Abstract
According to conceptual metaphor, this study finds and categorizes three metaphors in perfume commercials: FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, and FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT. Drawing on the analytical tool of multimodal metaphor analysis, the study further analyzes how perfume commercials complete the metaphorical operation mechanism of mapping from visual and auditory modes to olfactory. It is found that, different from the traditional definition of a concrete source domain and an abstract target domain in conceptual metaphors, the joint participation of multiple modes in commercials may cause a reversal of the degree of abstraction between the source and the target. Due to the limitation of transmitting olfactory information in fragrance commercials where the audience can only receive audible and visual information, “scent” becomes a more abstract concept, while the abstract concepts of “attraction” and “emotion” become a more concrete source. Additionally, the three metaphors’ advertising effects in fragrance commercials are evaluated. Theoretical implications for future studies in multimodal metaphor analysis are also discussed.
1 Introduction
Perfumes have played a crucial role in social communication (Lindqvist 2012a, 2012b), as scent can affect people’s emotions (Richard Ortegón et al. 2023), mate attraction (Allen et al. 2016), personality judgments (Sorokowska et al. 2012, 2016), and atmosphere perception (Kjellmer 2021). In the commercial market, fragrance has become a popular luxury with the help of advertising marketing skills. As commercials involve multiple “modes” such as pictures, music, and language to deliver information (Cook 1992: 37), studies on perfume commercials take into account the interaction of different modes together no matter in which specific areas (Lindqvist 2012a, 2012b; Linke 2013; Zhang and Wu 2018).
Semiotics, a field of study about the interaction of signs and symbols, has provided valuable analytical perspectives in evaluating advertising. Semiotic studies in advertising have concentrated on the interplay of signs and symbols, how they convey information, create meanings, and elicit the audience’s emotions and perceptions of the brands or products (O’Barr 1994; Zakia and Nadin 1987). Based on the key elements such as signifiers, signifieds, symbolism, and visual composition in the semiotics approach, this research can delve into how perfume advertisements deliver messages to consumers through semiotic expressions.
Existing semiotics studies on perfumes have focused on various topics ranging from the gender stereotype of women (Linke 2013), linguistic use or pictorial information (Zhang and Wu 2018), to the perfume product’s theme and culture (Deng 2014), while little research has highlighted the core of perfume: its scent. The neglect of fragrance scent in current studies on perfume commercials is related to the limit of transmitting olfactory information through television and computer screens. Therefore, this study plans to bridge the research gap to investigate how perfume commercials promote scent through the interaction of multiple modes, including visual images, language, and acoustic music and sound.
Multimodal metaphors have helped to explain the abstract transformation from audio-visual information to olfactory information in fragrance commercials. Metaphor has been viewed as a mode of thought that structures human patterns of thought and action, and its essence is to employ one concept to understand and experience another (Lakoff and Johnson 2003). In the fundamental structure of a metaphor “A IS B,” the target domain A is a much more abstract concept, whereas the source domain B is a more concrete one (Kövecses and Benczes 2010). The process of an understandable source domain projecting and describing information of an abstract target domain is defined as “mapping” (Kövecses and Benczes 2010; Lakoff and Johnson 2003).
Based on conceptual metaphor, the notion of metaphor has been extended from the single dimension of verbal language to multiple modes. Multimodal metaphors are defined as metaphors “whose target and source are each represented exclusively or predominantly” (Forceville 2009a: 24). As commercials include pictorial visual and audio information, that is, multiple modes, the present study employs a multimodal metaphor analysis to explore the operation mechanism of the metaphorical mapping of perfume commercials from visual and auditory modes (images, texts, music, sounds) to olfactory mode. By doing so, this study intends to investigate how fragrance commercials promote the scent of products by analyzing the construction process of multimodal metaphors in perfume commercials; this study intends to address the following three research questions:
What types of metaphors for fragrance can be found in perfume commercials?
How do the metaphorical mappings work in these olfactory metaphors between different modes?
How do advertising effects differ in the three types of metaphors?
2 Literature review
2.1 The theory of conceptual metaphor
A metaphor was commonly considered a rhetorical device that merely related to language. Ortony (1993: 210), however, put forward that “metaphor is not a figure of speech, but a mode of thought,” triggering a heated debate among academics. Lakoff and Johnson (2003) agreed that metaphors are related to human thought and actions, and proposed conceptual metaphor theory. In Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson (2003) defined metaphors as a way of “understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another” (2003: 5). They explained that conceptual metaphor exists in language, human thoughts, and actions, and the conceptual system governing how humans think and act is metaphorical. The metaphorical process has been considered unidirectional from concept A to concept B in the basic metaphor A IS B. Meanwhile, they defined the target domain (concept A) as a more abstract concept, while the source domain (concept B) as a more concrete concept (Kövecses and Benczes 2010). As such, conceptual metaphors referred to using a more concrete source domain to describe and interpret a more abstract domain, with the mapping from the source domain to the target domain relying on the similarities between the two domains. For example, in the metaphor IDEAS ARE FOOD, the similarities between IDEAS and FOOD are that they “both can be swallowed, digested, and devoured, and both can nourish you” (Lakoff and Johnson 2003: 148).
2.2 The framework of multimodal metaphor
Hinged on conceptual metaphor theory, Forceville (1996) studied metaphor in different modes rather than a single mode, extending conceptual metaphors to the context of multiple modes. The Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising (Forceville 1996) saw the research on metaphor shift from the verbal mode to pictorial metaphors, which triggered mounting studies in social media discourse to shift their focus on the dynamic metaphors in multiple modes such as visual images, auditory sounds, olfactory information, etc. (Feng 2017, 2019; Feng and O’Halloran 2013; Forceville 2002, 2006; 2007; Forceville and Urios-Aparisi 2009; Liu and Li 2022; Pérez Sobrino 2017).
In particular, Forceville and Urios-Aparisi’s (2009) Multimodal Metaphor, a collection of multimodal metaphors research, stated that “multimodal metaphors are metaphors whose target and source are each represented exclusively or predominantly in different modes” (Forceville 2009a: 24) and classified modality into pictorial signs, gestures, sounds, music, smells, tastes, and touch (Forceville 2009a: 22). There are abundant studies on multimodal metaphors in different modes. For example, studies on advertisements (Caballero 2009; Koller 2009; Urios-Aparisi 2009; Yu 2009), comics and animation (Eerden 2009; Shinohara and Matsunaka 2009) and political cartoons (El Refaie 2009; Schilperoord and Maes 2009; Teng 2009; Yus 2009) concentrate on pictorial metaphors, providing hints for the analysis methods of metaphors in visual mode in this thesis. Additionally, regarding the modes of smell and touch, Caballero (2009) found that the characteristics of the senses of taste and smell were transformed by the shared “words” of pictures and language. In this sense, it is relevant for the current study to investigate how advertisements exhibit the smell of fragrance with multimodal metaphor analysis.
In terms of the modes of music and sounds, some academics (Forceville 2009b; Spitzer 2004; Zbikowski 2009) discuss the modes of nonverbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor based on Speech, Music, Sound by van Leeuwen (1999), which contributed to the analysis of metaphors in auditory modes in this study. Additionally, recent research by Kou and Liang (2022) has delved into the metaphors in food advertisements in multiple modes, such as text and sound, in China and America, further providing new insights into how cultural differences influenced the multimodal metaphor applications in advertising.
According to Multimodal Metaphor, several principles for employing multimodal metaphor analysis should be highlighted. Firstly, it is necessary to distinguish multimodal metaphors from monomodal metaphors. In the form of a monomodal metaphor, the source is merely triggered in the same mode as the target. Conversely, in the way of multimodal metaphor, the source would be represented in different modes from the target. Secondly, it is essential to make clear the differences between strict and broad definitions of multimodal metaphors. The target and source in multimodal metaphor differ from each other “exclusively or predominantly” (Forceville 2009a: 24). However, this definition is difficult to follow in fundamental analysis (Eggertsson and Forceville 2009). Many studies on multimodal metaphors adopted a broad definition: simultaneously, the metaphors represented in more than two modes are multimodal metaphors (Zhao 2011). As such, this study will employ a broad rather than strict definition.
2.3 Semiotic studies on advertising
Semiotics has been a study on the integration and meaning construction of signs and symbols in language, visual representation, gestures, and sounds in different cultural and social contexts (Eco 1979). Semiotics studies in advertising have investigated how signs and symbols interact, deliver information, creat meanings, and evoke consumers’ emotions and perceptions (O’Barr 1994; Williamson 1984; Zakia and Nadin 1987). The critical factors in semiotics studies in advertising included signs, signifiers, signifieds, symbolism, and visual composition, with the signifier defined as the concrete form of the sign, including words, images, colors, and sound, while the signified is the concept or meaning connected with the signifier (Chandler 2007; Danesi 2004; Džanić 2013).
Symbolism in the semiotics of advertising is regarded as a technique of using symbols to represent connotations that go beyond literal meanings (Džanić 2013). Symbolic communication in advertising is normally constructed in specific socio-cultural contexts with information, rhetorical, socially unifying, aesthetic, and educational functions (Petrovici 2014). Visual composition in the semiotics of advertising refers to the role of visual elements such as shapes, colors, and typography, which can evoke the audience’s emotions and attention (Van Niekerk 2018).
Recent years have seen increasing semiotics studies shedding light on advertising discourse (Bianchi 2011; Chen and Cheung 2022; Chirig et al. 2023; Hemais et al. 2022; Jabeen and Cheong 2024; Morris and Dobson 2023; Taghian and Ali 2023; Vermeer et al. 2022; Xing and Feng 2023). Among these studies, some researchers have employed a semiotic approach to investigate how advertisements convey emotions through the interaction of different modes to promote the advertised products. For example, by analyzing printing advertisements from semiotic perspectives, Bianchi (2011) asserted that the key issues in textual semiotics in advertisements are expressing passions and emotions through visual elements, which help advertisers to advertise their brands or products to the audience. Likewise, based on the semiotic approach, Taghian and Ali (2023) evaluated how viewers’ emotions are successfully elicited multimodally through stylistic and semiotic expressions in an American film, which also provides evidence that emotions can be transmitted between multiple modes through stylistic choices and semiotic strategies.
In addition, other studies have utilized a semiotic approach, particularly from the social semiotic perspective, to delve into the meaning-making of advertisements. For instance, based on Kress’s (2010: 108) theoretical framework focusing on “meanings to be made” and “means for making meanings,” Xing and Feng (2023) explored how intertextual references in thirty video advertisements are constructed with multimodal resources such as gestures, images, and language and create particular meanings to the audience. Inspired by this research focusing on meaning-making, the present research explores how different signs and symbols are employed in perfume commercials to generate meaning. However, different from Xing and Feng’s research, the present study plans to evaluate the meaning-making of the metaphors represented in multiple modes by illustrating the mechanisms through which the multimodal metaphors are constructed and how the metaphors contribute to the meaning-making of perfume advertisements.
Therefore, based on the existing literature, this study will explore what other elements can be conveyed through advertisements apart from “emotions” and “passions” and how these elements contribute to the meaning-making of the perfume commercials impinged on the semiotic approach.
2.4 Previous studies on perfume commercials
Based on a comprehensive review of current studies on perfume commercials, some studies concentrate on a single mode of the commercials (Zhang and Wu 2018), whereas others shed light on multiple modes (Deng 2014). Classified by the research field, the relevant studies were generally related to gender studies (Linke 2013) and marketing communication (Deng 2014). In gender studies, Linke (2013) evaluated how perfume advertising is a carrier of multiple modes reflected and reinforced the gender stereotype of women through the interplay of images, music, and language.
In marketing communication, researchers in linguistics tended to analyze perfume advertisements to provide suggestions for fragrance advertisers. For instance, Zhang and Wu (2018) probed into fragrance advertising at the levels of lexicon and syntax, drawing a comparison between male and female perfume advertising in terms of the diction of advertising language. They found similarities and differences between female and male perfume advertising in linguistic choice. Although the study at lexical and syntactical levels provided practical and theoretical implications for better language use in perfume advertising, the broader picture of fragrance advertisements has been hidden. The present study considers commercials as a form of information communication that employs language, sound, text, image, action, performance, and other comprehensive means of advertising, and therefore it is necessary to transfer research objects from language to visual images and audio sounds.
Therefore, recent years have witnessed mounting studies on multiple modes, such as pictorial signs, written signs, and music. Hu (2007) explored the compositional meaning of a perfume advertising case through the interactions of images and language based on a social semiotic approach. Also, in cognitive linguistics, Deng (2014) illustrated how a Chanel No. 5 perfume advertisement represented its design concept by evaluating the metaphors and metonymies in the advertising movie. Specifically, Deng evaluated the multimodal metaphors and metonymies in the commercial of two types of Chanel perfume through the interplay of visual, aural, olfactory, and tactile modes, which expressed the perfume theme of love and romance. Although this study mentioned the olfactory mode, it merely served for the interpretation of the design concept of the perfume.
Among the research in marketing discourse, on the one hand, multimodal discourse or semiotic analysis have been used to investigate the interaction of different modes in perfume advertisements, create a connection between the interaction and the design concept of the product or the main topic of the advertising, and explain how advertising successfully attracted the audience emotionally (Hu 2007). On the other hand, through multimodal metaphor analysis, the connotative meaning connected to the theme of perfume advertisements or the design concept behind products has been deciphered. For instance, Deng (2014) illustrated the conceptual metaphor of “love is a journey,” which was also the topic of the advertising movie, by analyzing the operating mechanism between source and target domains. However, these studies were inclined to accentuate how perfume advertisements promoted the design concepts behind the products while downplaying or ignoring the core of perfume products – scent. Considering all this, this study aims to fill such a research gap and focus on how the scent, the essential feature of perfume, is transmitted through the television screen.
In order to explore how olfactory information is decoded by visual and auditory information in perfume commercials, it is necessary to employ multimodal metaphor analysis instead of multimodal discourse analysis. The framework of multimodal metaphor can help this research to analyze the metaphorical operation mechanism from pictorial and auditory messages to olfactory information. As such, this study plans to explore the mechanism of cross-modal operation in perfume commercials, and the purpose of this thesis is to investigate how the viewers sense the smell from visual and auditory perception conforms to the essence of metaphor.
3 Methodology
The materials for this study are six examples of perfume commercials from the collection of nearly thirty perfume commercials with brands such as Lacoste, Gucci, Channel, Marc Jacob, Giorgio Armani, Lancôme, Dior, Tom Ford, etc., all of which are well-known and international brands that are famous for the production of perfume. The perfume commercials are collected from the fragrance brands’ official channels on video or the perfume’s official websites.
Specifically, this research employs a qualitative approach in multimodal metaphor analysis. Firstly, after an extensive collection of perfume commercials in a wide range, the multimodal metaphors related to fragrance in perfume commercials can be generally classified as “attraction,” “emotion,” and “object.” Then, typical commercials will be discussed based on multimodal metaphor analysis. In the following analysis, relevant screenshots of each commercial will be represented, and song lyrics or narrators in commercials will also be added. The mapping process of three types of metaphors regarding sensory transformation across modes will be discussed in cases. Furthermore, elaborate and organized tables will be shown to identify the interaction of different modes in the source domain. Next, the relationship between the source and target domains in different metaphors will be classified and concluded. Finally, the study will analyze what advertising effects can be exerted according to the different types of metaphors with different relationships between source and target domains.
4 Data analysis: multimodal metaphors of fragrance in perfume commercials
Three types of visual metaphors for fragrance are identified from the collection of perfume commercials: FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, and FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT. The images, background music, and advertising language are applied to identify the source and target domains and explain their metaphorical relation. The metaphorical operation mechanism from the visual, auditory, and tactile senses to the olfactory sense is explored.
4.1 FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION
Most advertisements prefer to portray the scent of perfume as a certain kind of attraction, among which the most often observed is the mutual attraction between a male and female. In this section, the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION is evaluated in three forms of cross-sensory mapping: pictorial signs to smell, music and sound to smell, and mixed modes to smell.
4.1.1 From pictorial signs to smell
The pictorial sign refers to the information that people can receive visually. The visual message is one of the main pieces of information that television can transmit, so most commercials deploy visual images to present the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION. For example, the commercial titled Timeless by Lacoste describes a man who falls in love at first sight with a woman in an old train station, trying to find the lady on the train as he navigates the crowd (see Figure 1).

Visual images of the first commercial exemplified.
In this commercial, there is a metaphor, FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, from visual mode to olfactory mode, in which a metaphorical relation is established between the visible attraction as the source domain and the target domain of fragrance. The relation between the two domains is established through multi-faceted mapping. This advertisement employs graphical images (signifiers) to represent the attractiveness (signified) of the woman to the man to trigger the audience to associate the visual information with the fragrance (signified). Figure 1(a) shows the actor, who enters the car and immediately distinguishes the actress from the crowd of passengers and keeps looking at her. In Figure 1(c), the man still stares at the woman among the people in the subway. Additionally, his exaggerated behavior, lifted by the surrounding people in the air and still with his eyes fixed on the woman, makes the visible attraction more understandable in the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION.
Another facet of mapping that allows the metaphor to work in this advertisement lies in the shared attribute of durability in both domains. A satisfactory perfume ought to be equipped with a long-lasting fragrance. Likewise, attractiveness can last for a while, and the length of time depends on the strength of the attractiveness. Hence, to promote this fragrance’s persistence, this commercial intelligently utilizes the idea of the hero and heroine recognizing and falling in love with each other from the past to the present, representing the enduring continuity of their attraction. In sum, eye contact, facial expression, and body language as pictorial signs can contribute to identifying ATTRACTION as the source domain, and the mapping from the source domain to the target can be achieved through various dimensions. These semiotic concepts, including signifiers (pictorial images), signifieds (attractiveness and fragrance), and symbolism (metaphorical relation), contribute to the advertising’s effectiveness in delivering the message about the fragrance to the viewers.
4.1.2 From music and sound to smell
Apart from pictorial signs, auditory information can also play a critical role in commercials. The commercial for Gucci’s Bamboo fragrance involves the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION mapping from auditory to olfactory mode. The metaphorical connection between the source and target domains is created audibly by mapping from varied facets. Generally, the commercial presents some fragments of the heroine’s daily life with male narration, which expresses his admiration for the heroine’s confidence and independence (see Figure 2).

Visual images of the second commercial exemplified.
The audible attraction of the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION in this advertisement is displayed explicitly by the voice-over and implicitly by the background music. Due to the lack of a storyline in this commercial, the visual cues only are not sufficient to guarantee the viewers’ recognition of the source in the commercial. However, the voice-over in a male voice epitomizes the attraction of the heroine wearing the advertised perfume (Table 1).
Interaction of modes in the source of Bamboo’s metaphor.
Components | Visual | Sound (Voice-over) | Music |
---|---|---|---|
SOURCE | Movement of speaking to each other | “When she speaks, we listen” | Gentle |
Movement of dancing between the heroine and a man (Figure 2(a)) | “When she moves, we watch” | Crescendo Speeding Up | |
Act of the heroine driving and playing piano (Figure 2(b)) | “She controls. She masters” | Addition of instruments and the increase of the volume |
The mapping from ATTRACTION to FRAGRANCE relies on their common feature of intensity. In the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION in this commercial, music is an intermediary between the target and the source to bridge the gap between the two types of intensity. Along with the change in the rhythm and volume of the background music, the degree of attraction and intensity of fragrance varies. As shown, when the music has a slower beat and a lower volume, it signifies moderate attraction from women to men. Hence, the “scent” the advertisement delivers to the audience is also lighter. On the contrary, the “scent” released through the commercial is increasingly heady when the music rhythm becomes faster and the volume turns louder.
With the help of music, the association between the source and the target is formed so that the olfactory metaphor can map information from audible to olfactory mode. Above all, the use of signifiers such as sound and music, as well as the symbolism and visual composition, plays a dominant role in this commercial to manifest the source – the abstract notion of attraction, making the abstract concept – of fragrance understandable. Integrating these semiotic elements helps establish an effective communication strategy in advertising, fostering the audience’s recognition of the advertisement information and meanings.
4.1.3 Advertising effects achieved by the metaphor
From what has been analyzed, perfume advertisements involving the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION are prone to advertising the design concept and theme behind the product. For instance, as analyzed previously, the commercial in Figure 1 tries to promote the product’s theme of true love. Figure 2 advocates the design philosophy of women’s confidence and independence.
As for perfume enterprises, they should rely on the perfume’s smell to attract customers and on unique brand culture to touch customers with different needs. The most apparent function of perfume is to draw the attention of the surrounding people with its distinctive scent. By attracting people’s attention, the wearers typically aim to show love or to show off their salient personalities. In this way, the perfume of different themes and concepts also are generated to meet different consumption demands. Therefore, when perfume advertisers try to promote the cultural concept of a particular perfume, they are more likely to use the mutual attraction between males and females to promote the design concept behind the perfume. This explains why the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION can indirectly promote a product’s design concept and theme to potential customers.
4.2 FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION
The perception of smell consists not only of the sensation of the odors themselves but of the emotions connected with these sensations (Richard Ortegón et al. 2023). Traditionally, the categories of fragrance type include floral, amber woody, leather, aquatic, and fruity scents (Zarzo and Stanton 2009). With different kinds of odors, fragrance can elicit people’s emotional reactions. In the same way, some perfume commercials that try to express certain emotions can also trigger the audience’s sense of smell since those emotions are related to the fragrance notes and the design philosophy of the promoted perfumes.
4.2.1 From pictorial signs to smell
The metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION is generally represented in visual images regarding the character’s facial expressions, eye contact, and body language. The commercial for Marc Jacobs’s Daisy perfume expresses the emotion of joy by describing the scene of three girls playing on the grassland.
The metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION is transmitted from the mode of pictorial sign to the mode of smell in this commercial. Its metaphorical relation depends on the common feature of being infectious of both the source EMOTION and the target. According to the images in Figure 3, the actresses’ emotions of enjoyment can be observed by their facial expressions and body language. At the beginning of the commercial, the act of the girl smelling the flower of a daisy cues the identification of the source FRAGRANCE (see Figure 3(b)). As for the source EMOTION, Figure 3(a) shows the three girls holding hands and playing games with smiles. This is a process in which pleasant emotions are transmitted from one person to the other two. Other than that, the enjoyable facial expressions of the girls in 3(c) and 3(d) reinforce the representation of the source EMOTION.

Visual images of the third commercial exemplified.
With the identification of the source domain and the visible act of smelling flowers, the viewers can effortlessly comprehend the connection between the two domains. In this way, they will paraphrase further that fragrance can make people joyful. The actresses’ facial expressions and body language in pictorial signs represent and enhance the identification of ATTRACTION as the source domain, and the mapping from the source domain to the target is achieved by the similarity that both fragrance and attraction are contagious. In sum, the semiotic concepts, including signifiers (facial expressions, body language), signifieds (emotion, fragrance), and the symbolism of the multimodal metaphor, work together to facilitate the audience’s understanding of the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, successfully formulating the communication strategy.
4.2.2 From music and sound to smell
In some commercials, the role of audible information, such as music, outweighs the effects of visual images. The example below is selected from the commercial for a feminine perfume by Giorgio Armani. The advertisement delineates a story of a lady traveling to several countries to seek the ingredients of the promoted perfume, and the process of searching for ingredients indicates that the lady is finding her true self (see Figure 4).

Visual images of the fourth commercial exemplified.
This commercial involves a metaphor, FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, mapping information primarily from the modes of sound and music to the mode of smell. The metaphor in this advertisement tends to evoke the audience’s sensation of smell with the metaphorical connection between the audible source EMOTION and the target FRAGRANCE. Also, the relation between the two domains is established through multi-faceted mapping (Table 2).
Interaction of modes in the source of Armani’s metaphor.
Components | Visual | Music (Lyrics) | Music |
---|---|---|---|
SOURCE | “We lost our way, that’s what you told me last. The tears they come and go” | The music begins to climax at the end of this shot | |
Hug with people after finding ingredient | “If you’re ready, your heart is open. I’ll be waiting, come find me” | Reaching climax | |
Talking with a girl in a religious rite | “I see you here in the darkness. Blinding light right where your heart is” | The rhythm becomes faster and more rapid |
Firstly, the source EMOTION is cued by the background music lyrics. Regarding the visual information, this advertisement merely consists of various scenes according to different countries, lacking coherence between different scenes. However, the lyrics of the music drive the story’s development by serving as the inner monologue of the actress. The lyrics indicate the transformation of the heroine’s emotion before and after she smells flowers (see Figure 4(c)), the ingredients of the advertised fragrance. At the beginning of the commercial, the lyrics “we lost our way” hint at why the actress is about to find her true self, reflecting her low spirit and pathing the way for the following plots. Then, the lyrics of “blinding light right where your heart is” imply the heroine’s determination to find herself. Finally, the lyrics of “heart is open” and “come to find me” are the self-manifesto of the heroine; that is, she is well-prepared for her new life. Therefore, the advertisement would not make sense without referencing the lyrics.
The connection between the source and the target is audibly created by people’s standard cognitive conventions towards scent, music, and emotion. The scent of perfume can be divided into high concentration and low concentration. Similarly, human emotions can be in high spirits and low spirits. Between the source and target, the background music functions as a glue joining the two domains. Different types of music grant different sensations to the listeners. The melody of the whole song is gentle at first. It becomes rapid until the climax, full of power and passion. It reflects the transformation of the heroine’s mind in searching for her ego and highlighting her joy that originates from the sense of achievement after finding the familiar flavor or finding herself. The signifier of music not only plays a critical role in the expression of the inner emotion of the heroine with its lyrics, which reinforces the audience’s identification of the source EMOTION, but also contributes to the metaphorical relation between the source and the target by their common feature of gradability. In summary, the interplay of semiotic concepts such as signifiers (lyrics, background music) and signifieds (emotion, fragrance) enhances the communication of the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION in this commercial, enhancing the viewers’ recognition of the metaphorical connection between emotion and fragrance.
4.2.3 Advertising effects achieved by the metaphor
According to the evaluation, commercials with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION tend to display the emotional effects caused by the advertised perfume. Meanwhile, since different types of scents evoke emotions, some commercials, such as in Figures 3 and 4, have to simultaneously represent the fragrance type with the appearance of the ingredients of the perfume. For some perfume brands, the central theme of their products is that perfume can bring them positive emotions, such as joy and happiness, based on the common knowledge that different scents can cause different emotional experiences in people. Perfumes that give the wearer a positive emotional experience are, in most cases, floral or fruity, as the ingredients of flowers and fruit are fresh and pleasurable. As a result, perfume advertisers sometimes inevitably promote the perfume ingredients in the advertisement so that the viewer naturally experiences the emotions by associating the flavor type. Therefore, when the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION is hidden in the advertisement, it aims to promote the product’s design concept by mentioning the perfume’s flavor type.
4.3 FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT
There are great perfume commercials promoting their products by introducing natural fragrance materials. Since the flavors of perfume vary, and the essential feature of perfume is the type of scent, advertisers prefer to display the fragrance types with the representation of the ingredients contained in perfume, such as flowers, fruits, and resins.
4.3.1 From pictorial signs to smell
The conceptual metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT is represented in the mode of pictorial signs in numerous commercials. Gucci’s Bloom is a floral perfume with ingredients of tuberose, jasmine, and Rangoon Creeper, so its commercial presents an abundance of flowers, trying to transport the viewers to a garden filled with the scent of thriving flowers and plants, just as in the name of this perfume – Bloom (see Figure 5).

Visual images of the fifth commercial exemplified.
This advertisement is a typical example of utilizing an olfactory metaphor, of which the source domain is FRAGRANCE and the target domain is OBJECT, to build the metaphorical relation and, therefore, prompt the audience’s perception of a smell. The mapping of this metaphor has one similarity. The metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT in the commercial utilizes the pictorial signs of abundant flowers to cue identifying the source OBJECT. “Object” in this study is treated as an abstract concept that can be calculated in quantity. Since the advertised product is a floral perfume, the advertisement involves a range of flowers of various kinds as the source.
In order to exhibit the foreground of the object of flowers, the advertisement first highlights the excessive number and kinds of flowers. Figure 5(a) indicates that the ladies’ home is designed and decorated as a garden with mixed flowers and plants. Meanwhile, the actresses’ dresses are covered with flowers, implying the source OBJECT. Additionally, Figure 5(b) and (c) depict the image of actresses swimming in a pool filled with flowers, echoing the fragrance ingredient, the OBJECT. These overwhelming pictures with excessive varieties and numbers of flowers reinforce the identification of the source OBJECT. As such, it would steer the viewers to connect these pictorial signs with the perfume. Therefore, the quantity of the objects – flowers in the advertisement enhances and quickens the identification of the source OBJECT, and the metaphorical connection between the source domain and the target domain in the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT is based on the fact that the large quantity of the ingredients in perfume indicates the high concentration of fragrance. Through the interplay of semiotics elements of graphic images, the commercial efficiently conveys the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT.
4.3.2 From touch to smell
Creatively, some commercials aim to evoke the audience’s tactile sensation to stimulate their sense of smell. Dior’s feminine perfume commercials hold the subject of “touch the perfume” to promote its product. The advertisement employs constant shots of abundant flowers on the whole screen to impose a strong visual impact on the viewers (see Figure 6).

Visual images of the sixth commercial exemplified.
Unlike the previously mentioned commercials, the metaphor in this advertisement innovatively achieves its metaphorical operating mechanism from tactile mode to olfactory mode, with the fragrance flavor as its target and the ingredients of the perfume as its source. The metaphorical mapping of the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT is developed in one facet, but its process is slightly sophisticated. Before the analysis, it should be explained that the mode of touch in which the source OBJECT projects its features to the target FRAGRANCE is developed by the interplay of the modes of pictorial and spoken signs. The advertisement fully uses visual impact and auditory cues to complete the audience’s tactile stimulation by getting them to reckon that they are in an environment filled with perfume.
The metaphorical relation between the two domains is that the quantity of the ingredients of perfume affects the concentration of its fragrance. The abstract source OBJECT, the product’s ingredient, can be calculated in large or small quantities, and the target FRAGRANCE, which is the product’s scent, has a high or low concentration. There are numerous shots covered with flowers in the advertisement from different angles. For example, the lens in Figure 6(a) adopts the method of shooting upside down to present many falling petals, creating the feeling of being in a sea of flowers for the audience. Besides, the shots in Figure 6(b) and (c) taken in the overhead mode present abundant white petals full of the screen. This visual impact will directly stimulate the audience’s olfactory receptors as they are in the mass of flowers. In addition, the lens in 6(d) has excessive red petals, while a gap is left in the middle, creating a sense of space for the spectators and generating the feeling of passing through a sea of flowers for them. These images with large objects of flowers may convince the audience that they are engaged in the sea of flowers, which triggers the audience to form tactile sensation through visual information.
When the audience feels surrounded and touched by flowers, they are more likely to perceive the considerable number of the objects of flowers. When the spectators feel that they are touched by perfume in an environment filled with perfume, they are likely to imagine that they are spraying perfume. As a result, by interacting with the visual and audible information (signifiers), the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT is represented to complete the metaphorical organism of sensory crossing from tactile sensation to olfactory sensation. After the olfactory stimulation, the viewers may further identify the fragrance type (signified) of the advertised product according to the overwhelming images of flowers in the advertisement. Above all, the frequent semiotic element of pictorial images of the abundant flowers that cover the whole advertising screen helps to cue the recognition of the source domain in the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT.
4.3.3 Advertising effects achieved by the metaphor
From what has been investigated, some fragrance commercials desire to impress potential consumers by displaying the product’s fragrance type with a direct representation of its ingredients. The essential difference distinguishing each perfume is its type of scent. Most perfume consumers buy products by judging the type of flavor they prefer. Therefore, for some perfume companies, promoting the type of fragrance is the primary purpose of their advertising. One of the most direct ways to advertise a scent type is to represent the product’s ingredients. By presenting raw materials, consumers can perceive the type of perfume by their knowledge of the ingredients. Thus, when the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT is deployed in advertising, the purpose of the perfume advertiser is to promote the perfume type.
4.4 The uniqueness of mapping in the operational mechanism of olfactory metaphor
According to Lakoff and Jonson (2003), the essence of metaphor is understanding one domain of experience, the target domain, in terms of another, the source domain. The target is usually abstract, while the source is relatively concrete (Kövecses and Benczes 2010). It is easier to perceive concrete concepts than abstract concepts in their cognitive system, so people are inclined to understand abstruse notions through concrete concepts. This explains why metaphors should be mapped from a more concrete source domain to a more abstract target domain. In the metaphors, FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, and FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION. However, the story is different. In a literal sense, the notion of “attraction” and “emotion” is much more abstract and abstruse compared with the concept of “fragrance.” It seems to be against the operation mechanism of conceptual metaphor. However, the reverse of abstraction between the source and the target discussed here is still compatible with the principle of metaphor.
In the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, the abstract concept of attraction is used to interpret the scent of the publicized perfume, the target domain. In the verbal dimension, the concept of attraction is more abstract than that of fragrance. Nevertheless, in the context of multiple modalities, the level of abstraction of the notions of attraction and fragrance overturns. The visible and audible attraction between men and women or human beings and animals can represent the concept of attraction. In contrast, fragrance – the scent of perfume cannot be directly conveyed through television screens due to its limitation in transmitting olfactory information. In this sense, the fragrance concept is comparatively abstract and can be explained by the more concrete concept of attraction.
Similarly, in the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, fragrance functions as the target domain, and the concept of emotion serves as the source domain. In a literal sense, the conception of fragrance is relatively concrete compared with emotion. The notion of emotion can be depicted by the characters’ body language and facial expressions in visual information and background music, as well as voice-over in auditory information. In contrast, at present, olfactory information is impossible to deliver through the television screen. In this way, emotion is sensible enough to act as the source of interpreting fragrance, which is a comparatively abstract concept.
From what has been analyzed, it is sensible to state that in commercials, a carrier with multiple modalities, the definition of concreteness and abstraction between the target domain and the source domain in the conceptual metaphor can be reversed. In terms of perfume commercials whose advertising purpose is to promote the product’s scent, the inability to convey the scent encourages the advertisers to trigger the audience’s sensation of smell by employing visual and auditory information. In this way, it shall be seen that (1) the principle that a more concrete source domain should interpret a more abstract target domain is fixed; (2) it is in the context of multiple modalities that enable the degree of abstraction of the target and the domain to reverse.
In such a sense, compared with the notion of “fragrance,” which is invisible, inaudible, and intangible through the screen of television and computers, “attraction” and “emotion” are comparatively more concrete and understandable. As such, the conceptual metaphors FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION and FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, in which the degree of abstraction of the source and target domains is reversed, seem to violate the metaphor operation mechanism. However, they are consistent with the mechanism due to the context of multiple modalities.
The analysis illustrates with typical examples that the source domain in perfume commercials can activate the mapping of the target fragrance through visual and auditory modes. Evaluating the identification of the target and the source demonstrates that the metaphorical relation between the target domain and the source domain guarantees the success of the metaphorical operation mechanism from the visual and auditory modes to the olfactory mode. In order to explain and interpret the intangible, invisible, and inaudible target domain – fragrance, most perfume commercials adopt “attraction,” “emotion,” and “object” to act as the source domain. The perfume commercials will have different advertising effects when involving metaphors in the sensory crossing mapping. It is proved that abstract concepts such as “attraction” and “emotion” can be utilized to make the target fragrance understandable due to the uniqueness of the discourse of commercials that cannot transmit the olfactory message through television and computer screens. The advertisements with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION represent the design concept of perfume, and the commercials with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION reflect the design concept and the type of scent, while those with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT highlight the fragrance types.
5 Conclusions
By integrating semiotic concepts of signifiers, signifieds, symbolism, and visual composition, this study analyzes metaphors from visual, auditory, and tactile modes to olfactory modes in perfume commercials within the framework of multimodal metaphor and the conceptual metaphor theory. Based on the collection of perfume commercials with different international brands, this research categorizes three conceptual metaphors: FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION, FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION, and FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT, further evaluating the metaphorical mapping of the conceptual metaphors with specific examples. In the context of semiotics, this study finds that the sensory transition from visual, auditory, and tactile sensations to olfactory sensations in metaphors is workable in decoding the metaphorical relation between the source and the target domains. The metaphorical connection can be achieved through both single-facet mapping and multi-faceted mapping. The metaphorical mapping involves semiotic elements such as pictorial signs, spoken signs, sounds, music, touch, and smell.
Another finding is that the options of the source and the target should consider the types of discourse. According to the rule of the conceptual metaphor, a more abstract target domain should be interpreted by a comparatively more concrete source domain. However, this thesis reveals that “attraction” and “emotion,” abstract concepts, can serve as the source domains to explain the fragrance target. This makes sense because, in the discourse of commercials, the scent of perfume cannot be sensed directly through television or computer screens. At the same time, the concept of attraction and emotion can be felt based on the visual and auditory information transmitted through the screen. Thereby, it is precisely the particularity of commercials that affects the choice of the source domain.
Apart from the finding in the framework of multimodal metaphor, this research discovers the differences in advertising effects caused by the three metaphors engaged in commercials. The fragrance commercials with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS ATTRACTION prefer to proclaim the design belief and theme of the advertised product. Meanwhile, the situation in the advertisements with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS EMOTION varies. Most of them intend to promote the design concept behind the product, but some of them should inevitably advertise the fragrance types. The advertisements with the metaphor FRAGRANCE IS OBJECT are inclined to promote the unique scent of the perfume.
The limitation of this study is that it merely categorizes three types of metaphors for fragrance in perfume commercials, and may need to be more comprehensive and representative. The implication for further studies is that, due to the limitation of the transmission of olfactory information in commercials, an abstract concept can be employed to interpret another more abstract concept. This unique finding still needs to be further confirmed in more academic research. The limitations and implications are sincerely provided for better future multimodal analysis research on commercials based on the semiotics approach.
References
Allen, Caroline, Kelly Cobey, Jan Havlíček & Craig Roberts. 2016. The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor. Evolution and Human Behavior 37(6). 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001.Search in Google Scholar
Bianchi, Cinzi. 2011. Semiotic approaches to advertising texts and strategies: Narrative, passion, marketing. Semiotica 183(1/4). 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.012.Search in Google Scholar
Caballero, Rosario. 2009. Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 73–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.2.73Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Zhen Troy & Ming Cheung. 2022. Consumption as extended carnival on Tmall in contemporary China: A social semiotic multimodal analysis of interactive banner ads. Social Semiotics 32(2). 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1720992.Search in Google Scholar
Chirig, Abdelkrim, Bouziane Karima & Marouane Zakhir. 2023. Emotional advertising in Morocco during the COVID-19 pandemic: A semiotic analysis. Social Science Information 62(2). 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231180377.Search in Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 1992. The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2004. Messages, signs, and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deng, Yu. 2014. On cognitive representation of nonverbal and multimodal metaphor and metonymy: A case study of a perfume commercial. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 27(4). 99–103.Search in Google Scholar
Džanić, Mirza. 2013. The semiotics of contemporary advertising messages: Decoding visuals. Jezikoslovlje 14(2–3). 475–485.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eerden, Bart. 2009. Anger in Asterix: The metaphorical representation of anger in comics and animated films. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 243–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.4.243Search in Google Scholar
Eggertsson, Gunnar Theodór & Forceville Charles. 2009. Multimodal expressions of the HUMAN VICTIM IS ANIMAL metaphor. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 429–449. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.7.429Search in Google Scholar
El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2009. Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 147–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.3.173Search in Google Scholar
Feng, Dezheng (William). 2017. Metonymy and visual representation: Towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication 6(4). 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217717142.Search in Google Scholar
Feng, Dezheng (William). 2019. Analyzing multimodal Chinese discourse: Integrating social semiotic and conceptual metaphor theories. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 65–81. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315213705-5Search in Google Scholar
Feng, Dezheng (William) & Kay L. O’ Halloran. 2013. The visual representation of metaphor: A social semiotic approach. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2). 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.07fen.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203272305Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2002. The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 34(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00007-8.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2006. The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey documentary: McElwee, Van der Keuken, Cole. New Review of Film and Television Studies 4(3). 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300600982023.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2007. Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics 1(1). 19–51. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8812.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2009a. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework: Agendas for research. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2009b. The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 383–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar
Hemais, Marcus W., Luís Alexandre Pessôa & Denise F. Barros. 2022. The “Esperanto” of business . or how to be successful in life: A decolonial reading, using semiotics, of English language courses’ advertisements in Brazil. Marketing Theory 22(2). 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221075368.Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Dan. 2007. A social semiotic approach to the multimodal discourse of an advertisement of perfume. Journal of East China Jiaotong University 24(3). 126–130.Search in Google Scholar
Jabeen, Sahira & Cecilia Yin Mei Cheong. 2024. Multimodal narrativity in a Pakistani TV advertisement: A socio-semiotic and narratological analysis. Social Semiotics 34(1). 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2043723.Search in Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Viveka. 2021. Scented scenographics and olfactory art: Making sense of scent in the museum. Konsthistorisk Tidskrift 90(2). 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2020.1775696.Search in Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2009. Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 45–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.2.45Search in Google Scholar
Kou, Guirong & Yuan Liang. 2022. A comparative study of multi-modal metaphors in food advertisements. Semiotica 249(1/4). 275–291.10.1515/sem-2020-0117Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán & Réka Benczes. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lindqvist, Anna. 2012a. How is commercial gender categorization of perfumes related to consumers preference of fragrances? Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 65. 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.136.Search in Google Scholar
Lindqvist, Anna. 2012b. Perfume preferences and how they are related to commercial gender classifications of fragrances. Chemosensory Perception 5(2). 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9119-7.Search in Google Scholar
Linke, Monika. 2013. Revision of gender stereotypes in selected women’s perfume commercials. In Dorota Guttfeld, Monika Linke & Agnieszka Sowińska (eds.), (Re)visions of history in language and fiction. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Yufeng & Dechao Li. 2022. Multimodal metaphor (re)framing: A critical analysis of the promotional image of China’s Hubei Province in the post-pandemic era in new media. Social Semiotics 34(2). 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2094233.Search in Google Scholar
Morris, Samuel & Amy Shields Dobson. 2023. Tinder marketing and transnational postfeminist media cultures: “Modern” women as single, not sorry? Feminist Media Studies 23(8). 4269–4284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2166972.Search in Google Scholar
O’Barr, William. 1994. Culture and the ad: Exploring otherness in the world of advertising. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew (ed.). 1993. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865Search in Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, Paula. 2017. Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ftl.2Search in Google Scholar
Petrovici, Iasmina. 2014. Aspects of symbolic communications in online advertising. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 149. 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.276.Search in Google Scholar
Richard Ortegón, Stéphane, Olivia Carlos, Aline Robert-Hazotte, Anne Lelgouarch, Clément Desoche, Keith Kawabata Duncan, Keiko Tagai, Arnaud Fournel, Moustafa Bensafi, Bénédicte Race & Camille Ferdenzi. 2023. Investigating the human chemical communication of positive emotions using a virtual reality-based mood induction. Physiology & Behavior 264. 114147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114147.Search in Google Scholar
Schilperoord, Joost & Alfons Maes. 2009. Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 213–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.3.213Search in Google Scholar
Shinohara, Kazuko & Yoshihiro Matsunaka. 2009. Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 265–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.4.265Search in Google Scholar
Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Piotr Sorokowski & Andrzej Szmajke. 2012. Does personality smell? Accuracy of personality assessments based on body odour. European Journal of Personality 26(5). 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.848.Search in Google Scholar
Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Piotr Sorokowski & Havlicek Jan. 2016. Body odor based personality judgments: The effect of fragranced cosmetics. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00530.Search in Google Scholar
Spitzer, Michael. 2004. Metaphor and musical thought. London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226279435.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Taghian, Muhammad & Ahmad M. Ali. 2023. Assessing the subtitling of emotive reactions: A social semiotic approach. Semiotica 252(1/4). 51–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0076.Search in Google Scholar
Teng, Norman Y. 2009. Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 197–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.3.197Search in Google Scholar
Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo. 2009. Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 95–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.2.95Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, music, sound. London: Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1Search in Google Scholar
van Niekerk, Angelique. 2018. The use of indexical signs, symbols, and icons in print advertising communication. Communitas 23(1). 108–123. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150525/comm.v23.7.Search in Google Scholar
Vermeer, Yvette, Higgs Paul & Georgina Charlesworth. 2022. Selling surveillance technology: Semiotic themes in advertisements for ageing in place with dementia. Social Semiotics 32(3). 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1767399.Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, Judith. 1984. Decoding advertisements: Ideology and meaning in advertising. New York: Marion Boyars.Search in Google Scholar
Xing, Chunyan & Dezheng (William) Feng. 2023. Multimodal intertextuality and persuasion in advertising discourse. Discourse & Communication 17(5). 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231170579.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, Ning. 2009. Nonverbal and multimodal manifestation of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 119–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.2.119Search in Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2009. Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.3.147Search in Google Scholar
Zakia, Richard & Mihai Nadin. 1987. Semiotics, advertising, and marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 4(2). 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008192a.Search in Google Scholar
Zarzo, Manuel & David T. Stanton. 2009. Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71(2). 225–247. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.71.2.225.Search in Google Scholar
Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2009. Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 359–381. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.6.359Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Jingxin & Sijing Wu. 2018. Contrastive study of perfume advertising texts from the perspective of appraisal theory. Journal of Northeast Normal University 3. 125–131.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Xiefeng. 2011. New development of conceptual metaphor studies: Multimodal metaphor. Foreign Languages Research 1. 1–10.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Signs and Images
- Computer creates a cat: sign formation, glitching, and the AImage
- Spatial pedagogy: exploring semiotic functions of one teacher’s movement in an Active Learning Classroom
- A semiotic analysis of the canonical image macro meme
- From the Socio-cultural
- The beheading of James Foley: a crossing of gazes between East and West
- An allegory of Fama and Historia: rumor studies, collective memory, and semiotics
- Towards the Cultural
- Pour une approche sémiotique de la traduction de la chanson : l’exemple de La chanson des vieux amants de Jacques Brel et de son adaptation turque Şarap Mevsimi
- Beyond “Made in China”: visual rhetoric and cultural functionality in translating the traditional Chinese totem Loong 龙
- Advertising Semiotics
- La marque comme service ayant une vision propre : une approche sémiotique des architectures de marques
- Advertising fragrance through visual and audible information: a multimodal metaphor analysis of perfume commercials
- Brand identity construction through the heritage of Chinese destination logos
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Signs and Images
- Computer creates a cat: sign formation, glitching, and the AImage
- Spatial pedagogy: exploring semiotic functions of one teacher’s movement in an Active Learning Classroom
- A semiotic analysis of the canonical image macro meme
- From the Socio-cultural
- The beheading of James Foley: a crossing of gazes between East and West
- An allegory of Fama and Historia: rumor studies, collective memory, and semiotics
- Towards the Cultural
- Pour une approche sémiotique de la traduction de la chanson : l’exemple de La chanson des vieux amants de Jacques Brel et de son adaptation turque Şarap Mevsimi
- Beyond “Made in China”: visual rhetoric and cultural functionality in translating the traditional Chinese totem Loong 龙
- Advertising Semiotics
- La marque comme service ayant une vision propre : une approche sémiotique des architectures de marques
- Advertising fragrance through visual and audible information: a multimodal metaphor analysis of perfume commercials
- Brand identity construction through the heritage of Chinese destination logos