A cautionary approach in transitioning to ‘green’ energy technologies and practices is required

References

1. UNEP(United Nations Environment Programme). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. In: Green Economy Initiative. United Nations Environment Programme; 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Barbier E. The policy challenges for green economy and sustainable economic development. In: Natural resources forum: 2011. Wiley Online Library, 233–45.10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01397.xSuche in Google Scholar

3. ILO (International Labour Organization). What is a green job? In Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2013. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/green-jobs/news/WCMS_220248/lang--en/index.htm. Accessed 18 Jun 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

4. EIA(US Energy Information Administration). Renewable energy shows strongest growth in global electric generating capacity. In: Today in energy. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration; 2011. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=3270. Accessed 03 Dec 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Kieffer G, Couture T. Renewable energy target setting. The International Renewable Energy Agency. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; 2015. http://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA_RE_Target_Setting_2015.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Li X, Chen Z, Chen Z, Zhang Y. A human health risk assessment of rare earth elements in soil and vegetables from a mining area in Fujian Province, Southeast China. Chemosphere 2013;93(6):1240–6.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.085Suche in Google Scholar

7. Brand U. Green economy–the next oxymoron? No lessons learned from failures of implementing sustainable development. GAIA 2012;21(1):28–32.10.14512/gaia.21.1.9Suche in Google Scholar

8. Marello M, Helwege A. Solid waste management and social inclusion of waste pickers: opportunities and challenges. In: Social-Inclusion-Working-Paper. Global Economic Governance Initiative, Paper 7, September; 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Azadi H, de Jong S, Derudder B, De Maeyer P, Witlox F. Bitter sweet: how sustainable is bio-ethanol production in Brazil? Renew Sust Energ Rev 2012;16(6):3599–603.10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

10. Phillips T. Brazil’s ethanol slaves: 200,000 migrant sugar cutters who prop up renewable energy boom’. The Guardian 2007, 9. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/09/brazil.renewableenergy. Accessed 06 Jul 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Mulloy KB, Sumner SA, Rose C, Conway GA, Reynolds SJ, et al. Renewable energy and occupational health and safety research directions: a white paper from the energy summit, Denver Colorado, April 11–13, 2011. Am J Ind Med 2013;56(11):1359–70.10.1002/ajim.22184Suche in Google Scholar

12. Mulvaney D, editor. Green technology: an A-to-Z guide. USA: SAGE publications, 2011; 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412975704.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Dresselhaus M. Thomas I: alternative energy technologies. Nature 2001;414(6861):332–7.10.1038/35104599Suche in Google Scholar

14. Clift R. Clean technology – an introduction. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1995;62(4):321–6.10.1007/978-94-011-1312-0_6Suche in Google Scholar

15. McEvoy A, Castañer L, Markvart T. Solar cells: materials, manufacture and operation. UK: Academic Press; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Fthenakis V, Kim HC, Frischknecht R, Raugei M, Sinha P, et al. Life Cycle Inventories and Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaic Systems, International Energy Agency (IEA) PVPS Task 12, Report T12-02:2011. In: International Energy Agency (IEA) PVPS Task 12, Report T12. vol. 4; 2011. https://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/pdf/226_Task12_LifeCycle_Inventories.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Xakalashe BS, Tangstad M. Silicon processing: from quartz to crystalline silicon solar cells. Chem Technol 2012 (April);32–7.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Mikhail SA, Turcotte A-M. The determination of low levels of crystalline silica in slag and silica fume. Thermochim Acta 1997;292(1):111–4.10.1016/S0040-6031(97)00001-4Suche in Google Scholar

19. Fletcher A, Phillips D, Barrow I. Determination of crystalline silica in silica fume. Talanta 1994;41(10):1663–8.10.1016/0039-9140(94)E0097-BSuche in Google Scholar

20. Steenland K. One agent, many diseases: exposure-response data and comparative risks of different outcomes following silica exposure. Am J Ind Med 2005;48(1):16–23.10.1002/ajim.20181Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Calvert GM, Rice FL, Boiano JM, Sheehy JW, Sanderson WT. Occupational silica exposure and risk of various diseases: an analysis using death certificates from 27 states of the United States. Occ Environ Med 2003;60(2):122–9.10.1136/oem.60.2.122Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Soo J-C, Li S-R, Chen J-R, Chang C-P, Ho Y-F, et al. Acid gas, acid aerosol and chlorine emissions from trichlorosilane burning processes. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2011;11(3):323–30.10.4209/aaqr.2011.03.0025Suche in Google Scholar

23. Ngai EY. Photovoltaic specialty materials safety. In: Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Austin Convention Center, Austin, Texas, 2012 38th IEEE: 2012: IEEE; 2012: 000619–000624.10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317687Suche in Google Scholar

24. Otanicar TP, Phelan PE, Prasher RS, Rosengarten G, Taylor RA. Nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector. J Renew Sustain Ener 2010;2(3):033102.10.1063/1.3429737Suche in Google Scholar

25. Krajnik P, Pusavec F, Rashid A. Nanofluids: properties, applications and sustainability aspects in materials processing technologies. In: Seliger G, Khraisheh MMK, Jawahir IS, editors. Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011;107–13.10.1007/978-3-642-20183-7_16Suche in Google Scholar

26. Mlinar V. Engineered nanomaterials for solar energy conversion. Nanotechnology 2013;24(4):042001.10.1088/0957-4484/24/4/042001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Song T, Lee S-T, Sun B. Prospects and challenges of organic/group IV nanomaterial solar cells. J Mater Chem 2012;22(10):4216–32.10.1039/c2jm14943eSuche in Google Scholar

28. Ardente F, Beccali G, Cellura M, Brano VL. Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector: sensitivity analysis, energy and environmental balances. Renew Energ 2005;30(2):109–30.10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.006Suche in Google Scholar

29. Jordan DC, Kurtz SR. Photovoltaic degradation rates – an analytical review. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 2013;21(1):12–29.10.1002/pip.1182Suche in Google Scholar

30. Mittelman G, Davidson JH, Mantell SC, Su Y. Prediction of polymer tube life for solar hot water systems: a model of antioxidant loss. Sol Energy 2008;82(5):452–61.10.1016/j.solener.2007.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

31. Camisa W, Mantell SC, Davidson JH, Singh G. Prediction of degradation of polyolefins used in solar domestic hot water components. In: ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Phoenix, Arizona, USA: 2010, 301–8. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/ES2010-90514Suche in Google Scholar

32. Timilsina G, Mevel S. Biofuels and climate change mitigation. In: Timilsina GR, Zilberman D, editors. The impacts of biofuels on the economy, environment, and poverty. New York: Springer, 2014:111–22.33.10.1007/978-1-4939-0518-8_9Suche in Google Scholar

33. Ogle SM, Del Grosso SJ, Adler PR, Parton WJ. Soil nitrous oxide emissions with crop production for biofuel: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. In: Joe L. Outlaw, David P. Ernstes, editors. The Lifecycle Carbon Footprint of Biofuels. Proceedings of a conference January 29, 2008, in Miami Beach, FL. Oak Brook, Illinois, USA: Farm Foundation, 2008:11–8.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Ravishankara A, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. Nitrous oxide (N₂O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009;326(5949):123–5.10.1126/science.1176985Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Hoefnagels R, Smeets E, Faaij A. Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010;14(7):1661–94.10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.014Suche in Google Scholar

36. Börjesson P, Tufvesson LM. Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J Clean Prod 2011;19(2–3):108–20.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

37. Travis N. Breathing easier? The known impacts of biodiesel on air quality. Biofuels 2012;3(3):285–91.10.4155/bfs.12.22Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. de Oliveira BF, Ignotti E, Artaxo P, do Nascimento Saldiva P, Junger W, et al. Risk assessment of PM2.5 to child residents in Brazilian Amazon region with biofuel production. Environ Health 2012;11(1):64.10.1186/1476-069X-11-64Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Cheung KL, Ntziachristos L, Tzamkiozis T, Schauer JJ, Samaras Z, et al. Emissions of particulate trace elements, metals and organic species from gasoline, diesel, and biodiesel passenger vehicles and their relation to oxidative potential. Aerosol Sci Technol 2010;44(7):500–13.10.1080/02786821003758294Suche in Google Scholar

40. Kisin ER, Shi XC, Keane MJ, Bugarski AB, Shvedova AA. Mutagenicity of biodiesel or diesel exhaust particles and the effect of engine operating conditions. J Environ Eng Ecol Sci 2013;2(1):3.10.7243/2050-1323-2-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Pourkhesalian AM, Stevanovic S, Rahman MM, Faghihi EM, Bottle SE, et al. Effect of atmospheric ageing on volatility and ROS of biodiesel exhaust nano-particles. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 2015;15(5):6481–508.10.5194/acpd-15-6481-2015Suche in Google Scholar

42. Johnson E. Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2009;29(3):165–8.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.11.002Suche in Google Scholar

43. HLPE. Biofuels and food security. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Pimentel D. Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative. Nat Resour Res 2003;12(2):127–34.10.1023/A:1024214812527Suche in Google Scholar

45. Elkurtehi BS. Processing and characterization of fiber/plastic composite for turbine blade. Sci J Phys 2014. 10.7237/sjp/155.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Zhang B, Misak H, Dhanasekaran P, Kalla D, Asmatulu R. Environmental impacts of nanotechnology and its products. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Lake Point Conference Center, Arkansas Tech University Russellville, Arkansas; 2011:1–9.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Ging J, Tejerina-Anton R, Ramakrishnan G, Nielsen M, Murphy K, et al. Development of a conceptual framework for evaluation of nanomaterials release from nanocomposites: environmental and toxicological implications. Sci Total Environ 2014;473:9–19.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.135Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Kingston C, Zepp R, Andrady A, Boverhof D, Fehir R, et al. Release characteristics of selected carbon nanotube polymer composites. Carbon 2014;68:33–57.10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.042Suche in Google Scholar

49. Miseljic M, Olsen SI. Life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a literature review of assessment status. J Nanopart Res 2014;16(6):1–33.10.1007/s11051-014-2427-xSuche in Google Scholar

50. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Ricciardi W, Hodson L, Hoover M. Opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology in the green economy. Environ Health 2014;13(1):78.10.1186/1476-069X-13-78Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Chakhmouradian AR, Wall F. Rare earth elements: minerals, mines, magnets (and more). Elements 2012;8(5):333–40.10.2113/gselements.8.5.333Suche in Google Scholar

52. Weber RJ, Reisman DJ. Rare Earth Elements: A Review of Production, Processing, Recycling, and Associated Environmental Issues. In: US EPA Region; 2012. Available at: https://clu-in.org/download/issues/mining/weber-presentation.pdf. Accessed 07 Dec 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Ragheb M, Tsoukalas L. Global and USA thorium and rare earth elements resources. In: Proceedings of the 2nd thorium energy alliance conference, the future thorium economy, Google Campus, Mountain View, California, 2010:1–17.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Zu-yi C. Accumulation and toxicity of rare earth elements in brain and their potential effects on health. Rural Eco-Environ 2005;4:014.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Rim KT, Koo KH, Park JS. Toxicological evaluations of rare earths and their health impacts to workers: a literature review. Saf Health Work 2013;4(1):12–26.10.5491/SHAW.2013.4.1.12Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Liu P, Barlow C. An update for wind turbine blade waste inventory. In: EWEA (European Wind Energy Association) 2015. Porte de Versailles Pavillon 1, Paris, France: European Wind Energy Association, 2015:PO.010.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Jacob A. Composites can be recycled. Reinf Plast 2011;55: 45–6.10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70079-0Suche in Google Scholar

58. Cherrington R, Goodship V, Meredith J, Wood BM, Coles SR, et al. Producer responsibility: defining the incentive for recycling composite wind turbine blades in Europe. Energy Policy 2012;47:13–21.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.076Suche in Google Scholar

59. Ortegon K, Nies LF, Sutherland JW. Preparing for end of service life of wind turbines. J Clean Prod 2013;39:191–9.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.022Suche in Google Scholar

60. Hurter S, Schellschmidt R. Atlas of geothermal resources in Europe. Geothermics 2003;32(4):779–87.10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00070-1Suche in Google Scholar

61. Giardini D. Geothermal quake risks must be faced. Nature 2009;462(7275):848–9.10.1038/462848aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Matek B. The manageable risks of conventional hydrothermal geothermal power systems: a factbook on geothermal power’s risks and methods to mitigate them. In.: Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) 2014. http://geo-energy.org/reports/Geothermal%20Risks_Publication_2_4_2014.pdf. Accessed 03 Dec 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

63. Majer E, Nelson J, Robertson-Tait A, Savy J, Wong I. Protocol for addressing induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. US Department of Energy, 2012. Available at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/geothermal_seismicity_protocol_012012.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.10.2172/1219482Suche in Google Scholar

64. Mena B, Wiemer S, Bachmann C. Building robust models to forecast the induced seismicity related to geothermal reservoir enhancement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2013;103(1):383–93.10.1785/0120120102Suche in Google Scholar

65. Douglas J, Edwards B, Convertito V, Sharma N, Tramelli A, et al. Predicting ground motion from induced earthquakes in geothermal areas. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2013;103(3):1875–97.10.1785/0120120197Suche in Google Scholar

66. Bravi M, Basosi R. Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy. J Clean Prod 2014;66:301–8.10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.015Suche in Google Scholar

67. Huang S, Liu J. Geothermal energy stuck between a rock and a hot place. Nature 2010;463(7279):293.10.1038/463293dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Stewart C. Geothermal energy – Effects on the environment, Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand, updated 13-Jul-12 [http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/geothermal-energy/page-5]. Accessed 02 Dec 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

69. Bayer P, Rybach L, Blum P, Brauchler R. Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013;26:446–63.10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.039Suche in Google Scholar

70. Olafsdottir S, Gardarsson SM. Impacts of meteorological factors on hydrogen sulfide concentration downwind of geothermal power plants. Atmos Environ 2013;77:185–92.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.077Suche in Google Scholar

71. Birkle P, Merkel B. Environmental impact by spill of geothermal fluids at the geothermal field of Los Azufres, Michoacán, Mexico. Water Air Soil Poll 2000;124(3-4):371–410.10.1023/A:1005242824628Suche in Google Scholar

72. Aksoy N, Şimşek C, Gunduz O. Groundwater contamination mechanism in a geothermal field: a case study of Balcova, Turkey. J Contam Hydrol 2009;103(1):13–28.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.08.006Suche in Google Scholar

73. Loppi S, Nascimbene J. Monitoring H₂S air pollution caused by the industrial exploitation of geothermal energy: the pitfall of using lichens as bioindicators. Environ Pollut 2010;158(8):2635–9.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

74. Thorsteinsson T, Hackenbruch J, Sveinbjörnsson E, Jáhannsson T. Statistical assessment and modeling of the effects of weather conditions on H₂S plume dispersal from Icelandic geothermal power plants. Geothermics 2013;45:31–40.10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

75. Kage S, Ito S, Kishida T, Kudo K, Ikeda N. A fatal case of hydrogen sulfide poisoning in a geothermal power plant. J Clin Forensic Med 1998;5(4):214–5.10.1016/S1353-1131(98)90149-3Suche in Google Scholar

76. Daldal H, Beder B, Serin S, Sungurtekin H. Hydrogen sulfide toxicity in a thermal spring: a fatal outcome. Clin Toxicol 2010;48(7):755–6.10.3109/15563650.2010.508044Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

77. Bassindale T, Hosking M. Deaths in Rotorua’s geothermal hot pools: hydrogen sulphide poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 2011;207(1–3):e28–9.10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

78. Bates MN, Garrett N, Shoemack P. Investigation of health effects of hydrogen sulfide from a geothermal source. Arch Environ Health 2002;57(5):405–11.10.1080/00039890209601428Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Kristbjornsdottir A, Rafnsson V. Incidence of cancer among residents of high temperature geothermal areas in Iceland: a census based study 1981 to 2010. Environ Health 2012;11(1):73.10.1186/1476-069X-11-73Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

80. Carlsen HK, Zoëga H, Valdimarsdóttir U, Gíslason T, Hrafnkelsson B. Hydrogen sulfide and particle matter levels associated with increased dispensing of anti-asthma drugs in Iceland’s capital. Environ Res 2012;113:33–9.10.1016/j.envres.2011.10.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Clark C, Harto C, Sullivan J, Wang M. Water use in the development and operation of geothermal power plants. In: Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), 2010. Available at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/geothermal_water_use_draft.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2015.10.2172/1013997Suche in Google Scholar

82. Bundschuh J, Maity JP. Geothermal arsenic: Occurrence, mobility and environmental implications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2015;42:1214–22.10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.092Suche in Google Scholar

83. Gunduz O, Simsek C, Hasozbek A. Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav Plain, Turkey: its impact on water quality and human health. Water Air Soil Poll 2010; 205(1–4):43–62.10.1007/s11270-009-0055-3Suche in Google Scholar

84. Sundar S, Chakravarty J. Antimony toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7(12):4267–77.10.3390/ijerph7124267Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

85. Sharma S. Geochemical interaction of fluorite and geofluid cripples life in parts of India. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2008;(Suppl 72):851.Suche in Google Scholar

86. DiPippo R. Chapter 19 – environmental impact of geothermal power plants. Geothermal power plants, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008:385–410.10.1016/B978-075068620-4.50025-3Suche in Google Scholar

87. Barta B, Van Dijk M, Van Vuuren F. Renewable energy: hydropower. J S Afr Inst Civ Eng 2011;19(5):37–41.Suche in Google Scholar

88. Harris M. Hydroelectric power, other renewables emphasized at G20 summit. In: Hydroworldcom. Tulsa, 2015. Available at: http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2015/10/hydroelectric-power-other-renewables-emphasized-at-g20-summit.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

89. Harris M. National Hydropower Association joins other energy advocates to push renewables before COP21. In: Hydroworldcom. Tulsa: Hydro Review, 2015. Available at: http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2015/11/national-hydropower-association-joins-other-energy-advocates-to-push-renewables-before-cop21.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

90. Klunne WJ. Small and micro-hydro developments in Southern Africa. In.: Energize, 2012. Available at: http://www.ee.co.za/wp-content/uploads/legacy/energize_2012/09_ST_01_Small.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

91. Klunne W. Sustainable implementation of microhydro to eradicate poverty in Africa. In: Proceedings of the World Energy Congress Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2010. Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/267384058. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

92. Klunne WJ. Small hydropower in southern Africa-an overview of five countries in the region. J Energy South Afr 2013;24(3):14–25.10.17159/2413-3051/2013/v24i3a3138Suche in Google Scholar

93. Carvalho GO. Environmental resistance and the politics of energy development in the Brazilian Amazon. J Env Dev 2006;15(3):245–68.10.1177/1070496506291575Suche in Google Scholar

94. Schwartzman S, Alencar A, Zarin H, Santos Souza AP. Social movements and large-scale tropical forest protection on the Amazon Frontier: conservation from Chaos. J Environ Dev 2010;19(3):274–99.10.1177/1070496510367627Suche in Google Scholar

95. Polimeni JM, Iorgulescu RI, Chandrasekara R. Trans-border public health vulnerability and hydroelectric projects: the case of Yali Falls Dam. Ecol Econ 2014;98:81–9.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.013Suche in Google Scholar

96. Premalatha M, Tabassum A, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. A critical view on the eco-friendliness of small hydroelectric installations. Sci Total Environ 2014;481:638–43.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.047Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Hydro Review. Dam safety and security. In: Hydro Review. vol. 34. Tulsa: Hydroworld.com, 2015. Available at: http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/hr/print/volume-34/issue-7/departments/dam-safety-and-security.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

98. Charles JA. Delivering benefits through evidence: lessons from historical dam incidents. In: Project Report. Bristol: Environment Agency, 2011. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290812/scho0811buba-e-e.pdf. Accessed 04 Dec 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

99. Hogan CJ. Hydroelectricity. In: Cleveland C, editor. Encyclopedia of Earth, 2014. Available at: http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/153619. Accessed 03 December 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

100. Imbrogno DF. Analysis of dam failures and development of a dam safety evaluation program. The Ohio State University, 2014. Available at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1406168902&disposition=inline. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

101. Li S, Lu XX. Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs could double within 40 years. In: Science, E-Letters, 28 July 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

102. Fearnside PM. Greenhouse gas emissions from hydroelectric dams: controversies provide a springboard for rethinking a supposedly ‘clean’energy source. An editorial comment. Climatic Change 2004;66(1):1–8.10.1023/B:CLIM.0000043174.02841.23Suche in Google Scholar

103. Fearnside PM. Carbon credit for hydroelectric dams as a source of greenhouse-gas emissions: The example of Brazil’s Teles Pires Dam. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 2013;18(5):691–9.10.1007/s11027-012-9382-6Suche in Google Scholar

104. Bai J, Cui B, Xu X, Ding Q, Gao H. Heavy metal contamination in riverine soils upstream and downstream of a hydroelectric dam on the Lancang River, China. Environ Eng Sci 2009;26(5): 941–6.10.1089/ees.2008.0136Suche in Google Scholar

105. Wang X, Yang H, Gong P, Zhao X, Wu G, et al. One century sedimentary records of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, mercury and trace elements in the Qinghai Lake, Tibetan Plateau. Environ Pollut 2010;158(10):3065–70.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Zhao Q, Liu S, Deng L, Dong S, Wang C. Longitudinal distribution of heavy metals in sediments of a canyon reservoir in Southwest China due to dam construction. Environ Monit Assess 2013;185(7):6101–10.10.1007/s10661-012-3010-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

107. Adal A, Wiener SW. Heavy metal toxicity. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/814960-overview. Accessed 30 Oct 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

108. Inoue K. Heavy metal toxicity. J Clin Toxicol 2013;s3:007.Suche in Google Scholar

109. Larssen T. Mercury in Chinese reservoirs. Environ Pollut 2010;158(1):24–5.10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

110. Schreier H, Hsu H-H, Amarasiriwardena C, Coull B, Schnaas L, et al. Mercury and psychosocial stress exposure interact to predict maternal diurnal cortisol during pregnancy. Environ Health 2015;14(1):28.10.1186/s12940-015-0016-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

111. Eisler R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. US Fish Wildlife Service Biological Report 1987;85(1.11):81.10.5962/bhl.title.11339Suche in Google Scholar

112. Choi H, Harrison R, Komulainen H, Saborit JM. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. 6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138709/.Suche in Google Scholar

113. Fankhauser S, McDermott TK. Understanding the adaptation deficit: why are poor countries more vulnerable to climate events than rich countries? Glob Environ Chang 2014;27:9–18.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.014Suche in Google Scholar

114. Semenza J, Ploubidis G, George L. Climate change and climate variability: personal motivation for adaptation and mitigation. Environ Health 2011;10(1):46.10.1186/1476-069X-10-46Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

115. Othman E, Ahmed A. Challenges of mega construction projects in developing countries. OTMCJ 2013;5(1):730–46.10.5592/otmcj.2013.1.10Suche in Google Scholar

116. Ibáñez-Forés V, Bovea M. A decision support tool for communicating the environmental performance of products and organisations from the ceramic sector. Clean Techn Environ Policy 2015;18:123–38.10.1007/s10098-015-0999-5Suche in Google Scholar

117. Banegil T, Chamorro A. World trade and ecolabelling: adverse implications and measures adopted. ICE 2005;824:157.Suche in Google Scholar

118. Urpelainen J. Environmental regulation in the shadow of international trade law. University of Pittsburgh, 2010. Available at: https://ipec.gspia.pitt.edu/Portals/7/Papers/ShadowUrpelainen.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

119. Mudgal S, Muehmel K, Kong M, Labouze E, Gerstetter C, et al. Study on different options for communicating environmental information for products. In: Galatola M, editor. European Commission – DG Environment Final Report. Paris: BIO Intelligence Service, 2012. Available at: http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2014/different-options-for-communication-environmental-information-for-products-2012_0.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

120. Tóth L, Torgyik T, Nagy L, Abonyi J. Multiobjective optimization for efficient energy utilization in batch biodiesel production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 2015;18:95–104.10.1007/s10098-015-0996-8Suche in Google Scholar

121. Bruneau J, Echevarria C. The poor are green too. Int J Cooper Stud 2009;16(3):1–22.Suche in Google Scholar