Electrohypersensitivity: a functional impairment due to an inaccessible environment

References

1. Miljöhälsorapport 2001, The National Board of Health and Welfare (in Swedish; ISBN: 91-7201-495-4).Suche in Google Scholar

2. DIVS: 2000:839; ISBN: 92-893-0559-2, http://www.nordclass.se/ICD-10_Nordic%20Occupational_2000.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

3. The Swedish Association for the Electrohypersensitive (http://www.feb.nu; http://www.feb.se; the website has an English version).Suche in Google Scholar

4. HSO, Handikappförbundens SamarbetsOrgan; http://www.hso.se.Suche in Google Scholar

5. UN 22 Standard Rules/UN Convention, see website: http://www.un.org.Suche in Google Scholar

6. The Swedish Action Plan for Persons with Impairments (“Den nationella handlingplanen för handikappolitiken – Från patient till medborgare”; Proposition 1999/2000:79, bet. 1999/2000:SoU14).Suche in Google Scholar

7. Sydsvenskan, January 23-26, 2009; http://sydsvenskan.se/chattarkiv/article408013.ece.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Petrov IR, editor. Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Organism of Man and Animals. Report from Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR. Translated to English “Vliyaniye SVChIzlucheniya na Organizm Cheloveka I Zhivotnykh”. Meditsina Press, Leningrad, 1970. Report from NASA TT F-708, Springfield, Virginia.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Nordström G, von Schéele C. Sjuk av bildskärm, Tidens Förlag, 1989, ISBN 91-550-3484-5.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Nordström G, von Schéele C. Fälslaget om de elöverkänsliga, Tidens Förlag, 1995, ISBN 91-550-4083-7.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Nordström G. Mörkläggning – Elektronikens rättslösa offer, Hjalmarson & Högberg Förlag, 2000, ISBN 91-89080-41-6.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Johansson O, Hilliges M, Björnhagen V, Hall K. Skin changes in patients claiming to suffer from “screen dermatitis”: a two-case open-field provocation study. Exp Dermatol 1994;3:234–8.10.1111/j.1600-0625.1994.tb00282.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Johansson O, Liu P-Y. “Electrosensitivity”, “electrosupersensitivity” and “screen dermatitis”: preliminary observations from on-going studies in the human skin. In: Simunic D, editor. Proceedings of the COST 244: Biomedical Effects of Electromagnetic Fields – Workshop on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Brussels/Graz: EU/EC (DG XIII), 1995;52–7.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Hillert L, Berglind N, Arnetz BB, Bellander T. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population based questionnaire survey. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002;28:33–41.10.5271/sjweh.644Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Johansson O. Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the art of a functional impairment. Electromagn Biol Med 2006;25:245–58.10.1080/15368370601044150Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Schröttner J, Leitgeb N. Sensitivity to electricity-temporal changes in Austria. BMC Public Health 2008;8:310.10.1186/1471-2458-8-310Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Schreier N, Huss A, Röösli M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzland. Soz Praventivmed 2006;51:202–9.10.1007/s00038-006-5061-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Levallois P, Neutra R, Lee G, Histova L. Study of self reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:619–23.10.1289/ehp.02110s4619Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Sears ME. The Medical Perspective on Environmental Sensitivities. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Human Rights Commission 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Meg Tseng MC, Lin YP, Cheng TJ. Prevalence and psychiatric comorbidity of self-reported electromagnetic field sensitivity in Taiwan: a population-based study. J Formos Med Assoc 2011;110:634–41.10.1016/j.jfma.2011.08.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Hilliges M, Wang L, Johansson O. Ultrastructural evidence for nerve fibers within all vital layers of the human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1995;104:134–7.10.1111/1523-1747.ep12613631Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Johansson O, Wang L, Hilliges M, Liang Y. Intraepidermal nerves in human skin: PGP 9.5 immunohistochemistry with special reference to the nerve density in skin from different body regions. J Peripher Nerv Syst 1999;4:43–52.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Wang L, Hilliges M, Jernberg T, Wiegleb-Edstrom D, Johansson O. Protein gene product 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibres and cells in human skin. Cell Tiss Res 1990;261:25–33.10.1007/BF00329435Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Johansson O, Gangi S, Liang Y, Yoshimura K, Jing C, et al. Cutaneous mast cells are altered in normal healthy volunteers sitting in front of ordinary TVs/PCs – results from open-field provocation experiments. J Cutan Pathol 2001;28:513–9.10.1034/j.1600-0560.2001.281004.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Johansson O, Hilliges M, Han SW. A screening of skin changes, with special emphasis on neurochemical marker antibody evaluation, in patients claiming to suffer from screen dermatitis as compared to normal healthy controls. Exp Dermatol 1996;5:279–85.10.1111/j.1600-0625.1996.tb00130.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Johansson O. Elöverkänslighet samt överkänslighet mot mobiltelefoner: Resultat från en dubbel-blind provokationsstudie av metodstudiekaraktär (=Electrohypersensitivity and sensitivity to mobile telephones: Results from a double-blind provocation study of pilot character, in Swedish), Enheten för Experimentell Dermatologi, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Rapport nr. 2, 1995, ISSN 1400-6111 (First study on humans).Suche in Google Scholar

27. Gangi S, Johansson O. Skin changes in “screen dermatitis” versus classical UV- and ionizing irradiation-related damage – similarities and differences. Two neuroscientists’ speculative review. Exp Dermatol 1997;6:283–91.10.1111/j.1600-0625.1997.tb00174.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Gangi S, Johansson O. A theoretical model based upon mast cells and histamine to explain the recently proclaimed sensitivity to electric and/or magnetic fields in humans. Med Hypotheses 2000;54:663–71.10.1054/mehy.1999.0923Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O. Melanoma incidence and frequency modulation (FM) broadcasting. Arch Environ Health 2002;57:32–40.10.1080/00039890209602914Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O. Malignant melanoma of the skin – not a sunshine story! Med Sci Monit 2004;10:CR336–40.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O. Mobile handset output power and health. Electromag Biol Med 2004;23:229–39.10.1081/JBC-200044239Suche in Google Scholar

32. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O. Alzheimer mortality – why does it increase so fast in sparsely populated areas? Europ Biol Bioelectromag 2005;1:225–46.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O. Apparent decreases in Swedish public health indicators after 1997 – are they due to improved diagnostics or to environmental factors? Pathophysiology 2009;16:43–6.10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.12.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Hallberg Ö, Johansson O, Horst E. A melanoma trend forecast from 2002 – what happened then? Electromagn Biol Med 2015;21:1–3.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Belpoggi F, Blackman CF, Blank M, Bobkova N, Boella F, et al. Benevento Resolution 2006. Electromag Biol Med 2006;25:197–200.10.1080/15368370601034003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Blackman CF, Blank M, Kundi M, Sage C, Carpenter DO, et al. The Bioinitiative Report – A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). 2007, http://www.bioinitiative.org.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Avino P, d’Alessandro A, Bedini A, Belyaev I, Belpoggi F, et al. The Venice Resolution 2008, http://www.icems.eu/resolution.htm.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Johansson O. The London Resolution. Pathophysiology 2009;16:247–8.10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.03.005Suche in Google Scholar

39. Fragopoulou A, Grigoriev Y, Johansson O, Margaritis LH, Morgan L, et al. Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: consensus points, recommendations, and rationales. Scientific Meeting: Seletun, Norway, November 17-21, 2009. Rev Environ Health 2010;25:307–17.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Dämvik M, Johansson O. Health risk assessment of electromagnetic fields: a conflict between the precautionary principle and environmental medicine methodology. Rev Environ Health 2010;25:325–33.10.1515/REVEH.2010.25.4.325Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Hagström M, Auranen J, Johansson O, Ekman R. Reducing electromagnetic irradiation and fields alleviates experienced health hazards of VDU work. Pathophysiology 2012;19:81–7.10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.01.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Hagström M, Auranen J, Ekman R. Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study. Pathophysiology 2013;20:117–22.10.1016/j.pathophys.2013.02.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Holmboe G, Johansson O. Symptombeskrivning samt förekomst av IgE och positiv Phadiatop Combi hos personer med funktionsnedsättningen elöverkänslighet (=Description of symptoms as well as occurrence of IgE and positive Phadiatop Combi in persons with the physical impairment electrohypersensitivity, in Swedish). Medicinsk Access 2005;1:58–63.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Lindberg E-R. Building planning for persons with the functional impairment electrohypersensitivity – a project in the voltage field between belief and knowledge (in Swedish with English summaries). Doctoral Dissertation, The Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, and the Karolinska Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011, http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:455407.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Kato Y, Johansson O. Reported functional impairments of electrohypersensitive Japanese: a questionnaire survey. Pathophysiology 2012;19:95–100.10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.02.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Kato Y, Johansson O. The situation of electrohypersensitivity: Symptoms, EMF sources, economic and social problems, and precautionary approach. Jap J Clin Ecol 2012;21:123–30.Suche in Google Scholar