Abstract
How is it that Empedocles’ world is is an organized system of diverse entities and how does this system of maintain regularity over long periods of time? I suggest that it is the impulses and thoughts of the roots and of Love and Strife that answer these questions. Love and Strife, working within the laws of nature provide the major structural aspects of the cosmos: the circular motion of the whirls created by the opposing forces produce the masses of roots that are worked up into the heavenly bodies and the living things that populate the cosmos. It is useful to conceive of Empedocles as a proto-power-structuralist. The basic ingredients of the world are ontologically prior to the medium sized objects of sensible experience: it is not the case that there are underlying Aristotelian subjects with properties and attributes depending on those subjects.
Bibliography
Cooper, J. M. (2004): “A Note on Aristotle on Mixture”. In: de Haas and J. Mansfeld, eds. (2004), pp. 315–26.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2005): “On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 137–62.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2011): “Divinity and Intelligibility in Parmenides”. In: L. Riggiu and C. Natali (eds.): Ontologia Scienza Mito: Per una nuova lettura di Parmenide. Milan: Mimesis Edizione, pp. 117–133.Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2013a): “The Divine and the Thinkable: Toward an Account of the Intelligible Cosmos”, Rhizomata 1, pp. 217–247.10.1515/rhiz-2013-0010Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2013b): “Where are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles”. In: J. McCoy (ed.): Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the Emergence of Reason. Washington DC: The Catholic University Press of America, pp. 113–138.10.2307/j.ctt3fgp4k.11Search in Google Scholar
Curd, P. (forthcoming): “Empedocles on Sensation, Perception, and Thought”. In: K. Ierodiakonou and P. S. Hasper (eds.): Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy. Special issue on Ancient Epistemology.Search in Google Scholar
Fine, K. (1992): “Aristotle on Matter”, Mind NS, 101, pp. 35–57.Search in Google Scholar
Fine, K. (1994): “A Puzzle Concerning Matter and Form”. In: T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, M. L. Gill (eds.): Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 13–40,Search in Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2004): “On Generation and Corruption I. 10: On Mixture and Mixables”. In: de Haas and Mansfeld, eds. (2004), pp. 289–314.Search in Google Scholar
Gemelli-Marciano, L. (2005): “Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 373–403.Search in Google Scholar
Graham D. W. (1988): “Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle”, Classical Quarterly NS 38, pp. 297–312.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2005): “The Typology and Dynamics of Empedocles’ Cycle”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 225–244.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2006): Explaining the Cosmos. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400827459Search in Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. ed. (2010): The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and J. Mansfeld, eds. (2004): Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2005): “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, pp. 1–37.Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1992): The Poem of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with an Introduction. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Iribarren, L. (2013): “Les Peintures d’Empédocle (DK 31 B23): Enjeux et Portée d’une Analogie Préplatonicienne”, Philosophie Antique 13, pp. 83–115.Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1960): “Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42, pp. 1–35.Search in Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (2009): “Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles”, Phronesis 54, pp. 215–238.Search in Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1994): “Empedocles and his Interpreters: the Four Element Doxography”, Phronesis 39, pp. 235–254.Search in Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995): Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (2001): “Empedocles for the New Millennium”, Ancient Philosophy 22, pp. 333–413.Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2005): “Some Thoughts about Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles”, In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 265–282.Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2009): “Three Pre-Socratic Eschatologies: A Speculative Reading of Parmenides, Anaxagoras, and Empedocles about the Future of the World”. Unpublished manuscript, presented at Princeton Classical Philosophy Colloquium, December 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2013): “Phenomenon and Reference: Revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the Problem of Rationalization”. In: S. C. Humphreys and R. G. Wagner (eds.): Modernity’s Classics. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 165–186.10.1007/978-3-642-33071-1_8Search in Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1966): “Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?” Classical Quarterly NS 16, pp. 256–276.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, A. and O. Primavesi (1999): L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. (1986): “Quality, Structure, and Emergence in Later Presocratic Philosophy”, Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2, pp. 127–194.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1969): Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0009838800010260Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1995): “Empedocles Revisited”, Ancient Philosophy 15, pp. 403–470.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2001): “Empedocles: The Wandering Daimon and the Two Poems”, Aevum Antiquum NS 1, pp. 79–179.Search in Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (1987): “Empedocles Recycled”, Classical Quarterly 37, pp. 24–50.Search in Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (2005): “Sin and Moral Responsibility in Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 283–308.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2013): “Revelation and Reasoning in Kalliopeia’s Address to Empedocles”, Rhizomata 1, pp. 308–329.Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2004): “Les cinq sources dont parle Empédocle”, Revue des études grecques 117, pp. 393–446.Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2005): “Corrigenda. Liste des erreurs qui se sont introduites dans « Les cinq sources dont parle Empédocle », lors de la re-composition de l’article après l’incendie de l’imprimerie fin 2004”, Revue des études grecques 118, pp. 322–325. Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2009): “Water and Bronze in the Hands of Empedocles’ Muse”, Organon 41, pp. 59–84. [Revised and expanded version, in English, of Picot (2004) and (2005)].Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2012): “Apollon et la Φρὴν ἰερὴ καὶ ἀθέσφατος (Empédocle, fr. 134 DK)”, Anais de Filosofia Clássica 6, No. 11, pp. 1–31.Search in Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. and Berg, W. (2013): “Empedocles vs. Xenophanes: Differing Notions of the Divine”, Organon 45, pp. 5–19.Search in Google Scholar
Pierris, A. ed. (2005): The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process, and The Question of Cyclicity. Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research.Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2005): “The Structure of Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: Aristotle and the Byzantine Anonymous”. In: Pierris, ed. (2005), pp. 265–282.Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2006): “Empedokles in Florentiner Aristoteles-Scholien”, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 157, pp. 27–40.Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008a): “Empedocles: Physical Divinity and Allegorical Myth”. In: P. Curd and D. Graham (eds.): Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 250–283.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195146875.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008b): Empedokles Physika I: Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110210514Search in Google Scholar
Rangos, S. (2012): “Empedocles on Divine Nature”, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 74, pp. 314–338.Search in Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2001): “La Chronographie du Système d’Empédocle: Documents Byzantins Inédits”, Aevum Antiquum NS 1, pp. 237–259.Search in Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2011): “La zoogonie de la Haine selon Empédocle: retour sur l’ensemble ‘d’ du papyrus d’Akhmim”, Phronesis 56, pp. 33–57.10.1163/156852811X540419Search in Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2014): “La Chronographie du Système d’Empédocle: Addenda et Corrigenda”, Les Etudes Philosophiques 110, pp. 315–342.Search in Google Scholar
Santaniello, C. (2012): “Θεός, Δαίμων, Φρὴν ’Ιερή: Empedocles and the Divine.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 74, pp. 301–313.10.3917/rmm.123.0301Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007): Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520934368Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2003): “Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25, pp. 1–57.Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2004): Empedocles: An Interpretation. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203483923Search in Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2014): “From Wandering Limbs to Limbless Gods: δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles”, Apeiron 47, pp. 172–210.10.1515/apeiron-2012-0033Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1952): “Presocratic Theology and Philosophy”, Philosophical Quarterly 2, pp. 97–123.Search in Google Scholar
Wilford, F. A. (1968): “Embryological Analogies in Empedocles’ Cosmogony”, Phronesis 13, pp. 108–118.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. (1981): Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© De Gruyter 2016
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Special issue: Empedocles’s metaphysics, Guest editor: Anna Marmodoro
- Empedocles’s metaphysics
- Articles
- Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys
- Elemental Change in Empedocles
- Powers, Structure, and Thought in Empedocles
- Love, Sex and the Gods: Why things have divine names in Empedocles’ poem, and why they come in pairs
- Empedoclean Superorganisms
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Special issue: Empedocles’s metaphysics, Guest editor: Anna Marmodoro
- Empedocles’s metaphysics
- Articles
- Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys
- Elemental Change in Empedocles
- Powers, Structure, and Thought in Empedocles
- Love, Sex and the Gods: Why things have divine names in Empedocles’ poem, and why they come in pairs
- Empedoclean Superorganisms