Startseite Markedness relation, identity avoidance, and clausal recursion in Mandarin Chinese
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Markedness relation, identity avoidance, and clausal recursion in Mandarin Chinese

  • Yu-Ching Tseng EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. November 2021

Abstract

This paper uses optimality theory (OT) to account for the phenomenon of identity occurrence resulting from clausal recursion, which we argue is derived from syntactic embedding and syntactic adjunction. This paper shows that the interaction between faithfulness and economy constraints allows for the optional deletion of functional morphemes that occur repetitively. The syntactic process of deletion is sensitive to the concept of markedness in a few ways. First, the marked, rather than the unmarked, pattern is the trigger for deletion; second, unmarked constructions have priority over marked constructions as the target for deletion. All of these ideas are integrated into the OT model that involves self-conjoined constraints, the mechanism of harmonic alignment, and the competition between faithfulness and economy constraints.


Yu-Ching Tseng Tamkang University 151, Ingzhuan Rd., Tamsui Dist. New Taipei City, 251 Taiwan

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2006b). Serial Verb Constructions in Tariana. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions. A Crosslinguistic Typology, pp. 178-200, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199279159.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Aissen, J. (1999). Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17(4), 673–711.10.1023/A:1006335629372Suche in Google Scholar

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483.10.1023/A:1024109008573Suche in Google Scholar

Alderete, J. (1996). Self-conjunction under strict adjacency. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Suche in Google Scholar

Alderete, J. (1997). Dissimilation as local conjunction. In K. Kusumoto (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 27 (pp. 17–32). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Suche in Google Scholar

Anttila, A., & Fong, V. (2000). The partitive constraint in optimality theory. Journal of Semantics, 17(4), 281–314.10.1093/jos/17.4.281Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. (1989). Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 513-553.Suche in Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter. 1995. Verb serialization and converbs - differences and similarities. In M. Haspelmath & E. König (eds.), Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 137-188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884463-006Suche in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž., & Lasnik, H. (2003). On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 527–546.10.1162/002438903322520142Suche in Google Scholar

Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, H. (2017). Say-complementizers in Sinitic languages. In Sybesma, R., Behr, W., Gu, Y., Handel, Z., Huang, C.-T. J., & Myers, J. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 658–664). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, L. R. (1997). Taiwan yu Taiwan huayu li de ziju jiegou biaozhi “jiang” yu “kan” [Taiwan and the clausal markers “speak” and “see” in Taiwanese Chinese]. In Taiyu, huayu de jiegou ji dongxiang Volume II: Tai, hua yu de jiechu yu tongyiyu de hudong (pp. 105–132). Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-liou.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng. L. L.-S. (1986). De in Mandarin. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 31(4), 313– 326.10.1017/S0008413100011865Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Suche in Google Scholar

Fukazawa, H. (1999). Theoretical implications of OCP effects on features in optimality theory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, T. (2009). Multiple routes to clause union: The diachrony of complex verb phrases. In: T. Givón & M. Shibatani (Eds.), Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution (pp. 81–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.85.04mulSuche in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, A. J. (1984). Meeussen's rule. In M. Aronoff & R. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp. 245–259). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. (1997). Projections, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 373-422.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, A. Y. (1971). Mandarin syntactic structures. Unicorn (Chi-Lin), 8, 1–149.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 25–70.10.1017/S0022226705003683Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. (2016). The Serial verb construction: comparative concept and crosslinguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics, 17(3), 291-319.10.1177/2397002215626895Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar (Doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, N. (2018). Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: Implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 27, 347-376.10.1007/s10831-018-9185-1Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, S. F. (2013). Chinese grammar at work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scld.1Suche in Google Scholar

Holton, D. (1995). Assimilation and dissimilation of Sundanese liquids. In J. Beckman, L. Dickey, & S. Urbancqyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, 18 (pp. 167–180). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Suche in Google Scholar

Itô, J. & Mester, A. (1996). Structural economy and OCP interactions in local domains. Paper presented at Western Conference on Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.Suche in Google Scholar

Itô, J. & Mester, A. (1998). Markedness and word structure: OCP effects in Japanese.Suche in Google Scholar

Rutgers Optimality Archive. Retrieved from http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

Itô, J. & Mester, A. (2003). Lexical and postlexical phonology in optimality theory: evidence from Japanese. In G. Fanselow & C. Féry (Eds.), Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 11: Resolving Conflicts in Grammars (pp. 183–207).Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1957). The relationship between genitive and plural in the declension of Russian nouns. Scando-Slavica, 3(1), 181–186.10.1080/00806765708600268Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1966). Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes, 13(51), 21–37.10.1515/9783110873269.345Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1972). Verbal communication. Scientific American, 227, 72–80.10.1515/9783110855463.81Suche in Google Scholar

Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Y. H. (1990). Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Suche in Google Scholar

Mohanan, T. (1994). Case OCP: A constraint on word order in Hindi. In M. Butt, T. H. King, & G. Ramchand (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages (pp. 185–216). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Myers, S. (1997). OCP effects in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(4), 847–892.10.1002/9780470756171.ch13Suche in Google Scholar

Odden, D. (1994). Adjacency parameters in phonology. Language, 70(2): 289–330.10.2307/415830Suche in Google Scholar

Padgett, J. (1992). OCP subsidiary features. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, 22 (pp. 335–346). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Suche in Google Scholar

Paul, W. (2014). Why particles are not particular: sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica, 68, 77–115.10.1111/stul.12020Suche in Google Scholar

Paul, W. (2015). New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin/Munich/Boston, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338775Suche in Google Scholar

Poster, W. J. (2002). The double-o constraints in Japanese. Unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, J. R. (1972). Doubl-ing. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 61–86.Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Atlantic City, NJ: Humanities Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, A. (2014). Sentence-final particles. In C.-T. J. Huang, Y.-H. A. Lee, & A. Simpson (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 156–179). UK: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584552.ch7Suche in Google Scholar

Tang, T.-C. (1992). Hanyu cifa jufa sanji [Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax Vol. 3] Taipei: Student Book Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. (1931). Die phonologischen systeme. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 96–116.Suche in Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der phonologie. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Tseng, Y. C. (2008). A typology of syntactic OCP effects: A study of OCP in Hakka syntax and optimality theory (Doctoral dissertation). State University of New York, Albany, NY.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, D. (1993). A CP analysis of Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics in Netherlands, 10, 189-200.10.1075/avt.10.19xuSuche in Google Scholar

Yip, M. (1995). Repetition and its avoidance: The case of Javanese. Unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Yip, M. (1998). Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, & P. M. Farrell (Eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax (pp. 216–246). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Zang Y. Q. & Tian, F. J. (2015). Study on markedness in linguistics. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(9), 667–671.10.17265/1539-8072/2015.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-08
Published in Print: 2021-11-08

© 2021 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Heruntergeladen am 19.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2021-0018/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen