoly Price Discrimination with Many Prices.” Economics Letters 109: 150–3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Kutlu, L. 2009. “Price Discrimination in Stackelberg Competition.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 57. 364, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00382.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kutlu, L. 2012. “Price Discrimination in Cournot Competition.” Economics Letters 117: 540–3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.07.019.Suche in Google Scholar

Lampart, M. 2012. “Stability of the Cournot Equilibrium for a Cournot Oligopoly Model with N Competitors.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 45: 1081–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2012.05.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Mukherjee, A. 2010. “Price Discrimination in Oligopoly with Asymmetric Firms.” Economics Bulletin 30: 2668–70, http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2010/Volume30/EB-10-V30-I4-P245.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Puu, T. 1991. “Chaos in Duopoly Pricing.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 1: 573–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0779(91)90045-b.Suche in Google Scholar

Puu, T. 1996. “Complex Dynamics with Three Oligopolists.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 7: 2075–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0779(96)00073-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Rand, D. 1978. “Exotic Phenomena in Games and Duopoly Models.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 5: 173–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(78)90022-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosser, J. B. 2002. “The Development of Complex Oligopoly Dynamics Theory.” In Text Book Oligopoly Dynamics: Models and Tools, edited by T. Puu, and I. Sushko. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-24792-0_2Suche in Google Scholar

Theocharis, R. D. 1960. “On the Stability of the Cournot Solution on the Oligopoly Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies 27: 133–4, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296135.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, K., W. Xiong, and Y. Wang. 2013. “Complex Dynamics of a N-Players Cournot Game with Adaptive Adjustments.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 363–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2013.78.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, W. L., Q. Q. Song, and Y. R. Jiang. 2019. “Price Discrimination in Dynamic Cournot Competition.” In Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019. Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9231582.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0137).


Received: 2019-11-17
Accepted: 2020-12-05
Published Online: 2020-12-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 6.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2019-0137/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen