Home Off the pitch: semiotics of liminality between space and play
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Off the pitch: semiotics of liminality between space and play

  • Ruggero Ragonese EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 2, 2022

Abstract

Playing fields are “spaces where the communitas suspends its everyday life and structures” and “The internal logic of sporting games is connected to values from the social context” (Parlebas, Pierre. 2013. Motor praxeology: A new scientific paradigm. In Mariann Vaczi (ed.), Playing fields: Power, practice, and passion in sport, 127–144. Reno: University of Nevada Press). But what about the space in between? What kind of semiotics organisation can be detected in the membrane between player and liminal space where spectators are not allowed yet specific characters needed to carry out an event? We can therefore identify a liminality that can be connected either to the controlled or the wild playing field and depending on which of the two is the case can be analysed according to the degree of regulated system of signs which they produce. This implies different pathways and rituals: as matches are played, a variety of bodily activities may be taking place concurrently. Furthermore, it is inevitable that these activities attract the attention of the audience or alternately lead a player to interact with a non-player.

In this article, I will first try to identify certain semiotics features, especially connected to Eco’s Peircian concept of Encyclopedia, that characterize the status of liminal space around the playing field. Then I will focus on liminality in soccer, investigating what kinds of interaction exist outside the playing area.


Corresponding author: Ruggero Ragonese, Comunicazione ed Economia, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, E-mail:

References

Avedon, Elliott M. & Brian Sutton-Smith. 1971. The study of games. New York: John Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1990. The fashion system. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Betti, Mauro & Eliza Bruna Paiva. 2010. A grande montanha de areia: Breve encontro da Educação Física com a semiótica peirciana. In José Milton de Lima, Divina José da Silva & Paulo Cesar de Almeyda Rabone (ed.), Pesquisa em educação escolar: Percursos e perspectivas, 303–314. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica.Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihály. 1981. Some paradoxes in the definition of play. In Alyce Taylor Cheska (ed.), Play as context, 14–26. West Point, NY: Leisure Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Courtés Joseph. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar

Hinthorne, Lauren Leigh & Katy Schneider. 2012. Playing with purpose: Using serious play to enhance participatory development communication in research. International Journal of Communication 6(1). 2801–2824.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Jurij. 2004. Culture and explosion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Santos, Raúl. 2007. La praxeología motriz aplicada al fútbol. Universidad del País Vasco – Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Santos, Raúl. 2020. Signos, metáforas y educación física: Conectando Peirce y Parlebas mediante la acción motriz. Conexões 18. 1–18.10.20396/conex.v18i0.8659170Search in Google Scholar

Mirallas, Jaume A. 2007. Reflexión sobre la praxiología motriz. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte 7(28). 290–318.Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, John von & Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 1995. La mise en ordre sportive. In Sport, relations sociales et action collective : Actes du colloque des 14 et 15 octobre 1993, 39–46. Bordeaux: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine.10.4000/books.msha.16226Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 1998. Jeux, sports et sociétés : Lexique de praxéologie motrice. Paris: INSEP.10.4000/books.insep.1067Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2003. Le destin des jeux: Héritage et filiation. Socio-Anthropologie 13. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio-anthropologie.173.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2013. Motor praxeology: A new scientific paradigm. In Mariann Vaczi (ed.), Playing fields: Power, practice, and passion in sport, 127–144. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2017. La aventura praxiológica: Ciencia, acción y educación física. Málaga: Junta de Andalucía.Search in Google Scholar

Parlebas, Pierre. 2020. The universals of games and sports. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 593877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593877.Search in Google Scholar

Pisanty, Valentina & Alessandro Zijno. 2009. Semiotica. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, John, Malcom J. Hurth & Robert R. Bush. 1959. Games in culture. American Anthropologist 61. 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1959.61.4.02a00050.Search in Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall. 1981. Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom (Historical metaphors and mythical realities 1). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.6773Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1974. Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology, vol. 60, 53–92. Rice Institute Pamphlet.Search in Google Scholar

Violi, Patrizia. 1992. Le molte enciclopedie. In Patrizia Magli, Giovanni Manetti & Patrizia Violi (eds.), Storia teoria interpretazione: Saggi intorno a Umberto Eco, 99–113. Milano: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-28
Accepted: 2022-07-28
Published Online: 2022-09-02
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2022-0079/html
Scroll to top button