Construction-specific effects of phonological similarity avoidance

References

Alderete, J. 1997. Dissimilation as local conjunction. In K. Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 27, pp. 17–31. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Search in Google Scholar

Alderete, J. and S. A. Frisch. 2007. Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon. In P. de Lacy (ed.), Handbook of Phonology, pp. 379-398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.017Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. R. 2008. Phonologically conditioned allomorphy in the morphology of Surmiran (Rumantsch). Word Structure 1: 109–124.10.3366/E1750124508000184Search in Google Scholar

Anttila, A. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In F. Hinskens, R. van Hout and L. Wetzels (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, pp. 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.146.04antSearch in Google Scholar

Anttila, A. 2007. Variation and optionality. In P. de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, pp. 519–536. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.023Search in Google Scholar

Bańko, M., D. Komosińska, and A. Stankiewicz (eds.). 2003. Indeks a tergo do Uniwersalnego słownika języka polskiego pod redakcją Stanisława Dubisza. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Bat-El, O. 2005. Competing principles of in paradigm uniformity: Evidence from Hebrew Imperative paradigm. In L. J. Downing, T. A. Hall, and R. Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 44–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267712.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Berkley, D. M. 2000. Gradient Obligatory Contour Principle effects. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Search in Google Scholar

Blevins, J. and A. Garrett. 2004. The evolution of metathesis. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–156.10.1017/CBO9780511486401.005Search in Google Scholar

Booij, G. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Booij, G. 2016. Construction morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.254Search in Google Scholar

Booij, G. 2018. The construction of words: Introduction and overview. In G. Booij (ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology. Cham: Springer. 3–18.10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_1Search in Google Scholar

Booij, G. and J. Audring. 2017. Construction morphology and the parallel architecture of grammar. Cognitive Science 41(S2): 277–302.10.1111/cogs.12323Search in Google Scholar

Boyé, G. and M. Plénat. 2015. L’allomorphie radicale dans les lexèmes adjectivaux du français. Le cas des adverbes en -ment. In B. Tranel (ed.), Understanding Allomorphy. Perspectives from Optimality Theory, London: Equinox Publishing.10.1558/equinox.25216Search in Google Scholar

Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA, MIT.10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brentari, D. 1998. Comments on the paper by Yip. In S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, and P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, Stanford: CSLI, pp. 247–258.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612886Search in Google Scholar

Bye, P. 2011. Dissimilation. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen and E. Hume (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1408–1433.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0060Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, A. 1988. Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988, pp. 68–94. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, A. 1990. Phonologically conditioned suppletion. In W. Dressler, H. Luschützky, O. Pfeiffer, and R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary Morphology, pp. 17–23. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874082.17Search in Google Scholar

Casali, R. F. 1997. Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: which vowel goes? Language 73: 493–533.10.2307/415882Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2013a. Arbitrariness in grammar: Palatalization effects in Polish. Lingua 123: 31–57.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2013b. R-metathesis in English: An account based on perception and frequency of use. Lingua 137: 172–192.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2014. Lexicon Based Phonology: Arbitrariness in Grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2019. Measuring the phonological (un)naturalness of selected alternation patterns in Polish. Language Sciences 72: 160–187.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2020. Construction-specific phonology: Evidence from Polish vowel-zero alternations. In Krzysztof Jaskuła (ed.), Phonological and Phonetic Explorations. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, pp. 77–93.Search in Google Scholar

Czaplicki, B. 2021. The strength of morphophonological schemas: Consonant mutations in Polish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1): 25. 1–34.10.5334/gjgl.1255Search in Google Scholar

Dell, G. S., L. K. Burger and W. R. Svec. 1997. Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104: 123–147.10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, S. A. 2004. Language processing and segmental OCP effects. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology, pp. 346–378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486401.011Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, S. A., J. Pierrehumbert, and M. Broe. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 179–228.10.1023/B:NALA.0000005557.78535.3cSearch in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Golston, C. 1995. Syntax outranks phonology: evidence from Ancient Greek. Phonology 21, 325–357.10.1017/S0952675700002554Search in Google Scholar

Good, J. 2018. Modeling Signifiers in Constructional Approaches to Morphological Analysis. In G. Booij (ed.), The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology. Cham: Springer. 19–58.10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_2Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1950. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6: 162–181.10.1080/00437956.1950.11659378Search in Google Scholar

Hamann, S. 2002. Postalveolar fricatives in Slavic languages as retroflexes. In S. Baauw, M. Huiskes, and M. Schoorlemmer (eds.), OTS Yearbook 2002, 105–127. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Hansson, G. Ó. 2014. (Dis)agreement by (non)correspondence: Inspecting the foundations. Paper presented at the ABC↔Conference. University of California Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, S. 2014. The Interplay of Morphology and Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280476.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Itô, J. and A. Mester. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese: theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 49–73.Search in Google Scholar

Itô, J. and A. Mester. 1999. The Phonological Lexicon. In N. Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 62-100.10.1002/9781405166225.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1941[1962]). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. [Reprinted in Jakobson (1962), 328-401.]Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VII: Syntax. London: George Allen. Republished in 1954.Search in Google Scholar

Jurgec, P. 2016. Velar palatalization in Slovenian: Local and long-distance interactions in a derived environment effect. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 24.10.5334/gjgl.129Search in Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N. 1987. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27: 117–143.10.1016/0010-0277(87)90016-3Search in Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1973. Phonological representations. In O. Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC, pp. 1–136.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 2001. Vowels and Consonants: an Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Malden: Blackwell Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. and I. Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. 1984. Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753459Search in Google Scholar

Marle, J. van 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111558387Search in Google Scholar

Mascaró, J. 2007. External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 715–735.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.715Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. 1986. OCP Effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–263.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. and A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA, pp. 249–384.Search in Google Scholar

Menn, L. and B. McWhinney. 1984. The Repeated Morph Constraint: Towards an explanation. Language 60: 519–541.10.2307/413990Search in Google Scholar

Mondorf, B. 1993. Support for More-support. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, no. 43 in Topics in English Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 251–304.Search in Google Scholar

Nevins, A. 2012. Haplological Dissimilation at Distinct Stages of Exponence. In J. Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–116.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Newman, P. 2000. The Hausa Language: an Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Odden, D. 1994. Adjacency paramaters in phonology. Language 70(2). 289–330.10.2307/415830Search in Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting, 178–203. Chicago Linguistic Society 17.10.1075/cilt.323.05ohaSearch in Google Scholar

Padgett, J. 1995. Stricture in feature geometry. Dissertations in Linguistics Series. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, C. and J.–F. Prunet. 1991. Introduction: Asymmetry and visibility in consonant articulations. In C. Paradis and J.–F. Prunet (eds), Phonetics and phonology. The special status of coronals. Internal and external evidence. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–28.10.1016/B978-0-12-544966-3.50007-5Search in Google Scholar

Paster, M. 2006. Phonological conditions on affixation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759400Search in Google Scholar

Priva, U. C. 2017. Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language, 93 (3): 569–597.10.1353/lan.2017.0037Search in Google Scholar

Rubach, J. 1984. Cyclic and Lexical Phonology: The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111392837Search in Google Scholar

Russell, K. 1995. Morphemes and Candidates in Optimality Theory. Ms.Search in Google Scholar

Satkiewicz, H. 1969. Produktywne typy słowotwórcze współczesnego języka ogólnopolskiego. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, S. 1986. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris [second edition].10.1515/9783110877328Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, P. A. 1976. Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Soto-Faraco, S. and C. Spence. 2001. Spatial modulation of repetition blindness and repetition deafness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54: 1181–1202.10.1080/713756015Search in Google Scholar

Stemberger, J. 1981. Morphological Haplology. Language 57(4): 791–817.10.2307/414242Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, K. 1998. A typological investigation of dissimilation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

Szymanek, B. 2010. A Panorama of Polish Word-Formation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Search in Google Scholar

West, P. 2000. Long-distance coarticulatory effects of English /l/ and /r/. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, R. 2004. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner and D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–57.10.1017/CBO9780511486401.002Search in Google Scholar

Wróbel, H. 1999. Czasownik. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, and H. Wróbel (eds.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego: Morfologia. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, pp. 536–583.Search in Google Scholar

Yip, M. 1998. Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, and P. M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 216–246.Search in Google Scholar

Zsiga, E. C. 2013. The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781394260980Search in Google Scholar

Zuraw, K. 2006. Using the web as a phonological corpus: a case study from Tagalog. In EACL-2006: Proceedings of the 11th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics/proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on web as corpus. Trento, pp. 59–66.10.3115/1628297.1628306Search in Google Scholar