Home Linguistics & Semiotics Is modernity really so bad? John Deely and Husserl's phenomenology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Is modernity really so bad? John Deely and Husserl's phenomenology

  • Derek S. Jeffreys
Published/Copyright: March 19, 2010
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2010 Issue 178

Abstract

This essay critically assesses John Deely's treatment of Edmund Husserl's phenomenology in the Four ages of understanding. First, it outlines Deely's compelling account of how the modern “Way of Ideas” confuses representation and signification. Second, it notes Deely's charge that Husserl is an idealist who thinks the mind constitutes what it knows. Third, it maintains that the early Husserl cannot be an idealist because he attacks psychologism, nominalism, and modern representational epistemologies. Fourth, discussing intentionality, the essay considers Husserl's account of how the mind discovers that mental contents are ideal, atemporal entities. Finally, it suggests that by labeling Husserl an idealist, Deely disregards valuable aspects of modernity.

Published Online: 2010-03-19
Published in Print: 2010-February

© 2010 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/New York

Downloaded on 21.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.2010.008/html
Scroll to top button