Abstract
Experiments by [Powell, B. A., Dai, Z. R., Zavarin, M., Zhao, P. H., Kersting, A. B.: Stabilization of plutonium nano-colloids by epitaxial distortion on mineral surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2698 (2011).] deduced the heteroepitaxial growth of a bcc Pu4O7 phase when sorbed onto goethite from d-spacing measurements obtained from selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. The structural and/or chemical modification of Pu(IV) oxide (PO) nanocolloids upon sorption to goethite, in turn, affects colloidal-transport of Pu in the subsurface. In this study, molecular simulations were applied to investigate mechanisms affecting the formation of non-fcc PO phases and to understand the influence of goethite in stabilizing the non-fcc PO phase. Analyses of the structure, chemistry, and formation energetics for several bulk PuO2 and PuO2–x phases, using ab initio methods, show that the formation of a non-fcc PO can occur from the lattice distortion (LD) of fcc PuO2 upon sorption and formation of a PO–goethite interface. To strain and non-uniformly distort the PuO2 lattice to match that of the goethite substrate at ambient conditions would require 88 kJ/mol Pu4O8. The formation of a hypostoichiometric PuO2–x phase, such as the experimentally-deduced bcc, Ia3̅ Pu4O7 phase, requires more O-poor conditions and/or high energetic inputs (> +365 kJ/mol Pu4O7 at O-rich conditions). Empirical methods were also applied to study the effect of lattice distortion on sorption energetics and adsorbate particle growth using simple heterointerfaces between cubic salts, where KCl clusters (notated as KClLD) of varying size and lattice mismatch (LM) were sorbed to a NaCl cluster. When the lattice of a KClLD cluster has <15% LM with that of a NaCl substrate, the sorption of KClLD onto NaCl is exothermic (<–80 kJ/mol) and the KClLD cluster can reach sizes of ~2–5 nm on the NaCl substrate. These models suggest that the lattice of a fcc PuO2 particle can distort upon formation of a heterointerface with goethite to lower LM, in turn better enabling the growth of the PO adsorbates and yielding more exothermic adsorption energies. A more detailed understanding of the interfacial environment between PO and goethite is obtained through structural, chemical, and energetic analyses on modeled PuO2 (110)– and PuO2–x (110)–goethite (001) heterointerfaces. Structural analyses of the heterointerfaces continue to support that the lattice of PO is strained to better match that of goethite and thus lead to the formation of a non-fcc PO phase. When the lattice of the PO (110) surface is distorted to match that of the goethite (001) surface, the alignment and d-spacings from simulated electron diffraction patterns for the PO–goethite heterointerfaces reproduce experimental observations. Non-fcc PO thin-films are also found to be stabilized through the formation of an interface with goethite, as the work of adhesion for the PuO2– and PuO2–x–goethite interfaces are 1.4 J/m2 and 2.0 J/m2, respectively. Analyses of electron and charge density of the heterointerfaces also show that covalent- to polar-covalent bonding at the interface promotes the stabilization of a PO–goethite interface. The results from these models contribute to experimental observations, providing further understanding of how the goethite substrate influences the formation and stabilization of a non-fcc PO phase. Furthermore, the information from this study aids in better understanding processes at mineral–water interfaces that influence actinide transport.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Subsurface Biogeochemical Research program under Award Number DE-SC0004883. We would also like to thank Dr. Donald Siegel at the University of Michigan, for his guidance on the construction and analysis of the interfaces, and Dr. Cameron Tracy at Stanford University, for his helpful discussions on the structures of actinide oxide phases.
References
1. Kersting, A. B.: Plutonium transport in the environment. Inorg. Chem. 52, 3533 (2013).10.1021/ic3018908Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Kersting, A. B., Efurd, D. W., Finnegan, D. L., Rokop, D. J., Smith, D. K., Thompson, J. L.: Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature 397, 56 (1999).10.1038/16231Search in Google Scholar
3. Novikov, A. P., Kalmykov, S. N., Utsunomiya, S., Ewing, R. C., Horreard, F., Merkulov, A., Clark, S. B., Tkachev, V. V., Myasoedov, B. F.: Colloid transport of plutonium in the far-field of the Mayak Production Association, Russia. Science 314, 638 (2006).10.1126/science.1131307Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Powell, B. A., Dai, Z. R., Zavarin, M., Zhao, P. H., Kersting, A. B.: Stabilization of plutonium nano-colloids by epitaxial distortion on mineral surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2698 (2011).10.1021/es1033487Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Zavarin, M., Zhao, P. H., Dai, Z. R., Kersting, A. B.: Plutonium sorption and precipitation in the presence of goethite at 25 and 80 °C. Radiochim. Acta 102, 983 (2014).10.1515/ract-2013-2188Search in Google Scholar
6. Coffinberry, A. S., Miner, W. N.: The metal plutonium. University of Chicago Press (1961), Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
7. Petit, L., Svane, A., Szotek, Z., Temmerman, W. M.: First-principles calculations of PuO2+/–x. Science 301, 498 (2003).10.1002/chin.200342004Search in Google Scholar
8. Reuter, K., Scheffler, M.: Composition, structure, and stability of RuO2 (110) as a function of oxygen pressure. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035406 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035406Search in Google Scholar
9. Sun, B., Liu, H. F., Song, H. F., Zhang, G. C., Zheng, H., Zhao, X. G., Zhang, P.: The environmental dependence of redox energetics of PuO2 and α-Pu2O3: a quantitative solution from DFT+U. Phys. Lett. A 376, 2672 (2012).10.1016/j.physleta.2012.07.030Search in Google Scholar
10. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Clark, S. J., Segall, M. D., Pickard, C. J., Hasnip, P. J., Probert, M. J., Refson, K., Payne, M. C.: First principles methods using CASTEP, Z. Kristallogr., 220, 567–570 (2005).10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075Search in Google Scholar
12. Segall, M. D., Lindan, P. J. D., Probert, M. J., Pickard, C. J., Hasnip, P. J., Clark, S. J., Payne, M. C.: First-principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J. Phys.-Condens. Mat. 14, 2717 (2002).10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/301Search in Google Scholar
13. Vanderbilt, D.: Soft Self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892Search in Google Scholar
14. Tang, W., Sanville, E., Henkelman, G.: A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys.-Condens. Mat. 21, 084204 (2009).10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204Search in Google Scholar
15. Schnitker, J., Srolovitz, D. J.: Misfit effects in adhesion calculations. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. 6, 153 (1998).10.1088/0965-0393/6/2/005Search in Google Scholar
16. Kubicki, J. D., Paul, K. W., Sparks, D. L.: Periodic density functional theory calculations of bulk and the (010) surface of goethite. Geochem. Trans. 9, 1 (2008).10.1186/1467-4866-9-4Search in Google Scholar
17. Rakovan, J., Becker, U., Hochella, M. F.: Aspects of goethite surface microtopography, structure, chemistry, and reactivity. Am. Mineral. 84, 884 (1999).10.2138/am-1999-5-623Search in Google Scholar
18. Rak, Z., Ewing, R. C., Becker, U.: Hydroxylation-induced surface stability of AnO2 (An = U, Np, Pu) from first-principles. Surf. Sci. 608, 180 (2013).10.1016/j.susc.2012.10.002Search in Google Scholar
19. Jomard, G., Bottin, F.: Thermodynamic stability of PuO2 surfaces: influence of electronic correlations. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195469 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195469Search in Google Scholar
20. Siegel, D. J., Hector, L. G., Adams, J. B.: Adhesion, stability, and bonding at metal/metal-carbide interfaces: Al/WC. Surf. Sci. 498, 321 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01811-8Search in Google Scholar
21. Siegel, D. J., Hector, L. G., Adams, J. B.: Adhesion, atomic structure, and bonding at the Al (111)/α-Al2O3 (0001) interface: A first principles study. Phys. Rev. B 65, 085415 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085415Search in Google Scholar
22. Batirev, I. G., Alavi, A., Finnis, M. W., Deutsch, T.: First-principles calculations of the ideal cleavage energy of bulk niobium (111)/α-alumina (0001) interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1510 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1510Search in Google Scholar
23. Wang, Z. C., Saito, M., Tsukimoto, S., Ikuhara, Y.: Heterointerfaces: Atomic structures, electronic states, and related properties. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 119, 783 (2011).10.2109/jcersj2.119.783Search in Google Scholar
24. Momma, K., Izumi, F.: VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).10.1107/S0021889811038970Search in Google Scholar
25. Hailstone, R. K., DiFrancesco, A. G., Leong, J. G., Allston, T. D., Reed, K. J.: A study of lattice expansion in CeO2 nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 15155 (2009).10.1021/jp903468mSearch in Google Scholar
26. Barron, V., Torrent, J.: Surface hydroxyl configuration of various crystal faces of hematite and goethite. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 177, 407 (1996).10.1006/jcis.1996.0051Search in Google Scholar
27. Cornell, R. M., Schwertmann, U.: The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions, occurrences, and uses, 2nd, Completely rev. and extended ed., Wiley-VCH (2003), Weinheim.10.1002/3527602097Search in Google Scholar
28. Mason, S. E., Iceman, C. R., Tanwar, K. S., Trainor, T. P., Chaka, A. M.: Pb(II) adsorption on isostructural hydrated alumina and hematite (0001) surfaces: a DFT study. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 2159 (2009).10.1021/jp807321eSearch in Google Scholar
Supplemental Material:
The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/ract-2015-2515) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Influence of the goethite (α-FeOOH) surface on the stability of distorted PuO2 and PuO2–x phases
- Photoreduction of Pu(V,VI) by TiO2
- Experimental measurements of U24Py nanocluster behavior in aqueous solution
- Comparision in the solvent extraction behavior of uranium (VI) in some trialkyl phosphates in ionic liquid
- Sorption behavior of cesium, cobalt and europium radionuclides onto hydroxyl magnesium silicate
- Separation of no-carrier-added 203Pb, a surrogate radioisotope, from proton irradiated natTl2CO3 target using calcium alginate hydrogel beads
- Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of no-carrier-added 2-(3-(4-(4-[18F]fluorobenzyl)piperazin-1-yl)propyl)benzo[d]thiazole, a potential dopamine D4 receptor radioligand
- Silver-based getters for 129I removal from low-activity waste
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Influence of the goethite (α-FeOOH) surface on the stability of distorted PuO2 and PuO2–x phases
- Photoreduction of Pu(V,VI) by TiO2
- Experimental measurements of U24Py nanocluster behavior in aqueous solution
- Comparision in the solvent extraction behavior of uranium (VI) in some trialkyl phosphates in ionic liquid
- Sorption behavior of cesium, cobalt and europium radionuclides onto hydroxyl magnesium silicate
- Separation of no-carrier-added 203Pb, a surrogate radioisotope, from proton irradiated natTl2CO3 target using calcium alginate hydrogel beads
- Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of no-carrier-added 2-(3-(4-(4-[18F]fluorobenzyl)piperazin-1-yl)propyl)benzo[d]thiazole, a potential dopamine D4 receptor radioligand
- Silver-based getters for 129I removal from low-activity waste