Startseite The Evolutionary Force of Behavioral Economics in Law
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Evolutionary Force of Behavioral Economics in Law

  • Saul Levmore EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. November 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper explores the interaction, rather than the competition, among incentivist (or rationalist), behavioral, and evolutionary explanations of legal rules and approaches to problems of public policy. It suggests that behavioral economics can play an important role in influencing people where an incentive-based approach to affecting behavior was tried first and failed on a subset of the targeted group. The discussion ranges across examples including savings rates, the performance of educational institutions, health care, rescue, and even university admissions to explore a range of behavioral tools, with a focus on endowment effects and N-of-1 thinking, in order to bring out the clash among – and the teamwork that is possible with – these three approaches.

JEL Code: D7; D8; D9; K11; K12

Corresponding author: Saul Levmore, Law, University of Chicago Law School, 1111 E. 60th St, 60637-2776, Chicago, IL, USA, E-mail:

References

Bruner, J., Frank, C., and Handfield, T. (2020). The evolution of the endowment effect. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41: 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Capen, E.C., Clapp, R.V., and Campbell, W.M. (1971). Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. J. Petrol. Technol. 23: 641–653. https://doi.org/10.2118/2993-pa.Suche in Google Scholar

Chingos, M. (2013). Class size and student outcomes: research and policy implications. J. Pol. Anal. Manag.: 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21677.Suche in Google Scholar

Gromada, A. and Shewbridge, C. (2016). Student learning time: a literature review. In: OECD education working papers 127.Suche in Google Scholar

Hanushek, E.A. and Peterson, P.E. (2014). Higher grades, higher GDP. Hoover Dig. 2014: 75–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoeppner, S. (2014). Experimental law and economics. In: Backhaus, J.G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of law and economics. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_172-1Suche in Google Scholar

Huck, S., Kirchsteiger, G., and Oeschssler, J. (2005). Learning to like what you have: explain the endowment effect. Econ. J. 115: 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01015.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, C.B., Brosnan, S.F., Levin, D., and Jones, O.D. (2020). Predicting variation in endowment effect magnitudes. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41: 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. (1986). The Winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. Am. Econ. Rev. 76: 894–920.10.1515/9781400830138.107Suche in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., and Thaler, R.H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J. Polit. Econ. 98: 1325–1348. https://doi.org/10.1086/261737.Suche in Google Scholar

Kristal, A.S. and Whillans, A.V. (2020). What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0795-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Levitt, S.D. and List, J.A. (2007). Viewpoint: on the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Can. J. Econ. 40: 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Levmore, S. (1986). Rethinking comparative law: variety and uniformity in ancient and modern tort law. Tulane Law Rev. 61: 235–287.Suche in Google Scholar

Levmore, S. (2021). Second opinions and appellate review: doing away with panels of three. Draft available from author. Forthcoming.Suche in Google Scholar

List, J. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies. Q. J. Econ. 118: 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535144.Suche in Google Scholar

Nixon, J. and Ulmann, P. (2006). The relationship between health care expenditure and health outcomes: evidence and caveats for a causal link. Eur. J. Health Econ. 7: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005-0336-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. (1994). Psychology and savings policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 84: 186–192.Suche in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93: 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-11

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 19.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rle-2021-0054/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen