Abstract
This paper considers a dynamical system, which models a two-sided market. I evaluate the volume of users from each side of the market as a function of time. I formulate and prove theorems describing the long-term behavior and tendency of the market. Even though I consider generic attachment functions, I obtain a concrete result, formulated in terms of properties of attachment functions. This result is followed by examples (defined by the most popular in economics attachment functions), which illustrate behavior of the two-sided markets. I also simulate some two-sided market scenarios, showing how adjustments of attachment functions can influence the users’ dynamics. The dynamical system’s approach to the study of two-sided market problem allows natural generalization to multi-sided market, where one can utilize the same technique and obtain similar results in higher dimensions.
References
Andronov, A. A., E. A. Vitt, and S. E. Khaiken. 1966. Theory of Oscillators. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carr, J.. 1981. Applications of Centre Manifold Theory. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-5929-9Search in Google Scholar
Guckenheimer, J., and Ph. Holmes. 1983. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2Search in Google Scholar
Guysinsky, M., B. Hasselblatt, and V. Rayskin. 2003. “Differentiability of the Hartman-Grobman Linearization.” Discrete Continuous Dynamical Systems 9:979–84.10.3934/dcds.2003.9.979Search in Google Scholar
Henry, D. 1981. Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Volume 840 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/BFb0089647Search in Google Scholar
Pugh, C. C., and M. Shub. 1970. “Linearization of Normally Hyperbolic Diffeomorphisms and Flows.” Inventiones mathematicae 10:187–98.10.1007/BF01403247Search in Google Scholar
Rochet, J.-C., and J. Tirole. 2003. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4):990–1029.10.1162/154247603322493212Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter