Home Enhancing methane sensing with NDIR technology: Current trends and future prospects
Article Open Access

Enhancing methane sensing with NDIR technology: Current trends and future prospects

  • Li Fu EMAIL logo , Shixi You , Guangjun Li and Zengchang Fan
Published/Copyright: November 3, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study presents an in-depth review of non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensors for methane detection, focusing on their principles of operation, performance characteristics, advanced signal processing techniques, multi-gas detection capabilities, and applications in various industries. NDIR sensors offer significant advantages in methane sensing, including high sensitivity, selectivity, and long-term stability. The underlying principles of NDIR sensors involve measuring the absorption of infrared radiation by the target gas molecules, leading to precise and reliable methane concentration measurements. Advanced signal processing techniques, such as single-frequency filtering and wavelet filtering algorithms, have been explored to improve the performance of the sensor by reducing noise, enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio, and achieving more accurate results. In the context of multi-gas detection, NDIR sensors face challenges due to overlapping absorption spectra. However, various solutions, including narrow-band optical bandpass filters, gas filter correlation techniques, and machine learning algorithms, have been proposed to address these issues effectively. This study delves into specific applications of NDIR sensors in various industries, such as coal mines, wastewater treatment plants, and agriculture. In these settings, NDIR sensors have demonstrated their reliability, accuracy, and real-time monitoring capabilities, contributing to environmental protection, safety, and energy recovery. Furthermore, the anticipated future trends and developments in NDIR methane detection technology are explored, including increased miniaturization, integration with artificial intelligence, improvements in power efficiency, and the development of multi-gas NDIR sensors. These advancements are expected to further enhance the capabilities and widespread adoption of NDIR sensors in methane detection applications.

1 Introduction

Non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) technology is a highly effective and commonly used method for the detection of certain types of gases [1]. As its name suggests, NDIR technology operates based on infrared (IR) properties and the specific absorption characteristics of different gas molecules [2]. IR light, an electromagnetic radiation invisible to the human eye, has a wavelength longer than that of visible light but shorter than microwave radiation. Every gas molecule absorbs IR radiation at a specific wavelength. This unique absorption rate is sometimes referred to as the molecular “fingerprint” as it is different for every type of gas. It is this unique property that makes NDIR an effective method for gas detection [3].

An NDIR sensor is typically composed of an IR source, a sample chamber or light tube, a wavelength filter, and an IR detector. The IR source emits the light, which then passes through the sample chamber that contains the gas to be detected. The wavelength filter ensures that only the desired wavelengths reach the detector. The detector then measures the intensity of the incoming light and produces a corresponding electrical signal, which is processed and interpreted as the gas concentration [4]. A key advantage of NDIR technology is its high selectivity. Because each gas has a unique IR absorption rate, NDIR sensors can accurately detect specific gases in the presence of other gases.

The “non-dispersive” part of NDIR refers to the fact that the IR light is not separated or “dispersed” into its different wavelengths before being detected. Instead, a particular wavelength of IR light, known as the “active” wavelength, is selected for each type of gas that is being detected [5,6]. This wavelength is chosen based on the specific absorption rate of the gas in question. The sensor also uses a “reference” wavelength, at which the gas does not absorb IR light. The comparison between these two wavelengths allows the sensor to accurately measure the concentration of the gas.

Methane (methane) is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas that is lighter than air. It is a hydrocarbon, which means that it is composed of hydrogen and carbon atoms [7]. Specifically, each methane molecule consists of one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms. This simple structure, together with its abundance, makes methane the most basic representative of the alkanes, a significant group of hydrocarbons [8,9].

Despite being simple, methane plays a crucial role in various sectors and aspects of our life. It is the main constituent of natural gas, a vital source of energy worldwide [10]. Natural gas, often extracted from beneath the Earth’s surface, is used extensively for heating homes, cooking, and generating electricity [11]. Furthermore, it is used as a fuel source in various industries and transportation [12].

Methane also has a significant impact on the environment. As a potent greenhouse gas, it traps heat in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming [13]. In fact, although its concentration in the atmosphere is much less than CO2, the impact of methane on climate change is more than 25 times greater over a 100-year period. This is due to its high heat absorption capacity. Methane’s global warming potential makes its monitoring and control crucial for climate change mitigation [14].

Methane can also be a safety concern. When mixed with air and exposed to an ignition source, it can be highly explosive. Methane leaks can lead to serious accidents, especially in confined spaces such as mines and industrial plants [15]. Hence, accurate and reliable methane detection is critical in various industrial settings to ensure safety [16]. Biologically, methane is produced by a group of Archaea known as methanogens [17]. These microorganisms generate methane as a metabolic by-product in anoxic conditions. This biological process, known as methanogenesis, plays a vital role in the carbon cycle, contributing to the global pool of atmospheric methane [18]. Methanogens are found in a variety of anaerobic environments, including wetlands, ruminant digestive tracts, and even in the human gut. The role of methane extends into the realm of astrobiology as well [19]. Methane detected in the atmosphere of other planets, such as Mars, can be considered as an indicator of possible extraterrestrial life, making it a molecule of interest in the search for life beyond the Earth [20].

The purpose of this review is to provide an in-depth and comprehensive analysis of NDIR technology and its application in detecting methane. NDIR technology plays a crucial role in various industries, environmental monitoring, and safety protocols due to its reliable and precise detection capabilities. Despite its significance, there is a lack of comprehensive resources that holistically cover the fundamentals of NDIR technology, its specific application for methane detection, comparison with other detection methods, and the advancements in this field.

Through this review, we aim to bridge this gap, creating a go-to resource for professionals, researchers, and students alike. It is designed to enable a deep understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of NDIR, the operation of NDIR sensors, and the reasons behind their widespread use in methane detection. In addition, this review intends to offer a comparison with other popular gas detection methods, exploring the advantages and potential limitations of NDIR technology. Finally, by discussing the current state of research and potential future developments in NDIR technology for methane detection, this review will provide a glimpse into the future of this field. The objective is to stimulate dialogue, encourage further research, and contribute to the advancement of this vital technology.

2 Basics of the NDIR technology

The Beer–Lambert law describes how absorption of light by a medium relates to its properties [21]. In NDIR sensors, gas concentration is directly proportional to IR absorption [22]. An NDIR sensor emits IR light into a gas sample [23]. NDIR uses a “non-dispersive” method, sending the entire IR spectrum through the gas [24]. NDIR sensors have two channels: a sample channel with the gas and a reference channel with a non-absorbing gas [25]. Both have an IR source and detector. The light passes through the sample channel, absorbed by target gas. The reference detector receives full-spectrum light.

Molecules can absorb energy at specific frequencies, causing vibration [26]. Each gas has a unique “vibrational signature” absorbing IR at specific wavelengths [27]. Complex molecules such as CO2 absorb IR effectively, while diatomic molecules such as N2 are “invisible” to IR [28]. Detectors generate a signal proportional to the IR intensity [29]. The two signals are compared; the difference indicates the light absorbed by the gas sample. This determines the concentration based on the Beer–Lambert law.

2.1 IR light source

The IR light source, often an incandescent lamp or light-emitting diode (LED), generates the initial IR light beam. It produces a broad spectrum of IR light to include the wavelengths absorbed by the target gas. For example, Ye et al. [30] selected an IRL715 lamp, widely used in NDIR sensors. Gibson and MacGregor [5] used an LED. LEDs offer benefits but early devices had challenges concerning power, stability, lifetime, and cost. The light source produces the initial IR beam sent into the sample cell.

2.2 Gas chamber

The sample cell contains the sample gas and allows IR light to pass through. The cell design ensures maximum light passes through the gas, enhancing sensitivity. The cell size and shape varies by application and required sensitivity. There are two cell designs: maximizing resolution or signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). High resolution is used for low gas concentrations. Cell length plays a crucial role. A longer path enhances sensitivity but decreases SNR [31]. New research proposes sensors without cells. Vafaei et al. [32,33] reported a method using a light source with reflector, measuring CO2 without a cell. They created 4 structures incorporating reflectors, light source and detector.

2.3 Optical filter

An optical filter selects the specific absorbed wavelengths. The filter enhances selectivity by passing only these wavelengths to the detector. This reduces the impact of other gases that absorb IR at different wavelengths. Filter design is often a research focus, with different designs improving performance. Fleming et al. [34] reduced N2O cross-talk using thin film filters. Zhou et al. [35] theoretically demonstrated multichannel mid-IR filters. The design uses Ge2Sb2Te5 grating defect layers in a photonic crystal, exciting defect and resonance modes.

2.4 Detectors

The detectors are typically pyroelectric or thermopile, converting IR light into an electrical signal. There are usually two detectors: one for the sample gas and another for reference. The reference detector measures the light source intensity, compensating for changes over time.

2.5 Amplifier and signal processing unit

The detector signals are small and require amplification. An amplifier amplifies the signals. A signal processing unit compares the measurement and reference signals. It calculates the gas concentration based on the difference in the signals.

3 NDIR technology in methane detection

The primary principle behind this specificity is the unique IR absorption characteristics of methane. Methane, a molecule comprising one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms, has a unique molecular structure that allows it to absorb IR light at a specific wavelength, approximately at 3.31 μm, in the mid-IR region [36]. This wavelength corresponds to one of methane’s fundamental vibrational modes, which is a bending mode involving the movement of the hydrogen atoms relative to the central carbon atom [37].

NDIR sensors designed for methane detection use an optical filter that allows only the IR light at this specific wavelength to pass through to the detector. By focusing on this wavelength, the sensor ensures that it responds primarily to methane, significantly enhancing its selectivity. This strategy allows the sensor to detect methane accurately, even in the presence of other gases that might also absorb IR light. Additionally, NDIR sensors provide excellent sensitivity, capable of detecting even low concentrations of methane, which is particularly valuable in applications where early detection of small methane leaks is critical. NDIR sensors show the minimal drift over time, maintaining their accuracy and reliability over extended periods. This stability is especially important for long-term monitoring applications. NDIR sensors typically offer fast response times, often in the range of seconds, enabling them to detect changes in methane concentrations rapidly. For example, Wu et al. [38] demonstrated a methane gas sensor using the NDIR principle, controlled by an STM32F103C8T6 microcontroller. The sensor design incorporates both hardware and software components. The hardware includes a stable driving circuit for the IR light source, over-voltage protection, and a signal conditioning circuit for the pyroelectric detector. The software uses noise reduction techniques. Experimental tests demonstrate that the sensor achieves high accuracy, with a relative error of less than 2%, enabling real-time methane gas measurement. Similarly, Xu and Chen [39] successfully designed and modeled a NDIR sensor for measuring the methane gas concentration. The sensor used cross-correlation signal processing to detect weak signals from the IR detector effectively. A phase-locked amplifier, based on the cross-correlation detecting technique, extracts signals from noise by correlating the input signal with a modulating signal of the same frequency. This technique enhances the SNR, making it possible to detect the weak signals produced by the low absorption ability of methane at the selected IR wavelength. The accuracy of the sensor falls within ±5% for concentrations between 1.00% and 10.00% methane and within ±10% for concentrations between 10.00% and 100% methane.

3.1 Factor compensation

NDIR sensors are relatively resistant to environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity changes, making them suitable for use in a wide range of environments. While these factors can affect the sensor’s readings, NDIR sensors can be designed with built-in compensations for these effects, ensuring accurate measurements under varying conditions. For example, the compensation of spectral impact from water vapor in air is necessary because methane and water vapor have overlapping absorption spectra in the IR region. When measuring the methane concentrations using a NDIR sensor, the presence of water vapor in the air can interfere with the accuracy of the methane measurements. The overlapping absorption lines of methane and water vapor can lead to an increase in the reported methane concentration, causing inaccuracies in the measurements. The compensation approach proposed by Gaynullin et al. [40] involves using a multispectral NDIR sensor, which measures the optic transmission in two specific spectral bands: the methane absorption spectra at 3.375 μm and the H2O absorption spectra at 2.7 μm. Additionally, a third channel at 3.95 μm is used as a reference for “zero-level” calibration. This channel does not contain absorption lines for any gas present in the atmosphere. To compensate for the spectral impact of water vapor on the methane measurements, the researchers perform a calibration procedure in an environment with variable humidity. They measure the absorptions in both the methane and H2O channels under different humidity levels and establish a relationship between the two. By simultaneously sensing both channels in the same environment, they can calculate the absorption of water vapor specifically at the methane spectral region (αH2O-at-methane) based on the known absorption in the separate H2O channel (αH2O). With this information, they can then correct the real methane transmission (τ methane) by eliminating the impact of water vapor, using the following formula:

τ methane = 1 ( ( 1 τ repmethane ) α H 2 O at-methane ) ,

where τ methane is the compensated transmission value for methane; τ repmethane is the transmission reported from the methane channel in a humid environment, containing the combined absorption of both methane and water vapor; and αH2O-at-methane is the absorption of water vapor specifically at the methane spectral region, derived from the calibration in the humid environment.

By applying this compensation algorithm, the researchers were able to reduce the uncertainty in methane concentration measurements to only 15–25 ppm relative to the reference concentrations, compared to the much higher uncertainty of 180–200 ppm for the non-corrected methane concentration.

3.2 Ethane interference

However, it should be noted that while the NDIR sensor is highly specific for methane, it is not perfect. Other gases, such as ethane (C2H6), also absorb light at similar wavelengths, although typically not as strongly as methane. Therefore, in environments with significant concentrations of such gases, some cross-sensitivity might occur. To solve this interference problem, Tian et al. [41] used a wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) technique combined with a compact home-made dense-pattern multipass cell (Figure 1). They used two tunable semiconductor lasers operating at different wavelengths: 1.653 μm for methane and 1.684 μm for ethane. Using lasers with specific wavelengths for each gas, they were able to target the specific absorption lines of methane and C2H6 separately, reducing the interference between the two gases during detection. The use of a dense-pattern multipass cell also increased the optical path length, enhancing the sensitivity of the sensor to low concentrations of both gases.

Figure 1 
                  Schematic diagram of the dual-gas sensor. Reproduced with permission from ref. [41].
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the dual-gas sensor. Reproduced with permission from ref. [41].

The problem of ethane interfering with the detection of methane was addressed in the design and algorithm of the hand-held unit based on NDIR sensor in the article published by Hennig et al. [42]. The hand-held unit is specifically designed to simultaneously detect both methane and ethane using a single tunable distributed feedback (DFB) laser diode. By reading both gases’ absorption lines simultaneously, the sensor can differentiate their concentrations accurately. The software running the sensor incorporates a sophisticated algorithm to analyze the acquired transmission signals. The acquired signals are compared with a stored background signal, normalized, and further processed to extract the concentrations of methane and ethane. The algorithm takes into account background effects, optical resonances, and variations in pressure and temperature. During the initialization process, the sensor records absorption reference lines for both methane and ethane at known concentrations, temperatures, and pressures. These data are then used for future monitoring and corrections during the operation. Although there is some cross-sensitivity between methane and ethane due to their overlapping absorption lines, the sensor applies correction methods to compensate for this interference. The algorithm is designed to differentiate and accurately quantify the individual contributions of methane and ethane to the overall signal.

This problem can also be solved by a dual-gas sensor system that uses two different detection techniques, DFB interband cascade lasers [43]. The two methods used for gas detection are laser direct absorption spectroscopy for methane and second-harmonic WMS (2f-WMS) for C2H6. Using two distinct detection methods, each optimized for the specific gas, the dual-gas sensor system can effectively differentiate between C2H6 and methane even in the presence of interference. This allows for simultaneous and accurate monitoring of both gases at ppbv concentration levels.

To address ethane interference, researchers have also proposed solutions: using lasers with specific wavelengths for methane and ethane, targeting their separate absorption lines. This reduces the overlap and interference; using gas filter correlation (GFC) techniques and sophisticated algorithms that can differentiate and quantify the contributions of methane and ethane to the sensor signal; and developing dual-gas sensor systems that use distinct detection methods optimized for methane and ethane. The selectivity and reliability of NDIR sensors depend on factors such as the design of the optical filter, signal processing techniques, and compensation for environmental factors. With proper calibration and validation, NDIR sensors can achieve good reproducibility and system suitability. However, ethane and propane interference still remains a challenge, especially at high concentrations of these gases. NDIR sensors show the highest selectivity for methane when ethane and propane levels are relatively low.

3.3 Light source

NDIR sensors, particularly those that use incandescent light sources, can have relatively high power consumption. While this may not be a significant concern for some applications, it can limit the use of NDIR sensors in battery-powered or remote devices. Using an MEMS-miniaturized IR light source enhances the sensitivity and precision of the system, concurrently minimizing power consumption and instrument size [32]. Introducing a black body radiating coating to the IR light source improves the emission of IR wavelengths [44]. Additionally, by creating micro-sized coating structures tailored to specific wavelength characteristics, narrow-band spectroscopy can be further optimized for enhanced efficiency [45].

Fanchenko et al. [46] proposed a new LED light source for methane detection emitting at a wavelength of 2.3 µm. They highlighted that recent advancements in laser optics have enabled the development of semiconductor heterostructures that emit light in the IR region, making it possible to create LEDs operating at specific wavelengths within the IR spectrum. The performance of the LED-based methane detector is discussed in the context of a NDIR gas detection scheme. They used a dual-beam optical system, with one LED emitting at 2.3 µm for the measurement channel and another LED emitting at 1.7 µm for the reference channel. The use of a reference channel helps to eliminate the influence of methane absorption bands close to the reference emitter, ensuring accurate measurements. The analytical model suggested that the LED-based NDIR detector with a 2-channel optical scheme is promising for methane detection near the lower explosive limit. The calibration curve for the LEDs is derived to determine gas concentration from NDIR measurements. The first prototype of the LED-based methane detector was constructed and tested, and the initial measurements show promising results. The methane concentration can be measured on the level of tenth percentage, indicating good sensitivity and accuracy for detecting methane gas.

3.4 Design of optical cavity

The field of NDIR methane detection continues to be an active area of research, with scientists and engineers working on several promising innovations that could further improve the performance of these sensors. One significant focus of current research is enhancing the sensitivity and selectivity of NDIR sensors. For instance, new designs for optical cavities are being explored that could increase the effective path length of the light, thereby improving the sensitivity of the sensor. For example, Ye et al. [30] proposed a compact pentahedron gas cell (Figure 2). The gas cell is designed to enhance the performance of the NDIR sensor for methane detection by increasing the optical path length while maintaining a compact and small-sized structure. The design of the gas cell incorporates a paraboloid concentrator, two biconvex lenses, and five planar mirrors. This configuration allows the IR light emitted by the incandescent lamp (IRL715) to undergo multiple reflections and significantly increase the optical path length. The extended optical path enhances the sensitivity of the sensor and improves the accuracy of methane detection. Despite the increased optical path length, the gas cell maintains a compact and small-sized structure. This is crucial for portable and handheld sensors that require a balance between performance and portability. The design allows for efficient gas absorption and detection in a reduced volume. The performance of the sensor was evaluated experimentally, and it demonstrated a 1σ detection limit of 2.96 ppm with a 43 s averaging time.

Figure 2 
                  (a) Mathematical model of cross-section and (b) three-dimensional spiral structure of the pentahedron gas cell. Reproduced with permission from ref. [30].
Figure 2

(a) Mathematical model of cross-section and (b) three-dimensional spiral structure of the pentahedron gas cell. Reproduced with permission from ref. [30].

3.5 New materials

In parallel, researchers are investigating new materials for the IR source and detector. These materials could potentially offer higher efficiency, longer lifespan, and better stability, leading to more reliable and longer-lasting sensors. Ahmed et al. [47] used lead zirconate titanate (PZT) to serve as the sensing material in the NDIR sensor (Figure 3). PZT is a piezoelectric material, which means that it generates an electrical signal in response to mechanical pressure or thermal changes. In this case, PZT is used as a pyroelectric material, where it generates an electric signal when exposed to IR radiation and experiences temperature changes due to the absorbed IR energy. The LOD of a methane gas sensing system using NDIR spectroscopy was improved by an order of magnitude with the plasmonic IR detector. The LOD before adding the plasmonic crystal structure was 261 ppm, and after adding the plasmonic crystal structure, it was reduced to 20 ppm.

Figure 3 
                  Schematic diagram of the pyroelectric IR detector with a plasmonic crystal structure. Reproduced with permission from ref. [47].
Figure 3

Schematic diagram of the pyroelectric IR detector with a plasmonic crystal structure. Reproduced with permission from ref. [47].

Macroporous silicon filters were used as narrow-band optical filters for gas sensing in NDIR sensors [48]. The main purpose of these filters is to selectively isolate the absorption bands of specific gases from the broadband light source used in the detection system. This selective filtering allows the sensor to target and measure the absorption lines of the gas of interest accurately, which is crucial for achieving high sensitivity and selectivity in gas sensing. Macroporous silicon filters can be designed to have narrow bandwidths that correspond to specific absorption lines of the target gas. By filtering out unwanted frequencies, the filters significantly reduce interferences from other gases present in the measurement environment. This selective absorption allows for accurate identification and quantification of the target gas even in the presence of other gases with overlapping absorption spectra.

Wang et al. [49] deposited single layers of Nb2O5 and Ge onto optical substrates, which were subsequently used in the design of the bandpass filters. These materials were then sputter-deposited onto MBE-grown heterostructural diodes with the peak detectivity tuned to 3,300 nm using microwave plasma-assisted pulsed DC magnetron sputtering. Nb2O5 is a dielectric material with tunable optical properties, making it suitable for designing optical interference filters. Dielectric materials are used in multilayer thin film coatings to create interference effects that selectively transmit or reflect specific wavelengths of light. By carefully controlling the thickness and refractive index of the Nb2O5 layer, it becomes possible to create interference effects that allow certain wavelengths of light (in this case, those corresponding to the methane absorption band) to pass through while reflecting or blocking unwanted wavelengths. Germanium is also a dielectric material and has specific optical properties that can be useful for optical filter applications. In this work, Ge was likely used as another layer in the bandpass filters to further shape the spectral response of the filter and improve its performance in the target methane detection application. Similar to Nb2O5, the Ge layer’s thickness and refractive index would be carefully engineered to create additional interference effects that align with the desired spectral characteristics of the bandpass filter. Using multiple layers with different refractive indices and thicknesses, the overall transmission and blocking properties of the filter can be fine-tuned to achieve the required spectral response.

3.6 Advanced signal processing

Advanced signal processing techniques are being explored to improve the performance of NDIR sensors. These techniques could help to eliminate noise, compensate for environmental factors, and accurately interpret the sensor’s output, leading to more precise and reliable measurements. For example, a single-frequency filter denoising algorithm proposed by Zhu et al. [50] is a digital signal processing technique used to reduce the noise level in the output signal of the NDIR methane gas sensor. The algorithm is based on Fourier transform and aims to extract the signal component corresponding to the lamp modulation frequency while filtering out unwanted noise and interference from other frequencies. The algorithm applies the DFT to the input signal obtained from the IR detector. After performing the Fourier transform, the algorithm selects the amplitude of the signal component at the lamp modulation frequency as the filtered output signal. Since the output signal of the gas sensor is a sinusoidal or triangular-like wave with the dominating lamp modulation frequency, this filtering process allows only the signal component of interest to pass through. The algorithm effectively reduces noise and interference in the output signal because most of the unwanted frequency components are filtered out during the single-frequency filtering process. This leads to an increase in the SNR of the system. The main advantage of this algorithm is its ability to significantly enhance the SNR of the methane gas sensor. By extracting the signal component at the lamp modulation frequency and filtering out noise, the algorithm improves the sensitivity and accuracy of the sensor. The algorithm allows for adjusting the bandwidth of the filter by changing the sampling period. This flexibility enables optimizing the filtering process for the specific application and achieving the best SNR. The algorithm is implemented in software and does not require additional complex hardware components, making it a cost-effective solution for enhancing the performance of the methane gas sensor.

Wavelet filtering algorithm has been used to remove noise from the methane gas sensor’s signal, which is crucial for improving detection limit and SNR of the sensor [51]. The algorithm decomposes the signal of the sensor into different frequency components using the wavelet transform. The wavelet transform allows the algorithm to analyze the signal at various scales and resolutions. After decomposition, the algorithm applies a thresholding process to the wavelet coefficients. Thresholding involves setting small coefficients to zero, effectively removing noise from the signal. The choice of the thresholding method can be crucial in achieving an optimal denoising effect. Once the noise coefficients have been removed through thresholding, the algorithm reconstructs the denoised signal using the modified wavelet coefficients. The effectiveness of the wavelet filtering algorithm is demonstrated using comparisons with traditional low-pass filtering methods. The study showed that the wavelet filter outperformed the low-pass filter in reducing noise and improving the SNR. The SNR was improved by approximately 50 dB using the wavelet filter, which indicates a significant enhancement in sensor’s performance.

3.7 Multi-gas detection

In the context of detecting multiple gases, the presence of overlapping absorption in the IR spectrum leads to cross-talk issues, significantly impacting detection accuracy [52]. Consequently, for multi-gas NDIR analyzers, the elimination of interference between gases is of paramount importance. To address this challenge, previous studies have put forth several solutions, including the use of narrow-band optical bandpass filters, GFC techniques, machine learning algorithms, and the integration of multiple detection units.

The NDIR system in the report published by Tan et al. [53] achieves the detection of three gases (methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide). The gas chamber is designed with two crossed elliptical surfaces coated with a reflective gold film. This design allows the IR light to be reflected twice before reaching the detectors, increasing the optical path length and enhancing sensitivity. Four single-channel pyroelectric sensors are integrated into the miniature gas chamber. Each sensor is equipped with a specific filter piece to detect one of the gases or act as a reference channel (Figure 4). The system incorporates a compensation method for environmental parameters such as ambient temperature, humidity, and pressure. This compensation method helps overcome the influence of environmental variations on the detectors, thereby improving the accuracy of gas concentration measurements. By combining these features, the NDIR system can effectively detect and quantify the concentrations of methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide gases, making it a valuable tool for multi-gas monitoring applications in various industries and environments.

Figure 4 
                  Schematic diagram of NDIR system for methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide detection. Reproduced with permission from ref. [53].
Figure 4

Schematic diagram of NDIR system for methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide detection. Reproduced with permission from ref. [53].

Genner et al. [54] developed a NDIR gas sensor based on tunable Fabry–Pérot filter technology for online monitoring of methanol and methyl formate (MF) concentrations in the exhaust gas of an industrial formaldehyde production plant. They designed and implemented a prototype gas sensor that integrates a modulated thermal IR source, a temperature-controlled gas cell for absorption measurements, and a Fabry–Pérot interferometer–detector device. The use of tunable Fabry–Pérot filters allows for the selective measurement of methanol and MF in the gas phase. The gas sensor was calibrated in the laboratory to measure the methanol and MF concentrations in the range of 660 to 4,390 ppmV and 747 to 4,610 ppmV, respectively. The achieved limits of quantification were 184 ppmV for methanol and 165 ppmV for MF.

The NDIR sensor proposed by Fonseca et al. [55] uses a non-specific filter microarray and a thermopile microarray. The filter microarray contains multiple non-specific filters with broad transmittance bands in the mid-IR region. When exposed to a gas sample, each filter will capture various absorption features of different gases, including CO2 and methane, as the gas absorbs specific IR wavelengths. For the quantitative determination of gas mixtures of CO2 and methane, the system showed prediction errors in the range of tens to hundreds of ppm. The reported results indicated that the sensor could separate and quantify different mixtures of CO2 and methane, as well as detect them individually. It is important to note that the reported detection limits for CO2 and methane in this study are in the range of tens of ppm. While this sensitivity level may be suitable for certain applications, it might not be sufficient for highly sensitive applications requiring detection at lower concentrations, such as environmental monitoring or greenhouse gas studies. In another work [31], the optical E-nose uses NDIR sensors to detect CO2 and methane gases. The optical E-nose was equipped with four emitter–detector pairs (Figure 5), each encapsulated in individual heated sensor chambers. These emitter–detector pairs are tuned to specific IR wavelengths corresponding to the absorption frequencies of the gases of interest. When a gas sample containing CO2 or methane is passed through the sensor chamber, the gas molecules absorb the IR light emitted by the emitter, and the detector measures the amount of light that reaches it after passing through the gas sample. The performance of the optical E-nose in detecting CO2 and methane is evaluated using the gas rig test. The sensor responses to different concentrations of CO2 and methane gases are recorded, and the results show that the response is linear to polynomial (second degree) for changes in concentration. The detection limits for CO2 and methane using this technology are found to be below 25 ppm and below 1 ppm, respectively.

Figure 5 
                  Optical electronic nose 2 × 2 gas sensor chamber formation: (a) 3D model and (b) manufactured prototype. Reproduced with permission from ref. [31].
Figure 5

Optical electronic nose 2 × 2 gas sensor chamber formation: (a) 3D model and (b) manufactured prototype. Reproduced with permission from ref. [31].

Jiang et al. [56] proposed that a system uses four individually controlled DFB lasers, each emitting light at one of the selected wavelengths. These lasers are driven and controlled independently using thermoelectric controller modules and field programmable gate array boards. A specialized Herriott gas cell is used to provide a long optical path for the laser beam to interact with the gas sample. The gas sample, containing the dissolved hydrocarbon gases, is pumped into the gas cell. The transmitted light is detected by a photodetector, and a lock-in amplifier is used to extract the second harmonic signal (2f) from the modulated light intensity. This 2f signal is related to the gas concentration and is used for further analysis. To achieve the multi-gas detection, the system uses an optical switch to time-share the laser channels. This allows each laser to sequentially measure the absorption at different wavelengths, effectively enabling the detection of multiple gases in the same gas cell. The combination of specific wavelength selection, controlled lasers, long optical path gas cell, signal processing, and optical switching enables the system to perform simultaneous detection of methane, ethyne, ethene, and ethane dissolved in the transformer oil.

Liu et al. [57] reported a six-gas NDIR gas sensor for CO, CO2, methane, H2CO, NH3, and NO detection by six dual-channel IR detectors, each equipped with a specific filter that corresponds to the IR absorption peak of a particular gas.

4 Comparison of NDIR with other methane detection methods

There are several other technologies and methods used for methane detection, each with its own advantages and limitations. Here, we discuss two of the most common ones: electrochemical sensors and semiconductor sensors.

Electrochemical sensors operate by reacting chemically with the target gas, in this case, methane. The sensor consists of an electrolyte and two electrodes: an anode and a cathode [58]. When methane comes into contact with the sensor, it initiates a redox (reduction–oxidation) reaction, generating an electrical signal proportional to the methane concentration [59].

Electrochemical sensors are well known for their sensitivity, capable of detecting low levels of gases [60]. They also have low power requirements, making them suitable for battery-operated devices. However, they typically have a shorter lifespan than NDIR sensors and may require more frequent maintenance and replacement. Moreover, they can be sensitive to changes in temperature and humidity, which could affect their performance.

Semiconductor sensors, also known as metal oxide semiconductor sensors, detect gases by a change in resistance [61]. The sensor’s active material, often tin dioxide (SnO2), changes its electrical resistance when exposed to the target gas [62]. The greater the gas concentration, the larger the change in resistance.

Semiconductor sensors are relatively inexpensive and have a wide detection range, but they often lack the specificity of NDIR and electrochemical sensors. They are susceptible to interference from other gases, and changes in humidity and temperature can significantly impact their readings [63]. Additionally, they require a relatively high operating temperature, which can lead to increased power consumption [64].

Table 1 shows the comparative analysis based on key factors for NDIR sensors, electrochemical sensors, and semiconductor sensors for methane detection.

Table 1

Comparative analysis based on key factors for NDIR sensors, electrochemical sensors, and semiconductor sensors for methane detection

Key factor NDIR sensor Electrochemical sensor Semiconductor sensor
Sensitivity They offer high sensitivity and can detect even low concentrations of methane. NDIR sensors provide a linear output corresponding to the gas concentration, which allows for accurate readings over a wide range. These sensors are known for their high sensitivity and can detect trace levels of gases. However, they can suffer from signal drift over time, potentially affecting their accuracy in long-term monitoring applications. While they can detect a wide range of gas concentrations, their sensitivity is typically lower than that of NDIR and electrochemical sensors. They also exhibit non-linear output, which can complicate the interpretation of the readings.
Selectivity NDIR sensors have high selectivity due to their principle of operation based on the specific absorption wavelengths of gases. This allows them to differentiate methane from other gases accurately. They offer good selectivity as the redox reactions at the sensor’s electrodes are usually specific to the target gas. However, cross-sensitivity can occur with gases that have similar electrochemical behavior. Their selectivity is generally lower. Changes in resistance can be caused by various gases, not just the target gas, leading to potential false readings.
Cost-effectiveness NDIR sensors tend to be more expensive initially due to the complexity of their design and the high-quality components required. However, their longevity, stability over time, and low maintenance requirements can make them a cost-effective solution in the long term. These sensors are less expensive than NDIR sensors and require low power, making them suitable for battery-operated devices. However, their shorter lifespan and regular need for replacement or maintenance could lead to higher costs over time. Semiconductor sensors are typically the least expensive option. However, they may require regular calibration and replacement due to degradation over time, potentially increasing their long-term cost.
Durability and maintenance The non-contact nature of NDIR sensing technology contributes to its high durability. NDIR sensors usually have a long lifespan and require minimal maintenance, adding to their appeal for continuous monitoring applications. Although electrochemical sensors can offer excellent performance, they typically have a shorter lifespan than NDIR sensors. The chemicals in the sensor cell can deplete over time, requiring the sensor to be replaced. These sensors can be quite durable, but they are susceptible to poisoning or contamination from certain substances, which can reduce their lifespan. They also require regular calibration to maintain their accuracy.
Environmental conditions NDIR sensors are relatively resistant to environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity. Although these factors can impact sensor’s readings, many NDIR sensors have built-in compensations for these effects, ensuring accurate measurements under varying conditions. Changes in temperature and humidity can significantly affect the performance of electrochemical sensors, possibly leading to inaccurate readings. Some models include compensation features, but this is not always the case. These sensors are significantly influenced by environmental conditions. Changes in temperature can affect sensor’s resistance, and high humidity levels can cause condensation on the sensor, both leading to false readings.

Each of these technologies offers unique advantages and challenges, and the choice between them often depends on the specific requirements of the application. NDIR sensors excel in applications that require high sensitivity and selectivity, long lifespan, and low maintenance. Their relatively high initial cost can be justified by their durability and reliability over time. They are well suited to continuous or long-term monitoring of methane, particularly in industrial settings or for environmental research.

Electrochemical sensors can be an excellent choice for portable or battery-powered devices due to their low power requirements. They are sensitive and relatively selective, but their performance can be influenced by environmental factors. Their frequent need for replacement or maintenance can increase their long-term cost, making them less ideal for continuous monitoring.

Semiconductor sensors are the least expensive option and can detect a wide range of gas concentrations. However, their lower sensitivity and selectivity, along with their susceptibility to environmental factors, can limit their applicability. They may be more suitable for applications where cost is a significant constraint and where the presence of other gases that could interfere with the readings is not a concern.

5 Applications of NDIR methane detection

5.1 Industrial applications

One of the key applications of NDIR sensors in methane detection is particularly in coal oil industries. Tian et al. [65] developed a new monitoring system based on NDIR spectroscopy. This system uses NDIR sensors and specialized algorithms to measure gas concentrations, particularly CO and methane, which are key indicators of coal fire hazards. The NDIR-based system meets industrial standards for monitoring these gases and can be installed close to underground coal fire risk areas, offering real-time and in situ detection. Field applications have demonstrated the high accuracy, quick analysis, and excellent safety features of the system, leading to its successful implementation in various coal mines.

NDIR camera has been used to detect and quantify methane emissions from various sources in the anaerobic digester (AD) system at the municipal wastewater treatment plant [66]. The researchers used the NDIR camera to visually identify methane-emitting point sources within the AD system. These point sources included locations such as the sludge outlet at the digester’s head, leaking manhole sealing, and cracks in the concrete structure. Additionally, the NDIR camera was used to perform quantitative measurements of methane emissions. It allowed the researchers to determine the emission rates of methane from the identified point sources. This information was crucial for calculating the total methane loss from the AD system. The NDIR camera successfully detected methane-emitting point sources within the AD system, enabling the researchers to identify locations with potential methane emissions. The NDIR camera provided data on the emission rates of methane from the identified point sources. This information was used to calculate the total methane loss from the AD system. The measurements from the NDIR camera indicated that methane emissions from the AD system were relatively low compared to literature values for other plant components. The total methane loss from the AD was calculated to be approximately 0.4% of the produced biogas. Load-dependent behavior: The NDIR camera measurements revealed that methane emissions from the AD system exhibited a strong load-dependent behavior. The emission rates correlated with the sludge retention time in the sludge shaft and the amount of displaced digested sludge.

The successful application of the NDIR gas sensor based on tunable Fabry–Pérot filter technology in an industrial setting involved its installation and integration into the formaldehyde production plant operated by Metadynea Austria GmbH [54]. The gas sensor was linked to the plant’s process control system via a dedicated microcontroller, allowing for automated and real-time monitoring of the process off-gas. The gas sensor was installed at the production site, where it could access the exhaust gas streams from the formaldehyde production process. The compact design and robust construction of the sensor made it suitable for the industrial environment, with consideration given to factors such as humidity, vibration, and exposure to chemical substances in the air. The gas sensor was capable of sequentially monitoring up to five process streams in an automated manner. This feature allowed for continuous monitoring of different production lines or reactors within the plant, providing comprehensive information on the efficiency and performance of each individual process. The gas sensor demonstrated reliable performance in the challenging industrial environment of a formaldehyde production plant. Its ability to withstand temperature variations, humidity, and other environmental factors ensured consistent and accurate measurements over extended periods of operation.

5.2 Landfill applications

Landfills produce a significant amount of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Monitoring these emissions is essential both for environmental protection and for potential energy recovery. Mahbub et al. [67] successfully designed and developed a low-cost NDIR-based methane gas sensor using a rapidly pulsed NIR LED with flexible and on-the-fly real-time data handling capabilities. A landfill site was chosen as the location for field testing (Figure 6). They selected a specific area within the landfill where methane emissions were expected to be present. The methane gas sensor was taken to the landfill site and deployed at various sampling points within the selected area. The sensor was operated in a handheld mode, allowing the researchers to move around and take measurements at different locations. The sensor was used to measure methane concentrations at each sampling point, and the data were used to create a 3D spatial map of methane concentrations in the area. This spatial mapping provided valuable information about the distribution and variation of methane emissions at the landfill. The sensor continuously sampled methane concentrations at each location for a specific duration. The collected data included methane concentration levels and corresponding spatial coordinates. They interpreted the results to understand the methane emission patterns at the landfill. They identified areas with increased methane concentrations, which were likely associated with active decomposition of organic waste.

Figure 6 
                  (a) 3D spatial map of the methane concentrations at ten sampling points and (b) the image of the landfill site and the sampling path’s position in it.
Figure 6

(a) 3D spatial map of the methane concentrations at ten sampling points and (b) the image of the landfill site and the sampling path’s position in it.

Hahn and Grande [68] designed the methane-monitoring system, using the MQ-4 methane gas sensor, proved to be effective and flexible for detecting methane emissions in various environments, including landfills at different depths, ducts, and other places with methane emissions. The system demonstrated reliable performance in measuring methane concentrations, and the timing of measurements was optimized to achieve accurate results. The study also found that the solenoid coil temperature remained within safe limits during operation, making the system suitable for use in potentially explosive environments.

5.3 Agricultural applications

Agricultural activities, particularly livestock farming, also produce notable quantities of methane. NDIR was one of the two methods used by Rey et al. [69] compared for measuring methane emissions in cattle. The NDIR method is a sniffer method that measures methane concentration in exhaled breath or eructated air from the cows. It draws air through a gas sampling tube from the front of a cow’s head to the analyzer, continuously measuring methane concentration in the cow’s breath. The study found that the repeatability of methane concentration measurements with the NDIR method was relatively high (0.42). Repeatability measures how consistently the same method provides similar results when repeated measurements are taken. A higher repeatability indicates that the method is more consistent and less affected by random variations. The study observed a moderately high and positive correlation (0.73) between the NDIR measurements and the hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) measurements for methane concentration. Correlation measures the degree of association between the results obtained by the two methods. A higher correlation indicates a stronger association between the measurements taken by the two methods. The agreement between NDIR and LMD was assessed using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA). The CCC was found to be moderate (0.62), indicating that the agreement between the two methods is not perfect but still reasonable. The CIA values were moderately high (0.83), suggesting that the individual agreement between the two methods is relatively good. Overall, the NDIR method demonstrated a reasonably good performance in measuring methane concentration in cattle, showing relatively high repeatability and a moderate level of agreement with the hand-held LMD. However, the study also highlighted that the NDIR method cannot be used interchangeably with the LMD, and the sources of disagreement between the two methods need to be identified and corrected for in order to use them jointly for research purposes or mitigation strategies.

In a similar work [70], NDIR was used in two different variations: NDIR peaks and NDIR CO2t1. NDIR peaks have been used for measuring the methane concentration in eructation peaks (burping events) of the cows during milking or feeding. The purpose of NDIR peaks was to capture the highest methane concentration during the eructation events and to assess its correlation with respiration chambers, which are considered the gold standard for measuring methane emissions. NDIR CO2t1 has been used for detecting CO2 as a tracer gas in combination with NDIR technology to estimate the daily methane output. The daily CO2 output was calculated based on milk yield, live weight, and days pregnant for each cow. The purpose of NDIR CO2t1 was to evaluate its correlation with respiration chambers and other methods. The performance of NDIR peaks and NDIR CO2t1 was evaluated in terms of their correlation with respiration chambers, their accuracy, and precision in measuring methane emissions from individual cows. The study found that both NDIR peaks and NDIR CO2t1 showed high correlations with respiration chambers and other methods. Specifically, NDIR peaks had a correlation of 0.89 ± 0.07, and NDIR CO2t1 had a correlation of 0.97 with the respiration chambers. Overall, NDIR technology performed well in capturing methane concentrations during eructation peaks and estimating daily methane output using CO2 as a tracer gas. It demonstrated good agreement with the respiration chambers, which is essential for its potential application in large-scale genetic evaluation studies of methane emissions in dairy cattle. Other evaluation studies of methane emissions in dairy cattle using NDIR can be found in previous studies [7174].

6 Anticipated future trends and developments

The future of NDIR methane detection technology looks promising, with numerous trends and developments anticipated to shape the field in the years to come.

6.1 Increased miniaturization

As technology continues to evolve, we expect to see further miniaturization of NDIR sensors. This could open up new possibilities for applications in which size and weight are crucial factors, such as wearable devices for personal safety or drones for environmental monitoring.

6.2 Integration with artificial intelligence (AI)

The integration of AI and machine learning techniques with NDIR sensors is a promising trend. This could allow for more sophisticated analysis of the sensor data, leading to more accurate detection and quantification of methane, better compensation for environmental factors, and potentially even the identification of different methane sources based on their unique “signatures.”

6.3 Improvements in power efficiency

Future developments in materials science and electronics are expected to result in NDIR sensors that are even more power efficient. This could extend the battery life of portable devices or enable the use of energy-harvesting technologies, such as solar power, to provide a virtually unlimited operating life for stationary sensors.

6.4 New materials and designs

Future research and development are likely to uncover new materials and designs for NDIR sensors that offer even better performance. This could include materials that provide higher reflectivity for the optical cavity, more efficient IR sources, and more sensitive detectors, as well as innovative designs that enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of the sensor.

7 Conclusion

In conclusion, NDIR sensors have emerged as a robust and reliable technology for methane detection, offering a wide range of applications in various industries. Their ability to accurately measure methane concentrations with high sensitivity and selectivity has made them invaluable tools for environmental monitoring, safety, and energy management. This study has provided an extensive overview of NDIR sensors for methane detection, highlighting their principles of operation, performance characteristics, advanced signal processing techniques, multi-gas detection capabilities, and real-world applications. One of the key strengths of NDIR sensors lies in their high sensitivity, enabling the detection of even trace amounts of methane. This feature makes them suitable for a diverse range of applications, including industrial safety in coal mines, wastewater treatment plants, and agricultural emissions management. Advanced signal processing techniques, such as single-frequency filtering and wavelet filtering algorithms, have been explored to enhance the performance of NDIR sensors by reducing noise and improving the SNR. These techniques have proven effective in achieving more accurate and reliable methane concentration measurements. The ability of NDIR sensors to address multi-gas detection challenges has been extensively studied. Overlapping absorption spectra can lead to cross-talk issues, affecting the detection accuracy. However, innovative solutions, such as narrow-band optical bandpass filters, GFC techniques, and machine learning algorithms, have been proposed to overcome these limitations and improve the specificity of NDIR sensors for multi-gas applications. The applications of NDIR sensors in various industries have demonstrated their real-world efficacy. In coal mines, the implementation of NDIR-based monitoring systems has enabled real-time and in situ detection of gases, such as CO and methane, ensuring worker safety and mitigating fire hazards. In wastewater treatment plants, NDIR cameras have been used to visualize methane-emitting point sources and quantify emissions, aiding in environmental protection and energy recovery efforts. In agriculture, NDIR sensors have been used for measuring methane emissions in cattle, providing valuable data for research and mitigation strategies. Looking ahead, the future of NDIR methane detection technology holds promising developments. Continued miniaturization will pave the way for more compact and portable NDIR sensors, opening up new possibilities for wearable devices and unmanned aerial vehicles in environmental monitoring. Integration with AI and machine learning techniques is expected to enhance data analysis, enabling more accurate detection and providing insights into different methane sources. Additionally, improvements in power efficiency will extend battery life and allow for energy-harvesting solutions, facilitating long-term, autonomous monitoring.



  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Li Fu: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, methodology, formal analysis; Shixi You: writing – review and editing, formal analysis, project administration; Guangjun Li: writing – original draft; Zengchang Fan: writing – original draft.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Jha RK. Non-dispersive infrared gas sensing technology: a review. IEEE Sens J. 2022;22(1):6–15. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3130034.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Liang J-G, Jiang Y, Wu J-K, Wang C, von Gratowski S, Gu X, et al. Multiplex-gas detection based on non-dispersive infrared technique: a review. Sens Actuators A: Phys. 2023;356:114318. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.114318.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Xu M, Peng B, Zhu X, Guo Y. Multi-gas detection system based on non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) spectral technology. Sensors. 2022;22(3):836. 10.3390/s22030836.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Kim Y, Goo S, Lim JS. Multi-gas analyzer based on tunable filter non-dispersive infrared sensor: application to the monitoring of eco-friendly gas insulated switchgears. Sensors. 2022;22(22):8662. 10.3390/s22228662.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Gibson D, MacGregor C. A novel solid state non-dispersive infrared CO2 gas sensor compatible with wireless and portable deployment. Sensors. 2013;13(6):7079–103. 10.3390/s130607079.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Dinh T-V, Choi I-Y, Son Y-S, Kim J-C. A review on non-dispersive infrared gas sensors: Improvement of sensor detection limit and interference correction. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2016;231:529–38. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.040.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Shemshad J, Aminossadati SM, Kizil MS. A review of developments in near infrared methane detection based on tunable diode laser. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2012;171–172:77–92. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.018.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kwaśny M, Bombalska A. Optical methods of methane detection. Sensors. 2023;23(5):2834. 10.3390/s23052834.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Aldhafeeri T, Tran M-K, Vrolyk R, Pope M, Fowler M. A review of methane gas detection sensors: recent developments and future perspectives. Inventions. 2020;5(3):28. 10.3390/inventions5030028.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Blanco H, Codina V, Laurent A, Nijs W, Maréchal F, Faaij A. Life cycle assessment integration into energy system models: an application for power-to-methane in the EU. Appl Energy. 2020;259:114160. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114160.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tagliaferri C, Evangelisti S, Clift R, Lettieri P, Chapman C, Taylor R. Life cycle assessment of conventional and advanced two-stage energy-from-waste technologies for methane production. J Clean Prod. 2016;129:144–58. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.092.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cashman S, Ma X, Mosley J, Garland J, Crone B, Xue X. Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery. Bioresour Technol. 2018;254:56–66. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Shakhova N, Semiletov I. Methane release and coastal environment in the East Siberian Arctic shelf. J Mar Syst. 2007;66(1):227–43. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Nazaries L, Murrell JC, Millard P, Baggs L, Singh BK. Methane, microbes and models: fundamental understanding of the soil methane cycle for future predictions. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15(9):2395–417. 10.1111/1462-2920.12149.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Karacan CÖ, Ruiz FA, Cotè M, Phipps S. Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction. Int J Coal Geol. 2011;86(2):121–56. 10.1016/j.coal.2011.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

[16] de Santoli L, Paiolo R, Lo Basso G. An overview on safety issues related to hydrogen and methane blend applications in domestic and industrial use. Energy Procedia. 2017;126:297–304. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.224.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Garcia PS, Gribaldo S, Borrel G. Diversity and evolution of methane-related pathways in Archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2022;76(1):727–55. 10.1146/annurev-micro-041020-024935.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Evans PN, Boyd JA, Leu AO, Woodcroft BJ, Parks DH, Hugenholtz P, et al. An evolving view of methane metabolism in the Archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(4):219–32. 10.1038/s41579-018-0136-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Yamagishi A, Yokobori S, Yoshimura Y, Yamashita M, Hashimoto H, Kubota T, et al. Japan astrobiology mars project (JAMP): search for microbes on the Mars surface with special interest in methane-oxidizing bacteria. Biol Sci Space. 2010;24(2):67–82. 10.2187/bss.24.67.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Krasnopolsky VA, Maillard JP, Owen TC. Detection of methane in the martian atmosphere: evidence for life. Icarus. 2004;172(2):537–47. 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhang Y, Jiang P, Cao W, Li X, Lai J. High-sensitivity ethylene gas sensor based on NDIR and dual-channel lock-in amplifier. Optik. 2020;223:165630. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165630.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Makhdoumi Akram M, Nikfarjam A, Hajghassem H, Ramezannezhad M, Iraj M. Low cost and miniaturized NDIR system for CO2 detection applications. Sens Rev. 2020;40(6):637–46. 10.1108/SR-06-2019-0140.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Shen C-H, Yeah J-H. Long term stable Δ-Σ NDIR technique based on temperature compensation. Appl Sci. 2019;9(2):309. 10.3390/app9020309.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Shen C-H, Wu J-J. A new electro-optical-thermal modelling for non-dispersive IR sensing technique of gas concentration. Appl Sci. 2022;12(15):7772. 10.3390/app12157772.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Barritault P, Brun M, Lartigue O, Willemin J, Ouvrier-Buffet J-L, Pocas S, et al. Low power CO2 NDIR sensing using a micro-bolometer detector and a micro-hotplate IR-source. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2013;182:565–70. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.03.048.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Dinh T-V, Lee J-Y, Ahn J-W, Kim J-C. Development of a wide-range non-dispersive infrared analyzer for the continuous measurement of CO2 in indoor environments. Atmosphere. 2020;11(10):1024. 10.3390/atmos11101024.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Fietzek P, Fiedler B, Steinhoff T, Körtzinger A. In situ quality assessment of a novel underwater pCO2 sensor based on membrane equilibration and NDIR spectrometry. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2014;31(1):181–96. 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00083.1.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Arévalo-Martínez DL, Beyer M, Krumbholz M, Piller I, Kock A, Steinhoff T, et al. A new method for continuous measurements of oceanic and atmospheric N2O, CO and CO2: performance of off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy (OA-ICOS) coupled to non-dispersive infrared detection (NDIR). Ocean Sci. 2013;9(6):1071–87. 10.5194/os-9-1071-2013.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ng DKT, Ho CP, Xu L, Chen W, Fu YH, Zhang T, et al. NDIR CO2 gas sensing using CMOS compatible MEMS ScAlN-based pyroelectric detector. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2021;346:130437. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130437.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ye W, Tu Z, Xiao X, Simeone A, Yan J, Wu T, et al. A NDIR mid-infrared methane sensor with a compact pentahedron gas-cell. Sensors. 2020;20(19):5461. 10.3390/s20195461.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Esfahani S, Tiele A, Agbroko SO, Covington JA. Development of a Tuneable NDIR optical electronic nose. Sensors. 2020;20(23):6875. 10.3390/s20236875.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Vafaei M, Amini A, Siadatan A. Breakthrough in CO2 measurement with a chamberless NDIR optical gas sensor. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2020;69(5):2258–68. 10.1109/TIM.2019.2920702.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Vafaei M, Amini A. Chamberless NDIR CO2 sensor robust against environmental fluctuations. ACS Sens. 2021;6(4):1536–42. 10.1021/acssensors.0c01863.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Fleming L, Gibson D, Song S, Li C, Reid S. Reducing N2O induced cross-talk in a NDIR CO2 gas sensor for breath analysis using multilayer thin film optical interference coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2018;336:9–16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.09.033.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Zhou K, Sun X, Ma H, Zhong X. Theoretical demonstration of tunable multichannel midinfrared optical filters for infrared spectroscopic gas detection. IEEE Sens J. 2023;23(4):3567–72. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3234544.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wang Q, Bovenhuis H. Validation strategy can result in an overoptimistic view of the ability of milk infrared spectra to predict methane emission of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(7):6288–95. 10.3168/jds.2018-15684.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Gerakines PA, Hudson RL. Infrared spectra and optical constants of elusive amorphous methane. ApJL. 2015;805(2):L20. 10.1088/2041-8205/805/2/L20.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wu J, Chen H, Zhang X, Hu Q. Methane detector based on the principle of NDIR In: 2019 2nd International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE). 2019. p. 42–46.10.1109/ICISCAE48440.2019.221584Search in Google Scholar

[39] Xu S, Chen M. Design and modeling of non-linear infrared transducer for measuring methane using cross-correlation method. Measurement. 2012;45(3):325–32. 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Gaynullin B, Hummelgård C, Rödjegård H, Mattsson C, Thungstrom G. Environmental monitoring of methane utilizing multispectral NDIR gas sensing for compensation of spectral impact from water vapor in air In: 2022 IEEE Sensors. Dallas: IEEE; 2022. p. 1–4.10.1109/SENSORS52175.2022.9967115Search in Google Scholar

[41] Tian X, Cao Y, Chen J, Liu K, Wang G, Tan T, et al. Dual-gas sensor of CH4/C2H6 based on wavelength modulation spectroscopy coupled to a home-made compact dense-pattern multipass cell. Sensors. 2019;19(4):820. 10.3390/s19040820.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Hennig O, Strzoda R, Mágori E, Chemisky E, Tump C, Fleischer M, et al. Hand-held unit for simultaneous detection of methane and ethane based on NIR-absorption spectroscopy. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2003;95(1):151–6. 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00399-X.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Zheng C, Ye W, Sanchez NP, Gluszek AK, Hudzikowski AJ, Li C, et al. Infrared dual-gas CH4/C2H6 sensor using two continuous-wave interband cascade lasers. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett. 2016;28(21):2351–4. 10.1109/LPT.2016.2594028.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Jasek K, Puton J, Siodlowski B, Knap A. Platinum-black coatings for infrared emitters In: Optoelectronic and Electronic Sensors V. Rzeszów: SPIE; 2003. p. 92–5.10.1117/12.517061Search in Google Scholar

[45] Popa D, Udrea F. Towards integrated mid-infrared gas sensors. Sensors. 2019;19(9):2076. 10.3390/s19092076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Fanchenko S, Baranov A, Savkin A, Petukhov A, Kalinina K, Zhurtanov B, et al. Non-dispersive LED-based methane open path detector capabilities In: 2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS) Proceedings. 2015. p. 146–151.10.1109/EESMS.2015.7175868Search in Google Scholar

[47] Ahmed AS, Kim HJ, Kim J, Hwang KS, Kim S. Enhancing the responsivity of uncooled infrared detectors using plasmonics for high-performance infrared spectroscopy. Sensors. 2017;17(4):908. 10.3390/s17040908.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Maza DC, Garcia DS, Deriziotis I, Rodriguez A, Llorca J. Macroporous silicon filters, a versatile platform for NDIR spectroscopic gas sensing in the MIR. J Electrochem Soc. 2019;166(12):B1010. 10.1149/2.1051912jes.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Wang P, Fu X, Gibson D, Fleming L, Ahmadzadeh S, Li C, et al. Optimised performance of non-dispersive infrared gas sensors using multilayer thin film Bandpass filters. Coatings. 2018;8(12):472. 10.3390/coatings8120472.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Zhu Z, Xu Y, Jiang B. A one ppm NDIR methane gas sensor with single frequency filter denoising algorithm. Sensors. 2012;12(9):12729–40. 10.3390/s120912729.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ch’ien L, Wang Y, Shi A, Li F. Wavelet filtering algorithm for improved detection of a methane gas sensor based on non-dispersive infrared technology. Infrared Phys Technol. 2019;99:284–91. 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.04.025.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zou M, Sun L, Wang X. Multigas sensing based on wavelength modulation spectroscopy using frequency division multiplexing combined with time division multiplexing. IEEE Sens J. 2022;22(13):12930–8. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3178948.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Tan Q, Tang L, Yang M, Xue C, Zhang W, Liu J, et al. Three-gas detection system with IR optical sensor based on NDIR technology. Opt Lasers Eng. 2015;74:103–8. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.05.007.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Genner A, Gasser C, Moser H, Ofner J, Schreiber J, Lendl B. On-line monitoring of methanol and methyl formate in the exhaust gas of an industrial formaldehyde production plant by a mid-IR gas sensor based on tunable Fabry-Pérot filter technology. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(3):753–61. 10.1007/s00216-016-0040-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Fonseca L, Rubio R, Santander J, Calaza C, Sabaté N, Ivanov P, et al. Qualitative and quantitative substance discrimination using a CMOS compatible non-specific NDIR microarray. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2009;141(2):396–403. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.07.012.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Jiang J, Wang Z, Han X, Zhang C, Ma G, Li C, et al. Multi-gas detection in power transformer oil based on tunable diode laser absorption spectrum. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insulation. 2019;26(1):153–61. 10.1109/TDEI.2018.007535.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Liu H, Shi Y, Wang T. Design of a six-gas NDIR gas sensor using an integrated optical gas chamber. Opt Express. 2020;28(8):11451–62.10.1364/OE.388713Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Sekhar PK, Kysar J, Brosha EL, Kreller CR. Development and testing of an electrochemical methane sensor. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2016;228:162–7. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.100.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Kamieniak J, Randviir EP, Banks CE. The latest developments in the analytical sensing of methane. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2015;73:146–57. 10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.030.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Dosi M, Lau I, Zhuang Y, Simakov DSA, Fowler MW, Pope MA. Ultrasensitive electrochemical methane sensors based on solid polymer electrolyte-infused laser-induced graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(6):6166–73. 10.1021/acsami.8b22310.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Daugėla I, Visockienė JS, Kumpienė J. Detection and analysis of methane emissions from a landfill using unmanned aerial drone systems and semiconductor sensors. Detritus-Multidisciplinary J Waste Resour Residues. 2020;10:127–38.10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13942Search in Google Scholar

[62] Fedorenko G, Oleksenko L, Maksymovych N, Skolyar G, Ripko O. Semiconductor gas sensors based on Pd/SnO2 nanomaterials for methane detection in air. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12(1):329. 10.1186/s11671-017-2102-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Oleksenko LP, Fedorenko GV, Maksymovych NP. Platinum-containing adsorption-semiconductor sensors based on nanosized tin dioxide for methane detection. Theor Exp Chem. 2017;53(4):259–64. 10.1007/s11237-017-9523-9.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Oleksenko LP, Fedorenko GV, Maksymovych NP. Highly sensitive to methane sensor materials based on nano-Pd/SnO2. Theor Exp Chem. 2019;55(2):132–6. 10.1007/s11237-019-09604-7.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Tian F, Liang Y, Zhu H, Chen M, Wang J. Application of a novel detection approach based on non-dispersive infrared theory to the in-situ analysis on indicator gases from underground coal fire. J Cent South Univ. 2022;29(6):1840–55. 10.1007/s11771-022-5006-9.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Tauber J, Parravicini V, Svardal K, Krampe J. Quantifying methane emissions from anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol. 2019;80(9):1654–61.10.2166/wst.2019.415Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Mahbub P, Noori A, Parry JS, Davis J, Lucieer A, Macka M. Continuous and real-time indoor and outdoor methane sensing with portable optical sensor using rapidly pulsed IR LEDs. Talanta. 2020;218:121144. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121144.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Hahn F, Grande G. Design of a methane monitoring system for landfill and duct emissions. Nat Resour. 2020;11(11):520. 10.4236/nr.2020.1111030.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Rey J, Atxaerandio R, Ruiz R, Ugarte E, González-Recio O, Garcia-Rodriguez A, et al. Comparison between non-invasive methane measurement techniques in cattle. Animals. 2019;9(8):563. 10.3390/ani9080563.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Garnsworthy PC, Difford GF, Bell MJ, Bayat AR, Huhtanen P, Kuhla B, et al. Comparison of methods to measure methane for use in genetic evaluation of dairy cattle. Animals. 2019;9(10):837. 10.3390/ani9100837.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Sypniewski M, Strabel T, Cieslak A, Szumacher-Strabel M, Pszczola M. Technical note: interchangeability and comparison of methane measurements in dairy cows with 2 noninvasive infrared systems. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(10):9512–7. 10.3168/jds.2019-16258.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] van Engelen S, Bovenhuis H, van der Tol PPJ, Visker MHPW. Genetic background of methane emission by Dutch Holstein Friesian cows measured with infrared sensors in automatic milking systems. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(3):2226–34. 10.3168/jds.2017-13441.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Sorg D, Difford GF, Mühlbach S, Kuhla B, Swalve HH, Lassen J, et al. Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows. Computers Electron Agriculture. 2018;153:285–94. 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.024.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Schokker D, Mollenhorst H, Seigers G, de Haas Y, Veerkamp RF, Kamphuis C. Real-time visualization of methane emission at commercial dairy farms In: Athanasiadis IN, Frysinger SP, Schimak G, Knibbe WJ, editors. Environmental software systems. data science in action. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 194–200.10.1007/978-3-030-39815-6_19Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-22
Revised: 2023-09-09
Accepted: 2023-09-28
Published Online: 2023-11-03

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Detection of exosomes in various biological fluids utilizing specific epitopes and directed multiple antigenic peptide antibodies
  3. A green HPLC method for the determination of apixaban in pharmaceutical products: Development and validation
  4. Real-time monitoring of recombinant GFP expression in single-cell Komagataella phaffii through filamentous pelletization technology
  5. Review Articles
  6. Progress of sensitive materials in chemiresistive sensors for detecting chemical warfare agent simulants: A review
  7. Major biochemical constituents of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) extract: A review of chemical analysis
  8. A brief review of the application of microextraction by packed sorbent for antibiotics analysis from biological, food, and environmental samples
  9. Poly- and per-fluoroalkyl substances in water: Occurrence, analytical methodologies, and remediations strategies: A comprehensive review
  10. Special Issue: Greener Analytical Methods - Part I
  11. Green novel photometric and planar chromatographic assays of remdesivir: Comparative greenness assessment study using estimated GAPI tool versus ISO technical reported methods
  12. Enhancing methane sensing with NDIR technology: Current trends and future prospects
  13. Eco-friendly HPLC method by using response surface design to measure a combination of three antidiabetic drugs
  14. Metal and metalloid monitoring in water by passive sampling – A review
  15. Green chemistry and its implementation in pharmaceutical analysis
  16. Synthesis of a benzothiazole-based structure as a selective colorimetric-fluorogenic cyanate chemosensor
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/revac-2023-0062/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOophkssKGHOTwo8qsA0HDgr7fvVcOwhCBAo9bu2G9ugdaJ6WJ6Iy
Scroll to top button