Startseite Investigations of an anti-semiote: Stanisław Lem’s semiotic ideas in light of semiotic functionalism of Jerzy Pelc
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Investigations of an anti-semiote: Stanisław Lem’s semiotic ideas in light of semiotic functionalism of Jerzy Pelc

  • Jarosław Boruszewski ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. März 2021

Abstract

At the turn of 1960s and 1970s, Stanisław Lem devoted some of his non-fiction writing to a discussion and considerations of semiotics. Most of them were expressions of a critical approach mainly directed against structuralism. However, Lem also formulated some positive statements although they were not developed systematically. The article offers an analysis of Lem’s semiotic ideas from the perspective of semiotic functionalism of Jerzy Pelc, mainly considering its two main components: contextualism and typological approach. Special attention is paid to the latter because both Pelc and Lem proposed some original solutions in this respect. What is meant here is the multidimensional typology of symbolic uses of signs developed by Pelc and Lem’s multidimensional typology of the situations of the reception of texts. Although they are independent form each other, these proposals show some convergence both in their ways of construction and roles they are supposed to perform. Henceforth, one can say that Lem was a crypto-functionalist.


Corresponding author: Jarosław Boruszewski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, E-mail:

References

Astle, Richard. 1975. Lem’s misreading of Todorov. Science Fiction Studies 2(2). 167–169.Suche in Google Scholar

Barnouw, Dagmar. 1979. Science fiction as a model for probabilistic worlds: Stanislaw Lem’s fantastic empiricism. Science Fiction Studies 6(2). 153–163.Suche in Google Scholar

Brooke-Rose, Christine. 1976. Historical genres/theoretical genres: A discussion of Todorov on the fantastic. New Literary History 8(1). 145–158.10.2307/468618Suche in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz. 2021. Indexicality, meaning, use. Semiotica 238(1/4). 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0056.Suche in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz & Paweł Grabarczyk. 2020. An introduction: The architecture of context and context-sensitivity. In Tadeusz Ciecierski & Paweł Grabarczyk (eds.), The architecture of context and context-sensitivity: Perspectives from philosophy, linguistics and logic, 1–13. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.10.1007/978-3-030-34485-6_1Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbska, Izydora. 2015. Symbol. Studia Semiotyczne – English Supplement 8–12. 248–257.Suche in Google Scholar

Geier, Manfred. 1992. Stanislaw Lem’s fantastic ocean: Toward a semantic interpretation of “Solaris”. Science Fiction Studies 19(2). 192–218.Suche in Google Scholar

Geier, Manfred. 1993. “Eden”: Elemente einer “außerirdischen” Semiologie. Quarber Merkur 31(2). 15–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Głaz, Adam. 2014. Rorschach, we have a problem! The linguistics of first contact in Watts’s “Blindsight” and Lem’s “His master’s voice”. Science Fiction Studies 41(2). 364–391.10.5621/sciefictstud.41.2.0364Suche in Google Scholar

Głowiński, Michał. 1979. On concretization. In John Odmark (ed.), Problems of literary theory (Language, literature, and meaning 1), 325–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/llsee.1.11gloSuche in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. 2006. (Un)masking the agent: Stanislaw Lem’s “The mask”. In Swirski Peter (ed.), The art and science of Stanislaw Lem, 22–46. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1515/9780773575073-003Suche in Google Scholar

Kmita, Jerzy & Włodzimierz Ławniczak. 2015. Sign – symbol – allegory. Studia Semiotyczne – English Supplement 1. 61–94.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuße, Holger. 2008. Phantastische Objekte. Stanisław Lems Beitrag zur Semantik. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 53(1). 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1524/slaw.2008.0004.Suche in Google Scholar

Langer, Susanne K. 1942. Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1972. Wyznania antysemioty [Confessions of an anti-semiote]. Teksty 1(1). 62–79.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1973. On structural analysis of science fiction. Science Fiction Studies 1(1). 26–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1974. Todorov’s fantastic theory of literature. Science Fiction Studies 1(4). 227–237.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1975a. Filozofia przypadku: Literatura w świetle empirii [Philosophy of chance: Literature in the light of empiricism], vol. 1. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1975b. Filozofia przypadku. Literatura w świetle empirii [Philosophy of chance. Literature in the light of empiricism], vol. 2. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1975c. In response. Science Fiction Studies 2(2). 169–170.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1981a. Über Inkonsequenzen in der Literatur. In Essays, 35–59. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1981b. Bekenntnisse eines Antisemioten. In Essays, 60–78. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1981c. Sade und die Spieltheorie. In Essays, 79–117. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1984. Mathematische Kodierung auf lebendem Trägermaterial. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 6(3). 253–256.Suche in Google Scholar

Lem, Stanisław. 1989. Philosophie des Zufalls. Zu einer empirischen Theorie der Literatur. Band 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1981. Prolegomena to a definition of the concept of sign. In Annemarie Lange-Seidl (ed.), Zeichenkonstitution: Akten des 2. Semiotischen Kolloquiums Regensburg 1978, 45–52. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110903966-007Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1988. A plea for semiotics. In Michael Herzfeld & Lucio Melazzo (eds.), Semiotic theory and practice: Proceedings of the third international congress of the IASS, Palermo 1984, 855–872. Berlin, New York & Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110868883-088Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1992. The methodological status of semiotics: Signs, semiosis, interpretation and the limits of semiotics. In Michel Balat, Janice Deledalle-Rhodes & Gérard Deledalle (eds.), Signs of humanity/L’homme et ses signes: Proceedings of the fourth international congress of the IASS/Actes du IVe Congrès Mondial de ’AIS, Barcelona/Perpignan 1989, 23–34. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1993. Semiosis, cognition, interpretation. In René J. Jorna, Barend van Heusden & Roland Posner (eds.), Signs, search, and communication: Semiotic aspects of artificial intelligence, 25–38. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871579.25Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1996. “Symptom” and “symbol” in language. In Marcelo Dascal, Dietfried Gerhardus, Kuno Lorenz & Georg Meggle (eds.), Sprachphilosophie/Philosophy of language/La philosophie du langage. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössicher Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research/Manuel international des rechersches contemporaines, 1292–1313. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110139914.2.5.1292Suche in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 2000. Semiosis and semiosics vs. semiotics. Semiotica 128(3/4). 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.128.3-4.425.Suche in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1934. Symbolism. In Encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 14, 492–495. New York: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Scholes, Robert. 1975. Lem’s fantastic attack on Todorov. Science Fiction Studies 2(2). 166–167.Suche in Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. 1973. The fantastic: A structural approach to a literary genre. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University.Suche in Google Scholar

Vischer, Friedrich Theodor. 2015. The symbol. Art in Translation 7(4). 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2015.1107314.Suche in Google Scholar

Wallis, Mieczysław. 2015. Remarks on symbols. Studia Semiotyczne – English Supplement 7. 4–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-23
Accepted: 2021-02-06
Published Online: 2021-03-05
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0015/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen