CALUX bioassay: a cost-effective rapid screening technique for screening dioxins like compounds

Selvaraj Sakthivel; Prithiviraj Balasubramanian; Masafumi Nakamura; Shunkei Ko; Paromita Chakraborty

doi:10.1515/reveh-2015-0078

Artikel

CALUX bioassay: a cost-effective rapid screening technique for screening dioxins like compounds

Selvaraj Sakthivel , Prithiviraj Balasubramanian , Masafumi Nakamura , Shunkei Ko und Paromita Chakraborty

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. März 2016

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift Reviews on Environmental Health Band 31 Heft 1

Abstract

Xenobiotic detection systems-chemically activated luciferase expression (XDS-CALUX) bioassay in determining the toxic equivalency (TEQ) of PCDD/Fs from contaminated sites reported in several papers has been discussed in this study. CALUX bioassay method has been validated by an effective combined column clean-up system followed by addition of samples to monolayer cell cultures of H1L6.1c3 cell line in 96 well plates. Cultures are then examined under microscope after 24 h incubation followed by rinsing with 75 μL phosphate buffer saline and 30 μL of cell culture lysis. The response is observed in the luminometer and expressed in relative light unit (RLUs). CALUX-TEQ is estimated from a TCDD standard curve for unknown samples. Quality control in CALUX is done by selecting the range of CALUX values falling in the center of the linear standard curve. For developing nations CALUX biossay can be used as a cost effective and rapid screening technique for screening xenobiotic compounds from the hotspots like open solid waste burning sites, informal e-waste recycling workshops and industrial zones where constant monitoring for such compounds is required.

Keywords: CALUX BEQ; CALUX bioassay; cost effective screening; HRGC-HRMS-TEQ

Corresponding author: Paromita Chakraborty, Department of Civil Engineering, SRM Research Institute, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India, E-mail: paromita.c@res.srmuniv.ac.in

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (SERB/F/1693/2014-15 dt 13.06.2014). Authors would like to thank Hiyoshi Corporation, Japan and Hiyoshi India for providing 2 months CALUX Bioassay training to Mr. Sakthivel on CALUX analysis.

References

1. Bilau M, Matthys C, Baeyens W, Bruckers L, De Backer G, et al. Dietary exposure to dioxin-like compounds in three age groups: results from the Flemish environment and health study. Chemosphere 2008;70(4):584–92.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.008Suche in Google Scholar

2. Minh NH, Minh TB, Watanabe M, Kunisue T, Monirith I, et al. Open dumping site in Asian developing countries: a potential source of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37(8):1493–502.10.1021/es026078sSuche in Google Scholar

3. Liu H, Zhou Q, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Cai Z, et al. E-waste recycling induced polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzo-furans pollution in the ambient environment. Environ Int 2008;34(1):67–72.10.1016/j.envint.2007.07.008Suche in Google Scholar

4. Government of India. National Implementation Plan. In: MoEF, editor. New Delhi: Government of India, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Czuczwa JM, Hites RA. Environmental fate of combustion-generated polychlorinated dioxins and furans. Environ Sci Technol 1984;18(6):444–50.10.1021/es00124a010Suche in Google Scholar

6. Roland W, Bertram K. Relevance of BFRs and thermal conditions on the formation pathways of brominated and brominated–chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans. Environ Int 2003;29:699–710.10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00118-1Suche in Google Scholar

7. Schecter A, Sheu S, Birnbaum L, Devito M, Denison M, et al. A comparison and discussion of two differing methods of measuring dioxin-like compounds: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and the calux bioassay – implications for health studies. Organohalogen Compd 1999;40:247–50.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Behnisch PA, Hosoe K, Sakai S-i. Brominated dioxin-like compounds: in vitro assessment in comparison to classical dioxin-like compounds and other polyaromatic compounds. Environ Int 2003;29(6):861–77.10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00105-3Suche in Google Scholar

9. Garrison P, Tullis K, Aarts J, Brouwer A, Giesy J, et al. Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals. Toxicol Sci 1996;30(2):194–203.10.1093/toxsci/30.2.194Suche in Google Scholar

10. Koppen G, Covaci A, Van Cleuvenbergen R, Schepens P, Winneke G, et al. Comparison of CALUX-TEQ values with PCB and PCDD/F measurements in human serum of the Flanders Environmental and Health Study (FLEHS). Toxicol Lett 2001;123(1):59–67.10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00378-2Suche in Google Scholar

11. Han D, Nagy SR, Denison MS. Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists. Biofactors 2004;20(1):11–22.10.1002/biof.5520200102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Kayama F, Horiguchi H, Oguma E, Fujino J, Yabushita H, Brown D, et al. Regional differences of blood dioxin and organochlorine pesticides concentrations of japanese female farmers.-application of calux assay for epidemiological study. Organohalogen compounds. 2002;55:275–8.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Denison MS, Zhao B, Baston DS, Clark GC, Murata H, et al. Recombinant cell bioassay systems for the detection and relative quantitation of halogenated dioxins and related chemicals. Talanta 2004;63(5):1123–33.10.1016/j.talanta.2004.05.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Croes K, Van Langenhove K, Elskens M, Desmedt M, Roekens E, et al. Analysis of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in atmospheric deposition samples from the Flemish measurement network: optimization and validation of a new CALUX bioassay method. Chemosphere 2011;82(5):718–24.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.092Suche in Google Scholar

15. Windal I, Denison MS, Birnbaum LS, Van Wouwe N, Baeyens W, et al. Chemically activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) cell bioassay analysis for the estimation of dioxin-like activity: critical parameters of the CALUX procedure that impact assay results. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39(19):7357–64.10.1021/es0504993Suche in Google Scholar

16. Brown DJ, Orelien J, Gordon JD, Chu AC, Chu MD, et al. Mathematical model developed for environmental samples: prediction of GC/MS dioxin TEQ from XDS-CALUX bioassay data. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41(12):4354–60.10.1021/es062602+Suche in Google Scholar

17. Vromman V, Baert K, Vanderperren H, Goeyens L, Huyghebaert A, et al. Evaluation of the use of CALUX results for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs analysis for quantitative human exposure assessments. Food Control 2012;27(2):314–21.10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.10.047Suche in Google Scholar

18. Murk A, Legler J, Denison M, Giesy J, Van de Guchte C, et al. Chemical-activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX): a novel in vitro bioassay for Ah receptor active compounds in sediments and pore water. Toxicol Sci 1996;33(1):149–60.10.1093/toxsci/33.1.149Suche in Google Scholar

19. Van Langenhove K, Croes K, Denison MS, Elskens M, Baeyens W. The CALUX bio-assay: analytical comparison between mouse hepatoma cell lines with a low (H1L6.1c3) and high (H1L7.5c1) number of dioxin response elements. Talanta 2011;85(4): 2039–46.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.07.042Suche in Google Scholar

20. Brown DJ, Van Overmeire I, Goeyens L, Chu MD, Denison MS, et al. Elimination of interfering compounds in preparation for analysis by an Ah receptor based bioassay. Organohalogen Compd 2002;58:401–4.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Clark G. The XDS-CALUX^® Assay. Retrieved 23 November 2015 from http://www.dioxins.com/calux.html#.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Fujino J, Tsutsumi T, Nakamura YAM, Kitagawa H, Yamamoto T, Sasaki K, et al. Application of the CALUX TM assay to the analysis of DXNS in fish (The First Report). 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Hasegawa J, Guruge KS, Seike N, Shirai Y, Yamata T, et al. Determination of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in fish oils for feed ingredients by congener-specific chemical analysis and CALUX bioassay. Chemosphere 2007;69(8):1188–94.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.021Suche in Google Scholar

24. Hilscherova K, Kannan K, Nakata H, Hanari N, Yamashita N, et al. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran concentration profiles in sediments and flood-plain soils of the Tittabawassee River, Michigan. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37(3):468–74.10.1021/es020920cSuche in Google Scholar

25. Behnisch PA, Hosoe K, Sakai S-i. Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds – a review of bioassay/biomarker technology. Environ Int 2001;27(5):413–39.10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00028-9Suche in Google Scholar

26. Ziccardi MH, Gardner IA, Denison MS. Development and modification of a recombinant cell bioassay to directly detect halogenated compounds like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in serum. Toxicol Sci 2000;54:183–93.10.1093/toxsci/54.1.183Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-12-16

Accepted: 2015-12-22

Published Online: 2016-03-04

Published in Print: 2016-03-01

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0078

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

CALUX BEQ; CALUX bioassay; cost effective screening; HRGC-HRMS-TEQ