Home Knowledge in action: what the feet can learn to know
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Knowledge in action: what the feet can learn to know

  • Katja Pettinen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 15, 2022

Abstract

This article deploys Peircean approach to bodily skills, foregrounding motricity as a semiotically mediated and a “suprasubjective” process. By examining two contrasting skills – javelin and martial arts – I draw out the relevance of dynamic movement to the semiotics of sport and embodiment. These contrasting movements expose different epistemological assumptions since they emerge in distinct cultural traditions. To attend to the cultural dimension of movement practices – including the mediation of signs making certain movement forms seem reasonable or desirable in the first place – I highlight ecological dimensions of each somatic tradition. This ecological focus aligns with Peirce’s project of tracking how semiotic signs are positioned and mediated. To make ecological factors of motricity more recognizable, I contrast somatic engagements that take place on synthetic, predictable substrates and somatic engagements that take place on variable, unpredictable ground. In a similar way to the classic gestalt figure-ground relations, where perception of a figure depends on the particulars of the ground, I suggest that the ground upon which somatic action occurs shapes the way we make sense of it epistemologically. These different grounds – both literally and figuratively – operate representationally via thirdness: they lead us to conceptualize movement in culturally and historically particular ways.


Corresponding author: Katja Pettinen, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada, E-mail:

References

Besnier, Niko, Susan Brownell & Thomas F. Carter. 2018. The anthropology of sport: Bodies, boarders, and biopolitics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520963818Search in Google Scholar

Callagher, Shawn. 2017. Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Cary, Alin Olteanu & Sebastian Feil. 2021. Peircean anti-psychologism and learning theory. Chinese Semiotic Studies 17(1). 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2021-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Nancy. 2003. Breathing spaces: Qigong, psychiatry, and healing in China. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442675032Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2014. Semiotic entanglement: The concepts of environment, Umwelt, and Lebenswelt in semiotic perspective. Semiotica 199(1/4). 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0085.Search in Google Scholar

Dunbar, Robin. 2004. Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language, 2nd edn. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Du Plessis, Gitte. 2020. Invisibility, colors, snow: Arctic biosemiotics and the violence of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society 38(7–8). 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420976793.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Gopnik, Allison. 2020. Childhood as a solution to explore-exploit tensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375. 20190502. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0502.Search in Google Scholar

Guttmann, Allen. 1978. From ritual to record: The nature of modern sports. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herzfeldt, Michael. 2021. Subversive archaism: Troubling traditionalists and the politics of national heritage. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9781478022244Search in Google Scholar

Hino, Akira. 2019. Don’t think, listen to the body!: Introduction to the Hino Method and theory of human body and movement control. Japan: Independently published.Search in Google Scholar

Hipólito, Inês, Manuel Baltieri, Karl Friston & Maxwell J. D. Ramstead. 2021. Embodied skillful performance: Where the action is. Synthese 199. 4457–4481.10.1007/s11229-020-02986-5Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2008. The semiotic body. Biosemiotics 1. 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9015-3.Search in Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim. 2004. Culture on the ground: The world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture 9(3). 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183504046896.Search in Google Scholar

Keane, Webb. 2018. Perspectives on affordances, or the anthropologically real. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8(1/2). 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/698357.Search in Google Scholar

Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. The metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leder, Drew. 1990. The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Santos, Raúl, María Pilar Founaud, Astrid Aracama & Asier Oiarbide. 2020. Sports teaching, traditional games, and understanding in physical education: A tale of two stories. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 581721.10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581721Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Santos, Raúl. 2020. Time, order, and motor action domains: On the praxiological classification of sporting games. Pragmatism Today 11(1). 42–63.Search in Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 1973 [1935]. Techniques of the body. Economy and Society 2(1). 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, Jonathan. 2009. Why I am not a scientist: Anthropology and modern knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520943308Search in Google Scholar

Merrell, Floyd. 2003. Sensing corporeally: Toward a posthuman understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442679771Search in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 228(1/4). 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090.Search in Google Scholar

Naquin, Susan. 1981. Shantung rebellion: The Wang Lun uprising 1774. London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Noe, Alva. 2010. Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Novotny, Helga. 2016. The cunning of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Olteanu, Alin & Andrew Stables. 2018. Learning and adaptation from a semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies 46(4). 409–434. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2018.46.4.01.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2013. Motor praxeology: A new scientific paradigm. In Mariann Vaczi (ed.), Playing fields: Power, practice, and passion in sport, 127–144. Reno, NV: Center for Basque Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2020. The universals of games and sports. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 593877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593877.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1905. What pragmatism is. The Monist 7(2). 161–181. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist190515230.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1997. On Phenomenology, or the categories. In Patricia Ann Turrisi (ed.), Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Jeffrey V., Ann Marie Thornburg, Mark Kissel, Christopher Ball & Agustín Fuentes. 2018. Semiotic mechanisms underlying niche construction. Biosemiotics 11(2). 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9323-1.Search in Google Scholar

Pettinen, Katja. 2012. From habits of doing to habits of feeling: Skill acquisition in Taijutsu practice. In Daniel Lende & Greg Downey (eds.), The encultured brain: An introduction to neuroanthropology, 195–212. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9219.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Salthe, Stanley. 1993. Development and evolution: Complexity and change in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8255.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Spatz, Ben. 2015. What a body can do: Technique as knowledge, practice as research. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315722344Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Tadashi. 1986. The way of acting: The theatre writings of Tadashi Suzuki, J. Thomas Rimer (trans.). New York: Theatre Communications Group.Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. 2010 [1934]. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans with a theory of meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Waugh, Linda R. 1982. Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. Semiotica 38(3–4). 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1982.38.3-4.299.Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. & Myrdene Anderson (eds.). 2016. Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit: Before and beyond consciousness. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2Search in Google Scholar

Zilcosky, John & Marlo A. Burks. 2019. The allure of sports in Western culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781487519605Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-07-08
Accepted: 2022-07-21
Published Online: 2022-08-15
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2022-0082/html
Scroll to top button