Abstract
Water and wastewater treatment is crucial to meet the global demand for clean drinking water and attaining environmental sustainability. Using graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) membranes for wastewater and water treatment is innovative in tackling water pollution and water scarcity worldwide. Graphene-based membranes have been proven advantageous and effective in water purification due to their unique qualities such as increased surface area, mechanical and thermal durability, adsorbability, and antifouling and antibacterial capabilities. This chapter discusses the synthesis of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide membranes and their hybrid derivatives. It also discusses their applicability and challenges in wastewater purification. Ongoing research is necessary to optimize these membranes, as challenges persist in the large-scale cost-effective production for widespread use in water treatment plants.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editors for their guidance and review of this article before its publication.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contribution: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Lin, L, Yang, H, Xu, X. Effects of water pollution on human health and disease heterogeneity: a review. Front Environ Sci 2022;10:880246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.880246.Search in Google Scholar
2. Shayo, GM, Elimbinzi, E, Shao, GN, Fabian, C. Severity of waterborne diseases in developing countries and the effectiveness of ceramic filters for improving water quality. Bull Natl Res Cent 2023;47:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01088-9.Search in Google Scholar
3. Sharma, S, Bhattacharya, A. Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Appl Water Sci 2017;7:1043–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0455-7.Search in Google Scholar
4. Lade, H, Kadam, A, Paul, D, Govindwar, S. Biodegradation and detoxification of textile azo dyes by bacterial consortium under sequential microaerophilic/aerobic processes. EXCLI J 2011;14:Doc158. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2014-642.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Robinson, T, McMullan, G, Marchant, R, Nigam, P. Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol 2001;77:247–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00080-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Sivarajasekar, N, Rajoo, B. Agriculture waste biomass valorisation for cationic dyes sequestration: a concise review. J Chem Pharmaceut Res 2015;7:737–48.Search in Google Scholar
7. Othman, NH, Alias, NH, Fuzil, NS, Marpani, F, Shahruddin, MZ, Chew, CM, et al.. A review on the use of membrane technology systems in developing countries. Membranes 2021;12:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12010030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. El Batouti, M, Alharby, NF, Elewa, MM. Review of new approaches for fouling mitigation in membrane separation processes in water treatment applications. Separations 2021;9:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9010001.Search in Google Scholar
9. Esfahani, MR, Aktij, SA, Dabaghian, Z, Firouzjaei, MD, Rahimpour, A, Eke, J, et al.. Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: fabrication, modification, and applications. Sep Purif Technol 2019;213:465–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.050.Search in Google Scholar
10. Gohil, JM, Suresh, AK. Chlorine attack on reverse osmosis membranes: mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J Membr Sci 2017;541:108–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.092.Search in Google Scholar
11. LawNg, Y, Chua, HS, Ng, CY. Incorporation of graphene oxide-based nanocomposite in the polymeric membrane for water and wastewater treatment: a review on recent development. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105994.Search in Google Scholar
12. Jiang, Y, Zeng, Q, Biswas, P, Fortner, JD. Graphene oxides as nanofillers in polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes: shape matters. J Membr Sci 2019;581:453–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.056.Search in Google Scholar
13. Ray, SC. Application and uses of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. In: Applications of graphene and graphene-oxide based nanomaterials. Elsevier; 2015:39–55 pp.10.1016/B978-0-323-37521-4.00002-9Search in Google Scholar
14. Zhen, Z, Zhu, H. Structure and properties of graphene. In: Graphene [Internet]. Elsevier; 2018:1–12 pp. Available from:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B978012812651600001X.10.1016/B978-0-12-812651-6.00001-XSearch in Google Scholar
15. Yang, G, Li, L, Lee, WB, Ng, MC. Structure of graphene and its disorders: a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2018;19:613–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.1494493.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Lee, C, Wei, X, Kysar, JW, Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008;321:385–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Balandin, AA, Ghosh, S, Bao, W, Calizo, I, Teweldebrhan, D, Miao, F, et al.. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 2008;8:902–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0731872.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Nair, RR, Blake, P, Grigorenko, AN, Novoselov, KS, Booth, TJ, Stauber, T, et al.. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008;320:1308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156965.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Tiwari, SK, Sahoo, S, Wang, N, Huczko, A. Graphene research and their outputs: status and prospect. J Sci: Adv Mater Devices 2020;5:10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.006.Search in Google Scholar
20. Gkika, DA, Karmali, V, Lambropoulou, DA, Mitropoulos, AC, Kyzas, GZ. Membranes coated with graphene-based materials: a review. Membranes 2023;13:127. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Kumar, P, Huo, P, Zhang, R, Liu, B. Antibacterial properties of graphene-based nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2019;9:737. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9050737.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Ahmed, M, Giwa, A, Hasan, SW. Challenges and opportunities of graphene-based materials in current desalination and water purification technologies. In: Nanoscale materials in water purification. Elsevier; 2019:735–58 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00033-1Search in Google Scholar
23. Kandasamy, SK. Graphene oxide. In: Graphene, nanotubes and quantum dots-based nanotechnology. Elsevier; 2022:155–72 pp. Available from:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323854573000244.10.1016/B978-0-323-85457-3.00024-4Search in Google Scholar
24. Pendolino, F, Armata, N. Synthesis, characterization and models of graphene oxide. In: Graphene oxide in environmental remediation process. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017:5–21 pp. Available from:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-60429-9_2.10.1007/978-3-319-60429-9_2Search in Google Scholar
25. Guo, S, Garaj, S, Bianco, A, Ménard-Moyon, C. Controlling covalent chemistry on graphene oxide. Nat Rev Phys 2022;4:247–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00422-w.Search in Google Scholar
26. Trikkaliotis, DG, Christoforidis, AK, Mitropoulos, AC, Kyzas, GZ. Graphene oxide synthesis, properties and characterization techniques: a comprehensive review. ChemEngineering 2021;5:64. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering5030064.Search in Google Scholar
27. Stobinski, L, Lesiak, B, Malolepszy, A, Mazurkiewicz, M, Mierzwa, B, Zemek, J, et al.. Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 2014;195:145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003.Search in Google Scholar
28. Wang, Y, Chen, Y, Lacey, SD, Xu, L, Xie, H, Li, T, et al.. Reduced graphene oxide film with record-high conductivity and mobility. Mater Today 2018;21:186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.008.Search in Google Scholar
29. Tarcan, R, Todor-Boer, O, Petrovai, I, Leordean, C, Astilean, S, Botiz, I. Reduced graphene oxide today. J Mater Chem C 2020;8:1198–224. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tc04916a.Search in Google Scholar
30. Phukan, P, Narzary, R, Sahu, PP. A green approach to fast synthesis of reduced graphene oxide using alcohol for tuning semiconductor property. Mater Sci Semicond Process 2019;104:104670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104670.Search in Google Scholar
31. Qi, Y, Xia, T, Li, Y, Duan, L, Chen, W. Colloidal stability of reduced graphene oxide materials prepared using different reducing agents. Environ Sci Nano 2016;3:1062–71. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6en00174b.Search in Google Scholar
32. Broide, XIII. On the atomic weight of graphite. Phil Trans R Soc 1859;149:249–59.10.1098/rstl.1859.0013Search in Google Scholar
33. Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren zur Darstellung der Graphitsäure. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1898;31:1481–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.18980310237.Search in Google Scholar
34. Hummers, WS, Offeman, RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958;80:1339–. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017.Search in Google Scholar
35. An, J, Wen, C, Chen, C, Qiu, X. Structural defects of graphene oxidation reduction and its high-efficiency structural reforming technology. Peralta-Hernández, JM, editor. International journal of photoenergy; 2021:1–7.10.1155/2021/8894830Search in Google Scholar
36. Alkhouzaam, A, Qiblawey, H, Khraisheh, M, Atieh, M, Al-Ghouti, M. Synthesis of graphene oxides particle of high oxidation degree using a modified Hummers method. Ceram Int 2020;46:23997–4007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.177.Search in Google Scholar
37. Marcano, DC, Kosynkin, DV, Berlin, JM, Sinitskii, A, Sun, Z, Slesarev, A, et al.. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2010;4:4806–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1006368.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Liu, S, Hu, M, Zeng, TH, Wu, R, Jiang, R, Wei, J, et al.. Lateral dimension-dependent antibacterial activity of graphene oxide sheets. Langmuir 2012;28:12364–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/la3023908.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Zhang, J, Ren, Y, Xu, T, Yang, H, Xu, Q. Liquid crystal graphene oxide with different layers: fabrication, characterization and applications. RSC Adv 2015;5:94809–13. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra16539c.Search in Google Scholar
40. Yu, H, Zhang, B, Bulin, C, Li, R, Xing, R. High-efficient synthesis of graphene oxide based on improved Hummers method. Sci Rep 2016;6:36143. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36143.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
41. Al-Gaashani, R, Najjar, A, Zakaria, Y, Mansour, S, Atieh, MA. XPS and structural studies of high quality graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide prepared by different chemical oxidation methods. Ceram Int 2019;45:14439–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.165.Search in Google Scholar
42. Méndez-Lozano, N, Pérez-Reynoso, F, González-Gutiérrez, C. Eco-friendly approach for graphene oxide synthesis by modified Hummers method. Materials 2022;15:7228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207228.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
43. Moosa, AA, Abed, MS. Graphene preparation and graphite exfoliation. Turk J Chem 2021;45:493–519. https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-2101-19.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
44. Sun, P, Kuga, S, Wu, M, Huang, Y. Exfoliation of graphite by dry ball milling with cellulose. Cellulose 2014;21:2469–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0264-9.Search in Google Scholar
45. Ogino, I, Yokoyama, Y, Iwamura, S, Mukai, SR. Exfoliation of graphite oxide in water without sonication: bridging length scales from nanosheets to macroscopic materials. Chem Mater 2014;26:3334–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm501305c.Search in Google Scholar
46. Shao, G, Lu, Y, Wu, F, Yang, C, Zeng, F, Wu, Q. Graphene oxide: the mechanisms of oxidation and exfoliation. J Mater Sci 2012;47:4400–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6294-5.Search in Google Scholar
47. Parvez, K, Rincón, RA, Weber, NE, Cha, KC, Venkataraman, SS. One-step electrochemical synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped, high-quality graphene oxide. Chem Commun 2016;52:5714–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc01250g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Pei, S, Wei, Q, Huang, K, Cheng, HM, Ren, W. Green synthesis of graphene oxide by seconds timescale water electrolytic oxidation. Nat Commun 2018;9:145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02479-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
49. Pei, S, Cheng, HM. The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 2012;50:3210–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010.Search in Google Scholar
50. Khojasteh, H, Safajou, H, Mortazavi-Derazkola, S, Salavati-Niasari, M, Heydaryan, K, Yazdani, M. Economic procedure for facile and eco-friendly reduction of graphene oxide by plant extracts; a comparison and property investigation. J Clean Prod 2019;229:1139–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.350.Search in Google Scholar
51. De Silva, KKH, Huang, HH, Joshi, RK, Yoshimura, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide using green reductants. Carbon 2017;119:190–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.025.Search in Google Scholar
52. Chamoli, P, Das, MK, Kar, KK. Urea-assisted low temperature green synthesis of graphene nanosheets for transparent conducting film. J Phys Chem Solid 2018;113:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.10.001.Search in Google Scholar
53. Karim, MR, Hayami, S. Chemical, thermal, and light-driven reduction of graphene oxide: approach to obtain graphene and its functional hybrids. In: Graphene materials – advanced applications. InTech; 2017. [Internet].10.5772/67808Search in Google Scholar
54. Dubin, S, Gilje, S, Wang, K, Tung, VC, Cha, K, Hall, AS, et al.. A one-step, solvothermal reduction method for producing reduced graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents. ACS Nano 2010;4:3845–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100511a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
55. Zhou, Y, Bao, Q, Tang, LAL, Zhong, Y, Loh, KP. Hydrothermal dehydration for the “green” reduction of exfoliated graphene oxide to graphene and demonstration of tunable optical limiting properties. Chem Mater 2009;21:2950–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9006603.Search in Google Scholar
56. Lyu, J, Wen, X, Kumar, U, You, Y, Chen, V, Joshi, RK. Separation and purification using GO and r-GO membranes. RSC Adv 2018;8:23130–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra03156h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
57. Ma, J, Ping, D, Dong, X. Recent developments of graphene oxide-based membranes: a review. Membranes 2017;7:52. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7030052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
58. Tang, B, Zhang, L, Li, R, Wu, J, Hedhili, MN, Wang, P. Are vacuum-filtrated reduced graphene oxide membranes symmetric? Nanoscale 2016;8:1108–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr06797a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
59. Zhang, Y, Zhang, S, Gao, J, Chung, TS. Layer-by-layer construction of graphene oxide (GO) framework composite membranes for highly efficient heavy metal removal. J Membr Sci 2016;515:230–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.035.Search in Google Scholar
60. Guan, K, Shen, J, Liu, G, Zhao, J, Zhou, H, Jin, W. Spray-evaporation assembled graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen transport. Sep Purif Technol 2017;174:126–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.012.Search in Google Scholar
61. Pedico, A, Baudino, L, Aixalà-Perelló, A, Lamberti, A. Green methods for the fabrication of graphene oxide membranes: from graphite to membranes. Membranes 2023;13:429. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040429.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
62. Joshi, RK, Carbone, P, Wang, FC, Kravets, VG, Su, Y, Grigorieva, IV, et al.. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 2014;343:752–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245711.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
63. Liu, T, Tian, L, Graham, N, Yang, B, Yu, W, Sun, K. Regulating the interlayer spacing of graphene oxide membranes and enhancing their stability by use of PACl. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:11949–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04418.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
64. Suhalim, NS, Kasim, N, Mahmoudi, E, Shamsudin, IJ, Mohammad, AW, Mohamed Zuki, F, et al.. Rejection mechanism of ionic solute removal by nanofiltration membranes: an overview. Nanomaterials 2022;12:437. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030437.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
65. Shah, IA, Bilal, M, Ihsanullah, I, Ali, S, Yaqub, M. Revolutionizing water purification: unleashing graphene oxide (GO) membranes. J Environ Chem Eng 2023;11:111450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.111450.Search in Google Scholar
66. Zunita, M. Graphene oxide-based nanofiltration for Hg removal from wastewater: a mini review. Membranes 2021;11:269. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11040269.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
67. Wang, J, Zhang, P, Liang, B, Liu, Y, Xu, T, Wang, L, et al.. Graphene oxide as an effective barrier on a porous nanofibrous membrane for water treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8:6211–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12723.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
68. Adel, M, Ahmed, MA, Elabiad, MA, Mohamed, AA. Removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater using graphene oxide-based nanomaterials: a critical review. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 2022;18:100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100719.Search in Google Scholar
69. Nundy, S, Ghosh, A, Nath, R, Paul, A, Tahir, AA, Mallick, TK. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) aerogel: efficient adsorbent for the elimination of antimony (III) and (V) from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 2021;420:126554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126554.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
70. Cui, L, Wang, Y, Gao, L, Hu, L, Yan, L, Wei, Q, et al.. EDTA functionalized magnetic graphene oxide for removal of Pb(II), Hg(II) and Cu(II) in water treatment: adsorption mechanism and separation property. Chem Eng J 2015;281:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.043.Search in Google Scholar
71. Gopalakrishnan, A, Krishnan, R, Thangavel, S, Venugopal, G, Kim, SJ. Removal of heavy metal ions from pharma-effluents using graphene-oxide nanosorbents and study of their adsorption kinetics. J Ind Eng Chem 2015;30:14–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.06.005.Search in Google Scholar
72. Sarmiento, V, Lockett, M, Sumbarda-Ramos, EG, Vázquez-Mena, O. Effective removal of metal ion and organic compounds by non-functionalized rGO. Molecules 2023;28:649. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020649.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
73. Guo, T, Bulin, C, Li, B, Zhao, Z, Yu, H, Sun, H, et al.. Efficient removal of aqueous Pb(II) using partially reduced graphene oxide-Fe3 O4. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2018;36:1031–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617417744402.Search in Google Scholar
74. Zhang, CZ, Chen, B, Bai, Y, Xie, J. A new functionalized reduced graphene oxide adsorbent for removing heavy metal ions in water via coordination and ion exchange. Separ Sci Technol 2018;53:2896–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1497655.Search in Google Scholar
75. Janwery, D, Memon, FH, Memon, AA, Iqbal, M, Memon, FN, Ali, W, et al.. Lamellar graphene oxide-based composite membranes for efficient separation of heavy metal ions and desalination of water. ACS Omega 2023;8:7648–56. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07243.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
76. El Hadki, A, Ulucan-Altuntas, K, El Hadki, H, Ustundag, CB, Kabbaj, OK, Dahchour, A, et al.. Removal of oxytetracycline by graphene oxide and Boron-doped reduced graphene oxide: a combined density function Theory, molecular dynamics simulation and experimental study. FlatChem 2021;27:100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2021.100238.Search in Google Scholar
77. Tee, WT, Chua, J, Yong, JE, Hiew, BYZ, Gan, S, Lee, LY. Remediation of amitriptyline pharmaceutical wastewater by heteroatom-doped graphene oxide: process optimization and packed-bed studies. Separations 2023;10:392. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10070392.Search in Google Scholar
78. Tshangana, C, Mubiayi, MP, Kuvarega, A, Mamba, B, Muleja, A. Advanced oxidation processes for pharmaceutical degradation and disinfection of wastewater: peracetic acid and graphene oxide quantum dots. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2023;20:11997–2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04931-8.Search in Google Scholar
79. Zubir, NA, Yacou, C, Motuzas, J, Zhang, X, Diniz da Costa, JC. Structural and functional investigation of graphene oxide–Fe3O4 nanocomposites for the heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Sci Rep 2014;4:4594. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04594.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
80. Xu, C, Cui, A, Xu, Y, Fu, X. Graphene oxide–TiO2 composite filtration membranes and their potential application for water purification. Carbon 2013;62:465–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.035.Search in Google Scholar
81. Ali, I, Basheer, AA, Mbianda, XY, Burakov, A, Galunin, E, Burakova, I, et al.. Graphene based adsorbents for remediation of noxious pollutants from wastewater. Environ Int 2019;127:160–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
82. Zhang, M, Guan, K, Shen, J, Liu, G, Fan, Y, Jin, W. Nanoparticles@rGO membrane enabling highly enhanced water permeability and structural stability with preserved selectivity. AIChE J 2017;63:5054–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15939.Search in Google Scholar
83. Van Tuan, P, Tuong, HB, Tan, VT, Thu, LH, Khoang, ND, Khiem, TN. SnO2/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Opt Mater 2022;123:111916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111916.Search in Google Scholar
84. Niu, X, Yan, W, Zhao, H, Yang, J. Synthesis of Nb doped TiO2 nanotube/reduced graphene oxide heterostructure photocatalyst with high visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 2018;440:804–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.069.Search in Google Scholar
85. Kovtun, A, Zambianchi, M, Bettini, C, Liscio, A, Gazzano, M, Corticelli, F, et al.. Graphene oxide–polysulfone filters for tap water purification, obtained by fast microwave oven treatment. Nanoscale 2019;11:22780–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr06897j.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
86. Liu, Z, Ma, Z, Wang, X, Ye, D, Yu, H, Xin, JH. Ultrathin graphene oxide membrane for pilot scale dyehouse effluent treatment. Desalination 2022;537:115876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.115876.Search in Google Scholar
87. Ilyas, H, Haleem, A, Iqbal, M, Siddiq, M. Influence of GO-Ag nano-filler on the antibacterial, antifouling and hydrophilic characteristics of polyvinyl chloride membrane. J Water Proc Eng 2021;44:102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102336.Search in Google Scholar
88. Wu, X, Tan, S, Xing, Y, Pu, Q, Wu, M, Zhao, JX. Graphene oxide as an efficient antimicrobial nanomaterial for eradicating multi-drug resistant bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017;157:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.05.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
89. Kichukova, D, Kovacheva, D, Staneva, A, Spassova, I. Аntimicrobial impact of nanocomposites of reduced graphene oxide with silver and copper. Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 2021. http://www.proceedings.bas.bg/DOI/doi2021_2_04.html.10.7546/CRABS.2021.02.04Search in Google Scholar
90. Huong, NT, Dat, NM, Thinh, DB, Minh Anh, TN, Nguyet, DM, Quan, TH, et al.. Optimization of the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles-decorated graphene oxide nanocomposites. Synth Met 2020;268:116492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116492.Search in Google Scholar
91. Staneva, AD, Dimitrov, DK, Gospodinova, DN, Vladkova, TG. Antibiofouling activity of graphene materials and graphene-based antimicrobial coatings. Microorganisms 2021;9:1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091839.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
92. Li, Z, Tian, Y. Recent advances in graphene oxide membranes for water desalination. In: Du, W, Grasso, S, editors. E3S Web Conf; 2021, vol 308:01023 p.10.1051/e3sconf/202130801023Search in Google Scholar
93. Wen, Q, Jia, P, Cao, L, Li, J, Quan, D, Wang, L, et al.. Electric‐field‐Induced ionic sieving at planar graphene oxide heterojunctions for miniaturized water desalination. Adv Mater 2020;32:1903954. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903954.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
94. Kim, SG, Hyeon, DH, Chun, JH, Chun, BH, Kim, SH. Novel thin nanocomposite RO membranes for chlorine resistance. Desalination Water Treat 2013;51:6338–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.780994.Search in Google Scholar
95. Feng, B, Xu, K, Huang, A. Synthesis of graphene oxide/polyimide mixed matrix membranes for desalination. RSC Adv 2017;7:2211–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra24974d.Search in Google Scholar
96. Shi, J, Wu, W, Xia, Y, Li, Z, Li, W. Confined interfacial polymerization of polyamide-graphene oxide composite membranes for water desalination. Desalination 2018;441:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.030.Search in Google Scholar
97. Jia, B, Zou, L. Graphene nanosheets reduced by a multi-step process as high-performance electrode material for capacitive deionisation. Carbon 2012;50:2315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.051.Search in Google Scholar
98. Yang, E, Kim, CM, Songho, J, Ki, H, Ham, MH, Kim, IS. Enhanced desalination performance of forward osmosis membranes based on reduced graphene oxide laminates coated with hydrophilic polydopamine. Carbon 2017;117:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.005.Search in Google Scholar
99. Romaniak, G, Dybowski, K, Jeziorna, A, Kula, P, Kaźmierczak, T. Synthesis and characterization of semi-permeable graphene/graphene oxide membranes for water desalination. J Mater Sci 2020;55:9775–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04648-w.Search in Google Scholar
100. Wang, X, Peng, G, Chen, M, Zhao, M, He, Y, Jiang, Y, et al.. Reduced graphene oxide composites and its real-life application potential for in-situ crude oil removal. Chemosphere 2020;249:126141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
101. Songsaeng, S, Thamyongkit, P, Poompradub, S. Natural rubber/reduced-graphene oxide composite materials: morphological and oil adsorption properties for treatment of oil spills. J Adv Res 2019;20:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.05.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
102. Burress, JW, Gadipelli, S, Ford, J, Simmons, JM, Zhou, W, Yildirim, T. Graphene oxide framework materials: theoretical predictions and experimental results. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010;49:8902–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201003328.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
103. Homaeigohar, S, Elbahri, M. Graphene membranes for water desalination. NPG Asia Mater 2017;9:e427–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2017.135.Search in Google Scholar
104. Yeh, CN, Raidongia, K, Shao, J, Yang, QH, Huang, J. On the origin of the stability of graphene oxide membranes in water. Nat Chem 2015;7:166–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2145.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
105. Han, Y, Xu, Z, Gao, C. Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv Funct Mater 2013;23:3693–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202601.Search in Google Scholar
106. Akbari, A, Sheath, P, Martin, ST, Shinde, DB, Shaibani, M, Banerjee, PC, et al.. Large-area graphene-based nanofiltration membranes by shear alignment of discotic nematic liquid crystals of graphene oxide. Nat Commun 2016;7:10891. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10891.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
107. Fahmy Taha, M, Ashraf, H, Caesarendra, W. A brief description of cyclic voltammetry transducer-based non-enzymatic glucose biosensor using synthesized graphene electrodes. ASI 2020;3:32. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3030032.Search in Google Scholar
108. Qureshi, T, Panesar, D. A comparison of graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide and pure graphene: early age properties of cement composites; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
109. Su, CY, Xu, Y, Zhang, W, Zhao, J, Tang, X, Tsai, CH, et al.. Electrical and spectroscopic characterizations of ultra-large reduced graphene oxide monolayers. Chem Mater 2009;21:5674–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902182y.Search in Google Scholar
110. Shen, J, Hu, Y, Shi, M, Lu, X, Qin, C, Li, C, et al.. Fast and facile preparation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Chem Mater 2009;21:3514–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm901247t.Search in Google Scholar
111. Sun, L, Fugetsu, B. Mass production of graphene oxide from expanded graphite. Mater Lett 2013;109:207–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.07.072.Search in Google Scholar
112. Eigler, S, Enzelberger-Heim, M, Grimm, S, Hofmann, P, Kroener, W, Geworski, A, et al.. Wet chemical synthesis of graphene. Adv Mater 2013;25:3583–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300155.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
113. Panwar, V, Chattree, A, Pal, K. A new facile route for synthesizing of graphene oxide using mixture of sulfuric–nitric–phosphoric acids as intercalating agent. Phys E Low-dimens Syst Nanostruct 2015;73:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2015.06.006.Search in Google Scholar
114. Chen, J, Li, Y, Huang, L, Li, C, Shi, G. High-yield preparation of graphene oxide from small graphite flakes via an improved Hummers method with a simple purification process. Carbon 2015;81:826–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.033.Search in Google Scholar
115. Dimiev, AM, Ceriotti, G, Metzger, A, Kim, ND, Tour, JM. Chemical mass production of graphene nanoplatelets in ∼100% yield. ACS Nano 2016;10:274–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b06840.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
116. Chen, L, Moon, JH, Ma, X, Zhang, L, Chen, Q, Chen, L, et al.. High performance graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane prepared by electrospraying for wastewater purification. Carbon 2018;130:487–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.062.Search in Google Scholar
117. Wei, SC, Fan, S, Lien, CW, Unnikrishnan, B, Wang, YS, Chu, HW, et al.. Graphene oxide membrane as an efficient extraction and ionization substrate for spray-mass spectrometric analysis of malachite green and its metabolite in fish samples. Anal Chim Acta 2018;1003:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.11.076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
118. Chong, JY, Wang, B, Mattevi, C, Li, K. Dynamic microstructure of graphene oxide membranes and the permeation flux. J Membr Sci 2018;549:385–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.018.Search in Google Scholar
119. Abdel-Karim, A, Leaper, S, Alberto, M, Vijayaraghavan, A, Fan, X, Holmes, SM, et al.. High flux and fouling resistant flat sheet polyethersulfone membranes incorporated with graphene oxide for ultrafiltration applications. Chem Eng J 2018;334:789–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.069.Search in Google Scholar
120. Kang, H, Shi, J, Liu, L, Shan, M, Xu, Z, Li, N, et al.. Sandwich morphology and superior dye-removal performances for nanofiltration membranes self-assembled via graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 2018;428:990–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.212.Search in Google Scholar
121. Zhan, Y, Wan, X, He, S, Yang, Q, He, Y. Design of durable and efficient poly(arylene ether nitrile)/bioinspired polydopamine coated graphene oxide nanofibrous composite membrane for anionic dyes separation. Chem Eng J 2017;29:333.10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.147Search in Google Scholar
122. Ma, J, He, Y, Zeng, G, Li, F, Li, Y, Xiao, J, et al.. Bio‐inspired method to fabricate poly‐dopamine/reduced graphene oxide composite membranes for dyes and heavy metal ion removal. Polymer Adv Tech 2018;29:941–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4205.Search in Google Scholar
123. Liu, Y, Tu, W, Chen, M, Ma, L, Yang, B, Liang, Q, et al.. A mussel-induced method to fabricate reduced graphene oxide/halloysite nanotubes membranes for multifunctional applications in water purification and oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 2018;336:263–77. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2017.63030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
124. Bagheripour, E, Moghadassi, AR, Hosseini, SM, Van der Bruggen, B, Parvizian, F. Novel composite graphene oxide/chitosan nanoplates incorporated into PES based nanofiltration membrane: chromium removal and antifouling enhancement. J Ind Eng Chem 2018;62:311–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.009.Search in Google Scholar
125. Zhang, Q, Chen, S, Fan, X, Zhang, H, Yu, H, Quan, X. A multifunctional graphene-based nanofiltration membrane under photo-assistance for enhanced water treatment based on layer-by-layer sieving. Appl Catal B Environ 2018;224:204–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.016.Search in Google Scholar
126. Yang, E, Alayande, AB, Kim, CM, Songho, J, Kim, IS. Laminar reduced graphene oxide membrane modified with silver nanoparticle-polydopamine for water/ion separation and biofouling resistance enhancement. Desalination 2018;426:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.023.Search in Google Scholar
127. Bhattacharya, S, Banerjee, P, Das, P, Bhowal, A, Majumder, SK, Ghosh, P. Removal of aqueous carbamazepine using graphene oxide nanoplatelets: process modelling and optimization. Sustain Environ Res 2020;30:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-00062-8.Search in Google Scholar
128. Rosli, FA, Ahmad, H, Jumbri, K, Abdullah, AH, Kamaruzaman, S, Fathihah Abdullah, NA. Efficient removal of pharmaceuticals from water using graphene nanoplatelets as adsorbent. R Soc Open Sci 2021;8:201076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
129. Wang, H, Wang, W, Wang, L, Zhao, B, Zhang, Z, Xia, X, et al.. Enhancement of hydrophilicity and the resistance for irreversible fouling of polysulfone (PSF) membrane immobilized with graphene oxide (GO) through chloromethylated and quaternized reaction. Chem Eng J 2018;334:2068–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.135.Search in Google Scholar
130. Liu, Z, Wu, W, Liu, Y, Qin, C, Meng, M, Jiang, Y, et al.. A mussel inspired highly stable graphene oxide membrane for efficient oil-in-water emulsions separation. Sep Purif Technol 2018;199:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.041.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Production strategies for carbon composites and carbon-based adsorbents
- Role of carbon nanotubes, carbon nano-fibres and nano-gels in eliminating pollutants from aqueous solution
- Utilization of graphene and rGO membranes for water and wastewater treatments
- Characterization techniques for carbon-based adsorbents and carbon composites
- Biochar-mediated removal of various pollutants from the environment
- Carbon-polymer composites for environmental applications
- Carbon composites in the mitigation of micro and nanoplastics
- Carbon composites as an Avante garde material in mitigating dyes and heavy metal pollution
- Carbon metal nanoparticle composites for the removal of pollutants
- Activated carbon-mediated adsorption of emerging contaminants
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Production strategies for carbon composites and carbon-based adsorbents
- Role of carbon nanotubes, carbon nano-fibres and nano-gels in eliminating pollutants from aqueous solution
- Utilization of graphene and rGO membranes for water and wastewater treatments
- Characterization techniques for carbon-based adsorbents and carbon composites
- Biochar-mediated removal of various pollutants from the environment
- Carbon-polymer composites for environmental applications
- Carbon composites in the mitigation of micro and nanoplastics
- Carbon composites as an Avante garde material in mitigating dyes and heavy metal pollution
- Carbon metal nanoparticle composites for the removal of pollutants
- Activated carbon-mediated adsorption of emerging contaminants