Startseite How did Anaximander Become a Material Monist?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

How did Anaximander Become a Material Monist?

  • Nicola Carraro EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Dezember 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Rhizomata
Aus der Zeitschrift Rhizomata Band 4 Heft 2

Abstract

Although the view that Anaximander was a Material Monist is not very popular nowadays, it is still widely held that it was embraced by Aristotle at least on some occasions, then adopted by Theophrastus, and later on inherited by Simplicius, our main source on the Presocratics. I argue that none of these three philosophers held this view and that, for this reason, it should not be seen as the standard ancient interpretation of Anaximander.

Bibliography

Bonitz, Hermann (1870): Index Aristotelicus. Berlin: Reimer.Suche in Google Scholar

Buchheim, Thomas, ed. (2010): Aristoteles: Über Werden und Vergehen. Berlin: Akademie.10.1524/9783050055527Suche in Google Scholar

Charles, David (2000): “Metaphysics Λ 2”. In Michael Frede and David Charles (eds.): Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda.Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 81 – 110.Suche in Google Scholar

Conche, Marcel (1991): Anaximandre:Fragments and Temoignages. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis M. (1934): “Innumerable Worlds in Presocratic Philosophy”. The Classical Quarterly, 28 (1), pp. 1 – 16.10.1017/S0009838800009897Suche in Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann (1879): Doxographi graeci. Berlin: Reimer. Reprint: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511710483Suche in Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann, ed. (1882): Simplicii in Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotetelem Graeca 9 – 10. Berlin: Reimer.Suche in Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann (1923): “Anaximandros von Milet”, Neue Jahrbücher fur das klassische Altertum, Geschichte und deutsche Literatur 26, pp. 65‒76.Suche in Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann and Walther Kranz, eds. (1952): Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (3 Vols). 6th edition. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Fazzo, Silvia (2008): “Nicolas, l’auteur du Sommaire de la philosophie d’Aristote: doutes sur son identité, sa datation, son origine”, Revue des études grecques 121, pp. 99 – 126.10.3406/reg.2008.7892Suche in Google Scholar

, (2008): Les Commentaires de Simplicius et Jean Philopon à la Physique d’Aristote: Tradition et innovation. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208078Suche in Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W. (2006): Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400827459Suche in Google Scholar

Hayduck, Michael, ed. (1891): Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis metaphysica commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotetelem Graeca 1. Berlin: Reimer.10.1515/9783110807677Suche in Google Scholar

Heidel, William A. (1912): “On Anaximander”, Classical Philology 7, pp. 212‒234.10.1086/359654Suche in Google Scholar

Joachim, Harold H., ed. (1922): Aristotle on Coming-to-Be & Passing-Away. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles (1960): Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/kahn90334Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsey, Sean (2008): “The Place of I 7 in the Argument of Physics I”, Phronesis 53, pp. 180 – 208.10.1163/156852808X278721Suche in Google Scholar

Kirk, Geoffrey S. (1955): “Some Problems in Anaximander”, The Classical Quarterly (New Series)5, pp. 21 – 38.10.1017/S0009838800002433Suche in Google Scholar

Kirk, Geoffrey S., John E. Raven, and Malcolm Schofield (1983): The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts.Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813375Suche in Google Scholar

Laks, André (2008): Diogène d’Apollonie: edition, traduction et commentaire des fragments et témoignages. 2nd revised and augmented edition. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap (2002): “Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Simplicius on Anaximander”, Φιλοσοφία31, pp. 25 – 45.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap (2011): “Anaximander’s Fragment: Another Attempt”, Phronesis 56, pp. 1 – 32.10.1163/9789004382060_006Suche in Google Scholar

Marcinkowska-Rosół, Maria (2014): Die Prinzipienlehre der Milesier: Kommentar zu den Textzeugnissen bei Aristoteles und seinen Kommentatoren. Studia Presocratica. Vol. 6. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614518365Suche in Google Scholar

McDiarmid, John B. (1953): “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 61, pp. 85 – 156.10.2307/310774Suche in Google Scholar

Moraux, Paul (1973): Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Vol. 1. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110827743Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, John A. (2009): Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567904.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Prantl, Carl, ed. (1854): Aristoteles’ 8 Bücher Physik. Leipzig: Engelmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Rashed, Marwan, ed. (2005): Aristote: De la génération et la corruption. Paris: Belles lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, William D., ed. (1936): Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schenkl, Heinrich, ed. (1900): Themistii in Aristotelis Physica paraphrasis. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Vol. 5.2. Berlin: Reimer.Suche in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich (1815a): “Über Diogenes von Apollonia”, Abhandlungen der philosophischen Klasse der Königlich-Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1804 – 1811, pp. 79 – 96. Reprinted in: Akademievorträge. Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 11. Martin Rössler (ed.). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 11 – 29.Suche in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich (1815b): “Ueber Anaximandros”, Abhandlungen der philosophischen Klasse der Königlich-Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften aus den Jahren 1804 – 1811, pp. 97 – 124. Reprinted in: Akademievorträge, Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 11. Martin Rössler (ed.). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 31 – 63.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwabl, Hans (1964): “Anaximander. Zu den Quellen und seiner Einordnung im vorsokratischen Denken”, Archiv fur Begriffsgeschichte 9, pp. 59‒72.Suche in Google Scholar

Whitby, Maurice (1982): “Quasi-Elements in Aristotle”, Mnemosyne (Fourth Series) 35, pp. 225 – 247.Suche in Google Scholar

Wicksteed, Philip H. and Francis M. Cornford, eds. (1929): Aristotle: The Physics, London: Heinemann.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeller, Eduard (1919): Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Vol. I. 6th revised edition, ed. by Wilhelm Nestlé, Leipzig: Reisland.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-12-15
Published in Print: 2016-12-15

© De Gruyter 2016

Heruntergeladen am 30.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen