Naming as doing: Identities, positioning, and ideologies in capital trials

References

Aceto, M. 2002. “Ethnic personal names and multiple identities in Anglophone Caribbean speech communities in Latin America”. Language in Society 31. 577–608.10.1017/S0047404502314040Suche in Google Scholar

Adams, M. 2009. “Power, politeness, and the pragmatics of nicknames”. Names 57. 81–91.10.1179/175622709X436369Suche in Google Scholar

Ainiala, T. and J. Ostman (eds.). 2017. Socio-onomastics: The pragmatics of names. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.275Suche in Google Scholar

Aldrin, E. 2016. “Names and identity”. In: Hough, X. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 382–39410.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.24Suche in Google Scholar

Aldrin, E. 2017. “Creating identities through the choice of first names”. In: Ainiala, T. and J. Ostman (eds.), Socio-onomastics: The pragmatics of names. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 45–68.10.1075/pbns.275.03aldSuche in Google Scholar

Aldrin, E. 2019. “Naming, identity, and social positioning in teenagers’ everyday mobile phone interaction”. Names 67. 30–39.10.1080/00277738.2017.1415523Suche in Google Scholar

Alford, R. 1988. Naming and identity: A cross-cultural study of personal naming practices. New Haven: HRAF Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Anchimbe, E. 2011. “On not calling people by their names: Pragmatic undertones of sociocultural relationships in a postcolony”. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1472–1483.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.013Suche in Google Scholar

Bednarek, M. 2006. “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach”. Text & Talk 26. 635–660.10.1515/TEXT.2006.027Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, W. 1978. “Storytelling in criminal trials: A model of social judgment”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 64. 1–22.10.1080/00335637809383408Suche in Google Scholar

Bishop, A. 1977. “Name calling: Defendant nomenclature in criminal trials”. Ohio Northern University Law Review 4. 38–76.Suche in Google Scholar

Bright, S. 2000. “Developing themes in closing argument and elsewhere: Lessons from capital cases”. Litigation 27. 40–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, R. and A. Gilman. 1972. “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. In: Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 253–276Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, R. and M. Ford. 1961. “Address in American English”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62. 375–385.10.1037/h0042862Suche in Google Scholar

Bucolo, D. and E. Cohn. 2010. “Playing the race card: Making race salient in defence opening and closing statements”. Legal and Criminological Psychology 15. 293–303.10.1348/135532508X400824Suche in Google Scholar

Burt, M. 2008. “The importance of storytelling at all stages of a capital case”. UMKC Law Review 77. 877–910.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, K. 1992. “The linguistics of blame: Representations of women in the Sun’s reporting of crimes and sexual violence”. In: Toolan, M. (ed.), Language, text, and context: Essays in Stylistics. London: Routledge. 208–226.Suche in Google Scholar

Clayman, S. 2010. “Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk”. Discourse and Communication 4. 161–18310.1177/1750481310364330Suche in Google Scholar

Conley, R. 2016. Confronting the death penalty: How language influences jurors in capital cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334162.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Danet, B. 1980. “‘Baby’ or ‘Fetus’?: Language and the construction of reality in a manslaughter trial”. Semiotica 32. 187–219.10.1515/semi.1980.32.3-4.187Suche in Google Scholar

Dickey, E. 1997. “Forms of address and terms of reference”. Journal of Linguistics 33. 255–274.10.1017/S0022226797006488Suche in Google Scholar

Duranti, A. 1984. “The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation”. Text 4. 277–311.10.1515/text.1.1984.4.4.277Suche in Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. 1972. “Sociolinguistic rules of address”. In: Pride, J. and J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 225–240Suche in Google Scholar

Finch, J. 2008. “Naming names: Kinship, individuality, and personal names”. Sociology 42. 709–725.10.1177/0038038508091624Suche in Google Scholar

Gatson, S. 2011. “Self-naming practices on the internet: Identity, authenticity and community”. Cultural Studies <-> Critical Methodologies 11. 224–235.10.1177/1532708611409531Suche in Google Scholar

Hagstrom, C. 2012. “Naming me, naming you: Personal names, online signatures, and cultural meaning”. In: Helleland, B., O. Christian-Emil and S. Wilkstrom (eds.): Names and identities. Oslo: University of Oslo. 81–9310.5617/osla.312Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Haney, C. 1997. “Violence and the capital jury: Mechanisms of moral disengagement and the impulse to condemn to death”. Law and Human Behavior 18: 223–248.10.2307/1229350Suche in Google Scholar

Harré, R. 1980. “What’s in a nickname?” Psychology Today. 78–84.10.1063/1.2914136Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, C. 2011. “Legitimising assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: Evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration”. Discourse Studies 13. 751–769.10.1177/1461445611421360Suche in Google Scholar

Hassa, S. 2012. “Projecting, exposing, revealing self in the digital world: Usernames as a social practice in a Morroccan chatroom”. Names 60. 201–209.10.1179/0027773812Z.00000000031Suche in Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 2007. “Person reference in Tzotzil gossip: Referring dupliciter”. In: Enfield, N.J. and T. Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 226–252.10.1017/CBO9780511486746.011Suche in Google Scholar

Hwang, S. 1991. “Terms of address in Korean and American cultures”. Intercultural Communication Studies 1. 117–134.Suche in Google Scholar

Joseph, J. 2004. Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230503427Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. 2015. “Nicknames”. In: Taylor, J. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 650–66810.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.012Suche in Google Scholar

Keshavarz, M. 2001. “The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address”. International Journal of Sociology of Language 148. 5–18.10.1515/ijsl.2001.015Suche in Google Scholar

Kitagawa, C. and A. Lehrer. 1990. “Impersonal uses of personal pronouns”. Journal of Pragmatics 14. 739–759.10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-WSuche in Google Scholar

Kleinig, J. 2008. Ethics and criminal justice: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806155Suche in Google Scholar

Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 2006. “Impoliteness in Early Modern English court trial discourse”. In: Kryk-Kastovsky, B. (ed.), Historical Courtroom Discourse Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7. 213–245.10.1075/jhp.7.2.04krySuche in Google Scholar

Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 2012. “From monarch, through traitor, to martyr and saint: Power shift in the trial of Charles I”. In: Kryk-Kastovsky, B. (ed.), Intercultural communication: Past and present. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. 245–262.10.3726/978-3-653-01353-5Suche in Google Scholar

Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 2018. “Implicatures in Early Modern English courtroom records”. In: Kurzon, D. and B. Kryk-Kastovsky (eds.), Legal pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 65–80.10.1075/pbns.288.03krySuche in Google Scholar

Kryk-Kastovsky, B. and D. Kastovsky. 2002. “Deictic anchoring in Early Modern English court trials”. In: Fischer, A., G. Tootie and H. Lehmann (eds.), Text types and corpora: Studies in honour of Udo Fries. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 53–58.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. 2007. “Optimizing person reference: Perspectives from usage on Rossel Island”. In: Enfield, N.J. and T. Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 29–7210.1017/CBO9780511486746.004Suche in Google Scholar

Li, D. 1997. “Borrowed identity: Signaling involvement with a Western name”. Journal of Pragmatics 28. 489–513.10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00032-5Suche in Google Scholar

Luchjenbroers, J. and M. Aldridge. 2007. “Conceptual manipulation with metaphors and frames: Dealing with rape victims in legal discourse”. Text and Talk 27. 339–359.10.1515/TEXT.2007.014Suche in Google Scholar

Matoesian, G. 2001. Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195123296.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

McKinlay, A. and C. McVittie. 2011. Identities in context: Individuals and discourse in action. London: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444397222Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer, C. 1987. Apposition in English. Journal of English Linguistics 20. 101–121.10.1177/007542428702000107Suche in Google Scholar

Mondala, L. 2004. “L’annuncio del nome del paziente come dispositivo strutturante per l’attivita”. Revista di Psicolinguistica Applicata 2. 65–78.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Barr, W. 1982. Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, L. 2004. The death penalty in the United States: A complete guide to federal and state laws. (2nd ed.) Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Suche in Google Scholar

Powell, G. 2001. “Opening statements: The art of storytelling”. Stetson Law Review 31. 89–104.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, R. et al. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosulek, L. 2008. “Manipulative silence and social representation in the closing arguments of a child sexual abuse case”. Text & Talk 28. 529–550.10.1515/TEXT.2008.026Suche in Google Scholar

Rosulek, L. 2015. Dueling discourses: The construction of reality in closing arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337613.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. 2007. “Conveying who you are: The presentation of self, strictly speaking”. In: Enfield, N.J. and T. Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 123–148.10.1017/CBO9780511486746.007Suche in Google Scholar

Sornig, K. 1989. “Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion”. In: Wodak, R. (ed.), Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–114.10.1075/ct.7.09sorSuche in Google Scholar

Spiecker, S. and D. Worthington. 2003. “The influence of opening statement/closing statement organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards”. Law and Human Behavior 27. 437–456.10.1023/A:1024041201605Suche in Google Scholar

Stirling, L. and L. Manderson. 2011. “About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority”. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1581–1602.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

Teo, P. 2000. “Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers”. Discourse & Society 11. 7–49.10.1177/0957926500011001002Suche in Google Scholar

Trew, T. 1979. “What the papers say: Linguistic variation and ideological differences”. In: Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew (eds.), Language and control. London: Routledge. 117–156.10.4324/9780429436215-7Suche in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Weng, H. 2010. “Naming and Chinese Muslim identities: Boundary-making, negotiation, and hybridity in Malaysia”. In: Yangwen, Z. and C. Macdonald (eds.), Personal names in Asia: History, culture and identity. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press. 288–304.10.2307/j.ctv1qv2k0.18Suche in Google Scholar

White, P.R.R. 2006. “Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis”. In: Lassen I. (ed.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 37–69.10.1075/dapsac.18.05whiSuche in Google Scholar