Home Linguistics & Semiotics Are Verb-Noun Compounds Syntactically or Lexically Related to Verb Phrases?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Are Verb-Noun Compounds Syntactically or Lexically Related to Verb Phrases?

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 5, 2022

Abstract

This paper explores the links between Spanish verb-noun (VN) compounds and verb phrases (VPs) (limpiabotas lit. ‘clean+boots’ ‘shoe shine’/limpiar botas ‘to clean boots’), particularly between those with idiomatic meaning (metepatas lit. ‘put+paws’ ‘bungler’/meter la pata lit. ‘put the paw’ ‘to put your foot in it’). I discuss the theoretical implications of different accounts of the phrase-compound divide, namely, whether or not compounds are created by rules of a different nature than those for phrases (lexicalist vs. neoconstructionist approaches), and whether or not VN compounds can be derived from phrases through applying any kind of transformation. I show that VN compounds share key properties with VPs which could justify their treatment as syntactic objects. By contrast, the VN compound pattern presents unique restrictions that challenge the empirical adequacy of derivational approaches, which are likely to overgenerate ill-formed compounds from existing phrases. Once stored as lexical objects, however, VN compounds and VP idioms may evidence strong semantic connections as illustrated by the pair metepatas/meter la pata, which suggests the need to carefully examine lexical associations to ensure a balanced understanding of the phrase-compound divide.


Corresponding author: Bárbara Marqueta Gracia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: Spanish State Research Agency (AEI) & FEDER (EU)

Award Identifier / Grant number: FFI2017-82460-P

Funding source: Psylex Research Group

  1. Research funding: This research was supported by the Spanish State Research Agency (AEI) & FEDER (EU) grant FFI2017-82460-P, and a Government of Aragon grant to the Psylex Research Group.

References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2010. The role of syntax and morphology in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 21–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.04ackSearch in Google Scholar

Alvar, Manuel. 1984. De nuevo sobre los compuestos de verbo más sustantivo. In Manuel Alvarcoord (ed.), Actas del II simposio internacional de lengua española, 83–97. Gran Canaria: La muralla.Search in Google Scholar

Arnaud, Pierre. 2008. Semantic complexity in English [NN] N compounds. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics 12. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.962.Search in Google Scholar

Bisetto, Antonietta. 1994. Italian compounds of the “accendigas” type: A case of endocentric formation? Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Bok-Bennema, Reineke & Brigitte Kampers-Manhe. 2006. Taking a closer look at romance VN compounds. In Chido Nishida & Jean Paul Montreuil (eds.), New perspectives on Romance linguistics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.275.04bokSearch in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bosque, Ignacio. 2001. Sobre el concepto de ‘colocación’ y sus límites. Lingüística Española Actual 23(1). 9–40.Search in Google Scholar

Bosque, Ignacio. 2012. On the lexical integrity hypothesis and its (in)accurate predictions. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(1). 140–173.Search in Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolph. 1984. Morphological mechanisms. Lexicalist analyses of synthetic compounding. New York: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Centro Virtual Cervantes (s.f.). Banco de neologismos. http://cvc.cervantes.es/lengua/banco_neologismos/default.htm (accessed 25 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Coseriu, Eugenio. 1978. Gramática, semántica, universales. Estudios de gramática funcional. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Di sciullo, Anna Maria. 1991. On the structure of deverbal compounds. Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 72–112.Search in Google Scholar

Di sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Espinal, Maria Teresa & Jaume Mateu. 2010. On classes of idioms and their interpretation. Journal of pragmatics 42(5). 1397–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.016.Search in Google Scholar

Everaert, Martin, Erik-Jan van der Linden, Andr Schenk, Rob Schreuder & Robert Schreuder. 1995. Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Fábregas, Antonio. 2005. La definición de la categoría gramatical en una morfología orientada sintácticamente. Nombres y adjetivos. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fábregas, Antonio. 2014. On a grammatically relevant definition of word and why it belongs to syntax. In Iraide Ibarretxe & José Luis Mendívil (eds.), To be or not to be a word: New reflections on the definition of word, 94–130. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Soriano, Olga. 2012. Las expresiones idiomáticas y los compuestos VN. In Antonio Fábregas, Elena Felíu, Josefa Martín & José Pazó (eds.), Los límites de la morfología: Estudios ofrecidos a Soledad Varela Ortega, 193–206. Madrid: UAM.10.15366/l.morfologia2012.011Search in Google Scholar

Franco, Ludovico. 2015. VN compounds in Italian and some other romance languages. Phrasal spell-out and rebooting. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 37(1). 81–98.Search in Google Scholar

Floricic, Franck. 2008. The Italian verb-noun anthroponymic compounds at the syntax/morphology interface. Morphology 18(2). 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9126-9.Search in Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz. 2009. The English compound stress myth. Word Structure 2(1). 1–17.10.3366/E1750124509000270Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in distributed morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 204–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0007Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice. 2006. Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82(1). 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0037.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, Juan Ignacio. 2007. Stress removal and stress addition in Spanish. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 6(1). 59–89. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.145.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the Lexicon. Language 51(3). 639–671. https://doi.org/10.2307/412891.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray & Jenny Audring. 2020. The texture of the lexicon. Relational morphology and the parallel architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198827900.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Janda, Laura. 2011. Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics 22(2). 359–392. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.014.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfeld, Malena. 2004. La formación de palabras en la sintaxis desde la perspectiva de la Morfología Distribuida. Buenos Aires: UBA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Langer, Stefan. 2004. A linguistic test battery for support verb constructions. Lingvisticae Investigationes 27(2). 171–184.10.1075/li.27.2.03lanSearch in Google Scholar

Lees, Robert. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Sergio Scalise. 2006. The lexical integrity hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 6. 7–32.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Marqueta, Bárbara. 2018. Una propuesta de categorización sin morfemas para el compuesto lavaplatos. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 32. 219–236.10.14198/ELUA2018.32.10Search in Google Scholar

Marqueta, Bárbara. 2019. La composición, la arquitectura del léxico y la sintaxis de las palabras con estructura interna en español. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Mendívil, José Luis. 1999. Las palabras disgregadas. Sintaxis de las expresiones idiomáticas y los predicados complejos. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias.Search in Google Scholar

Moyna María Irene. 2011. Compound words in Spanish. Theory and history. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.316Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 1974. The regularity of idiom behavior. Lingua 34(4). 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(74)90002-3.Search in Google Scholar

Nóbrega, Vitor. 2014. On merge and word formation: The case of compounds. Unpublished manuscript. Sao Paulo: University of Sao Paulo.Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag Ivan & Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70(3). 491–538. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1994.0007.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. A theory of computational lexical semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española. 2016. Corpus diacrónico del español. RAE. Available at: http://corpus.rae.es/cordenet.html.Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española. 2017. Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Available at: https://dle.rae.es/.Search in Google Scholar

Rainer, Franz & Soledad Varela. 1992. Compounding in Spanish. Rivista di Lingüística 4(1). 117–142.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2013. Compounding in modern Greek. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112328040Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio, Antonio Fábregas & Francesca Forza. 2009. Exocentricity in compounding. Gengo Kenkyū 135. 49–84.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shwayder, Kobey. 2015. Word-level recursion in Spanish compounds. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(1). 1–2.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Word formation and syntax. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), The handbook of word formation, 73–97. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_4Search in Google Scholar

Val Álvaro, José Francisco. 1999. La composición. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 4757–4841. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, Soledad. 1990. Composición nominal y estructura temática. Revista Española de Lingüística 20(1). 55–81.Search in Google Scholar

Vergnaud, Jean Roger & María Luisa Zubizarreta. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4). 595–652.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67. 439–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-05
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/shll-2022-2064/html
Scroll to top button