Startseite Asymmetric impact of uncertainty in recessions: are emerging countries more vulnerable?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Asymmetric impact of uncertainty in recessions: are emerging countries more vulnerable?

  • Pratiti Chatterjee ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. September 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper asks two questions “Does there exist heterogeneity in the response of macro variables to uncertainty shocks across advanced and emerging countries? and, “How important is the state of the economy for the effects of an uncertainty shock?. I analyze the recession-specific effects of uncertainty for a sample of 8 countries – the US, UK, France, Canada, Mexico, Chile Argentina, and South Korea. The results emphasize asymmetries along two dimensions – (1) An uncertainty shock disproportionately increases the depth and duration of a recession for an emerging country vis-a`-vis an advanced economy. Furthermore, I find that openness to trade exacerbates this decline and subsequently the pace of recovery in emerging countries in comparison to advanced economies. (2) Controlling for the state of the economy is crucial when quantifying the effects of an uncertainty shock. I show that a linear model – without regime differentiation – consistently underestimates the response of macroeconomic variables to uncertainty shocks when compared with the predictions from the recessionary regime of the nonlinear model. The extent of this under prediction is again disproportionately larger for emerging countries. The results in conjunction can potentially explain the excess volatility of macro variables for emerging countries during recessionary episodes.

JEL Classification: C32; E32; F41

Acknowledgement

I am grateful to Fabio Milani and Eric Swanson for their extensive guidance and research advice. I would like to thank the editor Bruce Mizrach, Jeremy Piger and two anonymous referees whose comments allowed me to improve my paper. I am grateful to the organizers of the 24th Annual Symposium of the Society for Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics for awarding this paper the James B. Ramsey student prize. I would like to thank the participants of the 24th Annual Symposium of the Society for Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics and the Fall 2016 Midwest Macro Meeting for helpful comments and discussions.

Appendix

Table 13:

Data Definitions.

CountryGDP – TotalGross fixed capital formationPrivate consumption expenditureGDP deflatorExports of goods and servicesImports of goods and servicesInterest rateUncertainty
US (1986Q1–2014Q2)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsEffective Federal Funds Rate – FREDCBOE VIX
UK (1979Q1–2014Q3)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic Indicators3-Month or 90-day Rates and Yields: Treasury Securities for the UK – FREDFTSE Composite Index
Canada (1990Q1–2014Q4)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsNot UsedComposite Index Toronto Stock Exchange
France (1991Q1–2014Q4)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsNot UsedStock Market Index – SBF 250 Index
South Korea (1975Q1–2014Q4)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsNot UsedKorea Stock Exchange – Kospi Composite Index
Mexico (1993Q1–2014Q2)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic Indicators3-Month or 90-day Rates and Yields: Treasury Securities for Mexico – FREDMexican Stock Exchange: Bolsa IPC
Chile (1996Q1–2014Q4)OECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsOECD Main Economic IndicatorsNot UsedSantiago Stock Exchange- IGPA Index
Argentina (1994Q3–2012Q2)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)IMF, International Financial Statistics (IFS)Not UsedBuenos Aires Stock Exchange – Merval Index
  1. Variables reported are seasonally adjusted and recorded in local currency units.

References

Aguiar, M., and G. Gopinath. 2007. “Emerging Market Business Cycles: The Cycle Is the Trend.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (1): 69–102.10.1086/511283Suche in Google Scholar

Auerbach, A. J., and Y. Gorodnichenko. 2012. “Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4 (2): 1–27.10.3386/w16311Suche in Google Scholar

Bachmann, R., S. Elstner, and E. Sims. 2013. “Uncertainty and Economic Activity: Evidence from Business Survey Data.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5 (2): 217–249.10.3386/w16143Suche in Google Scholar

Basu, S., and B. Bundick. 2017. “Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand.” Econometrica 85 (3): 937–958.10.3982/ECTA13960Suche in Google Scholar

Bernanke, B. S. 1983. “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1): 85–106.10.2307/1885568Suche in Google Scholar

Bloom, N.. 2009. “The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks.” Econometrica 77: (3): 623–685.10.3982/ECTA6248Suche in Google Scholar

Bloom, N.. 2014. “Fluctuations in Uncertainty.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28: (2): 153–176.10.1257/jep.28.2.153Suche in Google Scholar

Bloom, N., M. Floetotto, N. Jaimovich, I. Saporta-Eksten, and S. J. Terry. 2018. “Really Uncertain Business Cycles.” Econometrica 86 (3): 1031–1065.10.3982/ECTA10927Suche in Google Scholar

Caggiano, G., E. Castelnuovo, and J. M. Figueres. 2017. “Economic Policy Uncertainty and Unemployment in the United States: A Nonlinear Approach.” Economics Letters 151: 31–34.10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

Caggiano, G., E. Castelnuovo, and J. M. Figueres. 2018. “Economic Policy Uncertainty Spillovers in Booms and Busts.” CAMA Working Paper number 27/2018, edition, URL https://ssrn.com/abstract=3192234.10.2139/ssrn.3192234Suche in Google Scholar

Caggiano, G., E. Castelnuovo, and N. Groshenny. 2014. “Uncertainty Shocks and Unemployment Dynamics in the U.S. Recessions.” Journal of Monetary Economics 67: 78–92.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.006Suche in Google Scholar

Caggiano, G., E. Castelnuovo, and G. Nodari. 2017. “Uncertainty Shocks and Unemployment Dynamics: An Analysis of Post – WWII the U.S. Recessions.” Melbourne Institute Working Paper, number 9/17, edition.Suche in Google Scholar

Carrière-Swallow, Y., and L. F. Céspedes. 2013. “The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks in Emerging Economies.” Journal of International Economics 90: 316–325.10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.03.003Suche in Google Scholar

Chernozhukov, V., and H. Hong. 2003. “An MCMC Approach to Classical Estimation.” Journal of Econometrics 115: (): 293–346.10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00100-3Suche in Google Scholar

Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. “Investment under Uncertainty.” Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830176Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández-Villaverde, J., P. Guerrón-Quintana, J. F. Rubio-Ramírez, and M. Uribe. 2011. “Risk Matters: The Real Effects of Volatility Shocks.” American Economic Review 101 (6): 2530–2561.10.1257/aer.101.6.2530Suche in Google Scholar

Fisher, Richard W. (2013). “Uncertainty Matters - Remarks before the Causes & Macroeconomic Consequences of Uncertainty Conference,” https://www.dallasfed.org/news/speeches/fisher/2013/~/media/Documents/news/speeches/fisher/2013/fs131003.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Jordà, O. 2005. “Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections.” American Economic Review 95 (1): 161–182.10.1257/0002828053828518Suche in Google Scholar

Jurado, K., S. C. Ludvigson, and S. Ng. 2015. “Measuring Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 105 (3): 1177–1216.10.1257/aer.20131193Suche in Google Scholar

Lagarde, Christine (2015). “IMF Survey : Lagarde Calls for ‘Policy Upgrade’ to Combat Uncertain Global Outlook,” https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/28/04/53/sonew093015a.Suche in Google Scholar

Leduc, S., and Z. Liu. 2016. “Uncertainty Shocks are Aggregate Demand Shocks.” Journal of Monetary Economics 82: 20–35.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

Luukkonen, R., P. Saikonen, and T. Terasvirta. 1988. “Testing Linearity Against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models.” Biometrika 75 (3): 491–499.10.1093/biomet/75.3.491Suche in Google Scholar

Nieuwerburgh, S. V., and L. Veldkamp. 2006. “Learning Asymmetries in Real Business Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (4): 753–772.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

Rossi, B., and T. Sekhposyan. 2015. “Macroeconomic Uncertainty Indices Based on Nowcast and Forecast Error Distributions.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 105 (5): 650–655.10.1257/aer.p20151124Suche in Google Scholar

Scotti, C. 2016. “Surprise and Uncertainty Indexes: Real-Time Aggregation of Real-Activity Macro-Surprises.” Journal of Monetary Economics 82: 1–19.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.06.002Suche in Google Scholar

Terasvirta, T., and Y. Yang. 2014. “Specification, Estimation and Evaluation of Vector Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models with Applications.” 8, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus: CREATES Research Paper, 2014-4 edition.Suche in Google Scholar

Uribe, M., and V. Z. Yue. 2006. “Country Spreads and Emerging Countries: Who Drives whom?” Journal of International Economics 69: 6–36.10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.04.003Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2016-0148).


Published Online: 2018-09-08

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2016-0148/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen