Home Signizing: The root of the functions of the intentional sign
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Signizing: The root of the functions of the intentional sign

  • Yiqiang Jin EMAIL logo and Liqin Cao
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2019

Abstract

Studies on the functions of the sign to date have been inadequate in that they leave unanswered a basic question of semiotics: What are the functions of a simple sign that consists essentially in the relation between two relata? The answer to this question is to be found in the phenomenon called “signize.” For intentional signs at least, all the mental entities can be signized, but only certain kinds of them have a strong signizing value. When these mental entities are signized, they tend to be signized into certain kinds of images. The advantages of these images over those mental entities give rise to certain benefits that, in turn, result in the basic functions of simple intentional signs. These basic functions are the starting point of a systematic study of the hierarchy of functions of intentional sign.

References

Allen, R. & C. Hulme. 2006. Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 64–88.10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. 2006. Categories, on interpretation, and on sophistical refutations, E. M. Edghill & W. A. Pickard-Cambridge (trans.). Stilwell: Digireads.com.Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. 2017. On the soul, J. A. Smith (trans.). http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.3.iii.html (accessed 30 April 2017).10.1093/oseo/instance.00258582Search in Google Scholar

Augustine. 1962. De doctrina christiana, I. Martin (ed.). Turnholti: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bacon, Roger. 1978. De signis. Traditio 34. 75–136.10.1017/S0362152900016093Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1967. Elements of semiology, Annette Lavers & Colin Smith (trans.). Hill: Jonathan Cape.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, B., D. E. Breedlove & P. H. Raven. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75. 214–242.10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140Search in Google Scholar

Borkowki, J. G. & H. C. Eisner. 1968. Meaningfulness and abstractness in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76. 56–60.10.1037/h0025291Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1965. Social psychology. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 2011. Theory of language: The representational function of language, Donald Fraser Goodwin & Achim Eschbach (trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/z.164Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2002. The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25. 657–726.10.1017/S0140525X02000122Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. 1977. The pragmatics of lexical specificity. Journal of Linguistics 13. 153–164.10.1017/S0022226700005363Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2004. Messages, signs, and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication theory, 3rd edn. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo. 1995. The dispute on the primacy of thinking or speaking. In Marcelo Dascal, Dietfried Gerhardus, Kuno Lorenz & Georg Meggle (eds.), Sprachphilosophie, vol. 2, 1024–1041. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110139914.2.4.1024Search in Google Scholar

Dik, S. 1986. On the notion “functional explanation”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1. 11–52.10.1075/bjl.1.02dikSearch in Google Scholar

Dik, S. & J. Kooij. 1979. Algemene taalwetenschap [General linguistics]. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Search in Google Scholar

Dukes, W. P. & J. Bastian. 1966. Recall of abstract and concrete words equated on meaningfulness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5. 455–458.10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80060-9Search in Google Scholar

Duns Scotus, John. 1963. Ordinatio, Commissio Scotistica (ed.). Rome: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Search in Google Scholar

Finke, Ronald A. 1993. Principles of mental imagery, 2nd edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fliessbach, K., S. Weis, P. Klaver, C. E. Elger & B. Weber. 2006. The effects of word concreteness on recognition memory. NeuroImage 32. 1413–1421.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Gorman, A. M. 1961. Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 23–29.10.1037/h0040561Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 89–97.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2001 [1970]. Logical investigations, vol. 1, J. N. Findlay (trans.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, D. 1968 [1962]. The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, 99–138. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110805376.99Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jampolsky, M. 1950. Etude de quelques épreuves de reconnaissance. L’histoire de L’Année Psychologique 49. 63–97.10.3406/psy.1948.8354Search in Google Scholar

Jessen, F., R. Heun, M. Erb, D. O. Granath, U. Klose, A. Papassotiropoulos & W. Grodd. 2000. The concreteness effect: Evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain and Language 7. 103–112.10.1006/brln.2000.2340Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Yiqiang & Liqin Cao. 2016. Rethinking semiotics: Toward a theory of intentional sign. Semiotica 210(1/4). 167–189.10.1515/sem-2016-0065Search in Google Scholar

Klaver, P., J. Fell, T. Dietl, S. Schur, C. Schaller, C. E. Elger & G. Fernandez. 2005. Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory. Hippocampus 15. 704–712.10.1002/hipo.20081Search in Google Scholar

Kravchenko, Alexander. 2003. Sign, meaning, knowledge: An essay in the cognitive philosophy of language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, E. L., G. L. Murphy & E. J. Shoben. 1997. The effect of prior processing episodes on basic-level superiority. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A. 25–48.10.1080/713755686Search in Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding, P. H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 2011. Medieval semiotics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/semiotics-medieval (accessed 30 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Charles. 1946. Signs, language, and behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall.10.1037/14607-000Search in Google Scholar

Morris, M. W. & G. L. Murphy. 1990. Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition 18. 407–418.10.3758/BF03197129Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Gregory Leo. 2002. The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Newport, E. & U. Bellugi. 1979. Linguistic expression of category levels. In E. S. Klima & U. Bellugi (eds.), The signs of language, 49–71. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 1993. On determining the functions of language. Semiotica 94(3–4). 201–232.10.1515/semi.1993.94.3-4.201Search in Google Scholar

Ockham, William. 1964. Philosophical writings: A selection, Philotheus Boehner (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Search in Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. & I. A. Richards. 1923. The meaning of meaning. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Paivio, A. 1967. Paired-associate learning and free recall of nouns as a function of concreteness, specificity, imagery, and meaningfulness. Psychological Reports 20. 239–245.10.2466/pr0.1967.20.1.239Search in Google Scholar

Paivio, Allan. 1990. Representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Paivio, Allan, John C. Yuille & Stephen A. Madigan. 1968. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76(1). 1–25.10.1037/h0025327Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. , C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913). Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, W. 1972. Language and social behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Romani, C., S. McAlpine & R. C. Martin. 2007. Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 292–323.10.1080/17470210601147747Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, E. 1999. Principles of categorization. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core readings, 189–206. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382–439.10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-XSearch in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. D. 2001. Course in general linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schie, H. van, A. A. Wijers, R. B. Mars, J. S. Benjamins, A. Laurie & L. A. Stowe. 2005. Processing of visual semantic information to concrete words: Temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms indicated by event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22. 364–386.10.1080/02643290442000338Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5. 1–23.10.1017/S0047404500006837Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A. 2001. Signs: An introduction to semiotics, 2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A. & Marcel Danesi. 2000. The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110816143Search in Google Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1970. Second-order isomorphism of internal representation: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology 1. 1–17.10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2Search in Google Scholar

Stoke, S. M. 1929. Memory for onomatopes. Journal of Genetic Psychology 36. 594–596.10.1080/08856559.1929.10532218Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, J. W. & M. E. Taylor. 1991. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology 15. 121–149.10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-HSearch in Google Scholar

Tversky, B. & K. Hemenway. 1983. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology 15. 121–149.10.1016/0010-0285(83)90006-3Search in Google Scholar

Veer, René van der & Valsiner Valsiner (eds.). 1994. The Vygotsky reader. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, I. & C. Hulme. 1999. Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25. 1256–1271.10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1256Search in Google Scholar

Wisniewski, E. J. & G. L. Murphy. 1989. Superordinate and basic category names in discourse: A textual analysis. Discourse Processes 12. 245–261.10.1080/01638538909544728Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-05-16
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Spontaneous emergence of language-like and music-like vocalizations from an artificial protolanguage
  3. A sociological analysis of moves in the formation of Iranian epitaphs
  4. Sign systems: The dawn of earliest mankind
  5. L’ambigüité structurale et l’acquisition des compétences linguistiques en français en passant par la langue maternelle
  6. The corporeal meaning of language: A semiotic approach to musical glossolalia
  7. Bringing back the image into its frame: Barthes’ soldier and the contextual frame of human perception and interpretation of signs
  8. Context-based analysis of an advertising poster
  9. Semiotic approaches to “traditional music”, musical/poetic structures, and ethnographic research
  10. The theory of synesthesia according to the Pythagorean tradition and Nabokov’s revisiting of Pythagorean synesthesia
  11. “Do you understand these charges?”: How procedural communication in youth criminal justice court violates the rights of young offenders in Canada
  12. Between the institution and the individual: What walking in a place that includes institutional heritage discloses
  13. Finite semiotics: Cognitive sets, semiotic vectors, and semiosic oscillation
  14. The “Fiat 500L” commercial: A journey into Italian style
  15. Epiepistemology/neuro-semantic programming
  16. Diagrams and mental figuration: A semio-cognitive analysis
  17. Perelman’s phenomenology of rhetoric: Foucault contests Chomsky’s complaint about media communicology in the age of Trump polemic
  18. Semiotic and discursive consequences of the cybertextual condition: The case of tragedy
  19. Signizing: The root of the functions of the intentional sign
  20. Review Article
  21. Vital signs: The Darwinian semiotics of beauty in the animal and human worlds
Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0064/pdf
Scroll to top button