Home Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review

  • Salit Mohd Sapuan EMAIL logo , Moklis Muhammad Harussani , Aleif Hakimi Ismail , Noorashikin Soh Zularifin Soh , Mohamad Irsyad Mohamad Azwardi and Vasi Uddin Siddiqui
Published/Copyright: March 21, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Physical Sciences Reviews
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews Volume 9 Issue 3

Abstract

In the last few years, there are rising numbers for environmental waste due to factors such as plastic based food packaging that really need to get enough attention in order to prevent the issue from becoming worse and bringing disaster to society. Thus, the uses of plastic composite materials need to be reduced and need to be replaced with materials that are natural and have low degradation to preserve nature. Based on the statistics for the global, the production of plastic has been roughly calculated for passing 400 million metric tons every year and has a high probability of approaching the value of 500 million metric tons at the year of 2025 and this issue needs to be counteracted as soon as possible. Due to that, the increasing number for recent development of natural biopolymer, as an example starch, has been investigated as the substitution for the non-biodegradable biopolymer. Besides, among all biodegradable polymers, starch has been considered as promising substitution polymer due to its renewability, easy availability, and biodegradability. Apart from that, by the reinforcement from the nanocellulose, starch fiber has an increasing in terms of mechanical, barrier and thermal properties. In this review paper, we will be discussing the up-to-date development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites throughout this century.

Keywords: biopolymer; food packaging; nanocellulose; reinforcement; starch
Corresponding author: Salit Mohd Sapuan, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Advanced Engineering Materials and Composites (AEMC) Research Centre, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources; 2020. Total Forested Areas in Malaysia (1990 – 2018): Ketsa. Available from: https://www.ketsa.gov.my/en-my/KetsaCore/Forestry/Pages/Total-Forested-Areas-in-Malaysia.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gironès, J, López, J, Mutjé, P, Carvalho, A, Curvelo, A, Vilaseca, F. Natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites obtained by melt processing. Compos Sci Technol 2012;72:858–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.02.019.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gowthaman, N, Lim, H, Sreeraj, T, Amalraj, A, Gopi, S. Advantages of biopolymers over synthetic polymers. In: Biopolymers and Their Industrial Applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021:351–72 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00015-8Search in Google Scholar

4. Kargarzadeh, H, Mariano, M, Huang, J, Lin, N, Ahmad, I, Dufresne, A, et al.. Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymer 2017;132:368–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.043.Search in Google Scholar

5. Havstad, MR. Biodegradable plastics. In: Plastic waste and recycling. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2020:97–129 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-817880-5.00005-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Trache, D, Tarchoun, AF, Derradji, M, Hamidon, TS, Masruchin, N, Brosse, N, et al.. Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Front Chem 2020;8:392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00392.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Salas, C, Nypelö, T, Rodriguez-Abreu, C, Carrillo, C, Rojas, OJ. Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2014;19:383–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cao, X, Chen, Y, Chang, PR, Muir, AD, Falk, G. Starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with flax cellulose nanocrystals. Express Polym Lett 2008;2:502–10. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.60.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cruz-Tato, P, Ortiz-Quiles, EO, Vega-Figueroa, K, Santiago-Martoral, L, Flynn, M, Díaz-Vázquez, LM, et al.. Metalized nanocellulose composites as a feasible material for membrane supports: design and applications for water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51:4585–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05955.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Czaja, WK, Young, DJ, Kawecki, M, Brown, RM. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2006;8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060620dda.Search in Google Scholar

11. Iguchi, M, Yamanaka, S, Budhiono, A. Bacterial cellulose – a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 2000;35:261–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004775229149.10.1023/A:1004775229149Search in Google Scholar

12. Dufresne, A. Chapter 1. Nanocellulose: potential reinforcement in composites. In: Green chemistry series. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2012:1–32 pp.10.1039/9781849735315-00001Search in Google Scholar

13. Lee, KY, Aitomäki, Y, Berglund, LA, Oksman, K, Bismarck, A. On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 2014;105:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.032.Search in Google Scholar

14. Gozzo, A, Glittenberg, D. Chapter 9.2. Starch: a versatile product from renewable resources for industrial applications. In: Green chemistry series. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2009:238–63 pp.10.1039/9781847552686-00238Search in Google Scholar

15. Laycock, BG, Halley, PJ. Starch applications: state of market and new trends. In: Starch polymers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2014:381–419 pp.10.1016/B978-0-444-53730-0.00026-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Sanyang, ML, Ishak, MR, Zainudin, ES. Nanocrystalline cellulose as reinforcement for polymeric matrix nanocomposites and its potential applications: a review. Curr Anal Chem 2018;14:203–25. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573411013666171003155624.Search in Google Scholar

17. Lu, Y, Weng, L, Cao, X. Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites—reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 2006;63:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.027.Search in Google Scholar

18. Anglès, MN, Dufresne, A. Plasticized starch/tunicin whiskers nanocomposites. 1. Structural analysis. Macromolecules 2000;33:8344–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0008701.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nasri-Nasrabadi, B, Behzad, T, Bagheri, R. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofiber reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. Fibers Polym 2014;15:347–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0347-0.Search in Google Scholar

20. Babaee, M, Jonoobi, M, Hamzeh, Y, Ashori, A. Biodegradability and mechanical properties of reinforced starch nanocomposites using cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 2015;132:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Llanos, JH, Tadini, CC. Preparation and characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on cassava starch or chitosan, reinforced with montmorillonite or bamboo nanofibers. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;107:371–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Das, S, Ghosh, B, Sarkar, K. Nanocellulose as sustainable biomaterials for drug delivery. Sensor Int 2022;3:100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100135.Search in Google Scholar

23. Brinchi, L, Cotana, F, Fortunati, E, Kenny, J. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr Polym 2013;94:154–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Costa, AFS, Almeida, FCG, Vinhas, GM, Sarubbo, LA. Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Phanthong, P, Reubroycharoen, P, Hao, X, Xu, G, Abudula, A, Guan, G. Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers 2018;1:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

26. Chandra, J, George, N, Narayanankutty, SK. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk fibre. Carbohydr Polym 2016;142:158–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Kusmono, Affan, MN. Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from ramie fibers via phosphoric acid hydrolysis. J Nat Fibers 2020;19:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1821292.Search in Google Scholar

28. Morais, JPS, Rosa, MDF, de Souza Filho, MDSM, Nascimento, LD, do Nascimento, DM, Cassales, AR. Extraction and characterization of nanocellulose structures from raw cotton linter. Carbohydr Polym 2013;91:229–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Wulandari, WT, Rochliadi, A, Arcana, IM. Nanocellulose prepared by acid hydrolysis of isolated cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2016;107:012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/107/1/012045.Search in Google Scholar

30. Yu, M, Yang, R, Huang, L, Cao, X, Yang, F, Liu, D. Preparation and characterization of bamboo nanocrystalline cellulose. Bioresources 2012;7:1802–12. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.2.1802-1812.Search in Google Scholar

31. Nazrin, A, Sapuan, SM, Zuhri, MYM. Mechanical, physical and thermal properties of sugar palm nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch (TPS)/Poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites. Polymers 2020;12:2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102216.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Ribeiro, RSA, Pohlmann, BC, Calado, V, Bojorge, N, Pereira, N. Production of nanocellulose by enzymatic hydrolysis: trends and challenges. Eng Life Sci 2019;19:279–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Bondeson, D, Mathew, A, Oksman, K. Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 2006;13:171–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4.Search in Google Scholar

34. Dong, XM, Revol, JF, Gray, DG. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 1998;5:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009260511939.10.1023/A:1009260511939Search in Google Scholar

35. Gupta, GK, Shukla, P. Lignocellulosic biomass for the synthesis of nanocellulose and its eco-friendly advanced applications. Front Chem 2020;8:601256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.601256.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Nasir, M, Hashim, R, Sulaiman, O, Asim, M. Nanocellulose. In: Cellulose-Reinforced Nanofibre Composites. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2017:261–76 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-100957-4.00011-5Search in Google Scholar

37. Nascimento, DM, Nunes, YL, Figueirêdo, MCB, de Azeredo, HMC, Aouada, FA, Feitosa, JPA, et al.. Nanocellulose nanocomposite hydrogels: technological and environmental issues. Green Chem 2018;20:2428–48. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8gc00205c.Search in Google Scholar

38. Abdul Khalil, H, Bhat, A, Ireana Yusra, A. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2012;87:963–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078.Search in Google Scholar

39. Abitbol, T, Rivkin, A, Cao, Y, Nevo, Y, Abraham, E, Ben-Shalom, T, et al.. Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2016;39:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 2013;16:220–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

41. Fahma, F, Febiyanti, I, Lisdayana, N, Arnata, I, Sartika, D. Nanocellulose as a new sustainable material for various applications: a review. Arch Mater Sci Eng 2021;2:49–64. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2624.Search in Google Scholar

42. Lin, N, Huang, J, Dufresne, A. Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 2012;4:3274. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30260h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Moon, RJ, Martini, A, Nairn, J, Simonsen, J, Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 2011;40:3941. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Wang, B, Sain, M. Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers. Compos Sci Technol 2007;67:2521–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.015.Search in Google Scholar

45. Mondal, S. Review on nanocellulose polymer nanocomposites. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 2017;57:1377–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2017.1381253.Search in Google Scholar

46. Luong, ND, Korhonen, JT, Soininen, AJ, Ruokolainen, J, Johansson, LS, Seppälä, J. Processable polyaniline suspensions through in situ polymerization onto nanocellulose. Eur Polym J 2013;49:335–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.026.Search in Google Scholar

47. Bhanvase, B, Sonawane, S. Ultrasound assisted in situ emulsion polymerization for polymer nanocomposite: a review. Chemical Engineering and Processing. Process Intensif 2014;85:86–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2014.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

48. Tortorella, S, Vetri Buratti, V, Maturi, M, Sambri, L, Comes Franchini, M, Locatelli, E. Surface-modified nanocellulose for application in biomedical engineering and nanomedicine: a review. Int J Nanomed 2020;15:9909–37. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s266103.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Hayase, G, Kanamori, K, Hasegawa, G, Maeno, A, Kaji, H, Nakanishi, K. A superamphiphobic macroporous silicone monolith with marshmallow-like flexibility. Angew Chem Int Ed 2013;52:10788–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201304169.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Phanthong, P, Guan, G, Karnjanakom, S, Hao, X, Wang, Z, Kusakabe, K, et al.. Amphiphobic nanocellulose-modified paper: fabrication and evaluation. RSC Adv 2016;6:13328–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra24986d.Search in Google Scholar

51. Liu, K, Tian, Y, Jiang, L. Bio-inspired superoleophobic and smart materials: design, fabrication, and application. Prog Mater Sci 2013;58:503–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

52. Si, Y, Guo, Z. Superhydrophobic nanocoatings: from materials to fabrications and to applications. Nanoscale 2015;7:5922–46. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr07554d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Cui, S, Li, M, Zhang, S, Liu, J, Sun, Q, Xiong, L. Physicochemical properties of maize and sweet potato starches in the presence of cellulose nanocrystals. Food Hydrocolloids 2018;77:220–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.09.037.Search in Google Scholar

54. Ilyas, R, Sapuan, S, Ishak, M, Zainudin, E. Development and characterization of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch bionanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 2018;202:186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Slavutsky, AM, Bertuzzi, MA. Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 2014;110:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Lavoine, N, Desloges, I, Dufresne, A, Bras, J. Microfibrillated cellulose – its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2012;90:735–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Saito, T, Kuramae, R, Wohlert, J, Berglund, LA, Isogai, A. An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules 2012;14:248–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301674e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Ridzwan, MI, Zainudin, ES, Atikah, M. Nanocellulose reinforced starch polymer composites: a review of preparation, properties and application. In: 5th International Conference on Applied Sciences and Engineering Application (ICASEA 2018). Cameron Highlands, Malaysia; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

59. Kovacs, T, Naish, V, O’Connor, B, Blaise, C, Gagné, F, Hall, L, et al.. An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology 2010;4:255–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435391003628713.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Islam, MT, Alam, MM, Zoccola, M. Review on modification of nanocellulose for application in composites. Int J innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2013;2:5444–51.Search in Google Scholar

61. Silvério, HA, Flauzino Neto, WP, Dantas, NO, Pasquini, D. Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from corncob for application as reinforcing agent in nanocomposites. Ind Crop Prod 2013;44:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

62. Zhang, W, Yang, X, Li, C, Liang, M, Lu, C, Deng, Y. Mechanochemical activation of cellulose and its thermoplastic polyvinyl alcohol ecocomposites with enhanced physicochemical properties. Carbohydr Polym 2011;83:257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.062.Search in Google Scholar

63. Criado, P, Hossain, FMJ, Salmieri, S, Lacroix, M. Nanocellulose in food packaging. In: Composites materials for food packaging. Beverly, MA: Scrivener Publishing; 2018:297–329 pp.10.1002/9781119160243.ch10Search in Google Scholar

64. Simões, D, Miguel, SP, Ribeiro, MP, Coutinho, P, Mendonça, AG, Correia, IJ. Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2018;127:130–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Tong, WY, bin Abdullah, AYK, Binti Rozman, NAS, bin Wahid, MIA, Hossain, MS, Ring, LC, et al.. Antimicrobial wound dressing film utilizing cellulose nanocrystal as drug delivery system for curcumin. Cellulose 2017;25:631–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1562-9.Search in Google Scholar

66. Lu, P, Hsieh, YL. Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 2010;82:329–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.073.Search in Google Scholar

67. Hasan, N, Rahman, L, Kim, SH, Cao, J, Arjuna, A, Lallo, S, et al.. Recent advances of nanocellulose in drug delivery systems. J Pharm Investig 2020;50:553–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-020-00499-4.Search in Google Scholar

68. Nechyporchuk, O, Belgacem, MN, Bras, J. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 2016;93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

69. Abdul Khalil, H, Davoudpour, Y, Islam, MN, Mustapha, A, Sudesh, K, Dungani, R, et al.. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2014;99:649–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Lin, N, Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 2014;59:302–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025.Search in Google Scholar

71. Klemm, D, Schumann, D, Udhardt, U, Marsch, S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose — artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 2001;26:1561–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00021-1.Search in Google Scholar

72. Ardanuy, RM, Claramunt, JB, Arévalo, PR, Parés, SF, Aracri, E, Vidal, LT. Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) as a potential reinforcement for high performance cement mortar composites. Bioresources 2012;7:3883–94.10.15376/biores.7.3.3883-3894Search in Google Scholar

73. Viana, LC, Potulski, DC, Muniz, GIBD, Andrade, ASD, Silva, ELD. Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive for recycled paper. Cerne 2018;24:140–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201824022518.Search in Google Scholar

74. Gomes, FP, Silva, NH, Trovatti, E, Serafim, LS, Duarte, MF, Silvestre, AJ, et al.. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy 2013;55:205–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

75. Jozala, AF, de Lencastre-Novaes, LC, Lopes, AM, de Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma, V, Mazzola, PG, Pessoa, AJr, et al.. Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;100:2063–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7243-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Chen, G, Wu, G, Chen, L, Wang, W, Hong, FF, Jönsson, LJ. Comparison of productivity and quality of bacterial nanocellulose synthesized using culture media based on seven sugars from biomass. Microb Biotechnol 2019;12:677–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

77. Huang, Y, Huang, X, Ma, M, Hu, C, Seidi, F, Yin, S, et al.. Recent advances on the bacterial cellulose-derived carbon aerogels. J Mater Chem C 2021;9:818–28. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tc05433j.Search in Google Scholar

78. Heßler, N, Klemm, D. Alteration of bacterial nanocellulose structure by in situ modification using polyethylene glycol and carbohydrate additives. Cellulose 2009;16:899–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9301-5.Search in Google Scholar

79. Czaja, W, Krystynowicz, A, Bielecki, S, Brownjr, R. Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 2006;27:145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Darder, M, Aranda, P, Ruiz-Hitzky, E. Bionanocomposites: a new concept of ecological, bioinspired, and functional hybrid materials. Adv Mater 2007;19:1309–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200602328.Search in Google Scholar

81. Mahsuli, T, Suryanto, H, Larasati, A, Muhajir, M. Mechanical properties of bacterial nanocellulose membrane from pineapple peel waste after homogenization process. In: International Conference On Biology And Applied Science (ICOBAS); 2019.10.1063/1.5115695Search in Google Scholar

82. Fu, L, Zhang, J, Yang, G. Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym 2013;92:1432–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Sionkowska, A, Mężykowska, O, Piątek, J. Bacterial nanocelullose in biomedical applications: a review. Polym Int 2019;68:1841–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5882.Search in Google Scholar

84. Fu, L, Zhou, P, Zhang, S, Yang, G. Evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose-based uniform wound dressing for large area skin transplantation. Mater Sci Eng C 2013;33:2995–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

85. Zhijiang, C, Guang, Y. Bacterial cellulose/collagen composite: characterization and first evaluation of cytocompatibility. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;120:2938–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33318.Search in Google Scholar

86. Amorim, JDP, Junior, CJGS, Costa, AFS, Nascimento, HA, Vinhas, GM, Sarrubo, LA. Biomask, a polymer blend for treatment and healing of skin prone to acne. Chem Eng Trans 2020;79:205–10. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2079035.Search in Google Scholar

87. Alam, M. A., Sapuan, S. M., Ya, H. H., Hussain, P. B., Azeem, M., Ilyas, R. A. Application of biocomposites in automotive components: a review. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2021:1–17.10.1016/B978-0-12-820559-4.00001-8Search in Google Scholar

88. Hussein, FH, Al-Khafaji, YF. Biopolymers, biocomposites, and their types. In: Advanced green materials. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2021:43–60 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819988-6.00004-5Search in Google Scholar

89. Ashraf, MA, Batool, S, Ahmad, M, Sarfraz, M, Noor, WSAWM. Biopolymers as biofilters and biobarriers. In: Biopolymers and biotech admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2016:387–420 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-100214-8.00017-8Search in Google Scholar

90. Harries, KA, Sharma, B, editors. Nonconventional and vernacular construction materials: characterisation, properties and applications. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

91. Wirawan, R., Sapuan, S. M. Sugarcane bagasse-filled poly (Vinyl Chloride) composites: a review. In: Natural Fibre Reinforced Vinyl Ester and Vinyl Polymer Composites. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2018:157–68 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-102160-6.00007-XSearch in Google Scholar

92. Mishra, RK, Ha, SK, Verma, K, Tiwari, SK. Recent progress in selected bio-nanomaterials and their engineering applications: an overview. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 2018;3:263–88.10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.05.003Search in Google Scholar

93. Shah, U, Naqash, F, Gani, A, Masoodi, FA. Art and science behind modified starch edible films and coatings: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016;15:568–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12197.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

94. Sanyang, ML, Sapuan, SM, Jawaid, M, Ishak, MR, Sahari, J. Recent developments in sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) based biocomposites and their potential industrial applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;54:533e549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.037.Search in Google Scholar

95. Pérez, S, Baldwin, PM, Gallant, DJ. Structural features of starch granules I. In: Starch. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2009:149–92 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00005-7Search in Google Scholar

96. Reddy, MM, Misra, M, Mohanty, AK. Bio-based materials in the new bio-economy. Chem Eng Prog 2012;108:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(82).Search in Google Scholar

97. Atiqah, A, Jawaid, M, Sapuan, SM, Ishak, MR, Ansari, MNM, Ilyas, RA. Physical and thermal properties of treated sugar palm/glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol 2019;8:3726e3732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.032.Search in Google Scholar

98. Ilyas, R, Sapuan, S, Norrrahim, MNF, Yasim-Anuar, TAT, Kadier, A, Kalil, MS, et al.. Nanocellulose/starch biopolymer nanocomposites: processing, manufacturing, and applications. In: Advanced processing, properties, and applications of starch and other bio-based polymers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020:65–88 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819661-8.00006-8Search in Google Scholar

99. Mazani, N, Sapuan, SM, Sanyang, ML, Atiqah, A, Ilyas, RA. Design and fabrication of a shoe shelf from kenaf fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. In: Lignocellulose for future bioeconomy. Amsterdam,  Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019:315–32 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-816354-2.00017-7Search in Google Scholar

100. Nurazzi, NM, Khalina, A, Sapuan, SM, Ilyas, RA, Rafiqah, SA, Hanafee, ZM. Thermal properties of treated sugar palm yarn/glass fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol 2020;9:1606–18.10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.086Search in Google Scholar

101. Asyraf, MRM, Ishak, MR, Sapuan, SM, Yidris, N, Ilyas, RA. Woods and composites cantilever beam: a comprehensive review of experimental and numerical creep methodologies. J Mater Res Technol 2020;9:6759–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.013.Search in Google Scholar

102. Jaafar, J, Siregar, JP, Oumer, AN, Hamdan, MHM, Tezara, C, Salit, MS. Experimental investigation on performance of short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced tapioca biopolymer composites. BioResources 2018;13:6341–55.10.15376/biores.13.3.6341-6355Search in Google Scholar

103. Takagi, H, Asano, A. Effects of processing conditions on flexural properties of cellulose nanofiber reinforced “green” composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf 2008;39:685e689. https://doi.org/10.1016/.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.019Search in Google Scholar

104. Mehanny, S, Abu-El Magd, EE, Ibrahim, M, Farag, M, Gil-San-Millan, R, Navarro, J, et al.. Extraction and characterization of nanocellulose from three types of palm residues. J Mater Res Technol 2021;10:526e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.027Search in Google Scholar

105. Kaushik, M, Moores, A. Review: nanocelluloses as versatile supports for metal nanoparticles and their applications in catalysis. Green Chem 2016;18:622–37. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc02500a.Search in Google Scholar

106. Onuaguluchi, O, Banthia, N. Plant-based natural fibre reinforced cement composites: a review. Cement Concr Compos 2016;68:96e108. https://doi.org/10.1016/.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.014Search in Google Scholar

107. Shah, N, Fehrenbach, J, Ulven, CA. Hybridization of hemp fiber and recycled-carbon fiber in polypropylene composites. Sustain Times 2019;11:3163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113163.Search in Google Scholar

108. Khalid, MY, Arif, ZU. Novel biopolymer-based sustainable composites for food packaging applications: a narrative review. Food Packag Shelf Life 2022;33:100892.10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100892Search in Google Scholar

109. Norrrahim, MNF, Nurazzi, NM, Jenol, MA, Farid, MAA, Janudin, N, Ujang, FA, et al.. Emerging development of nanocellulose as an antimicrobial material: an overview. Mater Adv 2021;2:3538–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ma00116g.Search in Google Scholar

110. Faradilla, RHF, Lee, G, Rawal, A, Hutomo, T, Stenzel, MH, Arcot, J. Nanocellulose characteristics from the inner and outer layer of banana pseudo-stem prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 2016;23:3023–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1025-8.Search in Google Scholar

111. Punia, S. Barley starch: structure, properties and in vitro digestibility – a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;155:868–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.219.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

112. Siqueira, G, Bras, J, Dufresne, A. Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2009;10:425e432. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801193.Search in Google Scholar

113. Bangar, SP, Whiteside, WS. Nano-cellulose reinforced starch bio composite films-A review on green composites. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;185:849–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

114. Teixeira, EDM, Pasquini, D, Curvelo, AA, Corradini, E, Belgacem, MN, Dufresne, A. Cassava bagasse cellulose nanofibrils reinforced thermoplastic cassava starch. Carbohydr Polym 2009;78:422–31.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.034Search in Google Scholar

115. Azeredo, HMC, Mattoso, LHC, Wood, D, Williams, TG, Avena-Bustillos, RJ, McHugh, TH. Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers. J Food Sci 2009;74:N31–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01186.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

116. Teixeira, EDM, Lotti, C, Corrêa, AC, Teodoro, KB, Marconcini, JM, Mattoso, LH. Thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with cotton cellulose nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;120:2428–33.10.1002/app.33447Search in Google Scholar

117. Hietala, M, Mathew, AP, Oksman, K. Bionanocomposites of thermoplastic starch and cellulose nanofibers manufactured using twin-screw extrusion. Eur Polym J 2013;49:950–6.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.016Search in Google Scholar

118. Karimi, S, Tahir, PM, Dufresne, A, Karimi, A, Abdulkhani, A. A comparative study on characteristics of nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch biofilms prepared with different techniques. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 2014;29:41–5.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p041-045Search in Google Scholar

119. Asrofi, M, Abral, H, Kasim, A, Pratoto, A, Mahardika, M, Hafizulhaq, F. Characterization of the sonicated yam bean starch bionanocomposites reinforced by nanocellulose water hyacinth fiber (WHF): the effect of various fiber loading. J Eng Sci Technol 2018;13:2700–15.Search in Google Scholar

120. Herrera, N, Salaberria, AM, Mathew, AP, Oksman, K. Plasticized polylactic acid nanocomposite films with cellulose and chitin nanocrystals prepared using extrusion and compression molding with two cooling rates: effects on mechanical, thermal and optical properties. Compos Appl Sci Manuf 2016;83:89e97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.024.Search in Google Scholar

121. Mathew, AP, Thielemans, W, Dufresne, A. Mechanical properties of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch and tunicin whiskers. J Appl Polym Sci 2008;109:4065e4074. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28623.Search in Google Scholar

122. Liu, D, Zhong, T, Chang, PR, Li, K, Wu, Q. Starch composites reinforced by bamboo cellulosic crystals. Bioresource technology. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:2529–36.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

123. Angellier, H, Choisnard, L, Molina-Boisseau, S, Ozil, P, Dufresne, A. Optimization of the preparation of aqueous suspensions of waxy maize starch nanocrystals using a response surface methodology. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:1545–1551.10.1021/bm049914uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

124. Anglès, MN, Dufresne, A. Plasticized starch/tunicin whiskers nanocomposite materials. Mechanical behavior. Macromolecules 2001;34:2921e2931. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma001555h.Search in Google Scholar

125. Chen, D, Lawton, D, Thompson, MR, Liu, Q. Biocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from potato peel waste. Carbohydr Polym 2012;90:709–16.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

126. Park, JH, Koo, MS, Cho, SH, Lyu, MY. Comparison of thermal and optical properties and flowability of fossil-based and bio-based polycarbonate. Macromol Res 2017;25:1135–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-017-5153-2.Search in Google Scholar

127. Fonseca-García, A, Jiménez-Regalado, EJ, Aguirre-Loredo, RY. Preparation of a novel biodegradable packaging film based on corn starch-chitosan and poloxamers. Carbohydr Polym 2021;251:117009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

128. Bruni, GP, Oliveira, JP, Fonseca, LM, Silva, FT, Dias, ARG, da Rosa Zavareze, E. Biocomposite films based on phosphorylated wheat starch and cellulose nanocrystals from rice, oat, and Eucalyptus husks. Starch Staerke 2020;72:1900051. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201900051.Search in Google Scholar

129. Youssef, AM, El-Sayed, SM. Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: concepts and future outlook. Carbohydr Polym 2018;193:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.088.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

130. Montero, B, Rico, M, Rodríguez-Llamazares, S, Barral, L, Bouza, R. Effect of nanocellulose as a filler on biodegradable thermoplastic starch films from tuber, cereal and legume. Carbohydr Polym 2017;157:1094–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.073.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

131. Syafri, E, Sudirman, M, Yulianti, E, DeswitaAsrofi, M, Abral, H, Sapuan, S, et al.. Effect of sonication time on the thermal stability, moisture absorption, and biodegradation of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) nanocellulose-filled bengkuang (Pachyrhizus erosus) starch biocomposites. J Mater Res Technol 2019;8:6223–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.016.Search in Google Scholar

132. Souza, AG, Ferreira, RR, Paula, LC, Mitra, SK, Rosa, DS. Starch-based films enriched with nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions containing different essential oils for possible applications in food packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 2021;27:100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100615.Search in Google Scholar

133. Chen, Q, Liu, Y, Chen, G. A comparative study on the starch-based biocomposite films reinforced by nanocellulose prepared from different non-wood fibers. Cellulose 2019;26:2425–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02254-x.Search in Google Scholar

134. Bagde, P, Nadanathangam, V. Mechanical, antibacterial and biodegradable properties of starch film containing bacteriocin immobilized crystalline nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym 2019;222:115021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

135. Montoya, R, Zuluaga, R, Castro, C, Vélez, L, Gañán, P. Starch and starch/bacterial nanocellulose films as alternatives for the management of minimally processed mangoes. Starch Staerke 2018;71:1800120.10.1002/star.201800120Search in Google Scholar

136. Noorbakhsh-Soltani, S, Zerafat, M, Sabbaghi, S. A comparative study of gelatin and starch-based nano-composite films modified by nano-cellulose and chitosan for food packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym 2018;189:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

137. Nazrin, A, Sapuan, SM, Zuhri, MYM, Ilyas, RA, Syafiq, R, Sherwani, SFK. Nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch (TPS), polylactic acid (PLA), and polybutylene succinate (PBS) for food packaging applications. Front Chem 2020;8:213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00213.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

138. Yuan, Y, Chen, H. Preparation and characterization of a biodegradable starch-based antibacterial film containing nanocellulose and polyhexamethylene biguanide. Food Packag Shelf Life 2021;30:100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100718.Search in Google Scholar

139. Jayaraj, JJ, Renugadevi, K, Prakash, P, Harish, M, Kumar, RD. Effect of nanocellulose extracted from rice husk on the film properties of native starch based edible films. In: 3rd international conference on frontiers in automobile and mechanical engineering (FAME 2020); 2020.10.1063/5.0033961Search in Google Scholar

140. Owi, WT, Ong, HL, Sam, ST, Villagracia, AR, Tsai, CK, Akil, HM. Unveiling the physicochemical properties of natural Citrus aurantifolia crosslinked tapioca starch/nanocellulose bionanocomposites. Ind Crop Prod 2019;139:111548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111548.Search in Google Scholar

141. Bruna, ASM, João, HDOR, Lindaiá, SC, Ingrid, LL, Josiane, DVB, Joyce, BA, et al.. Characterization of cassava starch films plasticized with glycerol and strengthened with nanocellulose from green coconut fibers. Afr J Biotechnol 2017;16:1567–78. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2017.15943.Search in Google Scholar

142. Santana, JS, do Rosário, JM, Pola, CC, Otoni, CG, de Fátima FerreiraSoares, N, Camilloto, GP, et al.. Cassava starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanofibers extracted from sisal. J Appl Polym Sci 2016;134:44637. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44637.Search in Google Scholar

143. Salehudin, MH, Salleh, E, Muhamad, II, Mamat, SNH. Starch-based biofilm reinforced with empty fruit bunch cellulose nanofibre. Mater Res Innovat 2014;18:S6–322. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891714z.000000000977.Search in Google Scholar

144. Costa, SS, Druzian, JI, Machado, BAS, de Souza, CO, Guimarães, AG. Bi-functional biobased packing of the cassava starch, glycerol, licuri nanocellulose and red propolis. PLoS One 2014;9:e112554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112554.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

145. Othman, SH, Nordin, N, Azman, NAA, Tawakkal, ISMA, Basha, RK. Effects of nanocellulose fiber and thymol on mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of corn starch films. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;183:1352–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.082.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

146. Othman, SH, Majid, NA, Tawakkal, ISMA, Basha, RK, Nordin, N, Shapi’i, RA. Tapioca starch films reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose for potential food packaging application. Food Sci Technol 2019;39:605–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.36017.Search in Google Scholar

147. Zhou, P, Luo, Y, Lv, Z, Sun, X, Tian, Y, Zhang, X. Melt-processed poly (vinyl alcohol)/corn starch/nanocellulose composites with improved mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;183:1903–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

148. Nordin, N, Othman, S, Kadir Basha, R, Abdul Rashid, S. Mechanical and thermal properties of starch films reinforced with microcellulose fibres. Food Res 2018;2:555–63. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.2(6).110.Search in Google Scholar

149. Yang, S, Tang, Y, Wang, J, Kong, F, Zhang, J. Surface treatment of cellulosic paper with starch-based composites reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:13980–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502125s.Search in Google Scholar

150. Xu, Y, Rehmani, N, Alsubaie, L, Kim, C, Sismour, E, Scales, A. Tapioca starch active nanocomposite films and their antimicrobial effectiveness on ready-to-eat chicken meat. Food Packag Shelf Life 2018;16:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.02.006.Search in Google Scholar

151. Ji, N, Liu, C, Li, M, Sun, Q, Xiong, L. Interaction of cellulose nanocrystals and amylase: its influence on enzyme activity and resistant starch content. Food Chem 2018;245:481–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

152. Liu, L, Kong, F. In vitro investigation of the influence of nano-cellulose on starch and milk digestion and mineral adsorption. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;137:1278–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.194.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

153. Corral, ML, Cerrutti, P, Vázquez, A, Califano, A. Bacterial nanocellulose as a potential additive for wheat bread. Food Hydrocolloids 2017;67:189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.11.037.Search in Google Scholar

154. Khairuddin, N, Muhamad, II, Wan Abd Rahman, WA, Siddique, BM. Physicochemical and thermal characterization of hydroxyethyl cellulose – wheat starch based films incorporated thymol intended for active packaging. Sains Malays 2020;49:323–33. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2020-4902-10.Search in Google Scholar

155. Sharma, M, Aguado, R, Murtinho, D, Valente, AJ, Mendes De Sousa, AP, Ferreira, PJ. A review on cationic starch and nanocellulose as paper coating components. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;162:578–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.131.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

156. Khorasani, AC, Shojaosadati, SA. Starch-and carboxymethylcellulose-coated bacterial nanocellulose-pectin bionanocomposite as novel protective prebiotic matrices. Food Hydrocolloids 2017;63:273–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

157. Zhai, X, Gao, S, Xiang, Y, Wang, A, Li, Z, Cui, B, et al.. Cationized high amylose maize starch films reinforced with borax cross-linked nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;193:1421–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.206.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

158. Satyamurthy, P, Nadanathangam, V. Nanocellulose as functional filler in starch/polyvinyl alcohol film for preparation of urea biosensor. Curr Sci 2018;114:897. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/897-901.Search in Google Scholar

159. Meneguin, AB, Ferreira Cury, BS, dos Santos, AM, Franco, DF, Barud, HS, da Silva Filho, EC. Resistant starch/pectin free-standing films reinforced with nanocellulose intended for colonic methotrexate release. Carbohydr Polym 2017;157:1013–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.F10.062.Search in Google Scholar

160. Patil, MD, Patil, VD, Sapre, AA, Ambone, TS, Torris, AT, A, Shukla, PG, et al.. Tuning controlled release behavior of starch granules using nanofibrillated cellulose derived from waste sugarcane bagasse. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2018;6:9208–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01545.Search in Google Scholar

161. Hazrol, M, Sapuan, S, Ilyas, R, Othman, M, Sherwani, S. Electrical properties of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose, reinforced sugar palm starch nanocomposites. Polimery 2020;65:363–70. https://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2020.5.4.Search in Google Scholar

162. Zhen, WJ. Study on nanocellulose/starch composites. Adv Mater Res 2011;187:544–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.187.544.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-12-05
Accepted: 2023-01-09
Published Online: 2023-03-21

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
  4. Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
  5. Recent developments in sago starch thermoplastic bio-composites
  6. Mechanical degradation of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites in aqueous environments
  7. Computational design of the novel building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks based on the organic ligand protected Cu4 cluster
  8. Highly functional nanocellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch-based nanocomposites
  9. Spectral peak areas do not vary according to spectral averaging scheme used in functional MRS experiments at 3 T with interleaved visual stimulation
  10. Triterpenoids of antibacterial extracts from the leaves of Bersama abyssinica Fresen (Francoaceae)
  11. Immediate effects of atrazine application on soil organic carbon and selected macronutrients and amelioration by sawdust biochar pretreatment
  12. Process configuration of combined ozonolysis and anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment
  13. Concentration levels and risk assessment of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residue in selected cereals and legumes sold in Anambra State, south-eastern Nigeria
  14. XRD and cytotoxicity assay of submitted nanomaterial industrial samples in the Philippines
  15. Comparative study of the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light irradiation using Bi24O31Br11-anchored carbonaceous and silicates catalyst support
  16. Xanthoangelol, geranilated chalcone compound, isolation from pudau leaves (Artocarpus kemando Miq.) as antibacterial and anticancer
  17. Barley thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  18. Integration of chemo- and bio-catalysis to intensify bioprocesses
  19. Fabrication of starch-based packaging materials
  20. Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  21. Review on sago thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  22. Wheat thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  23. Synergistic effect in bimetallic gold catalysts: recent trends and prospects
  24. Simultaneous removal of methylene blue, copper Cu(II), and cadmium Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater using fennel-based adsorbents
  25. The investigation of the physical properties of an electrical porcelain insulator manufactured from locally sourced materials
  26. Concentration evaluation and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected vegetables sold in major markets of Port Harcourt South-South Nigeria
  27. Detection of iodine in aqueous extract of plants through modified Mohr’s method
  28. Exploration of bioactive compounds from Mangifera indica (Mango) as probable inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-Κb) in colorectal cancer management
  29. A new sphingoid derivative from Acacia hockii De Wild (Fabaceae) with antimicrobial and insecticidal properties
  30. Protection of wood against bio-attack and research of new effective and environmental friendly fungicides
  31. Computational investigation of Arbutus serratifolia Salisb molecules as new potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors
  32. Exploring the solvation of water molecules around radioactive elements in nuclear waste water treatment
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2022-0007
Keywords for this article
biopolymer; food packaging; nanocellulose; reinforcement; starch

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
  4. Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
  5. Recent developments in sago starch thermoplastic bio-composites
  6. Mechanical degradation of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites in aqueous environments
  7. Computational design of the novel building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks based on the organic ligand protected Cu4 cluster
  8. Highly functional nanocellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch-based nanocomposites
  9. Spectral peak areas do not vary according to spectral averaging scheme used in functional MRS experiments at 3 T with interleaved visual stimulation
  10. Triterpenoids of antibacterial extracts from the leaves of Bersama abyssinica Fresen (Francoaceae)
  11. Immediate effects of atrazine application on soil organic carbon and selected macronutrients and amelioration by sawdust biochar pretreatment
  12. Process configuration of combined ozonolysis and anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment
  13. Concentration levels and risk assessment of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residue in selected cereals and legumes sold in Anambra State, south-eastern Nigeria
  14. XRD and cytotoxicity assay of submitted nanomaterial industrial samples in the Philippines
  15. Comparative study of the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light irradiation using Bi24O31Br11-anchored carbonaceous and silicates catalyst support
  16. Xanthoangelol, geranilated chalcone compound, isolation from pudau leaves (Artocarpus kemando Miq.) as antibacterial and anticancer
  17. Barley thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  18. Integration of chemo- and bio-catalysis to intensify bioprocesses
  19. Fabrication of starch-based packaging materials
  20. Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  21. Review on sago thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  22. Wheat thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  23. Synergistic effect in bimetallic gold catalysts: recent trends and prospects
  24. Simultaneous removal of methylene blue, copper Cu(II), and cadmium Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater using fennel-based adsorbents
  25. The investigation of the physical properties of an electrical porcelain insulator manufactured from locally sourced materials
  26. Concentration evaluation and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected vegetables sold in major markets of Port Harcourt South-South Nigeria
  27. Detection of iodine in aqueous extract of plants through modified Mohr’s method
  28. Exploration of bioactive compounds from Mangifera indica (Mango) as probable inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-Κb) in colorectal cancer management
  29. A new sphingoid derivative from Acacia hockii De Wild (Fabaceae) with antimicrobial and insecticidal properties
  30. Protection of wood against bio-attack and research of new effective and environmental friendly fungicides
  31. Computational investigation of Arbutus serratifolia Salisb molecules as new potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors
  32. Exploring the solvation of water molecules around radioactive elements in nuclear waste water treatment
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0007/html
Scroll to top button