The Law and Economics of Behavioral Regulation

References

Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. J. Publ. Econ. 95: 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. and Sunstein, C. (2015). Regulating internalities. J. Pol. Anal. Manag. 34: 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21843.Suche in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. and Kessler, J.B. (2019). The welfare effects of nudges: a case study of energy use social comparisons. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 11: 236–276. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170328.Suche in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. and Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioural interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104: 3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.Suche in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. and Taubinsky, D. (2015). Evaluating behaviorally motivated policy: experimental evidence from the lightbulb market. Am. Econ. Rev. 105: 2501–2538.10.1257/aer.20131564Suche in Google Scholar

Altmann, S., Falk, A., Heidhues, P., Jayaraman, R., and Teirlinck, M. (2019). Defaults and donations: evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 101: 808–826. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00774.Suche in Google Scholar

Altmann, S., Grunewald, A., and Radbruch, J. (2021). Interventions and cognitive spillovers. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1–36 (in press).10.1093/restud/rdab087Suche in Google Scholar

Arad, A. and Rubinstein, A. (2018). The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies. J. Law Econ. 61: 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/698608.Suche in Google Scholar

Arimura, T.H., Li, S., Newell, R.G., and Palmer, K. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs. Energy J. 33: 63–99. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.4.Suche in Google Scholar

Arno, A. and Thomas, S. (2016). The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Publ. Health 16: 1–11.10.1186/s12889-016-3272-xSuche in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R. (2014). From regulation to behaviour change: giving nudge the third degree. Mod. Law Rev. 77: 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12094.Suche in Google Scholar

Ball, S., Eckel, C., Grossman, Phillip J., and Zame, W. (2001). Status in markets. Q. J. Econ. 116: 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556374.Suche in Google Scholar

Bang, H., Shu, S., and Weber, E. (2018). The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture. Behav. Public Policy 4: 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Barton, A. and Grune-Yanoff, T. (2015). From libertarian paternalism to nudging—and beyond. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 6: 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0268-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bauer, J.M. and Reisch, L.A. (2019). Behavioural insights and (Un)healthy dietary choices: a review of current evidence. J. Consum. Pol. 42: 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9387-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Behavioral Insights Team (2012). Annual update 2011–2012, Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/behavioural-insights-team-annual-update.Suche in Google Scholar

Behavioral Insights Team (2019). Annual report 2017–2018, Available at: https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Annual-update-report-BIT-2017-2018.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K., Cass, S., Thaler, R., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W., and Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychol. Sci. 28: 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernheim, B.D. and Taubinsky, D. (2018). Behavioral public economics – foundations and applications 1. In: Bernheim, B.D., DellaVigna, S., and Libson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral economics. North Holland: Elsevier.10.3386/w24828Suche in Google Scholar

Berthet, V. and Ouvard, B. (2019). Nudge: towards a consensus view? Psychol. Cognitive Sci. 5: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-5-143.Suche in Google Scholar

Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., and Weimer, D.L. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice, 5th ed Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/9781108235594Suche in Google Scholar

Brandon, A., Ferraro, Paul J., List, John A., Metcalfe, Robert D., Price, Michael K., and Rundhammer, Florian. (2017). Do the effects of social nudges persist? theory and evidence from 38 natural field experiments. In: NBER Working Paper #23277. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w23277.10.3386/w23277Suche in Google Scholar

Bursztyn, L. and Jensen, R. (2017). Social image and economic behavior in the field: identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure. Annu. Rev. Econom. 9: 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103625.Suche in Google Scholar

Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P.J., Wagner, C., Palchak, E., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T.H., Schwartz, A.J., and Fisher, B. (2018). Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16: 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1777.Suche in Google Scholar

Capraro, V., Jagfeld, G., Klein, R., Mul, M., and van de Pol, I. (2019). Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Sci. Rep. 9: 1880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, G.D., Choi, J.J., Laibson, D.I., Madrian, B., and Metrick, A. (2009). Optimal defaults and active decisions. Q. J. Econ. 124: 1639–1674. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1639.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaloupka, F.J., Gruber, J., and Warner, K.E. (2015). Accounting for ‘lost pleasure’ in a cost–benefit analysis of government regulation: the case of the food and drug administration’s proposed cigarette labeling regulation. Ann. Intern. Med. 162: 64–66. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1910.Suche in Google Scholar

Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N., Leth-Petersen, S., Nielsen, T.H., and Olsen, T. (2014). Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: evidence from Denmark. Q. J. Econ. 129: 1141–1219. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju013.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, James J., Laibson, D., Madrian, Brigitte C., Metrick, A., and Poterba, James M. (2004). For better or for worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. In: Wise, David A. (Ed.), Perspectives on the economics of aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.3386/w8651Suche in Google Scholar

Cioffi, Catherine E., Levitsky, David A., Pacanowski, Carly R., and Bertz, F. (2015). A nudge in a healthy direction. The effect of nutrition labels on food purchasing behaviors in university dining facilities. Appetite 92: 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.053.Suche in Google Scholar

Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3: 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560.Suche in Google Scholar

Czeisler, Mark E., Marynak, K., Clarke, Kristie E.N., Salah, Z., Shakya, I., Thierry, JoAnn M., Ali, N., McMillan, H., Wiley, Joshua F., Weaver, Matthew D., et al.. (2020). Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19-related concerns. MMWR (Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.) 69: 1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4.Suche in Google Scholar

Damgaard, Mette T. and Gravert, C. (2017). Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 66: 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Damgaard, Mette T. and Gravert, C. (2018). The hidden costs of nudging: experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. J. Publ. Econ. 157: 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.11.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Davidai, S., Gilovich, T., and Lee, R.D. (2012). The meaning of default options for potential organ donors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109: 15201–15202. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211695109.Suche in Google Scholar

Deb, R., Gazzale, R.S., and Kotchen, M.J. (2014). Testing motives for charitable giving: a revealed-preference methodology with experimental evidence. J. Publ. Econ. 120: 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar

De Francesco, F. (2012). Diffusion of regulatory impact analysis among OECD and EU member states. Comp. Polit. Stud. 45: 1277–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011434297.Suche in Google Scholar

De Haan, T. and Linde, J. (2018). ‘Good nudge lullaby’: choice architecture and default bias reinforcement. Econ. J. 128: 1180–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12440.Suche in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. and Linos, E. (2020). RCTs to scale: comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. In: SSRN working paper, Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27594.10.3386/w27594Suche in Google Scholar

Dinner, I., Johnson, E.J., Goldstein, D.G., and Liu, K. (2011). Partitioning default effects: why people choose not to choose. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 17: 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024354.Suche in Google Scholar

Dolan, P. and Galizzi, Matteo M. (2015). Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy. J. Econ. Psychol. 47: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Duflo, E. and Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 118: 815–842. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698432.Suche in Google Scholar

Duflo, E., Gale, W., Liebman, J., Peter, O., and Saez, E. (2007). Savings incentives for low- and moderate-income families in the United States: why is the saver’s credit not more effective? J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 5: 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.647.Suche in Google Scholar

Dunlop, C.A. and Radaelli, C.M. (2016). Handbook of regulatory impact assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing, London, United Kingdom.10.4337/9781782549567Suche in Google Scholar

Ebeling, F. and Lotz, S. (2015). Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tarrifs. Nat. Clim. Change 5: 868–871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2681.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellig, J., McLaughlin, P.A., and Morrall, J. (2013). Continuity, change, and priorities: the quality and use of regulatory analysis across US administrations. Regul. Govern. 7: 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01149.x.Suche in Google Scholar

European Commission (2016). Behavioral insights applied to policy: European report 2016, Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/behavioural-insights-applied-policy-european-report-2016.Suche in Google Scholar

Exec. order no. 12,866, 58 fed. reg. 51,735 (1993), Available at: https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12866.pdf (Accessed 4 October 1993).Suche in Google Scholar

Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25: 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(04)00005-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Farhi, E. and Gabaix, X. (2020). Optimal taxation with behavioral agents. Am. Econ. Rev. 110: 298–336. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151079.Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzjarrald, B. (2019). Utilities investing in behavior? Yes! Examples of behavior strategies in action. In: Behavior, energy, and climate change webinar series, Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0w_rZSaEmw (Accessed 17 November 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Food and Drug, Administration (2020). Tobacco products; required warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements, final rule. 85 Federal Register 15638, pp. 15638–15710, 21 CFR 1141.Suche in Google Scholar

Forberger, S., Resich, L., Kampfmann, T., and Zeen, H. (2019). Nudging to move: a scoping review of the use of choice architecture interventions to promote physical activity in the general population. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activ. 16: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0844-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Frey, E. and Rogers, T. (2014). Persistence: how treatment effects persist after interventions stop. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 1: 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214550405.Suche in Google Scholar

Garcia, S.M. and Tor, A. (2022). Social comparison and competition: a progress report. In: Garcia, S.M., Tor, A., and Elliott, A.S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on the psychology of competition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190060800.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Garcia, Stephen M., Tor, A., and Schiff, Tyrone M. (2013). The psychology of competition: a social comparison perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8: 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504114.Suche in Google Scholar

Garcia, Stephen M., Reese, Zachary A., and Tor, A. (2020). Social comparison before, during, and after the competition. In: Suls, J., Collins, R., and Wheeler, L. (Eds.), Social comparison, judgment and behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190629113.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward L. (2006). Paternalism and psychology. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 73: 133–156.10.3386/w11789Suche in Google Scholar

Gold, N., Lin, Y., Ashcroft, R., and Osman, M. (2020). ‘Better off, as judged by themselves’: do people support nudges as a method to change their own behavior? Behav. Public Policy: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.6.Suche in Google Scholar

Goswami, I. and Urminsky, O. (2016). When should the ask be a nudge? The effect of default amounts on charitable giving. J. Market. Res. 53: 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0001.Suche in Google Scholar

Grune-Yanoff, T. and Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudges versus boost: how coherent. Minds Mach. 26: 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Hagmann, D., Ho, E.H., and George, L. (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nat. Clim. Change 9: 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J.D. and Madsen, J. (2021). Can behavioral interventions be too salient? Evidence from traffic safety messages. In: SSRN working paper, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3633014.10.2139/ssrn.3633014Suche in Google Scholar

Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit. London, UK: WH Allen.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayek, F.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. Am. Econ. Rev. 35: 519–530.Suche in Google Scholar

Hollands, G., Bignardi, G., Johnston, M., Kelly, M.P., Ogilvie, D., Petticrew, M., Prestwich, A., Shemilt, I., Sutton, S., and Marteau, T.M. (2017). The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nat. Human Behav. 1: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0140.Suche in Google Scholar

Houde, S. (2018). How consumers respond to product certification and the value of energy information. Rand J. Econ. 49: 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12231.Suche in Google Scholar

Hummel, D. and Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 80: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Ito, K. (2015). Asymmetric incentives in subsidies: evidence from a large-scale electricity rebate program. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol. 7: 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130397.Suche in Google Scholar

Jachimowicz, J.M., Duncan, S., Weber, E.U., and Johnson, E.J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behav. Public Policy 3: 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.43.Suche in Google Scholar

Janis, I.L. and Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Häubl, G., Larrick, R.P., Payne, J.W., Peters, E., Schkade, D., et al.. (2012). Beyond nudges: tool of a choice architecture. Market. Lett. 23: 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Jolls, C., Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Rev. 50: 1471–1550. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229304.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, R., Pykett, J., and Whitehead, M.J. (2013). Changing behaviours: the rise of the psychological state. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.10.4337/9780857936882Suche in Google Scholar

Jung, J. and Mellers, B. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 11: 62–74.10.1017/S1930297500007592Suche in Google Scholar

Keller, Punam A., Harlam, B., George, L., and Volpp, K.G. (2011). Enhanced active choice: a new method to motivate behavior change. J. Consum. Psychol. 21: 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Khern-am-nuai, W., Yang, W., and Li, N. (2017). Using context-based password strength meter to nudge users’ password generating behavior: a randomized experiment. In: Proceedings of the 50th hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp. 587–596.10.24251/HICSS.2017.071Suche in Google Scholar

Klick, J. and Mitchell, G. (2006). Government regulation of irrationality: moral and cognitive hazards. Minn. Law Rev. 90: 1620–1663.Suche in Google Scholar

Layard, R. and Glaister, S. (1994). Cost-benefit analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511521942Suche in Google Scholar

Le Grand, J. and New, B. (2015). Government paternalism: nanny state or helpful friend? Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.10.23943/princeton/9780691164373.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Legros, S. and Cislaghi, B. (2020). Mapping the social-norms literature: an overview of reviews. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15: 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866455.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, H.M. and Belfield, C. (2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 8: 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.915604.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, H.M. and McEwan, P.J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Suche in Google Scholar

Levy, H., Norton, E.C., and Smith, J.A. (2018). Tobacco regulation and cost-benefit analysis: how should we value foregone consumer surplus? Am. J. Health Econ. 4: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajhe_a_00091.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Osman, M., and Ashcroft, R. (2017). Nudge: concept effectiveness and ethics. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 39: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304.Suche in Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G.F., Hsee, C.K., Weber, E.U., and Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127: 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.Suche in Google Scholar

Madrian, Brigitte C. (2014). Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Annu. Rev. Econom. 6: 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033.Suche in Google Scholar

Mathis, K. and Tor, A. (2016). Nudging – possibilities, limitations and applications in European law and economics. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-29562-6Suche in Google Scholar

McClernon, Francis J., Koznik, Rachel V., and Rose, Jed E. (2008). Individual differences in nicotine dependence, withdrawal symptoms, and sex predict transient fMRI-BOLD responses to smoking cues. Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 2148–2157. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301618.Suche in Google Scholar

McLaughlin, P.A. and Mulligan, C.B. (2020). Three myths about federal regulation. In: NBER working paper #27233, Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27233.10.3386/w27233Suche in Google Scholar

Medina, Paolina C. (2021). Side effects of nudging: evidence from a randomized intervention in the credit card market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34: 2580–2607. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa108.Suche in Google Scholar

Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., and Eccles, M. (2008). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behavior change techniques. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 57: 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Mollenkamp, M., Zeppernick, M., and Jonas, S. (2019). The effectiveness of nudges in improving the self-management of patients with chronic diseases: a systematic literature review. Health Pol. 123: 1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Morris, Michael W., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., and Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 129: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Mueller, D.C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511813771Suche in Google Scholar

Münscher, R., Vetter, M., and Scheuerle, T. (2015). A review and taxonomy of choice architecture techniques. J. Behav. Decis. Making 29: 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1897.Suche in Google Scholar

Nilsson, A., Bergquist, M., and Schultz, Wesley P. (2017). Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda. Environ. Educ. Res. 23: 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148.Suche in Google Scholar

Noar, S.M., Hall, M.G., Francis, D.B., Ribisl, K.M., Pepper, J.K., and Brewer, N.T. (2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobac. Control 25: 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978.Suche in Google Scholar

Noar, S.M., Francis, D.B., Bridges, C., Sontag, J., Brewer, N.T., and Ribisl, K.M. (2017). Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: a systematic review. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 94: 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016674188.Suche in Google Scholar

Nolan, J.M., Schultz, W., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N.J., and Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34: 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. J. Publ. Econ. 90: 1825–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, A. (2015). Nudging, shoving, and budging: behavioral-economic informed policy. Publ. Adm. 93: 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12165.Suche in Google Scholar

Oliver, A. (2017). The Origins of behavioural public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/9781108225120Suche in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). Behavioral insights and public policy: lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing, Paris, FR, Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/behavioural-insights-and-public-policy_9789264270480-en.Suche in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020). Regulatory policy and COVID-19: behavioural insights for fast-paced decision making. OECD Publishing, Paris, DR. Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=137_137590-2p5x0tveyp&title=Regulatory-policy-and-COVID-19-Behavioural-insights-for-fast-paced-decision-making&_ga=2.85898713.1392342847.1628886762-1064373644.1624924646.Suche in Google Scholar

Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. J. Law Econ. 19: 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1086/466865.Suche in Google Scholar

Reisch, L. and Sunstein, Cass R. (2016). Do Europeans like nudges? Judgm. Decis. Mak. 11: 310–325.10.2139/ssrn.2739118Suche in Google Scholar

Required warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements, 76 fed. reg. 36,627, 36,629 (September 22, 2011) (codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1141).Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzo, M. and Whitman, G. (2019). Escaping paternalism: rationality, behavioral economics, and public policy (Cambridge studies in economics, choice, and society). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/9781139061810Suche in Google Scholar

Romer, D., Ferguson, Stuart G., Strasser, Andrew A., Evans, Abigail T., Tompkins, M.K., Macisco, J., Fardal, M., Tusler, M., and Peters, E. (2018). Effects of pictorial warning labels for cigarettes and quit-efficacy on emotional responses, smoking satisfaction, and cigarette consumption. Ann. Behav. Med. 52: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9916-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Sibony, A. and Alemanno, A. (2015). The emergence of behavioural policy-making: a European perspective. In: Alemanno, A. and Sibony, A. (Eds.), Nudge and the law: a European perspective. Hart Publishing, Oxford, UK.Suche in Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D.G. (2006). The affect heuristic. In: Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (Eds.), The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511618031.024Suche in Google Scholar

Spiegler, R. (2015). On the equilibrium effects of nudging. J. Leg. Stud. 44: 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1086/684291.Suche in Google Scholar

Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. (1998). Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Think. Reas. 4: 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394094.Suche in Google Scholar

Stigler, G.J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2: 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160.Suche in Google Scholar

Suls, J. and Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2014). Choosing not to choose. Duke Law J. 64: 1–52.10.2139/ssrn.2377364Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2015). The ethics of nudging. Yale J. Regul. 32: 413–450.10.2139/ssrn.2526341Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2016). The council of psychological advisers. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67: 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081914-124745.Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2018). The cost-benefit revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.10.7551/mitpress/11571.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2019). Ruining popcorn? The welfare effects of information. J. Risk Uncertain. 58: 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-019-09300-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. and Reisch, L.A. (2019). Trusting nudges: toward a bill of rights for nudging, 1st ed Routledge, Abingdon, UK.10.4324/9780429451645Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. and Thaler, R.H. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism is Not an oxymoron, 70. Univ. Chic. Law Rev., 1159–1202.10.2307/1600573Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R., Reisch, L.A., and Kaiser, M. (2019). Trusting nudges? Lessons from an international survey. J. Eur. Publ. Pol. 26: 1417–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1531912.Suche in Google Scholar

Szaszi, B., Palinkas, A., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., and Aczel, B. (2018). A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: toward understanding when and why nudges work. J. Behav. Decis. Making 31: 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2035.Suche in Google Scholar

Teichman, D. and Underhill, K. (2021). Infected by bias: behavioral science and the legal response to COVID-19. Am. J. Law Med. 47: 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2021.16.Suche in Google Scholar

Thaler, R. and Sunstein, Cass R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Thorgerson, J. and Olander, F. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 23: 225–236.10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5Suche in Google Scholar

Thunström, L. (2019). Welfare effects of nudges: the emotional tax of calorie menu labeling. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 14: 11–25.10.1017/S1930297500002874Suche in Google Scholar

Thunström, L., Gilbert, B., and Jones Ritten, C. (2018). Nudges that hurt those already hurting—distributional and unintended effects of salience nudges. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 153: 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., and Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Pol. 57: 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2008). The methodology of the behavioral analysis of law. Haifa Law Rev. 4: 237–327.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2014). Understanding behavioral antitrust. Tex. Law Rev. 92: 573–667.10.2139/ssrn.2293508Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2016). The critical and problematic role of bounded rationality in nudging. In: Mathis, K. and Tor, A. (Eds.), Nudging – possibilities, limitations, and applications in European law and economics. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-29562-6_1Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2019). All nudges are not the same: why rationality matters for welfare, unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2020a). Nudges that should fail? Behav. Public Policy 4: 316–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.5.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2020b). The target opportunity costs of successful nudges. In: Mathis, K. and Tor, A. (Eds.), Consumer law and economics. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-030-49028-7_1Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2021a). A better nudge definition, unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2021b). Organizing the behavioral toolbox: a rationality-based nudge taxonomy, unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. (2023). The private costs of behavioral interventions. Duke Law J. 72.10.2139/ssrn.4083707Suche in Google Scholar

Tor, A. and Klick, J. (2022). When should governments invest more in nudging? Revisiting Benartzi et al. 2017, unpublished manuscript.10.2139/ssrn.4189136Suche in Google Scholar

Truelove, Heather B., Carrico, Amanda R., Weber, Elke U., Raimi, Kaitlin T., and Vandenbergh, Michael P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environ. Change 29: 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Vecchio, R. and Cavallo, C. (2019). Increasing healthy food choices through nudges: a systematic review. Food Qual. Prefer. 78: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.014.Suche in Google Scholar

Weber, E.U., Baron, J., and Graham, L. (2001). Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Weimer, D.L. (2017). Behavioral economics for cost-benefit analysis: benefit validity when sovereign consumers seem to make mistakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/9781108178389Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, J.O. (1989). Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New York, NY.Suche in Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2017). WHO report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017: monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. World Health Organization, Geneva.Suche in Google Scholar

Zamir, E. (1998). The efficiency of paternalism. Va. Law Rev. 84: 229–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073801.Suche in Google Scholar

Zarghamee, H.S., Messer, K.D., Fooks, J.R., Schulze, W.D., Shang, W., and Jubo, Y. (2017). Nudging charitable giving: three field experiments. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 66: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.008.Suche in Google Scholar