Abstract
The environment is defined by the aggregate of surrounding things, conditions, or influences. The biophysical environment includes the physical and biological factors, along with chemical interactions that affect an organism. Contact dermatitis includes any inflammatory skin reaction to direct or indirect contact with noxious agents in the environment. Although the main clinical expression of contact dermatitis is eczema, other expressions like urticaria, contact urticaria (CoU), or lichenoid eruptions are described. The main objective of this chapter is to review CoU, which is often misdiagnosed, as part of the CoU syndrome (CUS).
References
1. Maibach HI, Johnson HL. Contact urticaria syndrome: contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide (immediate type hypersensitivity). Arch Dermatol 1975;111:726–30.10.1001/archderm.1975.01630180054004Suche in Google Scholar
2. Wakelin SH. Contact Urticaria. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26:132–6.10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00780.xSuche in Google Scholar
3. Fisher AA. Contact dermatitis, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1973:283–6.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Lesser E. Lehrbuch der Haut-und Teschlechtskrankheiten fur studirende und arzte (in German). Leipzig: Verlag von FCW Vogel, 1894.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Vega JM, Moneo I, Garcia Ortiz JC, Sánchez Palla P, Sanchis ME, et al. Prevalence of cutaneous reactions to pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocamba) in an adult population. Contact Dermatitis 2011;64:220–8.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01884.xSuche in Google Scholar
6. Burdick AE, Mathias T. The contact urticaria syndrome. Dermatol Clin 1985;3:71–84.10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30919-7Suche in Google Scholar
7. Maibach HI. Immediate hypersensitivity in hand dermatitis: role of food contact dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1976;112:1289–91.10.1001/archderm.1976.01630330051014Suche in Google Scholar
8. Hannuksela M. Atopic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1980;6:30.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1980.tb03886.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm A. Dietary restrictions in the treatment of adult patients with eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:223–8.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb02717.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J. Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis 1976;2:28–42.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1976.tb02975.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Doutre M-S. Occupational contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2005;15:419–24.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Elpern DJ. The syndrome of immediate reactivities (contact urticaria syndrome). A historical study from a dermatology practice. I. Age, sex, race and putative substances. Hawaii Med J 1985;44:426–39.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Rudzki E, Rebanel P. Occupational contact urticaria from penicillin. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:192.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02539.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Nilsson E. Contact sensitivity and urticaria in “wet” work. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:321–8.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02587.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Turjanmaa K. Incidence of immediate allergy to latex gloves in hospital personnel. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:270–5.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01476.xSuche in Google Scholar
16. Weissenbach T, Wutrich B, Weihe WH. Allergies to laboratory animals. An epidemiological, allergological study in persons exposed to laboratory animals. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1988;118:930–8.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Doutre M -S. Occupational contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2005;15:419–24.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Toikkanen J. Frequencies of occupational allergic diseases and gender differences in Finland. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1994;66:111–6.10.1007/BF00383366Suche in Google Scholar
19. Williams JD, Lee AY, Matheson MC, Frowen KE, Noonan AM, et al. Occupational contact urticaria: Australian data. Br J Dermatol 2008;159:125–31.10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08583.xSuche in Google Scholar
20. Teo S, Teik-Jin Goon A, Siang LH, Lin GS, Koh D. Occupational dermatoses in restaurant, catering and fast-food outlets in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond) 2009;59:466–71.10.1093/occmed/kqp034Suche in Google Scholar
21. Bourrain JL. Occupational contact urticaria. Clinical Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006;30:39–46.10.1385/CRIAI:30:1:039Suche in Google Scholar
22. Von Krogh C, Maibach HI. The contact urticaria syndrome. An update review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981;5:328–42.10.1016/S0190-9622(81)70099-9Suche in Google Scholar
23. Lahti A, Maibach HI. Long refractory period after application of one nonimmunologic contact urticaria agents to the guinea pig ear. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13:585–9.10.1016/S0190-9622(85)70201-0Suche in Google Scholar
24. Kanerva L, Estlander T. Immediate and delayed skin allergy from cow dander. Am J Contact Dermat 1997;8:167–69.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Conde-Salazar L, Gonzalez MA, Guimaraens D. Type I and Type IV sensitization to Anisakis simplex in 2 patients with hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:361.10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460612.xSuche in Google Scholar
26. Tupasela O, Kanerva L. Skin tests and specific IgE determinations in the diagnostics of Contact urticaria caused by low-molecular-weight chemicals, Chapter 4. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, editors. Contact urticaria syndrome. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997:33–44.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Cromwell O, Pepys J, Parish WE, Hughes EG. Specific IgE antibodies to platinum salts in sensitized workers. Clin Allergy 1979;9:109.10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb01529.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Tupasela O, Heskinen H, Jolanki R. Immediate and delayed allergy to nickel with contact urticaria, rhinitis, asthma and contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy 1993;23:306.10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00327.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Lahti A. Non-immunologic contact urticaria. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh) 1980;60:3–49.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Clemmenson O, Hjorth N. Perioral contact urticaria from sorbic acid and benzoic acid in a salad dressing. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:1–6.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04126.xSuche in Google Scholar
31. Kligman AM. The spectrum of contact urticaria: wheals, erythema and pruritus. Dermatologic clinic 1990;8:57–60.10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30522-9Suche in Google Scholar
32. Babilas P, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM. Anaphylactic reaction following hair bleaching. Hautarzt 2005;56:1152–5.10.1007/s00105-004-0875-4Suche in Google Scholar
33. Barbaud A. Urticarires de contact. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2002;128:1161–5.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Von Krogh G, Maibach HI. Contact Urticaria. In: Adam RM, editor. Occupational skin disease. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1983:58–69.Suche in Google Scholar
35. Gimenez-Arnau A. Contact urticaria syndrome. In: Wilhelm KP, editor. Dermatotoxicology. Informa Health Care (Eighth edition), 2012:125–32.10.3109/9781841848570.014Suche in Google Scholar
36. Gimenez-Arnau A, Maurer M, de la Cuadra J, Maibach H. Immediate contact skin reactions, an update of contact urticaria, contact urticaria syndrome and protein contact dermatitis – “A never ending story”. Eur J Dermatol 2010;20:1–11.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Tosti A, Guerra L, Morelli R, Bardazzi F, Fanti R. Role of foods in the pathogenesis of chronic paronychia. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;27:706–10.10.1016/0190-9622(92)70242-8Suche in Google Scholar
38. Kanerva L. Occupational protein contact dermatitis and paronychia from natural rubber latex. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000;14:504–6.10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00175.xSuche in Google Scholar
39. Crisi G, Belsito D. Contact urticaria from latex in a patient with immediate hypersensitivity to banana, avocado and peach. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:247–8.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03415.xSuche in Google Scholar
40. Jeannet-Peter N, Piletta-Zanin PA, Hauser C. Facial dermatitis, contact urticaria, rhinoconjuntivitis, and asthma induced by potato. Am J Contact Dermat 1999;10:40–2.10.1016/S1046-199X(99)90093-3Suche in Google Scholar
41. Morren M, Janssens V, Dooms-Goossens A, Van Hoeyveld E, Cornelis A, et al. alpha-Amylase, a flour additive: an important cause of protein contact dermatitis in bakers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;29:723–8.10.1016/0190-9622(93)70237-NSuche in Google Scholar
42. Czarnetzki B. Basic mechanisms, Chapter 2. In: Czarnetzki MB, editor. Urticaria. Berlin Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1986:5–25.Suche in Google Scholar
43. Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Brzoza Z, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition classification, diagnosis and management of Urticaria. The 2013 revision and update. Allergy 2014;69:868–87.10.1111/all.12313Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Czarnetzki B. Basic mechanisms, Chapter 6. In: Czarnetzki MB, editor. Urticaria. Berlin Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1986:89–95.Suche in Google Scholar
45. Ray MC, Tharp MD, Sullivan TJ, Tigelaar RE. Contact hypersensitivity reactions to dinitrofluorobenzene mediated by monoclonal IgE anti-DNP antibodies. J Immunol 1983;131: 1096–102.10.4049/jimmunol.131.3.1096Suche in Google Scholar
46. Andersen KE, Maiback HI. Multiple application delayed onset urticaria. Possible relation to certain unusual formalin and textile reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1984;10:227–34.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00105.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Gonzalez-Muñoz M, Gómez M, Aldalay E, Del Castillo A, Moneo I. Occupational protein contact dermatitis to chicken meat studied bt flow cytometry. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:62–3.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.01081.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Haustein UF. Anaphylactic shock and contact urticaria after patch test with professional allergens. Allergie Immunol 1976;22:349–52.Suche in Google Scholar
49. Maucher OM. Anaphylaktische Reaktionen beim Epicutantest. Hautarzt 1972;23:139–40.Suche in Google Scholar
50. Nicholson PJ. Evidence-based guidelines:occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Occ Med 2010;60:502–6.10.1093/occmed/kqq075Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
51. Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Canonica W, Church MK, et al. EAACI/GA2 LEN/EDF guideline: management of urticaria. Allergy 2009;64:1427–43.10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02178.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
©2014 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Skin and the environment
- Biology of percutaneous penetration
- Sampling the stratum corneum for toxic chemicals
- Textile allergic contact dermatitis: current status
- Percutaneous absorption from soil
- Percutaneous absorption of water in skin: a review
- The influence of vapor pressure of chemicals on dermal penetration
- Allergic contact dermatitis: clinical aspects
- Irritant contact dermatitis
- Contact urticaria and the environment
- Cutaneous irritancy of water
- Environmental airborne contact dermatoses
- Photoallergy
- UV light and skin aging
- Non-melanoma skin cancer: occupational risk from UV light and arsenic exposure
- Skin cancer: role of ultraviolet radiation in carcinogenesis
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Skin and the environment
- Biology of percutaneous penetration
- Sampling the stratum corneum for toxic chemicals
- Textile allergic contact dermatitis: current status
- Percutaneous absorption from soil
- Percutaneous absorption of water in skin: a review
- The influence of vapor pressure of chemicals on dermal penetration
- Allergic contact dermatitis: clinical aspects
- Irritant contact dermatitis
- Contact urticaria and the environment
- Cutaneous irritancy of water
- Environmental airborne contact dermatoses
- Photoallergy
- UV light and skin aging
- Non-melanoma skin cancer: occupational risk from UV light and arsenic exposure
- Skin cancer: role of ultraviolet radiation in carcinogenesis