Home Behaviour of DGA and Ln resin with alpha radiation dose
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Behaviour of DGA and Ln resin with alpha radiation dose

  • Rikard Malmbeck and Nidhu Lal Banik EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 17, 2022

Abstract

In this work the separation efficiency of the DGA and Ln extraction chromatographic resins has been investigated as a function of absorbed dose induced by alpha radiation. It was found that the resins show good stability towards alpha radiolysis, both maintaining high weight distribution ratios (and resin capacity factors) with the absorbed dose, calculated as if the complete alpha energy would be absorbed only in the resin material. However, the results obtained for Ln resin indicates that the method used in this work (extractive distribution ratio) to investigate alpha radiolytic behaviour is not appropriate. The reason is likely the strong acid dependency of this particular extraction system. The behaviour of the DGA resin towards alpha radiolysis was compared to alpha radiolysis in ordinary liquid-liquid extraction of an organic solvent based on the same extractant, TODGA, dissolved in n-dodecan. It was found that the alpha radiolysis rate of TODGA is about 5 times higher in liquid-liquid extraction where the complete energy of the alpha particle is deposited within the solvent, compared to the DGA resin. This indicates that in the heterogeneous DGA resin system, only 20% of the alpha energy is actually deposited to the organic solvent layered onto the particles of the DGA resin.


Corresponding author: Nidhu Lal Banik, European Commission, Joint Research Centre – JRC, Directorate G, Nuclear Safety and Security, 76125 Karlsruhe, Germany, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to especially thank Adrian Nicholl (JRC-Karlsruhe) for his constant support before, during and after the experiments.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Ostapenko, V., Vasiliev, A., Lapshina, E., Ermolaev, S., Aliev, R., Totskiy, Y., Kalmykov, S. Extraction chromatographic behavior of actinium and REE on DGA, Ln and TRU resins in nitric acid solutions. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 306, 707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4331-y.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gharibyan, N., Dailey, A., McLain, D. R., Bond, E. M., Moody, W., Happel, S., Sudowe, R. Extraction behavior of americium and curium on selected extraction chromatography resins from pure acidic matrices. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2014, 32, 391. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2014.884888.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dash, A., Pillai, M. R. A., Knapp, F. F. Production of 177Lu for targeted radionuclide therapy: available options. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 49, 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-014-0315-z.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bertelsen, E. R., Jessica, J. A., Jenifer, S. C. A survey of extraction chromatographic f-element separations developed by E. P. Horwitz. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2020, 38, 251. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2020.1720958.Search in Google Scholar

5. McAlister, D. R., Horwitz, E. P. Characterization of extraction of chromatographic materials containing bis (2-ethyl-1-hexyl)phosphoric acid, 2-ethyl-1-hexyl (2-ethyl-1-hexyl) phosphonic acid, and Bis(2,4,4-- trimethyl-1-Pentyl)Phosphonic acid. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2007, 25, 757. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290701634594.Search in Google Scholar

6. Horwitz, E. P., Bloomquist, C. A. The preparation, performance and factors affecting band spreading of high efficiency extraction chromatographic columns for actinide separations. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1972, 34, 3851. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(72)80033-2.Search in Google Scholar

7. Horwitz, E. P., McAlister, D. R., Bond, A. H., Barrans, J. R. E. Novel extraction of chromatographic resins based on tetraalkyldiglycolamides: characterization and potential applications. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2005, 23, 319. https://doi.org/10.1081/sei-200049898.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ansari, S. A., Pathak, P., Mohapatra, P. K., Manchanda, V. K. Chemistry of diglycolamides: promising extractants for actinide partitioning. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1751. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200002f.Search in Google Scholar

9. Peppard, D. F., Mason, G. W., Maier, J. L., Driscoll, W. J. Fractional extraction of the lanthanides as their di-alkyl orthophosphates. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1957, 4, 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(57)80016-5.Search in Google Scholar

10. Whittaker, D., Geist, A., Modolo, G., Taylor, R., Sarsfield, M., Wilden, A. Applications of diglycolamide based solvent extraction processes in spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, Part 1: TODGA. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2018, 36, 223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2018.1464269.Search in Google Scholar

11. Nilsson, M., Nash, K. L. Review article: a review of the development and operational characteristics of the TALSPEAK process. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2007, 25, 665. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290701634636.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gelis, A. V., Lumetta, G. J. Actinide lanthanide separation process − ALSEP. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 53, 1624. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403569e.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mincher, B. J., Modolo, G., Mezyk, S. P. Review article: the effects of radiation chemistry on solvent extraction 3: a review of actinide and lanthanide extraction. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2009, 27, 579. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290903114098.Search in Google Scholar

14. Zhang, A., Wei, Y.-Z., Kumagai, M., Koma, Y. A new partitioning process for high-level liquid waste by extraction chromatography using silica-substrate chelating agent impregnated adsorbents. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 390, 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.08.034.Search in Google Scholar

15. Zhang, A., Wei, Y.-Z., Hoshi, H., Kumagai, M., Koma, Y., Koyama, T. Resistance properties of a macroporous silica-based N,N,N0,N0-tetraoctyl-3-oxapentane-1,5-diamide-impregnated polymeric adsorption material against nitric acid, temperature and gamma-irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2005, 72, 669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.05.050.Search in Google Scholar

16. https://www.triskem-international.com/catalog/products/resins-and-accessories/dga-resin/bl,product,399,0.Search in Google Scholar

17. Pin, C., Gannoun, A. Miniaturized, rapid separation of Neodymium from ultramafic and chondritic samples prior to high precision measurements of 142,143Nd/144Nd isotope ratios by TIMS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2019, 34, 2136. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ja00272c.Search in Google Scholar

18. Loktionova, N. S., Belozu, A. N., Filosofov, D. V., Zhernosekov, K. P., Wagnerc, T., T̈urler, A., Rösch, F. Improved column-based radiochemical processing of the generator produced 68Ga. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Morgenstern, A., Bruchertseifer, F., Apostolidis, C. Bismuth-213 and actinium-225-generator performance and evolving therapeutic applications of two generator-derived alpha-emitting radioisotopes. Curr. Radiopharm. 2012, 5, 221. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874471011205030221.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. C Rébufa, A., Traboulsi, V., Nathalie, L., Dupuy, N., Sergent, M. Experimental design approach for identification of the factors influencing the-radiolysis of ion exchange resins. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015, 106, 223.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.07.020Search in Google Scholar

21. Shu, Q., Khayambashi, A., Wang, X., Wang, X., Feng, L., Wei, Y. Effects of γ irradiation on bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid supported by macroporous silica-based polymeric resins. Radiochim. Acta 2018, 106, 249. https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2017-2758.Search in Google Scholar

22. Tachimori, S. Radiation effects on the extraction of americium(III) with di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid. J. Radioanal. Chem. 1979, 50, 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02519950.Search in Google Scholar

23. Magnusson, D., Christiansen, B., Malmbeck, R., Glatz, J-P. Investigation of the radiolytic stability of a CyMe4-BTBP based SANEX solvent. Radiochim. Acta 2009, 97, 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2009.1647.Search in Google Scholar

24. Banik, N. L., Lützenkirchen, K., Malmbeck, R., Nicholl, A. A method for the mg separation of Cm from Am using a SCX column. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2019, 321, 841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06653-z.Search in Google Scholar

25. Malmbeck, R., Banik, N. L., Kerst, T., Soti, Z. Alpha induced liquid radioluminescence at varying alpha energies of radionuclides. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 7766–7773. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nj05394e.Search in Google Scholar

26. Malmbeck, R., Banik, N. L., Nicholl, A., Lützenkirchen, K. Precise determination of Cm by Cm/Pu alpha ratio measurements. Dalton 2021.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sasaki, Y., Kitatsuji, Y., Tsubata, Y., Sugo, Y., Morita, Y. Separation of Am, Cm and lanthanides by solvent extraction with hydrophilic and lipophilic organic ligands. Solvent Extr. Res. Dev. 2011, 18, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.15261/serdj.18.93.Search in Google Scholar

28. Weßling, P., Trumm, M., Geist, A., Panak, P. J. Stoichiometry of An(iii)–DMDOHEMA complexes formed during solvent extraction. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 10906. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt02504e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Galán, H., Núñez, A., Espartero, A. G., Sedano, R., Durana, A., de Mendoza, J. Radiolytic stability of TODGA: characterization of degraded samples under different experimental conditions. Procedia Chem 2012, 7, 195.10.1016/j.proche.2012.10.033Search in Google Scholar

30. Nucleonica Nuclear Science Portal. Nucleonica GmbH, Range and Stopping Power Version 3.0.65; Karlsruhe: Nucleonica Nuclear Science Portal, 2017. www.nucleonica.com.Search in Google Scholar

31. Malmbeck, R., Banik, N. L. Radiolytic behaviour of a TODGA based solvent under alpha irradiation. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 326, 1609–1615.10.1007/s10967-020-07444-7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-11-06
Accepted: 2021-11-05
Published Online: 2022-01-17
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2020-0113/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button