Home Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose

  • Nur Sharmila Sharip , Tengku Arisyah Tengku Yasim-Anuar , Farhana Aziz Ujang and Mohd Nor Faiz Norrrahim EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 14, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Physical Sciences Reviews
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews Volume 9 Issue 3

Abstract

Potato is a widely available feedstock with biocompatibility and biodegradability properties, making it a strong candidate for producing thermoplastic starch. The application of thermoplastic starch to replace petroleum-based plastic as a sustainable and environmentally friendly approach led to its further improvement through various techniques such as modification and filler reinforcement. Numerous studies have been done addressing the properties enhancement of potato thermoplastic starch through filler reinforcement including nanocellulose. This review focus on the recent and future potential of potato-based starch as one of the feedstocks for producing potato thermoplastic starch composites reinforced with nanocellulose.

Keywords: nanocellulose; potato; thermoplastic starch
Corresponding author: Mohd Nor Faiz Norrrahim, Research Center for Chemical Defence, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Nextgreen Pulp & Paper Sdn. Bhd. for their support and permission to work on this manuscript. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the technical and financial support from the Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM) in preparation of this review.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Norrrahim, MNF, Ariffin, H, Hassan, MA, Ibrahim, NA, Nishida, H. Performance evaluation and chemical recyclability of a polyethylene/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) blend for sustainable packaging. RSC Adv 2013;3:24378–88. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra43632b.Search in Google Scholar

2. Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Norrrahim, MNF, Sapuan, SM, Ilyas, RA, Jenol, MA, Mamat, NA, et al.. Polyhydroxyalkanoates for packaging application. In: Bio-based packaging: material, environmental and economic aspects. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2021.10.1002/9781119381228.ch16Search in Google Scholar

3. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Ibrahim, R, Atikah, MSN, Asyraf, MRM, Norrrahim, MNF, et al.. Environmental advantages and challenges of bio-based packaging materials. In: Bio-based packaging: material, environmental and economic aspects. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.10.1002/9781119381228Search in Google Scholar

4. Ariffin, H, Norrrahim, MNF, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Nishida, H, Hassan, MA, Ibrahim, NA, et al.. Oil palm biomass cellulose-fabricated polylactic acid composites for packaging applications. In: Bionanocomposites for packaging applications. Midtown Manhattan, New York City: Springer; 2018:95–105 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-67319-6_5Search in Google Scholar

5. Offiong, EU, Ayodele, SL. Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic starch from sweet potato. Int J Sci Eng Res 2016;7:438–43.Search in Google Scholar

6. Cai, Z, Čadek, D, Šmejkalová, P, Kadeřábková, A, Nová, M, Kuta, A. The modification of properties of thermoplastic starch materials: combining potato starch with natural rubber and epoxidized natural rubber. Mater Today Commun 2021;26:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101912.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ting, SS, Gie, GP, Omar, MF, Abdullah, MF. Nanocellulose-reinforced biocomposites. In: Binod, P, Raveendran, S, Pandey, A, editors. Biomass, biofuels, biochemicals: biodegradable polymers and composites - process engineering to commercialization. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021:461–94 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-821888-4.00016-2Search in Google Scholar

8. Trache, D, Tarchoun, AF, Derradji, M, Hamidon, TS, Masruchin, N, Brosse, N, et al.. Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Front Chem 2020;8:1–33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00392.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Sapuan, SM, Norrrahim, MNF, Ilyas, RA. Industrial applications of nanocellulose and its nanocomposites. Cambridge, United States: Woodhead Publishing; 2022.Search in Google Scholar

10. Norrrahim, MNF, Sapuan, SM, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Padzil, FNM, Sharip, NS, Ng, LYF, et al.. Antimicrobial studies on food packaging materials. In: Food packaging. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020:141–70 pp.10.1201/9780429322129-5Search in Google Scholar

11. Norrrahim, MNF, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Sapuan, SM, Ilyas, RA, Hakimi, MI, Najmuddin, SUFS, et al.. Nanocellulose reinforced polypropylene and polyethylene composite for packaging application. In: Bio-based packaging: material, environmental and economic aspects. USA: Wiley Online Library; 2021.10.1002/9781119381228.ch8Search in Google Scholar

12. Norrrahim, MNF, Ariffin, H, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Hassan, MA, Ibrahim, NA, Yunus, WMZW, et al.. Performance evaluation of cellulose nanofiber with residual hemicellulose as a nanofiller in polypropylene-based nanocomposite. Polymers 2021;13:1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071064.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Norrrahim, MNF, Kasim, NAM, Knight, VF, Halim, NA, Shah, NAA, Noor, SAM, et al.. Performance evaluation of cellulose nanofiber reinforced polymer composites. Funct Compos Struct 2021;3. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/abeef6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Norrrahim, MNF, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Jenol, MA, Mohd Nurazzi, N, Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM. Performance evaluation of cellulose nanofiber reinforced polypropylene biocomposites for automotive applications. In: Biocomposite and synthetic composites for automotive applications. Amsterdam, Netherland: Woodhead Publishing Series; 2020:119–215 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-820559-4.00007-9Search in Google Scholar

15. Ilyas, RA, Azmi, A, Nurazzi, NM, Atiqah, A, Atikah, MSN, Ibrahim, R, et al.. Oxygen permeability properties of nanocellulose reinforced biopolymer nanocomposites. Mater Today Proc 2022;52:2414–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.420.Search in Google Scholar

16. Bangar, SP, Whiteside, WS. Nano-cellulose reinforced starch bio composite films- A review on green composites. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;185:849–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2021.07.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Morán, JI, Vázquez, A, Cyras, VP. Bio-nanocomposites based on derivatized potato starch and cellulose, preparation and characterization. J Mater Sci 2013;48:7196–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-013-7536-X.Search in Google Scholar

18. Tibolla, H, Czaikoski, A, Pelissari, FM, Menegalli, FC, Cunha, RL. Starch-based nanocomposites with cellulose nanofibers obtained from chemical and mechanical treatments. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;161:132–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.05.194.Search in Google Scholar

19. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Nazrin, A, Syafiq, R, Aisyah, HA, Norrrahim, MNF, et al.. Nanocellulose/starch biopolymer nanocomposites: processing, manufacturing, and applications. In: Payne, E, editor. Advanced processing, properties, and applications of starch and other bio-based polymers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020:65–88 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819661-8.00006-8Search in Google Scholar

20. Fahrngruber, B, Eichelter, J, Erhäusl, S, Seidl, B, Wimmer, R, Mundigler, N. Potato-fiber modified thermoplastic starch: effects of fiber content on material properties and compound characteristics. Eur Polym J 2019;111:170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.050.Search in Google Scholar

21. Bergel, BF, Leite Araujo, L, dos Santos da Silva, AL, Campomanes Santana, RM. Effects of silylated starch structure on hydrophobization and mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch foams made from potato starch. Carbohydr Polym 2020;241:116274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116274.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Shoja, M, Mohammadi-Roshandeh, J, Hemmati, F, Zandi, A, Farizeh, T. Plasticized starch-based biocomposites containing modified rice straw fillers with thermoplastic, thermoset-like and thermoset chemical structures. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;157:715–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Koch, M, Naumann, M, Pawelzik, E, Gransee, A, Thiel, H. The importance of nutrient management for potato production Part I: plant nutrition and yield. Potato Res 2019;63:97–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11540-019-09431-2.Search in Google Scholar

24. FAO Crops and Livestock Products. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL [Accessed 21 Nov 2022].Search in Google Scholar

25. Bertoft, E, Blennow, A. Structure of Potato Starch. In: Advances in potato chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2016.10.1016/B978-0-12-800002-1.00003-0Search in Google Scholar

26. Sani, IK, Geshlaghi, SP, Pirsa, S, Asdagh, A. Composite film based on potato starch/apple peel pectin/ZrO2 nanoparticles/microencapsulated zataria multiflora essential oil; investigation of physicochemical properties and use in quail meat packaging. Food Hydrocolloids 2021;117:106719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106719.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kringel, DH, Halal, SLME, Zavareze, E, da, R, Dias, ARG. Methods for the extraction of roots, tubers, pulses, pseudocereals, and other unconventional starches sources: a review. Starch 2020.10.1002/star.201900234Search in Google Scholar

28. Torres, MD, Fradinho, P, Rodríguez, P, Falqué, E, Santos, V, Domínguez, H. Biorefinery concept for discarded potatoes: recovery of starch and bioactive compounds. J Food Eng 2020;275:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109886.Search in Google Scholar

29. Singh, R, Kaur, S, Sachdev, PA. A cost effective technology for isolation of potato starch and its utilization in formulation of ready to cook, non cereal, and non glutinous soup mix. J Food Meas Char 2021;15:3168–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00887-w.Search in Google Scholar

30. Altemimi, AB. Extraction and optimization of potato starch and its application as a stabilizer in yogurt manufacturing. Foods 2018;7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7020014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Domene-López, D, García-Quesada, JC, Martin-Gullon, I, Montalbán, MG. Influence of starch composition and molecular weight on physicochemical properties of biodegradable films. Polymers 2019;11:1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM11071084.Search in Google Scholar

32. Morán, JI, Vázquez, A, Cyras, VP. Bio-nanocomposites based on derivatized potato starch and cellulose, preparation and characterization. J Mater Sci 2013;48:7196–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-013-7536-X/FIGURES/6.Search in Google Scholar

33. Yusuph, M, Tester, RF, Ansell, R, Snape, CE. Composition and properties of starches extracted from tubers of different potato varieties grown under the same environmental conditions. Food Chem 2003;82:283–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00549-6.Search in Google Scholar

34. Dupuis, JH, Liu, Q. Potato starch: a review of physicochemical, functional and nutritional properties. Am J Potato Res 2019;96:127–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-018-09696-2.Search in Google Scholar

35. Sui, Z, Kong, X. Physical modifications of starch. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2018.10.1007/978-981-13-0725-6Search in Google Scholar

36. Tester, RF, Karkalas, J, Qi, X. Starch - composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 2004;39:151–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2003.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

37. Pycia, K, Juszczak, L, Gałkowska, D, Witczak, M. Physicochemical properties of starches obtained from polish potato cultivars. Starch/Staerke 2012;64:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201100072.Search in Google Scholar

38. Singh, N, Chawla, D, Singh, J. Influence of acetic anhydride on physicochemical, morphological and thermal properties of corn and potato starch. Food Chem 2004;86:601–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.10.008.Search in Google Scholar

39. Singh, J, Colussi, R, McCarthy, OJ, Kaur, L. Potato starch and its modification. In: Advances in potato chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2016.10.1016/B978-0-12-800002-1.00008-XSearch in Google Scholar

40. Lawal, OS, Adebowale, KO. Physicochemical characteristics and thermal properties of chemically modified Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) starch. Carbohydr Polym 2005;60:331–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

41. Liu, Q, Tarn, R, Lynch, D, Skjodt, NM. Physicochemical properties of dry matter and starch from potatoes grown in Canada. Food Chem 2007;105:897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.034.Search in Google Scholar

42. Vamadevan, V, Bertoft, E. Structure-function relationships of starch components. Starch/Staerke 2015;67:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201400188.Search in Google Scholar

43. Narpinder, S, Jaspreet, S, Lovedeep, K, Navdeep, SS, Balmeet, SG. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chem 2003;81:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00416-8.Search in Google Scholar

44. Kumar, R, Khatkar, BS. Thermal, pasting and morphological properties of starch granules of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. J Food Sci Technol 2017;54:2403–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2681-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Karim, AA, Toon, LC, Lee, VPL, Ong, WY, Fazilah, A, Noda, T. Effects of phosphorus contents on the gelatinization and retrogradation of potato starch. J Food Sci 2007;72:132–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00251.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Ye, F, Li, J, Zhao, G. Physicochemical properties of different-sized fractions of sweet potato starch and their contributions to the quality of sweet potato starch. Food Hydrocolloids 2020;108:106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106023.Search in Google Scholar

47. Sirohi, R, Singh, S, Tarafdar, A, Reddy, NBP, Negi, T, Gaur, VK, et al.. Thermoplastic starch. In: Binod, P, Raveendran, S, Pandey, A, editors. Biomass, biofuels, biochemicals. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021:31–49 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-821888-4.00011-3Search in Google Scholar

48. Altayan, MM, Al Darouich, T, Karabet, F. On the plasticization process of potato starch: preparation and characterization. Food Biophys 2017;12:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11483-017-9495-2/FIGURES/6.Search in Google Scholar

49. Jumaidin, R, Zainel, SNM, Sapuan, SM. Processing of thermoplastic starch. In: Al-Oqla, FM, Sapuan, SM, editors. Advanced processing, properties, and applications of starch and other bio-based polymers. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier; 2020:11–9 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819661-8.00002-0Search in Google Scholar

50. Bangar, SP, Whiteside, WS, Ashogbon, AO, Kumar, M. Recent advances in thermoplastic starches for food packaging: a review. Food Packag Shelf Life 2021;30:100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100743.Search in Google Scholar

51. Mościcki, L, Mitrus, M, Wójtowicz, A, Oniszczuk, T, Rejak, A, Janssen, L. Application of extrusion-cooking for processing of thermoplastic starch (TPS). Food Res Int 2012;47:291–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODRES.2011.07.017.Search in Google Scholar

52. González-Seligra, P, Guz, L, Ochoa-Yepes, O, Goyanes, S, Famá, L. Influence of extrusion process conditions on starch film morphology. LWT (Lebensm-Wiss & Technol) 2017;84:520–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2017.06.027.Search in Google Scholar

53. Kipping, T, Rein, H. A new method for the continuous production of single dosed controlled release matrix systems based on hot-melt extruded starch: analysis of relevant process parameters and implementation of an in-process control. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;84:156–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPB.2012.12.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Ren, J, Dang, KM, Pollet, E, Avérous, L. Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic potato starch/halloysite nano-biocomposites: effect of plasticizer nature and nanoclay content. Polymers 2018;10:808. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM10080808.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Zdanowicz, M, Staciwa, P, Jedrzejewski, R, Spychaj, T. Sugar alcohol-based deep eutectic solvents as potato starch plasticizers. Polymers 2019;11:1385. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM11091385.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Ballesteros-Mártinez, L, Pérez-Cervera, C, Andrade-Pizarro, R. Effect of glycerol and sorbitol concentrations on mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of sweet potato starch film. NFS J 2020;20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NFS.2020.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

57. Zdanowicz, M. Starch treatment with deep eutectic solvents, ionic liquids and glycerol. A comparative study. Carbohydr Polym 2020;229:115574. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2019.115574.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Mazerolles, T, Heuzey, MC, Soliman, M, Martens, H, Kleppinger, R, Huneault, MA. Development of multilayer barrier films of thermoplastic starch and low-density polyethylene. J Polym Res 2020;27:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10965-020-2015-Y/TABLES/2.Search in Google Scholar

59. Merino, D, Paul, UC, Athanassiou, A. Bio-based plastic films prepared from potato peels using mild acid hydrolysis followed by plasticization with a polyglycerol. Food Packag Shelf Life 2021;29:100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FPSL.2021.100707.Search in Google Scholar

60. Fu, Z, Guo, S, Sun, Y, Wu, H, Huang, ZG, Wu, M. Effect of glycerol content on the properties of potato flour films. Starch/Staerke 2021;73:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/STAR.202000203.Search in Google Scholar

61. Ng, JS, Kiew, PL, Lam, MK, Yeoh, WM, Ho, MY. Preliminary evaluation of the properties and biodegradability of glycerol- and sorbitol-plasticized potato-based bioplastics. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2022;19:1545–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13762-021-03213-5/TABLES/3.Search in Google Scholar

62. Tan, SX, Andriyana, A, Ong, HC, Lim, S, Pang, YL, Ngoh, GC. A comprehensive review on the emerging roles of nanofillers and plasticizers towards sustainable starch-based bioplastic fabrication. Polymers 2022;14:664. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14040664.Search in Google Scholar

63. Gutiérrez, TJ, Alvarez, VA. Cellulosic materials as natural fillers in starch-containing matrix-based films. A review. Polym Bull 2016;74:2401–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-016-1814-0.Search in Google Scholar

64. Yuan, L, Feng, W, Zhang, Z, Peng, Y, Xiao, Y, Chen, J. Effect of potato starch-based antibacterial composite films with thyme oil microemulsion or microcapsule on shelf life of chilled meat. LWT (Lebensm-Wiss & Technol) 2021;139:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110462.Search in Google Scholar

65. He, Y, Kong, W, Wang, W, Liu, T, Liu, Y, Gong, Q, et al.. Modified natural halloysite/potato starch composite films. Carbohydr Polym 2012;87:2706–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.057.Search in Google Scholar

66. Oleyaei, SA, Almasi, H, Ghanbarzadeh, B, Moayedi, AA. Synergistic reinforcing effect of TiO2 and montmorillonite on potato starch nanocomposite films: thermal, mechanical and barrier properties. Carbohydr Polym 2016;152:253–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Sharip, NS, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Norrrahim, MNF, Shazleen, SS, Nurazzi, NM, Sapuan, SM, et al.. A review on nanocellulose composites in biomedical application. In: Composites in biomedical applications. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2020:161–90 pp.10.1201/9780429327766-8Search in Google Scholar

68. Avérous, L. Biodegradable multiphase systems based on plasticized starch: a review. J Macromol Sci, Polym Rev 2004;44:231–74. https://doi.org/10.1081/MC-200029326.Search in Google Scholar

69. Shamsudin, S, Bahrin, EK, Jenol, MA, Sharip, NS. Characteristics and potential of renewable bioresources. In: Shukor, H, Makhtar, MMZ, Yaser, AZ, editors. Characteristics and potential of renewable bioresources. Singapore: Springer; 2022:21–43 pp.10.1007/978-981-16-9314-4_2Search in Google Scholar

70. Norrrahim, MNF, Mohd Kasim, NA, Knight, VF, Mohamad Misenan, MS, Janudin, N, Ahmad Shah, NA, et al.. Nanocellulose: a bioadsorbent for chemical contaminant remediation. RSC Adv 2021;11:7347–68. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA08005E.Search in Google Scholar

71. Sharip, NS, Ariffin, H. Cellulose nanofibrils for biomaterial applications. Mater Today Proc 2019;16:1959–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.074.Search in Google Scholar

72. Kargarzadeh, H, Huang, J, Lin, N, Ahmad, I, Mariano, M, Dufresne, A, et al.. Recent developments in nanocellulose-based biodegradable polymers, thermoplastic polymers, and porous nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 2018;87:197–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

73. Norrrahim, MNF, Kasim, NAM, Knight, VF, Halim, NA, Shah, NAA, Noor, SAM, et al.. Performance evaluation of cellulose nanofiber reinforced polymer composites. Funct Compos Struct 2021;3:024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/ABEEF6.Search in Google Scholar

74. Norrrahim, MNF, Norizan, MN, Jenol, MA, Farid, MAA, Janudin, N, Ujang, FA, et al.. Emerging development on nanocellulose as antimicrobial material: an overview. Mater Adv 2021;2:3538–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00116G.Search in Google Scholar

75. Fareez, IM, Jasni, AH, Norrrahim, MNF. Nanofibrillated cellulose based bio-phenolic composites. In: Phenolic polymers based composite materials. Singapore: Springer; 2020:139–51 pp.10.1007/978-981-15-8932-4_9Search in Google Scholar

76. Thiruganasambanthan, T, Ilyas, RA, Norrrahim, MNF, Kumar, TSM, Siengchin, S, Misenan, MSM, et al.. Emerging developments on nanocellulose as liquid crystals: a biomimetic approach. Polymers 2022;14:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14081546.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

77. Norrrahim, MNF, Huzaifah, MRM, Farid, MAA, Shazleen, SS, Misenan, MSM, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, et al.. Greener pretreatment approaches for the valorisation of natural fibre biomass into bioproducts. Polymers 2021;13:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172971.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

78. Norrrahim, MNF, Mohd Kasim, NA, Knight, VF, Ong, KK, Mohd Noor, SA, Abdul Halim, N, et al.. Emerging developments regarding nanocellulose-based membrane filtration material against microbes. Polymers 2021;13:3249. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193249.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

79. Norrrahim, MNF, Kasim, NAM, Knight, VF, Misenan, MSM, Janudin, N, Shah, NAA, et al.. Nanocellulose: a bioadsorbent for chemical contaminant remediation. RSC Adv 2021;11:7347–68. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA08005E.Search in Google Scholar

80. Norrrahim, MNF, Kasim, NAM, Knight, VF, Ujang, FA, Janudin, N, Razak, MAIA, et al.. Nanocellulose: the next super versatile material for the military. Mater Adv 2021;2:1485–506. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA01011A.Search in Google Scholar

81. Misenan, S, Shaffie, A, Zulkipli, N, Norrrahim, F. Nanocellulose in sensors. In: Industrial applications of nanocellulose and its nanocomposites. Sawston, UK: Wood Head Publishing; 2022:213–240 pp.10.1016/B978-0-323-89909-3.00005-5Search in Google Scholar

82. Ariffin, H, Tengku Yasim-Anuar, TA, Norrrahim, MNF, Hassan, MA. Synthesis of cellulose nanofiber from oil palm biomass by high pressure homogenization and wet disk milling. In: Nanocellulose: synthesis, structure, properties and applications. Singapore: World Scientific; 2021:51–64 pp.10.1142/9781786349477_0002Search in Google Scholar

83. Yasim-anuar, TAT, Ariffin, H, Norrrahim, MNF, Hassan, MA. Factors affecting spinnability of oil palm mesocarp fiber cellulose solution for the production of microfiber. Bioresources 2017;12:715–34.10.15376/biores.12.1.715-734Search in Google Scholar

84. Norrrahim, MNF, Ariffin, H, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Ghaemi, F, Hassan, MA, Ibrahim, NA, et al.. Superheated steam pretreatment of cellulose affects its electrospinnability for microfibrillated cellulose production. Cellulose 2018;25:3853–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1859-3.Search in Google Scholar

85. Norrrahim, MNF, Ariffin, H, Hassan, MA, Ibrahim, NA, Yunus, WMZW, Nishida, H. Utilisation of superheated steam in oil palm biomass pretreatment process for reduced chemical use and enhanced cellulose nanofibre production. Int J Nanotechnol 2019;16:668–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnt.2019.107360.Search in Google Scholar

86. Norrrahim, MNF, Mohd Kasim, NA, Knight, VF, Ujang, FA, Janudin, N, Abdul Razak, MAI, et al.. Nanocellulose: the next super versatile material for the military. Mater Adv 2021;2:1485–506. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA01011A.Search in Google Scholar

87. Aziz, MA, Zubair, M, Saleem, M. Development and testing of cellulose nanocrystal-based concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 2021;15:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2021.E00761.Search in Google Scholar

88. Marín, P, Martirani-Von Abercron, SM, Urbina, L, Pacheco-Sánchez, D, Castañeda-Cataña, MA, Retegi, A, et al.. Bacterial nanocellulose production from naphthalene. Microb Biotechnol 2019;12:662–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13399.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

89. Arun, S, Kumar, KAA, Sreekala, MS. Fully biodegradable potato starch composites: effect of macro and nano fiber reinforcement on mechanical, thermal and water-sorption characteristics. Int J Plast Technol 2012;16:50–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12588-012-9026-4.Search in Google Scholar

90. Montero, B, Rico, M, Rodríguez-Llamazares, S, Barral, L, Bouza, R. Effect of nanocellulose as a filler on biodegradable thermoplastic starch films from tuber, cereal and legume. Carbohydr Polym 2017;157:1094–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.073.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Nasseri, R, Mohammadi, N. Starch-based nanocomposites: a comparative performance study of cellulose whiskers and starch nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 2014;106:432–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

92. Slavutsky, AM, Bertuzzi, MA. Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 2014;110:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Yang, S, Tang, Y, Wang, J, Kong, F, Zhang, J. Surface treatment of cellulosic paper with starch-based composites reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:13980–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502125s.Search in Google Scholar

94. de Teixeira, E, Pasquini, D, Curvelo, AASS, Corradini, E, Belgacem, MN, Dufresne, A. Cassava bagasse cellulose nanofibrils reinforced thermoplastic cassava starch. Carbohydr Polym 2009;78:422–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.034.Search in Google Scholar

95. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Ishak, MR, Zainudin, ES. Development and characterization of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch bionanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 2018;202:186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

96. Lu, Y, Weng, L, Cao, X. Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallitesdreinforced plasticized starch biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 2006;63:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.027.Search in Google Scholar

97. Asrofi, M, Abral, H, Kasim, A, Pratoto, A, Mahardika, M, Hafizulhaq, F. Characterization of the sonicated yam bean starch bionanocomposites reinforced by nanocellulose water hyacinth fiber (WHF): the effect of various fiber loading. J Eng Sci Technol 2018;13:2700–15.Search in Google Scholar

98. Syafri, E, Sudirman, S, Mashadi, Yulianti, E, Deswita, Asrofi, M, et al.. Effect of sonication time on the thermal stability, moisture absorption, and biodegradation of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) nanocellulose-filled bengkuang (pachyrhizus erosus) starch biocomposites. J Mater Res Technol 2019;8:6223–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.016.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-04-11
Revised: 2023-01-19
Accepted: 2023-01-27
Published Online: 2023-03-14

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
  4. Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
  5. Recent developments in sago starch thermoplastic bio-composites
  6. Mechanical degradation of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites in aqueous environments
  7. Computational design of the novel building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks based on the organic ligand protected Cu4 cluster
  8. Highly functional nanocellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch-based nanocomposites
  9. Spectral peak areas do not vary according to spectral averaging scheme used in functional MRS experiments at 3 T with interleaved visual stimulation
  10. Triterpenoids of antibacterial extracts from the leaves of Bersama abyssinica Fresen (Francoaceae)
  11. Immediate effects of atrazine application on soil organic carbon and selected macronutrients and amelioration by sawdust biochar pretreatment
  12. Process configuration of combined ozonolysis and anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment
  13. Concentration levels and risk assessment of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residue in selected cereals and legumes sold in Anambra State, south-eastern Nigeria
  14. XRD and cytotoxicity assay of submitted nanomaterial industrial samples in the Philippines
  15. Comparative study of the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light irradiation using Bi24O31Br11-anchored carbonaceous and silicates catalyst support
  16. Xanthoangelol, geranilated chalcone compound, isolation from pudau leaves (Artocarpus kemando Miq.) as antibacterial and anticancer
  17. Barley thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  18. Integration of chemo- and bio-catalysis to intensify bioprocesses
  19. Fabrication of starch-based packaging materials
  20. Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  21. Review on sago thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  22. Wheat thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  23. Synergistic effect in bimetallic gold catalysts: recent trends and prospects
  24. Simultaneous removal of methylene blue, copper Cu(II), and cadmium Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater using fennel-based adsorbents
  25. The investigation of the physical properties of an electrical porcelain insulator manufactured from locally sourced materials
  26. Concentration evaluation and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected vegetables sold in major markets of Port Harcourt South-South Nigeria
  27. Detection of iodine in aqueous extract of plants through modified Mohr’s method
  28. Exploration of bioactive compounds from Mangifera indica (Mango) as probable inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-Κb) in colorectal cancer management
  29. A new sphingoid derivative from Acacia hockii De Wild (Fabaceae) with antimicrobial and insecticidal properties
  30. Protection of wood against bio-attack and research of new effective and environmental friendly fungicides
  31. Computational investigation of Arbutus serratifolia Salisb molecules as new potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors
  32. Exploring the solvation of water molecules around radioactive elements in nuclear waste water treatment
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2022-0015
Keywords for this article
nanocellulose; potato; thermoplastic starch

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
  4. Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
  5. Recent developments in sago starch thermoplastic bio-composites
  6. Mechanical degradation of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites in aqueous environments
  7. Computational design of the novel building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks based on the organic ligand protected Cu4 cluster
  8. Highly functional nanocellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch-based nanocomposites
  9. Spectral peak areas do not vary according to spectral averaging scheme used in functional MRS experiments at 3 T with interleaved visual stimulation
  10. Triterpenoids of antibacterial extracts from the leaves of Bersama abyssinica Fresen (Francoaceae)
  11. Immediate effects of atrazine application on soil organic carbon and selected macronutrients and amelioration by sawdust biochar pretreatment
  12. Process configuration of combined ozonolysis and anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment
  13. Concentration levels and risk assessment of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residue in selected cereals and legumes sold in Anambra State, south-eastern Nigeria
  14. XRD and cytotoxicity assay of submitted nanomaterial industrial samples in the Philippines
  15. Comparative study of the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light irradiation using Bi24O31Br11-anchored carbonaceous and silicates catalyst support
  16. Xanthoangelol, geranilated chalcone compound, isolation from pudau leaves (Artocarpus kemando Miq.) as antibacterial and anticancer
  17. Barley thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  18. Integration of chemo- and bio-catalysis to intensify bioprocesses
  19. Fabrication of starch-based packaging materials
  20. Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  21. Review on sago thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  22. Wheat thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  23. Synergistic effect in bimetallic gold catalysts: recent trends and prospects
  24. Simultaneous removal of methylene blue, copper Cu(II), and cadmium Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater using fennel-based adsorbents
  25. The investigation of the physical properties of an electrical porcelain insulator manufactured from locally sourced materials
  26. Concentration evaluation and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected vegetables sold in major markets of Port Harcourt South-South Nigeria
  27. Detection of iodine in aqueous extract of plants through modified Mohr’s method
  28. Exploration of bioactive compounds from Mangifera indica (Mango) as probable inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-Κb) in colorectal cancer management
  29. A new sphingoid derivative from Acacia hockii De Wild (Fabaceae) with antimicrobial and insecticidal properties
  30. Protection of wood against bio-attack and research of new effective and environmental friendly fungicides
  31. Computational investigation of Arbutus serratifolia Salisb molecules as new potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors
  32. Exploring the solvation of water molecules around radioactive elements in nuclear waste water treatment
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0015/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button