References

Ancheyta J, Sotelo R. An easy methodology for estimating kinetic constants in complex kinetic models. Stud Surf Sci Catal 2001; 133: 611–614.10.1016/S0167-2991(01)82020-6Suche in Google Scholar

Aris R. Optimal design of chemical reactors. Moscow, Russia: Inostrannaya Literature, 1963 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Aris R. The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts. Oxford, Great Britain: Clarendon Press, 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

Aris R. Analysis of processes in chemical reactors. Leningrad, Russia: Khimiya, 1976 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Balaev AV, Del Toro Fonseca DA. Construction of the kinetic model of hydrocracking of heavy oil residues on the basis of group components. J Mid Volga Math Soc 2012; 1: 43–47 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Bannov PG. Processes of oil refining. Moscow: TsNIIITneftekhim, 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

Barghi B, Fattahi M, Khorasheh F. The modeling of kinetics and catalyst deactivation in propane dehydrogenation over Pt-Sn/γ-Al₂O₃ in presence of water as an oxygenated additive. Pet Sci Technol 2014; 32: 1139–1149.10.1080/10916466.2011.631071Suche in Google Scholar

Baudrez E, Heynderickx GJ, Marin GB. Steadystate simulation of fluid catalytic cracking riser reactors using a decoupled solution method with feedback of the cracking reactions on the flow. Chem Eng Res Design 2010; 88: 290–303.10.1016/j.cherd.2009.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

Belinskaya NS, Frantsina EV, Ivanchina ED. Mathematical modelling of “reactor-stabilizer column” system in catalytic dewaxing of straight run and heavy gasoils. Chem Eng J 2017; 329: 283–294.10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.033Suche in Google Scholar

Belyi AS, Udras IE, Zatolkina EV, Chesak SV, Duplyakin VK. The way to prepare catalyst for naphtha reforming. Patent RF No. 2288779, 2006 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Berenblyum AS, Ovsyannikova LV, Katsman EA. Acid soluble oil, by-product formed in isobutane alkylation with alkene in the presence of trifluoro methane sulfonic acid: Part I Acid soluble oil composition and its poisoning effect. Appl Catal A 2002; 232: 51–58.10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00065-0Suche in Google Scholar

Berenblyum AS, Katsman EA, Berenblyum RA, Hommeltoft SI. Modeling of side reactions of isobutane alkylation with butenes catalyzed by trifluoromethane sulfonic acid. Appl Catal A 2005; 284: 207–214.10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.036Suche in Google Scholar

Berry TA, McKeen TR, Pugsley TS, Dalai AK. Two-dimensional reaction engineering model of the riser section of a fluid catalytic cracking unit. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004; 43: 5571–5581.10.1021/ie0306877Suche in Google Scholar

Beskov VS, Flokk V. Modeling of catalytic processes and reactors. Moscow, Russia: Khimiya, 1991 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Bityukov VK, Tikhomirov SG, Podkopaeva SV, Khromyh EA. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie ob’ektov upravleniya lhimicheskoi promyshlennosti. Voronezh: VGUIT, 2011 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Bityukov VK, Zhatova IA, Alekseev MV, Popov AP. The mathematical model development of the ethylbenzene dehydrogenation process kinetics in a two-stage adiabatic continuous reactor. Proc VSUET 2012; 2: 55–60 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Boldushevskii RE, Kapustin VM, Chernysheva EA, Gulyaeva LA, Grudanova AI, Stolonogova TI. Studying of the efficiency of a catalytic dewaxing process utilizing zeolite-based catalyst with an iron additive. Catal Ind 2015; 7: 301–306.10.1134/S2070050415040030Suche in Google Scholar

Boreskov GK. Heterogeneous catalysis. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 1986 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Boreskov GK. Catalysis. Issues of theory and practice. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1987 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Boreskov GK, Slinko MG. Modeling of chemical reactors. Theor Found Chem Eng 1967; 1: 5–16.Suche in Google Scholar

Chekantsev NV, Gyngazova MS, Ivanchina ED. Mathematical modeling of light naphtha (C5, C6) isomerization process. Chem Eng J 2014; 238: 120–128.10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.088Suche in Google Scholar

Chen Z, Yan Y, Elnashaie S. Catalyst deactivation and engineering control for steam reforming of higher hydrocarbons in a novel membrane reformer. Chem Eng Sci 2004; 59: 1965–1978.10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.046Suche in Google Scholar

Chen S, Fan Y, Yan Z, Wang W, Liu X, Lu C. CFD optimization of feedstock injection angle in a FCC riser. Chem Eng Sci 2016; 153: 58–74.10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

Corella J. On the modeling of the kinetics of the selective deactivation of catalysts. Application to the fluidized catalytic cracking process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004; 43: 4080–4086.10.1021/ie040033dSuche in Google Scholar

Corella J, Francés E. Fluid catalytic cracking. ACS Symposium Series. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

Coxon PG, Bischoff KB. Lumping strategy. Introduction to techniques and application of cluster analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 1987; 26: 1239–1248.10.1021/ie00066a031Suche in Google Scholar

Dagde KK, Puyate YT. Modelling and simulation of industrial FCC unit: analysis based on five-lump kinetic scheme for gas-oil cracking. Int J Eng Res Ind Appl 2012; 2: 698–714.Suche in Google Scholar

Das AK, Baudrez E, Marin GB, Heynderickx GJ. Three-dimensional simulation of a fluid catalytic cracking riser reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003; 42: 2602–2617.10.1021/ie020744gSuche in Google Scholar

Derouin C, Nevicato D, Forissier M, Wild G, Bernard JR. Hydrodynamics of riser units and their impact on FCC operation. Ind Eng Chem Res 1997; 36: 4504–4515.10.1021/ie970432rSuche in Google Scholar

Doronin VP, Lipin PV, Sorokina TP. Influence of conditions of conducting process for the composition of products with traditional and deep catalytic cracking oil factions. Catal Ind 2012; 1: 27–32 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Dupain X, Gamas ED, Madon R, Kelkar CP, Makkee M, Moulijn JA. Aromatic gas oil cracking under realistic FCC conditions in a microriser reactor. Fuel 2003; 82: 1559–1569.10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00077-2Suche in Google Scholar

Dyusembaeva AA, Vershinin VI. Modeling the reforming of straight-run gasoline (fraction 85–140°C) with allowance for the deactivation of Pt catalyst. Catal Ind 2017; 9: 10–16.10.1134/S2070050417010056Suche in Google Scholar

Ebrahimi AA, Tarighi S, Ani AB. Experimental and kinetic study of catalytic cracking of heavy fuel oil over E-CAT/MCM-41 catalyst. Kinet Catal 2016; 57: 610–616.10.1134/S0023158416050098Suche in Google Scholar

Faleev SA, Zanin IK, Ivanchina ED, Sharova ES, Prodan VI. Optimization of supply of hydrogen chloride in reforming reactors on the base of taking into account coke accumulation on the catalyst. Bull Tomsk Polytech Univ 2013; 322: 35–37.Suche in Google Scholar

Fetisova VA, Ivashkina EN, Ivanchina ED, Kravtsov AV. Mathematical model for the process of benzene alkylation by higher olefines. Catal Ind 2010; 2: 55–61.10.1134/S2070050410010095Suche in Google Scholar

Frank-Kamentsky DA. Diffusion and heat transfer in chemical kinetics. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 1967 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Frantsina EV, Ivashkina EN, Ivanchina ED, Romanovsky RV. Developing of the mathematical model for controlling the operation of alkane dehydrogenation catalyst in production of linear alkyl benzene. Chem Eng J 2014; 238: 129–139.10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.049Suche in Google Scholar

Frantsina E, Ivashkina E, Ivanchina E, Romanovskii R. Decreasing the hydrogen-rich gas circulation ratio and service life extension of the C9–C14 alkanes dehydrogenation catalyst. Chem Eng J 2015; 282: 224–232.10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.036Suche in Google Scholar

Froment GF. Single event kinetic modeling of complex catalytic processes. Catal Rev Sci Eng 2005; 47: 83–124.10.1081/CR-200047793Suche in Google Scholar

Froment G. On fundamental kinetic equations for chemical reactions and processes. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2014; 5: 1–6 (in Russian).10.1016/j.coche.2014.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Fusheng Q, Yongqian W, Qiao L. A lumped kinetic model for heavy oil catalytic cracking FDFCC process. Pet Sci Technol 2016; 34: 192–199.10.1080/10916466.2015.1124891Suche in Google Scholar

Gao J, Xu C, Lin S, Yang G, Guo Y. Advanced model for turbulent gas-solid flow and reaction in FCC riser reactor. AIChE J 1999; 45: 1095–1113.10.1002/aic.690450517Suche in Google Scholar

Grudanova AI, Khavkin VA, Gulyaeva LA, Sergienko SA, KrasilnikovaLA, Misko OM. Perspective processes of production of diesel fuels for the cold and arctic climate with improved environmental and operational characteristics. World Oil Products 2013; 12: 3–7 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Grudanova AI, Gulyaeva LA, Krasil’nikova LA, Chernysheva EA. A catalyst for producing diesel fuels with improved cold flow characteristics. Catal Ind 2016; 8: 40–47.10.1134/S2070050416010074Suche in Google Scholar

Gyngazova MS, Kravtsov AV, Ivanchina ED, Korolenko MV, Chekantsev NV. Reactor modeling and simulation of moving-bed catalytic reforming process. Chem Eng J 2011; 176177: 134–143.10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.128Suche in Google Scholar

Hou W, Su H, Hu Y, Chu J. Modeling, simulation and optimization of a whole industrial catalytic naphtha reforming process on Aspen Plus platform. Chin J Chem Eng 2006; 14: 584–591.10.1016/S1004-9541(06)60119-5Suche in Google Scholar

Ioffe II, Pismen LM. Engineering chemistry in heterogeneous catalysis. Moscow, Russia: Khimiya, 1965 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Ivanchina ED, Sharova ES, Poluboyartsev DS, Chekantsev NV, Kravtsov AV. Monitoring of the commercial operation of reforming catalysts using a computer simulation system. Catal Ind 2009; 1: 128–133.10.1134/S2070050409020068Suche in Google Scholar

Ivanchina ED, Ivashkina EN, Dolganova IO, Platonov VV. Effect of thermodynamic stability of higher aromatic hydrocarbons on the activity of the HF catalyst for benzene alkylation with C9–C14 olefins. Petrol Chem 2014; 54: 445–451.10.1134/S096554411406005XSuche in Google Scholar

Ivanchina ED, Ivashkina EN, Kozlov IA, Dolganova IO, Platonov VV. Prediction of the dynamics of the formation of high-molecular-weight organofluorine aromatic hydrocarbons in the process of alkylation of benzene with olefins by the method of mathematical modeling. Catal Ind 2015; 1: 55–63 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Ivanchina ED, Ivashkina EN, Nazarova GY, Stebeneva VI, Shafran TA, Kiseleva SV, Khrapov DV, Korotkova NV, Esipenko RV. Development of the kinetic model of catalytic cracking. Catal Ind 2017; 17: 477–486 (in Russian).10.18412/1816-0387-2017-6-477-486Suche in Google Scholar

Ivanova AS, Korneeva EV, Bukhtiyarova GA, Nuzhdin AL, Budneva AA, Prosvirin IP, Zaikovsky VI, Noskov AS. Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil in the presence of deposited Ni-W catalysts. Kinet Catal 2011; 52: 457–469 (in Russian).10.1134/S0023158411030098Suche in Google Scholar

Ivashkina EN, Frantsina EV, Romanovsky RV, Dolganov IM, Ivanchina ED, Kravtsov AV. Developing a method for increasing the service life of a higher paraffin dehydrogenation catalyst, based on the nonstationary kinetic model of a reactor. Catal Ind 2012; 4: 110–120.10.1134/S2070050412020079Suche in Google Scholar

Ivashkina EN, Nazarova GY, Ivanchina ED, Belinskaya NS, Ivanov SY. The increase in the yield of light fractions during the catalytic cracking of C13-C40 hydrocarbons. Curr Org Synth 2017; 14: 353–364.10.2174/1570179413666161031121659Suche in Google Scholar

Jacob SM, Gross B, Voltz SE, Weekman VW. A lumping and reaction scheme for catalytic cracking. AIChE J 1976; 22: 701–713.10.1002/aic.690220412Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang H, Ren S, Zhou L, Wang Y, Cao J. Kinetic model of heavy paraffins dehydrogenation. Pet Sci Technol 2015; 33: 1305–1313.10.1080/10916466.2015.1065276Suche in Google Scholar

Junusova AA, Ostrovsky NM. Two-level reforming model. Chem Technol 2003; 4: 23–29 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kafarov VV. Methods of cybernetics in chemistry and chemical engineering. Moscow, Russia: Khimiya, 1985 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kang X, Guo X, You H. An introduction to the lump kinetics model and reaction mechanism of FCC gasoline. Energy Sources A 2013; 35: 1921–1928.10.1080/15567036.2010.531508Suche in Google Scholar

Karimov EK, Kas’yanova LZ, Movsumzade EM, Daminev RR, Karimov OK. Salient features of deactivation of an iron oxide catalyst for dehydrogenation of methylbutenes to isoprene in industrial adiabatic reactors. Pet Chem 2014; 54: 213–217.10.1134/S0965544114030062Suche in Google Scholar

Kapustin VM. Innovative development of oil refining and petrochemistry of Russia. World Oil Products 2011; 6: 3–7 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kapustin VM, Chernysheva EA. The prospects of catalytic processes of oil refining and increasing the role of catalysts. II Russian congress on catalysis “RUSCATALYSIS”: abstracts of the congress, 2–5 October 2014, Samara. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS 2014; 1: 31–37 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kataev AN, Egorov AG, Egorova SR, Lamberov AA. Mathematical modeling of changes in particle size distribution of dehydrogenation catalysts in a fluidized bed reactor. Katal Prom-Sti 2015; 15: 60–66 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kazakov MO, Lavrenov AV, Belskaya OB, Danilova IG, Arbuzov AB, Gulyaeva TI, Drozdov VA, Duplyakin VK. Hydroisomerization of benzene-containing gasoline fractions on a Pt/SO₄²⁻-ZrO₂-Al₂O₃ catalyst: III. The hydrogenating properties of the catalyst. Kinet Catal 2012; 53: 101–106.10.1134/S0023158412010016Suche in Google Scholar

Khavkin VA, Gulyaeva LA, Vinokurov BV. The place of hydrogenation processes in the modernization of the Russian oil refining industry. Oil refining and petrochemistry. Scientific and Technological Achievements and Best Practices 2014; 7: 8–11 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kholokhonova LI, Korotkaya EV. Kinetika khimicheskikh reaktsii. Kemerovo: KTIPP, 2004 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Klenov OP, Noskov AS. Using computational hydrodynamics in modeling of catalytic reactors. Novosibirs, Russia: Publishing Office of SB RAS, 2014 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Kolesnikov SI. Scientific basis of the production of high octane gasoline with additives and catalytic process. Moscow: Neft I Gas, 2007 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Koronatov NN, Kuzuchkin NV, Fedorov VI. The influence of fractional composition of xylene reforming raw material on the aromatization degree of hydrocarbons C8. Bull St PbSIT(TU) 2013; 19: 75–77.Suche in Google Scholar

Kozlov IA, Andreev AB, Kravtsov AV, Ivanchina ED, Ivashkina EN, Frantsina EV, Romanovsky RV, Dolganov IM, Afanasyeva YI. Method for controlling the catalyst activity of the dehydrogenation process of higher n-paraffins. Patent No. 1 RU 2486168, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

Kravtsov AV, Gyngazova MS, Ivanchina ED, Korolenko MV, Uvarkina DD. Kinetic model of the catalytic reforming of gasolines in moving-bed reactors. Catal Ind 2010; 2: 374–380.10.1134/S2070050410040124Suche in Google Scholar

Lan X, Xu C, Wang G, Wu L, Gao J. CFD modeling of gas–solid flow and cracking reaction in two-stage riser FCC reactors. Chem Eng Sci 2009; 64: 3847–3858.10.1016/j.ces.2009.05.019Suche in Google Scholar

Lappas AA, Iatridis DK, Papapetrou MC, Kopalidou EP, VasalosIA. Feedstock and catalyst effects in fluid catalytic cracking – comparative yields in bench scale and pilot plant reactors. Chem Eng J 2015; 278: 140–149.10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.092Suche in Google Scholar

Lavrenov AV, Bogdanets EN, Duplyakin VK. Solid acid alkylation of isobutane by butenes: a way from study out of causes of fast catalyst deactivation to technological implementation of the process Kataliz V Promyshlennosti. Catal Ind 2009a; 1: 28–38 (in Russian).10.1134/S2070050409010073Suche in Google Scholar

Lavrenov AV, Kazakov MO, Duplyakin VK, Liholobov VA. Hydroisomerization of reformed gasoline on the Pt/SO₄²⁻-ZrO₂ catalyst. Pet Chem 2009b; 49: 218–224.10.1134/S0965544109030050Suche in Google Scholar

Lazyan YI, Lazyan NG, Gulyaeva LA, Kurganov VM. Kinetic model of hydrodewaxing of kerosene fraction. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 1992; 5: 9–12 (in Russian).10.1007/BF00719396Suche in Google Scholar

Lebedev BL, Afanasyev IP, Ishmurzin AV, Talalaev SY, Shteba VE, Kameshkov AV, Domnin PI. Production of winter diesel fuel in Russia. Oil refining and petrochemistry. Scientific and Technological Achievements and Best Practices 2015; 4: 19–27 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Levenspiel O. Engineering design of heterogenous processes. Moscow, Russia: Khimiya, 1969 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Levenspiel O. Modeling in chemical engineering. Chem Eng Sci 2002; 57: 4691–4696.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00280-4Suche in Google Scholar

Lid T, Skogestad S. Data reconciliation and optimal operation of a catalytic naphtha reformer. J Process Control 2008; 18: 320–331.10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Malinovskaya OA, Beskov VS, Slinko MG. Modeling of catalytic processes in porous grains. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1975 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Matros YuSh. Unsteady processes in catalytic reactors. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1982 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Matros YuSh, Noskov AS, Chumachenko VA. Catalytic disposal of off-gas in industry. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1991 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Mitrichev II, Zhensa AV, Kol’tsova EM. Thermodynamic criteria for estimating the kinetic parameters of catalytic reactions. Russ J Phys Chem A 2017; 91: 44–51.10.1134/S0036024417010186Suche in Google Scholar

Mukherjee M, Nehlsen J, Sundaresan S. Scale-up strategy applied to solid-acid alkylation process. Oil Gas J 2006; 104: 48–54.Suche in Google Scholar

Nazarova GY, Ivashkina EN, Ivanchina ED, Stebeneva VI. Influence of catalyst/feedstock ratio on the yield of light fractions and coke during the catalytic cracking technology. Pet Coal 2016; 58: 709–714.Suche in Google Scholar

Ngomo HM, Susu AA. Modelling the deactivation kinetics of cyclohexane dehydrogenation on platinum/alumina catalyst. Chem Eng Commun 1996; 154: 1–9.10.1080/00986449608936642Suche in Google Scholar

Niknaddaf S, Soltani M, Farjoo A, Khorasheh F. Modeling of coke formation and catalyst deactivation in propane dehydrogenation over a commercial Pt-Sn/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst. Pet Sci Technol 2013; 31: 2451–2462.10.1080/10916466.2011.565296Suche in Google Scholar

Oliveira L, Biscaia EC. Catalytic cracking kinetic models. Parameter estimation and model evaluation. Ind Eng Chem Res 1989; 28: 264–271.10.1021/ie00087a003Suche in Google Scholar

Ostrovsky NM. Kinetics of catalyst deactivation: mathematical models and their application. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 2001 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Padmavathi G, Chaudhuri KK, Rajeshwer D, Rao GS, Krishnamurthy KR, Trivedi PC, Hathi KK, Subramanyam N. Kinetics of n-dodecane dehydrogenation on promoted platinum catalyst. Chem Eng Sci 2005; 60: 4119–4129.10.1016/j.ces.2005.01.039Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer ER, Kao SH, Tung C, Shipman DR. Consider options to lower benzene levels in gasoline. New regulations further limit this aromatic from the refinery blending pool. Hydrocarbon Process 2008; 7: 55–66.Suche in Google Scholar

Parmon VN. Thermodynamics of non-equilibrium processes for chemists with application to chemical kinetics, catalysis, material science and biology. Dolgoprudny, Russia: ID “Intellect”, 2015 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Petrov NA, Yuryev VM, Khisaev AI. Synthesis of anionic and cationic surfactants for use in the oil industry. Textbook, Ufa: UNGTU, 2008 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Pitault I, Nevicato D, Forissier M, Bernard J. Détermination de constantes cinétiques du craquage catalytique par la modélisation du test de microactivité (MAT). Chem Eng Sci 1995; 43: 498–504.10.1002/cjce.5450730409Suche in Google Scholar

Poleshchuk OH, Kizhner DM. Chemical studies by methods of calculating the electronic structure of molecules. Tomsk: TPU Publishing House, 2006 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Radu S, Ciuparu D. Modelling and simulation of an industrial fluid catalytic cracking unit. Rev Chim 2014; 1: 113–119.Suche in Google Scholar

Rao P, Vatcha SR. Solid-acid alkylation process development is at a crucial stage. Oil Gas J 1996; 94: 56–61.Suche in Google Scholar

Road map “Using nanotechnologies in catalytic processes of oil refining”. http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/files/dk_katalizatory_rus.pdf. 2010 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Sa Y, Liang X, Chen X, Liu J. Study of 13-lump kinetic model for residual catalytic cracking. Petrochem. Eng Cor 1995; 3: 145–152.Suche in Google Scholar

Saeedizad M, Sahebdelfar S, Mansourpour Z. Deactivation kinetics of platinum-based catalysts in dehydrogenation of higher alkanes. Chem Eng J 2009; 154(1): 76–81.10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.017Suche in Google Scholar

Satterfield CN. Heterogeneous catalysis in practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984.Suche in Google Scholar

Shelepova EV, Vedyagin AA. Ecological and energy aspects of the propane dehydrogenation process realized in the membrane reactor. Int Sci J Altern Energy Ecol 2011; 2: 98–101.Suche in Google Scholar

Shelepova EV, Vedyagin AA, Noskov AS. Effect of catalytic combustion of hydrogen on the dehydrogenation processes in a membrane reactor. I. Mathematical model of the process. Combust Explos Shock Waves 2011; 47: 499–507.10.1134/S0010508211050017Suche in Google Scholar

Shelepova EV, Vedyagin AA, Noskov AS. Effect of catalytic combustion of hydrogen on dehydrogenation in a membrane reactor. II. Dehydrogenation of ethane. Verification of the mathematical model. Combust Explos Shock Waves 2013; 49: 125–132.10.1134/S0010508213020019Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Modeling of chemical reactor. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1968 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Kinetic studies is a basis of mathematical modeling of processes and reactors. Kinet Catal 1972; 13: 566–580 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Kinetic model as a basis of mathematical modeling of catalytic processes. Theor Found Chem Eng 1976; 10: 137–146 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Studies in the field of modeling of chemical reactors. Theor Found Chem Eng 1978; 12: 206–214 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Dynamics of chemical processes and reactors. Indus Chem 1979; 11: 27–31 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Tasks on kinetics of heterogonous catalytic reactions for modeling of chemical reactions. Kinet Catal 1981; 22: 5–14 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Mathematical modeling and numerical experiment in chemical engineering. Ind Chem 1986; 4: 3–4 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. On kinetics of heterogeneous-catalytic reactions. Indus Chem 1993; 12: 3–8 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Modeling of heterogeneous catalytic processes. Theor Found Chem Eng 1998; 32: 433–440 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Principles and methods of technology of catalytic processes. Theor Found Chem Eng 1999; 33: 528–538 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Scientific foundations of the theory of catalytic processes and reactors. Kinet Catal 2000; 41: 933–946 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Foundations and principles of mathematical modeling of catalytic processes. Novosibirsk, Russia: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, 2004 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. History of development of mathematical modeling of catalytic processes and reactors. Theor Found Chem Eng 2007; 41: 16–34 (in Russian).10.1134/S0040579507010022Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG. Automatic systems of scientific research (ASNI) – methodology and method of accelerating the development of catalytic processes. Catal Ind 2008; 5: 3–9 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Slinko MG, Yablonsky GS. Dynamics of heterogenous catalytic reactions. Prob Kinet Catal 1978; 17: 154–169.Suche in Google Scholar

Smolikov MD, Zaitsev AV, Khabibislamova NM, Belyi AS, Borovikov AY, Duplyakin VK, Kazanskii VB. Oxidized platinum surface in Pt/Al₂O₃ reforming catalysts: IR studies. Rect Kinet Catal Lett 1994; 53: 169–175.10.1007/BF02070127Suche in Google Scholar

Soloviev ME, Soloviev MM. Computer chemistry. Moscow: SOLON Press, 2005 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Talyshinsky RM. Kinetic aspects of deactivation of long operated catalysts. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 2006; 1: 35–37 (in Russian).10.1007/s10553-006-0027-xSuche in Google Scholar

The review on catalyst market in Russia, Moscow, September, 2013. https://www.marketing-magazin.ru/imgs/goods/879/file_437.pdf. (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Theologos KN, Markatos NC. Advanced modeling of fluid catalytic cracking riser-type reactors. AIChE J 1993; 39: 1007–1017.10.1002/aic.690390610Suche in Google Scholar

Topilnikov VI, Sosna MK. Modeling of the process of hydrocracking of paraffinic hydrocarbons. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 2012; 2: 34–38 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Topilnikov VI, Sosna MK, Lapidus AL. Development of a model for the hydrocracking of normal paraffins. Solid Fuel Chem 2012; 46: 93–99.10.3103/S0361521912020103Suche in Google Scholar

Tretyakov VF, Talyshinsky RM. Kinetika I dinamika geterogennykh kataliticheskikh neftekhimicheskikh protsessov. Moscow: MITKhT, 2012 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Vafajoo L, Khorasheh F, Nakhjavani MH, Fattahi M. Kinetic parameters optimization and modeling of catalytic dehydrogenation of heavy paraffins to olefins. Pet Sci Technol 2014; 32: 813–820.10.1080/10916466.2011.604061Suche in Google Scholar

Wan L, Zhang SP, Zhao ST, Xu QL, Yan YJ. Kinetic modeling for co-processing the high-boiling fraction of bio-oil with paraffin oil considering the deactivation by coke. Energy Sources A 2013; 35: 800–808.10.1080/15567036.2011.603031Suche in Google Scholar

Weekman JVW, Nace DM. Model of catalytic cracking conversion in fixed, moving, and fluid-bed reactors. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1968; 7: 90–95.10.1021/i260025a018Suche in Google Scholar

Wei J, Prater CD. The structure and analysis of complex reaction systems. Adv Catal 1962; 13: 203–392.10.1016/S0360-0564(08)60289-8Suche in Google Scholar

Xiong K, Lu C, Wang Z, Gao X. Kinetic study of catalytic cracking of heavy oil over an in-situ crystallized FCC catalyst. Fuel 2015; 142: 65–72.10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.072Suche in Google Scholar

Yablonsky GS, Bykov VI, Elohin VI. Kinetics of model reactions of heterogeneous reactions. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1981 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Yablonsky GS, Bykov VI, Gorban AN. Kinetic models of catalytic reactions. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1983 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Yakupova IV, Chernjakova ES, Ivanchina JD, Belyi AS, Smolikov MD. Performance prediction of the catalyst PR-81 at the production unit using mathematical modeling method. Proced Eng 2015; 113: 51–56.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.288Suche in Google Scholar

Zagoruiko AN. Unsteady catalytic processes and sorption-catalytic technologies. Russ Chem Rev 2007; 76: 639–654.10.1070/RC2007v076n07ABEH003664Suche in Google Scholar

Zagoruiko A, Belyi A, Smolikov M, Noskov A. Unsteady-state kinetic simulation of oil reforming and coke combustion processes in the fixed and moving catalyst beds. Catal Today 2014; 220222: 168–177.10.1016/j.cattod.2013.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

Zernov PA, Murzin DY, Paraps OI, Kuzichkin NV. Simulation of the process of alkylation of isobutane with butylenes in a reaction-rectification apparatus. Chem Chem Technol 2014; 57: 100–104 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Zhatova IA, Popov AP, Alekseev MV. Dynamics simulation of coke on the catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene bed reactor during the manufacture of styrene. Sci Bull Vgasu 2014; 2: 80–83 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar

Zhorov YM. Calculations and studies of chemical processes of oil refining. Moscow: Chemistry, 1973 (in Russian).Suche in Google Scholar