Prevalence and characteristics of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis: A hospital database and literature review

Introduction

Crystal-induced arthritis is a common form of arthritis encountered in clinical practice, with gouty arthritis being the most prevalent. Its prevalence ranges from 0.9%–5.2%, with higher rates observed in Western countries.^[1,2] The gold standard for diagnosing gout is the detection of intracellular monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in synovial fluid.^[3] Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) represents one of the most prevalent forms of crystal-induced arthritis, and is diagnosed by the detection of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals.^[4] The exact prevalence of CPPD is unknown due to there being a variety of clinical subtypes, including asymptomatic chondrocalcinosis; however, the incidence increases with age. One study in the UK showed that the prevalence of knee CPPD was 7%–10% in patients > 60 years of age.^[5] Septic arthritis occurs less frequently than crystal-induced arthritis; however, it is associated with a higher mortality rate of 11.5%.^[6] As a rheumatological emergency, this condition exhibits an incidence rate of approximately 2–10 cases per 100,000 person-years in the general population. In particular, this rate increases significantly to 30–100 cases per 100,000 person-years among individuals with certain risk factors, including older adults, immunocompromised hosts, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and those with prosthetic joints.^{[7, 8, 9, 10]}

Diagnosis of septic arthritis can be challenging due to its symptoms and laboratory findings, such as acute monoarthritis or oligoarthritis with or without fever, high synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, and leukocytosis, which are symptoms similar to those observed in crystal-induced arthritis.^[11] Delayed diagnosis and treatment of septic arthritis can lead to joint damage and increased mortality, significantly impacting both short- and long-term quality of life.^[12]

Differentiating between septic arthritis and crystal-induced arthritis presents a notable challenge, particularly when patients with existing crystal-induced arthritis may also develop concomitant septic arthritis.^[11,13,14] The detection of crystals in synovial fluid does not exclude the possibility of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis.^{[11,13, 14, 15]}

Research surrounding concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis remains sparse, underscoring our motivation for this study. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis.

Materials and Methods

Results

Initially, 2, 584 individuals were selected from the hospital’s electronic database based on the ICD-10 codes M00, M10, and M11. Subsequently, 426 patients with septic arthritis and 1116 with crystal-induced arthritis were identified from the hospital laboratory database. Among them, 50 patients initially showed positive findings for synovial fluid bacterial cultures and intracellular crystals; however, after excluding five patients due to probable contamination of the bacterial culture, 45 patients with concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis remained for inclusion in the study, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Patients enrollment. CPPD, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision; MSUC, monosodium urate crystal; SF, synovial fluid.

Discussion

Despite the rarity and limited research concerning concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis among patients with crystal-induced arthritis, our study identified a prevalence rate of 4%. Previous studies in the United States reported lower rates, ranging from 1.5%–1.8%,^[11,16] whereas Australia documented a higher rate of 5.2%.^[14]

The majority of patients were male (73.3%), with a mean age of 62.8 years. Gout was the most common underlying condition, present in 53.3% of patients. Fever was present in 95.6% of patients. The most common joint presentation was acute monoarthritis (66.7%), with the knee being the most frequently affected joint (68.9%). The median duration of arthritis was 3 days. The median synovial fluid WBC count was 61,478 cells/μL. The majority of patients (86.8%) had synovial WBC counts exceeding 20,000 cells/μL. The mean CRP level was 215 mg/L, and none of the patients had a CRP level < 82.2 mg/L. The most common crystals detected were monosodium urate crystals (80%). Gram-positive cocci were the most frequently isolated organisms and were identified in 84.4% of culture-positive patients. Among these cases, Staphylococcus was the most common (48.9%), and gram-negative bacilli were present in 15.6% of culture-positive patients. Among patients with positive cultures, synovial Gram staining was positive in 35.6%, while blood cultures were positive in only 15.6%.

We conducted a literature review and compared our results to those of previous studies. Owing to the rarity of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis, our findings consisted mainly of case reports and four case series as noted in Table 3.^{[13, 14, 15,17]}

Given the similarities in symptoms, such as acute monoarthritis or acute oligoarthritis with or without fever, and shared laboratory findings, such as elevated synovial fluid WBC counts and leukocytosis, diferentiating between septic arthritis and crystal-induced arthritis presents a significant challenge. This dificulty is further compounded in cases of concomitant septic arthritis and crystal-induced arthritis that occur in patients with crystal-induced arthritis. Even with the presence of crystals in synovial fluid, a diagnosis of concomitant septic arthritis and crystal-induced arthritis cannot be ruled out.^{[11,13, 14, 15, 16, 17]} Delayed diagnosis and treatment of septic arthritis can result in joint damage and increased morbidity and mortality. According to our literature review, the mortality rate associated with concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis ranges between 6.7%–28.6%.^{[12, 13, 14, 15,17]}

Several studies have aimed to differentiate concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis from crystal-induced arthritis. Gram staining demonstrates high specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) in the diagnosis of septic arthritis.^[14] However, due to its low sensitivity, it produced a positive result in only 35.6% of the cases in our study. A synovial WBC count ≤ 10, 000 cells/μL and CRP level ≤ 100 mg/L were unlikely to indicate concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis, with negative predictive values (NPV) of 98.5% and 98.7%, respectively. In contrast, elevated synovial WBC counts > 10,000 cells/μL or increased CRP levels > 100 mg/L were suggestive of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis, demonstrating a sensitivity of 86.4% and specificities of 48.3% and 54.6%, respectively.^[14] Compared to our findings, synovial WBC counts < 12,000 cells/μL and CRP levels < 80 mg/L were indicative of a lower likelihood of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis. Elevated synovial WBC count > 85,000 cells/μL strongly indicates concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis with a specificity of 100%, although with a low PPV of 12.0%.^[16] This is consistent with our study, where 86.8% of patients had synovial WBC counts > 20,000 cells/μL, and 60.5% had synovial WBC > 50,000 cells/μL. Procalcitonin is a biological laboratory marker of bacterial infection that may be useful for diagnosing septic arthritis and acute osteomyelitis.^[18] A recent diagnostic study demonstrated that a procalcitonin level of ≥ 1.36 μg/L is highly specific for distinguishing septic arthritis from gouty arthritis, with a sensitivity of 70.4%, specificity of 99.5%, and a PPV of 97.4%. Conversely, a procalcitonin level of < 0.4 μg/L unlikely to be septic arthritis, with a sensitivity of 96.3%, specificity of 67.8%, and a NPV of 98.5%.^[19]

Practitioner Points: In medical practice, we would like to suggest that the use of basic investigation to rule out concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis is easier than diagnosing such conditions, if synovial WBC < 12,000 cells/μL and CRP < 80 mg/L, or procalcitonin level < 0.4 ng/μL, the chance of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis is very low. In contrast, if the synovial fluid Gram stain is positive, it has high specificity and PPV for the diagnosis of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis. However, in typical cases where excluding this diagnosis is challenging, such as when synovial WBC > 20,000 cells/μL with fever or WBC > 85,000 cells/μL or procalcitonin level ≥ 1.36 ng/μL, it could be best to initially manage the condition as septic arthritis until further evidence allows a definitive exclusion of concomitant septic arthritis.

The strength of our study is that it encompasses the largest concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis population ever studied to date. One limitation of this study is that it was retrospective; it may lack some data, and the observed distribution of afected joints might be biased towards those more easily accessible for aspiration by physicians.

Conclusions

The prevalence of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis was 4% among patients with crystal-induced arthritis. Most patients presented with acute monoarthritis, fever, and elevated WBC counts in synovial fluid. The chance of concomitant septic and crystal-induced arthritis is very low in cases with synovial WBC counts < 12,000 cells/μL.