Accusative-instrumental alternation in Polish

References

Boas, Hans C. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Wanner, Dieter & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory; 69), 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.69.14bosSearch in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. H. Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Bouma, Gerlof, Irene Kraemer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Search in Google Scholar

Buttler, Danuta. 1976. Innowacje składniowe współczesnej polszczyzny [Syntactic innovations of contemporary Polish]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 1993. Radial categories in grammar: The Polish instrumental case. In Linguistica Silesiana 15, 83–94.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa & Michael Tomasello. 2008. Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children's acquisition of the instrumental construction. In Journal of child language 35 (3), 533–558.10.1017/S0305000908008660Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2004. Constructions at the crossroads: The place of construction grammar between field and frame. In Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2 (1), 197–233.10.1075/arcl.2.07glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2009. Polysemy, syntax, and variation. A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics. In Pourcel, Stephanie & Vyvyan Evans (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (= Human Cognitive Processing; 24), 77–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.08glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.). 2014. Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (= Human Cognitive Processing; 43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2018. Syntactic alternation research: Taking stock and some suggestions for the future. In Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31 (1), 8–29.10.1075/bjl.00001.griSearch in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2019. 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). In International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24 (3), 385–412.10.1075/ijcl.00011.griSearch in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Dagmar Divjak. 2009. Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. In Pourcel, Stephanie & Vyvyan Evans (eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (= Human Cognitive Processing; 24), 57–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.07griSearch in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. In International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1), 97–129.10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06griSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Typological Studies in Language 46, 53–84.10.1075/tsl.46.04hasSearch in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Holvoet, Axel. 1991. Transitivity and clause structure in Polish: A study in case marking (= Prace Slawistyczne; 95). Warszawa: Slawistyczny Ośrodek Wydawniczy.Search in Google Scholar

Hoop, Helen de & Andrej L. Malchukov. 2008. Case-marking strategies. In Linguistic Inquiry 39 (4), 565–587.10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. In Language 56, 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Kopka, Sonia. 2002. “Rzucać”- co, czym, kto, kogo?: Studium znaczeniowe [“Throw”: A semantic study]. Kraków: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, Adam, Mirosław Bańko, Rafał L. Górski & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, Adam, Elżbieta Hajnicz, Agnieszka Patejuk, Marcin Woliński, Filip Skwarski & Marek Świdziński. 2014. Walenty: Towards a comprehensive valence dictionary of Polish. In Calzolari, Nicoletta, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), The Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), 2785–2792. Reykjavík, Iceland.Search in Google Scholar

Przybylska, Renata. 2002. Polisemia przyimków polskich w świetle semantyki kognitywnej [The polysemy of Polish prepositions from the perspective of cognitive semantics]. Kraków: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, Torsten Hothorn & Achim Zeileis. 2009. Party on!: A new, conditional variable-important measure for random forests available in the party package. In The R Journal 1 (2), 14–17.10.32614/RJ-2009-013Search in Google Scholar

Szupryczyńska, Maria. 1973. Syntaktyczna klasyfikacja czasowników przybiernikowych [Verbs in constructions with the accusative – a syntactic classification]. Warszawa, Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. H. Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. In Language variation and change 24 (2), 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. In Journal of Linguistics 21, 385–396.10.1017/S0022226700010318Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. The case for surface case. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Phillip. 2003. Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. In Cognition 88, 1–48.10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00004-0Search in Google Scholar

Żelazko, Kazimierz. 1975. Czasowniki przechodnie o składni wielorakiej w języku polskim [Transitive verbs with multiple syntactic patterns] (= Prace Instytutu Języka Polskiego; 10). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Wydawnictwo PAN.Search in Google Scholar