Startseite Naturwissenschaften Fragment-based drug design of nature-inspired compounds
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Fragment-based drug design of nature-inspired compounds

  • Abdulkarim Najjar EMAIL logo , Abdurrahman Olğaç , Fidele Ntie-Kang und Wolfgang Sippl
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Juni 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Natural product (NP)-derived drugs can be extracts, biological macromolecules, or purified small molecule substances. Small molecule drugs can be originally purified from NPs, can represent semisynthetic molecules, natural fragments containing small molecules, or are fully synthetic molecules that mimic natural compounds. New semisynthetic NP-like drugs are entering the pharmaceutical market almost every year and reveal growing interests in the application of fragment-based approaches for NPs. Thus, several NP databases were constructed to be implemented in the fragment-based drug design (FBDD) workflows. FBDD has been established previously as an approach for hit identification and lead generation. Several biophysical and computational methods are used for fragment screening to identify potential hits. Once the fragments within the binding pocket of the protein are identified, they can be grown, linked, or merged to design more active compounds. This work discusses applications of NPs and NP scaffolds to FBDD. Moreover, it briefly reviews NP databases containing fragments and reports on case studies where the approach has been successfully applied for the design of antimalarial and anticancer drug candidates.

List of abbreviations

cLogP

The calculated logarithm of n-octanol/water partition coefficient

Da

Daltons

FBDD

Fragment-based drug design

HTS

High-throughput screening

LE

Ligand efficiency

LLE

Ligand lipophilicity efficiency

MW

Molecular weight

NP

Natural product

SM

Secondary metabolite

Acknowledgements

The work of AO was partially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Technology and Innovation Funding Programmes Directorate Grant Number 7141231) and EU financial support, received through the cHiPSet COST Action IC1406. FNK acknowledges a Georg Forster return fellowship and equipment subsidy from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany. Financial support is acknowledged from a ChemJets Fellowship awarded to FNK from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Czech Republic.

References

[1] Baker M. Fragment-based lead discovery grows up. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;12:5.10.1038/nrd3926Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hubbard RE, Murray JB. 20 - Experiences in fragment-based lead discovery. Fragm Based Drug Des Tools Pract Approaches Examples. 2011;493:509–31.10.1016/B978-0-12-381274-2.00020-0Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Hajduk PJ, Greer J. A decade of fragment-based drug design: strategic advances and lessons learned. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:211–9.10.1038/nrd2220Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Hann MM, Leach AR, Harper G. Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2001;41:856–64.10.1021/ci000403iSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Fink T, Bruggesser H, Reymond JL. Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 daltons. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2005;44:1504–8.10.1002/anie.200462457Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Congreve M, Carr R, Murray C, Jhoti H. A “Rule of Three” for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:876–7.10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Maly DJ, Choong IC, Ellman JA. Combinatorial target-guided ligand assembly: identification of potent subtype-selective c-Src inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2419–24.10.1073/pnas.97.6.2419Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Whittaker M, Law RJ, Ichihara O, Hesterkamp T, Hallett D. Fragments: past, present and future. Drug Discov Today. 2010;7:e163–71.10.1016/j.ddtec.2010.11.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Bienstock RJ Overview: fragment-based drug design. ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2011.10.1021/bk-2011-1076.ch001Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Lamoree B, Hubbard RE. Current perspectives in fragment-based lead discovery (FBLD). Essays Biochem. 2017;61:453–64.10.1042/EBC20170028Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Alex A, Flocco M. Fragment-based drug discovery: what has it achieved so far? Curr Top Med Chem. 2007;7:1544–67.10.2174/156802607782341082Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW. Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science. 1996;274:1531–4.10.1126/science.274.5292.1531Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Davies TG, Tickle IJ. Fragment screening using X-ray crystallography. Top Curr Chem. 2012;317:33–59.10.1007/128_2011_179Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Bauman JD, Patel D, Arnold E. Fragment screening and HIV therapeutics. Top Curr Chem. 2012;317:181–200.10.1007/128_2011_232Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Hennig M, Ruf A, Huber W. Combining biophysical screening and X-ray crystallography for fragment-based drug discovery. Top Curr Chem. 2012;317:115–43.10.1007/128_2011_225Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Retra K, Irth H, Van Muijlwijk-Koezen JE. Technologies drug discovery surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis as a useful tool in FBDD. Drug Discov Today. 2010;7:e181–7.10.1016/j.ddtec.2010.11.012Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Freire E. Technologies Drug Discovery Isothermal titration calorimetry: controlling binding forces in lead optimization. Drug Discov Today. 2004;1:295–9.10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Hofstadler SA, Sannes-Lowery KA. Applications of ESI-MS in drug discovery: interrogation of noncovalent complexes. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:585–95.10.1038/nrd2083Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Gozalbes R, Carbajo RJ, Pineda-Lucena A. Contributions of computational chemistry and biophysical techniques to fragment-based drug discovery. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:1769–94.10.2174/092986710791111224Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Erlanson DA, Wells JA, Braisted AC. Tethering: fragment-based drug discovery. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004;33:199–223.10.1146/annurev.biophys.33.110502.140409Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Vivat Hannah V, Atmanene C, Zeyer D, Van Dorsselaer A, Sanglier-Cianférani S. Native MS: an ’ESI‚ way to support structure- and fragment-based drug discovery. Future Med Chem. 2010;2:35–50.10.4155/fmc.09.141Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Concepcion J, Witte K, Wartchow C, Choo S, Yao D, Persson H, et al. Label-free detection of biomolecular interactions using biolayer interferometry for kinetic characterization. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009;12:791–800.10.2174/138620709789104915Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Pröll F, Fechner P, Proll G. Direct optical detection in fragment-based screening. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393:1557–62.10.1007/s00216-008-2477-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Najjar A, Platzer C, Luft A, Aßmann CA, Elghazawy NH, Erdmann F, et al. Computer-aided design, synthesis and biological characterization of novel inhibitors for PKMYT1. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;161:479–92.10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.10.050Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Schultes S, De Graaf C, Haaksma EE, De Esch IJ, Leurs R, Krämer O. Ligand efficiency as a guide in fragment hit selection and optimization. Drug Discov Today. 2010;7:157–62.10.1016/j.ddtec.2010.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Bembenek SD, Tounge BA, Reynolds CH. Ligand efficiency and fragment-based drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:278–83.10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Hopkins AL, Groom CR, Alex A. Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. Drug Discov Today. 2004;9:430–1.10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03069-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Crowther GJ, Rowley J, Nguyen B, Pouwer R, Pham NB, Andrews KT, et al. Fragment-based screening of a natural product library against 62 potential malaria drug targets employing native mass spectrometry. ACS Infect Dis. 2018;4:431–44.10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00197Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Shultz MD. Setting expectations in molecular optimizations: strengths and limitations of commonly used composite parameters. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:5980–91.10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.08.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Leeson PD, Springthorpe B. The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:881–90.10.1038/nrd2445Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Orita M, Ohno K, Niimi T. Two ‘Golden Ratio’ indices in fragment-based drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:321–8.10.1016/j.drudis.2008.10.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Card GL, Blasdel L, England BP, Zhang C, Suzuki Y, Gillette S, et al. A family of phosphodiesterase inhibitors discovered by cocrystallography and scaffold-based drug design. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:201–7.10.1038/nbt1059Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Early TR, Carr MG, O’Reilly M, Navarro EF, Maman S, Boulstridge JA, et al. Fragment-based discovery of the pyrazol-4-yl urea (AT9283), a multitargeted kinase inhibitor with potent aurora kinase activity. J Med Chem. 2008;52:379–88.10.1021/jm800984vSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Bian Y, Xie X-Q. Computational fragment-based drug design: current trends, strategies, and applications. Aaps J. 2018;20:59.10.1208/s12248-018-0216-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Hajduk PJ, Sheppard G, Nettesheim DG, Olejniczak ET, Shuker SB, Meadows RP, et al. Discovery of potent nonpeptide inhibitors of stromelysin using SAR by NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:5818–27.10.1021/ja9702778Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Hudson SA, Surade S, Coyne AG, McLean KJ, Leys D, Munro AW, et al. Overcoming the limitations of fragment merging: rescuing a strained merged fragment series targeting Mycobacterium tuberculosis CYP121. ChemMedChem. 2013;8:1451–6.10.1002/cmdc.201300219Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Najjar A, Ntie-Kang F, Sippl W. Application of computer modeling to drug discovery: case study of prk1 kinase inhibitors as potential drugs in prostate cancer treatment. In Unique Aspects of Anti-Cancer Drug Devevelopment (Jolanta Natalia Latosińska, Magdalena Latosińska). InTechOpen, 2017:18–49.10.5772/intechopen.68910Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Ertl P, Schuffenhauer A. Cheminformatics analysis of natural products: lessons from nature inspiring the design of new drugs. In: Petersen F, et al., editor. Natural compounds as drugs. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 2008:217–35.10.1007/978-3-7643-8595-8_4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Harris MJ, Thompson JR, Evans JR, Whitt JA, Akee RK, Ewing TL, et al. NCI Program for natural product discovery: a publicly-accessible library of natural product fractions for high-throughput screening. ACS Chem Biol. 2018;13:2484–97.10.1021/acschembio.8b00389Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod. 2016;79:629–61.10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Newman DJ. From natural products to drugs. Phys Sci Rev. 2018;14:717–8.10.1515/9783110579352-006Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Lipinski CA. Rule of five in 2015 and beyond: target and ligand structural limitations, ligand chemistry structure and drug discovery project decisions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:34–41.10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Laraia L, Waldmann H. Natural product inspired compound collections: evolutionary principle, chemical synthesis, phenotypic screening, and target identification. Drug Discov Today. 2017;23:75–82.10.1016/j.ddtec.2017.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Chen Y, De C, Kops B, Kirchmair J. Data resources for the computer-guided discovery of bioactive natural products. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:2099–111.10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00341Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Chen Y, Garcia De Lomana M, Friedrich NO, Kirchmair J. Characterization of the chemical space of known and readily obtainable natural products. J Chem Inf Model. 2018;58:1518–32.10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00302Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Olğaç A, Orhan IE, Banoglu E. The potential role of in silico approaches to identify novel bioactive molecules from natural resources. Future Med Chem. 2017;9:1663–84.10.4155/fmc-2017-0124Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Taber HW, Mueller JP, Miller PF, Arrow AS. Bacterial uptake of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Microbiol Rev. 1987;51:439–57.10.1128/mr.51.4.439-457.1987Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Ntie-Kang F, Nwodo JN, Ibezim A, Simoben CV, Karaman B, Ngwa VF, et al. Molecular modeling of potential anticancer agents from African medicinal plants. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:2433–50.10.1021/ci5003697Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Ntie-Kang F, Zofou D, Babiaka SB, Meudom R, Scharfe M, Lifongo LL, et al. AfroDb: a select highly potent and diverse natural product library from African medicinal plants. Plos One. 2013;8:e78085.10.1371/journal.pone.0078085Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Onguéné PA, Ntie-Kang F, Mbah JA, Lifongo LL, Ndom JC, Sippl W, et al. The potential of anti-malarial compounds derived from African medicinal plants, part III: an in silico evaluation of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics profiling. Org Med Chem Lett. 2014;4:6.10.1186/s13588-014-0006-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Pilón-Jiménez BA, Saldívar-González FI, Díaz-Eufracio BI, Medina-Franco JL. BIOFACQUIM: a Mexican compound database of natural products. Biomolecules. 2019;9:pii: E31.10.3390/biom9010031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Ntie-Kang F, Onguéné PA, Scharfe M, Owono Owono LC, Megnassan E, Mbaze LM, et al. ConMedNP: A natural product library from Central African medicinal plants for drug discovery. RSC Adv. 2014;4:409–19.10.1039/C3RA43754JSuche in Google Scholar

[53] Kang H, Tang K, Liu Q, Sun Y, Huang Q, Zhu R, et al. HIM-herbal ingredients in-vivo metabolism database. J Cheminform. 2013;5:28.10.1186/1758-2946-5-28Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Ye H, Ye L, Kang H, Zhang D, Tao L, Tang K, et al. HIT: linking herbal active ingredients to targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:1055–9.10.1093/nar/gkq1165Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Ntie-Kang F, Telukunta KK, Döring K, Simoben CV, Moumbock AF, Malange YI, et al. NANPDB: A resource for natural products from Northern African Sources. J Nat Prod. 2017;80:2067–76.10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00283Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Ming H, Tiejun C, Yanli W, Stephen BH. Web search and data mining of natural products and their bioactivities in PubChem. Sci China Chem. 2013;56:10.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Mangal M, Sagar P, Singh H, Raghava GP, Agarwal SM. NPACT: naturally occurring plant-based anti-cancer compound-activity-target database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D1124–910.1093/nar/gks1047Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Zeng X, Zhang P, He W, Qin C, Chen S, Tao L, et al. NPASS: natural product activity and species source database for natural product research, discovery and tool development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1217–22.10.1093/nar/gkx1026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] Choi H, Cho SY, Pak HJ, Kim Y, Choi JY, Lee YJ, et al. NPCARE: database of natural products and fractional extracts for cancer regulation. J Cheminform. 2017;5:2.10.1186/s13321-016-0188-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Pilon AC, Valli M, Dametto AC, Pinto ME, Freire RT, Castro-Gamboa I, et al. NuBBE DB : an updated database to uncover chemical and biological information from Brazilian biodiversity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7215.10.1038/s41598-017-07451-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[61] Ntie-Kang F, Onguéné PA, Fotso GW, Andrae-Marobela K, Bezabih M, Ndom JC, et al. Virtualizing the p-ANAPL library: a step towards drug discovery from african medicinal plants. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90655.10.1371/journal.pone.0090655Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[62] Hatherley R, Brown DK, Musyoka TM, Penkler DL, Faya N, Lobb KA, et al. SANCDB: a South African natural compound database. J Cheminform. 2015;7:1–9.10.1186/s13321-015-0080-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Klementz D, Döring K, Lucas X, Telukunta KK, Erxleben A, Deubel D, et al. StreptomeDB 2.0 - an extended resource of natural products produced by streptomycetes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D509–14.10.1093/nar/gkv1319Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] Xue R, Fang Z, Zhang M, Yi Z, Wen C, Shi T. TCMID: traditional Chinese medicine integrative database for herb molecular mechanism analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:1089–95.10.1093/nar/gks1100Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[65] Chen CY. TCM database@Taiwan: the world’s largest traditional Chinese medicine database for drug screening in silico. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15939.10.1371/journal.pone.0015939Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[66] Lin Y-C, Wang -C-C, Chen I-S, Jheng J-L, Li J-H, Tung C-W. TIPdb: A database of anticancer, antiplatelet, and antituberculosis phytochemicals from indigenous plants in Taiwan. Sci World J. 2013;2013:736386.10.1155/2013/736386Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[67] Gu J, Gui Y, Chen L, Yuan G, Lu HZ, Xu X. Use of natural products as chemical library for drug discovery and network pharmacology. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62839.10.1371/journal.pone.0062839Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[68] Li B, Ma C, Zhao X, Hu Z, Du T, Xu X, et al. YaTCM: yet another traditional chinese medicine database for drug discovery. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018;16:600–10.10.1016/j.csbj.2018.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Koch MA, Schuffenhauer A, Scheck M, Wetzel S, Casaulta M, Odermatt A, et al. Charting biologically relevant chemical space: A structural classification of natural products (SCONP). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17272–7.10.1073/pnas.0503647102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Prescher H, Koch G, Schuhmann T, Ertl P, Bussenault A, Glick M, et al. Construction of a 3D-shaped, natural product like fragment library by fragmentation and diversification of natural products. Bioorganic Med Chem. 2017;25:921–5.10.1016/j.bmc.2016.12.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Schuffenhauer A, Ertl P, Roggo S, Wetzel S, Koch MA, Waldmann H. The scaffold tree - Visualization of the scaffold universe by hierarchical scaffold classification. J Chem Inf Model. 2007;47:47–58.10.1021/ci600338xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Scott DE, Coyne AG, Hudson SA, Abell C. Fragment-based approaches in drug discovery and chemical biology. Biochemistry. 2012;51:4990–5003.10.1021/bi3005126Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Congreve M, Chessari G, Tisi D, Woodhead AJ. Recent developments in fragment-based drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2008;51:3661–80.10.1021/jm8000373Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Over B, Wetzel S, Grütter C, Nakai Y, Renner S, Rauh D, et al. Natural-product-derived fragments for fragment-based ligand discovery. Nat Chem. 2013;5:21–8.10.1038/nchem.1506Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] ChEMBL Neglected Tropical Diseases. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chemblntd. Accessed: 18 Apr 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Plouffe D, Brinker A, McNamara C, Henson K, Kato N, Kuhen K, et al. In silico activity profiling reveals the mechanism of action of antimalarials discovered in a high-throughput screen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9059–64.10.1073/pnas.0802982105Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Guiguemde WA, Shelat AA, Bouck D, Duffy S, Crowther GJ, Davis PH, et al. Chemical genetics of Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2010;465:311–5.10.1038/nature09099Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[78] Gamo FJ, Sanz LM, Vidal J, De Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera JL, et al. Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature. 2010;465:305–10.10.1038/nature09107Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Liang J, Wang M, Wang S, Li X, Meng F. Fragment-based structural optimization of a natural product itampolin A as a p38α inhibitor for lung cancer. Mar Drugs. 2019;17:53.10.3390/md17010053Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[80] Bucar F, Wube A, Schmid M. Natural product isolation – how to get from biological material to pure compounds. Nat Prod Rep. 2013;30:525.10.1039/c3np20106fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Lucas X, Gru A, Bleher S, Gu S. The purchasable chemical space: a detailed picture. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55:915–24.10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00116Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Carreira EM. Natural products synthesis: a personal retrospective and outlook. Isr J Chem. 2018;58:114–21.10.1002/ijch.201700127Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Lear MJ, Hirai K, Ogawa K, Yamashita S, Hirama M. A convergent total synthesis of the kedarcidin chromophore: 20-years in the making. J Antibiot. (Tokyo). 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41429-019-0175-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Lewell XQ, Judd DB, Watson SP, Hann MM. RECAP: retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure : a powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1998;2338:511–22.10.1002/chin.199836303Suche in Google Scholar

[85] Ertl P, Schuhmann T. A Systematic cheminformatics analysis of functional groups occurring in natural products. J Nat Prod. 2019. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b01022.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Zhu XL, Zhang R, Wu QY, Song YJ, Wang YX, Yang JF, et al. Natural product neopeltolide as a cytochrome bc 1 complex inhibitor: mechanism of action and structural modification. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:2774–81.10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06195Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2019-06-07

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2018-0110/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen