A Stoic Ethics for Attention (Seneca Letter 56)
-
Charles Brittain
Abstract
Seneca’s Letters sketch a theory of attentive action according to which distraction is caused by inconsistent beliefs about values, such that the degree of an agent’s attention to an endorsed action is proportionate to the consistency of her beliefs about value, i. e. her proximity to virtue. The agent’s activity of attentive action is co-ordinated with a state of alertness to her interests, which accordingly triggers switches in attention that sustain the endorsed action in single-minded agents or cause distraction if the new interest is irrelevant to it. Seneca’s theory reflects the older Stoic conception of the tensional mental strength of the virtuous agent, which Chrysippus identified as the causal factor over and above virtue that ensures her successful performance of right action.
Bibliography
Bénatouïl, Thomas (2005): “Force, Fermeté, Froid: La Dimension Physique de la Vertu Stoicïenne”, Philosophie antique 5, pp. 5–30.Suche in Google Scholar
Berno, Francesca Romana (2004): “Enea pius inperitus. Nota ad Sen. Epist. 56.12–13”. In: Lia De Finis (ed.): Colloquio su Seneca. Trento: Associazione italiana di cultura classica, pp. 7–24.Suche in Google Scholar
Berno, Francesca Romana (2006): L. Anneo Seneca. Lettere a Lucilio, libro VI: le lettere 53–57. Bologna: Pátron.Suche in Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles (2003): “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue”. In: John J. Cleary and Gary M. Gurtler (eds.): Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 18. Leiden: Brill, pp. 223–263.10.1163/22134417-90000043Suche in Google Scholar
Caston, Victor (2001): “Connecting Traditions: Augustine and the Greeks on Intentionality”. In: Dominik Perler (ed.): Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, pp. 23–48.10.1163/9789004453296_004Suche in Google Scholar
Cooper, John (1999): “The Unity of Virtue”, ch. 3 in his Reason and Emotion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 76–117.Suche in Google Scholar
De Lacy, Philip (2005): Galen on the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Paulus (1976): “Intentio”. In: J. Ritter & K. Gründer (ed): Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. IV. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 466–74.10.24894/HWPh.1818Suche in Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher (2007): “Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers?”, Phronesis 52, pp. 88–120.10.1163/156852807X177977Suche in Google Scholar
Gourinat, Jean-Baptiste (2007): “Akrasia and Enkrateia in Ancient Stoicism: Minor Vice and Minor Virtue”. In: C. Bobonich & P. Destrée (eds.): Akrasia in Ancient Philosophy. Leiden, Brill, pp. 215–47.10.1163/ej.9789004156708.i-308.55Suche in Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2002): Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret & Anthony Long (trans.) (2015): Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Letters on Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hahm, David (1978): “Early Hellenistic Theories of Vision and the Perception of Color”. In: Peter K. Machamer and Robert G. Turnbull (eds.): Studies in Perception. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, pp. 60–95.Suche in Google Scholar
Hensley, Ian (2020): “The Physics of Pneuma in Early Stoicism”. In: Sean Coughlin, David Leith and Orly Lewis (eds): The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle. Berlin: Edition Topoi, pp. 171–201.Suche in Google Scholar
Hönscheid, C. (2004): Fomenta Campaniae. Ein Kommentar zu Senecas 51, 55, und 56 Brief. Munich: K. G. Saur.10.1515/9783110956559Suche in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (2021): “The Stoic Provenance of the Notion of Prosochêˆ Rhizomata 9, pp. 202–232.10.1515/rhiz-2021-0012Suche in Google Scholar
Løkke, Hårvard (2008): “The Stoics on Sense Perception”. In: Simo Knuuttila, Pekka Kärkkäinen (eds): Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 35–46.10.1007/978-1-4020-6125-7_3Suche in Google Scholar
Løkke, Hårvard (2015): “Our progress towards virtue”, ch. 4 in his Knowledge and virtue in early Stoicism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 89–111.10.1007/978-94-007-2153-1_5Suche in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. and David N. Sedley (1987): The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Suche in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. (1991): “The Harmonics of Stoic Virtue”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Suppl. Vol. pp. 97–116.Suche in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A (1999): “Stoic psychology”. In: Keimpe Algra et al. (eds.): The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 560–84.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.018Suche in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap (1991): “The Idea of the Will in Chrysippus, Posidonius, and Galen”, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7, pp. 107–45.10.1163/2213441791X00079Suche in Google Scholar
Motto, Anna L. and John Clark (1970): “Epistle 56: Seneca’s Ironic Art”, Classical Philology 65:2, pp. 102–105.10.1086/365594Suche in Google Scholar
Nielsen, Palle (1963): “intentio, -ōnis f.”, Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Online Vol. 7.1, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 2120–22.Top of FormSuche in Google Scholar
Nightingale, Andrea (2015): “Augustine on Extending Oneself to God through Intention”, Augustinian Studies 46:2, pp. 185–209.10.5840/augstudies201511514Suche in Google Scholar
O’Daly, Gerald (1987): Augustine’s Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max (1918): M. Tullius Cicero Fasc. 44 Tusculanae Disputationes. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar
Reynolds, Leighton (1965): L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Reynolds, Leighton (1977): L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum Libri Duodecim. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rimelli, Victoria (2015): “Blood, sweat and fears in the Roman baths”, ch. 4 in her The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–230.10.1017/CBO9781139941532.006Suche in Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (2013): “Cardinal virtues: a contested Socratic inheritance”. In: Alex G. Long (ed.): Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.11–28.10.1017/CBO9781139629157.002Suche in Google Scholar
Sedley, David (1993): “Chrysippus on psychophysical causality”. In: Jacques Brunschwig and Martha Nussbaum (eds.): Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–31.Suche in Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc (2008): “Tension et intention: Esquisse de l’historie d’une notion”. In: Lambros Coloubaritsis and Antonino Mazzu (eds.): Questions sur l’intentionnalité. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, pp. 59–124.Suche in Google Scholar
Summers, Walter (1910): Select Letters of Seneca. London: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Tieleman, Teun (2003): Chrysippus’ On Affections. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004321175_008Suche in Google Scholar
Todd, Robert, B. (1974): “Sunentasis and the Stoic theory of perception”, Grazer Beiträge 24, pp. 251–61.Suche in Google Scholar
Vegetti, Mario (1993): “I nervi dell’anima”. In: Jutta Kollesch and Diethard Nickel (eds.): Galen und das hellenistische Erbe. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 63–77.Suche in Google Scholar
Veillard, Christelle (2020): “Soul, Pneuma, and Blood: The Stoic Conception of the Soul”. In: Brad Inwood and James Warren (eds.): Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–70.10.1017/9781108641487.007Suche in Google Scholar
von Arnim, Hans (1903/1905) = “SVF”: Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta vols. I–III. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, Kurt (1884): Ioannis Stobaei Anthologii Libri Duo Priores. Berlin: Weidmann.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
