Intercultural competition over resources via contests for symbolic capitals

Itamar Even-Zohar

doi:10.1515/sem-2019-0038

Article

Intercultural competition over resources via contests for symbolic capitals

Itamar Even-Zohar

Published/Copyright: January 11, 2020

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Semiotica Volume 2020 Issue 232

Abstract

Intergroup competition over resources is attested since the dawn of history. Written and archaeological evidence go back to at least the fourth millennium BC. According to accepted views, evolution has favored humans because of their ability to have cumulative cultures, which has made flexible adaptation possible. One major aspect of this adaptation has been the ability to handle power contests without engaging physical force. Instead, increasing prestige dynamics has allowed contest management by displaying symbolic assets. These have growingly been instrumental in deterring external assaults, thus guaranteeing the possession – or expansion – of a group’s resources. However, while material assets are believed to create status by the evidence of their tangible usefulness (such as foods, husbandry and tools), symbolic assets are by definition subject to ongoing negotiation, entirely dependent on being socio-semiotically recognized as types of capital. Symbolic stock exchanges thus appear to have been determinative since antiquity in hierarchizing ethnic and political groups fighting over resources, prioritizing ones over the others. They have culminated in repertoires of more solid tangible and intangible assets, from impressive buildings, city gates, gardens and temples, to ideas such as freedom, quality of life and wealth, justice, personal security, or whatever values that have gained universal recognition. The article discusses the creation and expansion of such symbolic repertoires and their uncertain position in recent times.

Keywords: semiosis; symbolic goods and assets; intergroup competition; prestige and status; violent and symbolic strategies; heritage

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Rakefet Sela-Sheffy for her invaluable comments and suggestions.

References

Bachrach, Peter & Morton S. Baratz. 1962. Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review 56(4). 947–952.10.2307/1952796Search in Google Scholar

Benbabaali, Dalel. 2016. From the peasant armed struggle to the Telangana state: Changes and continuities in a South Indian region’s uprisings. Contemporary South Asia 24(2). 184–196.10.1080/09584935.2016.1195340Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1971. Le marché des biens symboliques. L’Année sociologique 22. 49–126.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The market of symbolic goods. Poetics 14(1). 13–44.10.1515/9781503615861-007Search in Google Scholar

Brook, Kevin Alan. 2006. The Jews of Khazaria, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Bryce, Trevor. 2003. Letters of the great kings of the ancient Near East: The royal correspondence of the late Bronze Age. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203504987Search in Google Scholar

Çambel, Halet, John David Hawkins & Wolfgang Röllig. 1999. Corpus of hieroglyphic Luwian inscriptions [‘Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft’]. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Cline, Eric H. 2014. 1177 BC: The year civilization collapsed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400849987Search in Google Scholar

Donner, Herbert & Röllig. Wolfgang. 1971. Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften, I-II. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. 1994. The civilizing process. Edmund Jephcott (trans.), Eric Dunning, Johan Goudsbfom & Stephen Mennell (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert & Eric Dunning. 1993. Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert & Richard Kilminster. 1991. The symbol theory. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2016. Project CULT-COOP-06–2017: Participatory approaches and social innovation in culture. Horizon 2020 work programme 2016–2017. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-societies_en.pdf (accessed 10 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Even-Zohar, Itamar. 2008. Culture planning, cohesion, and the making and maintenance of entities. In Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger & Daniel Simeoni (eds.), Beyond descriptive translation studies: Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury, 277–292. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.75.22eveSearch in Google Scholar

Even-Zohar, Itamar. 2016. Intellectual labor and the success of societies. In Itamar Even-Zohar (ed.), Ideational labor and the production of social energy: Intellectuals, idea makers and culture entrepreneurs, 4–19. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Search in Google Scholar

Even-Zohar, Itamar. 2017. Le patrimoine qui attise les conflits. Ethnologies 39(1). 251–264.10.7202/1051063arSearch in Google Scholar

Even-Zohar, Itamar, Elias Torres Feijó & Antonio Monegal. 2019. The end of literature; or: What purposes does it continue to serve? Poetics Today 40(1). 7–31.10.1215/03335372-7259859Search in Google Scholar

Green, Douglas J. 2010. I undertook great works: The ideology of domestic achievements in west semitic royal inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.10.1628/978-3-16-151139-4Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, Joseph & Francisco J. Gil-White. 2001. The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 22(3). 165–196.10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4Search in Google Scholar

McCracken, Grant. 1990. “Ever dearer in our thoughts”: Patina and the representation of status before and after the eighteenth century. In Idem. Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities, 31–43. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mildner, Stormy-Annika, Gitta Lauster & Wiebke Wodni. 2011. Scarcity and abundance revisited: A literature review on natural resources and conflict. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 5(1). 156–172.Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2002. Guldhornsindskriften fra Gallehus: runer, sprog og politik. [=C. C. Rafn-forelæsning]. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Search in Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. 2008. The powers to lead. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Obama, Barack. 2016. Remarks by the President at Presentation of the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the White House, November 22, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/11/22/remarks-president-presentation-presidential-medal-freedom (accessed 10 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Panayotakis, Costas. 2010. On scarcity and abundance. Capitalism Nature Socialism 21(2). 122–124.10.1080/10455752.2010.489685Search in Google Scholar

Petrov, A. E. & Victor Shnirelman (eds.). 2011. Петров, A. E. & Виктор А. Шнирельман. Фальсификация исторических источников и конструирование этнократических мифов. Москва: РАН.Search in Google Scholar

Plourde, Aimée. M. 2009. Prestige goods and the formation of political hierarchy: A costly signaling model. In Stephen Shennan (ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution, 265–276. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520943360-019Search in Google Scholar

Plourde, Aimée M. 2010. Human power and prestige systems. In Peter Kappeler & Joan B. Silk (eds.), Mind the gap: tracing the origins of human universals, 139–152. Heidelberg & New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_6Search in Google Scholar

Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet. 2002. Canon formation revisited: Canon and cultural production. Neohelicon 29(2). 141–159.10.1023/A:1020386207413Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor. 2006. Шнирельман, Виктор Александрович. 2006. Быть аланами: интеллектуалы и политика на Северном Кавказе в Xx веке. Москва: Новое литературное обозрение.Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor. 2012. Шнирельман, В. А. Хазарский миф: идеология политического радикализма в России и ее истоки. Иерусалим & Москва: Гешарим & Мосты культуры.Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor A. 1996. Who gets the past? competition for ancestors among non-Russian intellectuals in Russia. Washington. Baltimore & London: Woodrow Wilson Center Press & Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor A. 2001. Aryans’ and ‘Khazars. In John K. Roth & Elisabeth Maxwell (eds.), Remembering for the future: The Holocaust in an age of genocide, 884–896. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_57Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor A. 2003. Шнирельман, Виктор Александрович 2003. Войны памяти: Мифы, идентичность и политика в Закавказье. Москва: Академкнига.Search in Google Scholar

Shnirelman, Victor A. 2007. The story of a euphemism: The Khazars in Russian nationalist literature. In Peter B. Golden, Haggai Ben-Shammai & András Róna-Tas (eds.), The world of the Khazars: New perspectives, 353–372. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004160422.i-460.62Search in Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Gísli. 1996. Icelandic national identity: From nationalism to tourism. In Pertti J. Anttonen (ed.), Making Europe in Nordic contexts, 41–75. Turku: Nordic Institute of Folklore.Search in Google Scholar

Srikanth, H. 2013. Construction and consolidation of the Telangana identity. Economic and Political Weekly 48(45–46). 39–45.Search in Google Scholar

Swartz, David. 2013. Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226925028.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tadmor, Hayim. 1981. History and ideology in the Assyrian royal inscriptions. In F. M. Fales (ed.), Assyrian royal inscriptions: New horizons in literary, ideological, and historical analysis, 13–33. Roma: Istituto per L’Oriente.Search in Google Scholar

Tadmor, Hayim. 1986. Monarchy and the elite in Assyria and Babylonia: The question of royal accountability. In S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.), The origins and diversity of axial age civilizations, 203–207. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tainter, Joseph A. 2002. Foundations and context of contemporary conflict. In Michael N. Dobkowski & Isidor Wallimann (eds.), On the edge of scarcity: Environment, resources, population, sustainability, and conflict, 108–120. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torres Feijó, Elias J. 2014. Historiar e comparar literatura como meio e análise de comunidades. Espaços literaturizados como exemplo e proposta. Letras de hoje, História da Literatura e Comparatismo 49(4). 434–445.10.15448/1984-7726.2014.4.18477Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Kuo-Cheng. 1928. Ancient Chinese political theories. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zabuzhko, Oksana. 2007. Забужко, Оксана 2007. Вони питають, чи єсть у нас культура! [‘They’re asking if we have culture!’], Sofiya Skachko (trans.). Українська правда [Ukrainska Pravda] 15.04.2007.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-01-11

Published in Print: 2020-02-25

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0038

Keywords for this article

semiosis; symbolic goods and assets; intergroup competition; prestige and status; violent and symbolic strategies; heritage