Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik The syntax of two existential unaccusative verbs in Polish
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The syntax of two existential unaccusative verbs in Polish

  • Anna Bondaruk EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. November 2023

Abstract

The paper examines the syntax of two unaccusative verbs in Polish – ubyć.perf/ubywać.imperf ‘to disappear, to decrease’ and przybyć.perf/przybywać.imperf ‘to arrive, to increase’ – with a view to shedding light on the structure of existential unaccusatives. The two above-mentioned verbs appear in two distinct paradigms – the disappearance/motion verb and the existential one – both of which are taken to represent subtypes of existential structure. Existential verbs are treated here as monadic predicates with a single small clause complement, whose internal structure may vary, depending on the predicate. The two existential unaccusatives analysed in the paper may select two different types of small clause complement, which are different from the small clause selected by the existential być ‘to be’. Thus, Polish seems to make use of three different small clause structures in existential clauses. The paper also provides evidence that in Polish, like in English, existential unaccusatives are structurally distinct from change of state unaccusatives, and thus in the two languages there is more than one way to be structurally unaccusative. The account bears on the analysis of the genitive of negation in Polish, especially the issue of its inapplicability to existential unaccusatives versus its presence with the existential być ‘to be’.


Corresponding author: Anna Bondaruk, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland, E-mail:

References

Babby, Leonard. 1980. Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Suche in Google Scholar

Babyonyshev, Maria. 1996. Structural connections in syntax and processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Błaszczak, Joanna. 2007. Phase syntax: The Polish genitive of negation. Potsdam: University of Potsdam Habilitation dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Błaszczak, Joanna. 2018. Clause structure, case and agreement in Polish existential, possessive and locative sentences: A phase-based account. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54(4). 637–696.10.1515/psicl-2018-0025Suche in Google Scholar

Bondaruk, Anna & Anna Prażmowska. Dative possessors with “lack”-type verbs in Polish. Die Welt der Slaven, in press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bondaruk, Anna & Bogdan Szymanek. 2007. Polish nominativeless contructions with dative experiencers: Form, meaning and structure. Studies in Polish Linguistics 4. 61–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Borschev, Vladimir & Barbara H. Partee. 2002. The Russian genitive of negation: Theme-rheme structure or perspective structure? Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10. 105–114.Suche in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2006. Case and agreement with genitive of quantification in Russian. In Cedrick Boeckx (ed.), Agreement systems, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.92.07bosSuche in Google Scholar

Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 591–656.Suche in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Suche in Google Scholar

Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2000. The unergative/unaccusative distinction in Polish. In Piotr Bański & Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.), Proceedings of GLiP-1, 35–46. Warszawa: IPIPAN.Suche in Google Scholar

Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2002. Unaccusativity mismatches and unaccusativity diagnostics from Derivational Morphology. In Paul Boucher & Marc Plénat (eds.), Many morphologies, 48–81. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00127.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Dziwirek, Katarzyna. 1992. Polish subjects. New York, NY: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2). 101–140.10.1111/1467-9612.00017Suche in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar. 2010. Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials. Linguistics and Philosophy 33(1). 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9073-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Jutta M. & Nataša Milićević. 2008. The syntax of existential sentences in Serbian. In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, vol. 16, 168–184. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Harves, Stephanie. 2002. Unaccusative syntax in Russian. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 393–430. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402616.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazout, Ilan. 2008. On the relation between expletive “there” and its associate: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.117.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Teun & René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Irwin, Patricia. 2012. Unaccusavtivity at the interfaces. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Irwin, Patricia. 2018. Existential unaccusativity and new discourse referents. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). X.1–X.42. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.283.Suche in Google Scholar

Irwin, Patricia. 2021. Discourse and unacccusativity: Quantitative effects of a structural phenomenon. In Artemis Alexiadou & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds.), The syntax of argument structure: Empirical advancements and theoretical relevance, 181–202. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110757255-007Suche in Google Scholar

Kagan, Olga. 2005. Genitive case: A modal account. In Yehuda Falk (ed.), Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics 21 (IATL 21). https://www.iatl.org.il/?page_id=139 (accessed 6 September 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Khrizman, Keren. 2011. Imperfective aspect and partitive case in Russian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Klockmann, Heidi. 2015. What are categories? Adjective-like and noun-like semi-lexical numerals in Polish. In Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), How categorical are categories? New approaches to the old questions of Noun, Verb and Adjective. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514510-008Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 1992. An interpretation for the English existential construction. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California at Santa Cruz dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 1997. A semantics for the English existential construction. New York, NY: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising or predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Suche in Google Scholar

Myler, Neil. 2016. Building and interpreting possession sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. & Vladimir Borschev. 2004. The semantics of Russian genitive of negation: The nature and role of perspectival structure. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceedings from SALT XIV, 212–234. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v14i0.2908Suche in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara, Vladimir Borschev, Elena Paducheva, Yakov Testelets & Igor Yanovich. 2012. The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: Genitive of Negation and Genitive of Intensionality. Oslo Studies in Language 4(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.229.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Przepiórkowski, Adam. 1999. Case assignment and the complement-adjunct dichotomy: A non-configurational constraint-based approach. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Rozwadowska, Bożena. 1992. Thematic constraints on selected constructions in English and Polish. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Suche in Google Scholar

Tajsner, Przemysław. 2021. How much inversion is there in Polish existential sentences? A view from Simplest Merge and feature-free syntax. Paper presented at 50th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań University, 16–19 September.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 2006. The subject-predicate theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 648–651. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648.Suche in Google Scholar

Willim, Ewa. 1989. On word order: A government-binding study of English and Polish. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Suche in Google Scholar

Willim, Ewa. 2015. Case distribution and φ-agreement with Polish Genitive of Quantification in the feature sharing theory of Agree. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(2). 315–357. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2015-0013.Suche in Google Scholar

Witkoś, Jacek. 1998. The syntax of clitics: Steps towards a minimalist account. Poznań: Motivex.Suche in Google Scholar

Witkoś, Jacek. 2003. Nominative-to-genitive shift and the negative copula nie ma/not is: Implications for the checking theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10. 174–199.Suche in Google Scholar

Witkoś, Jacek. 2020. Genitive of negation (GoN) in Polish possessive and locative existential sentences: A testing tool for case overwriting, case projections and derivational phases. In Gréte Dalmi, Jacek Witkoś & Piotr Cegłowski (eds.), Approaches to predicative possession, 11–40. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-002Suche in Google Scholar

Witkoś, Jacek, Dominika Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, Piotr Cegłowski & Paulina Łęska. 2018. The syntax of numeral noun constructions. A view from Polish. Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/b12901Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-20
Accepted: 2022-11-20
Published Online: 2023-11-28
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 15.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2022-1061/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen