An aspectual contour of phrasal verb constructions with English think

References

Brinton, L.L. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, C. 1981. Story of ‘over’: Polysemy, semantics and the structure of the lexicon. Trier: LAUT.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

CALD = Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. 2003. Gillard, P. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. (Available online at https://www.english-cor-pora.org/coca/)Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dewell, R.B. 1994. “Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis”. Cognitive Linguistics 5(4). 351–380.10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.351Search in Google Scholar

Dirven, R. 1989. “Space prepositions”. In: Dirven, R. (ed.), A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 519–550.Search in Google Scholar

Fabiszak, M., A. Hebda, I. Kokorniak and K. Krawczak. 2014. “The semasiological structure of Polish myśleć ‘to think’”. In: Glynn, D. and J.A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 223–251.10.1075/hcp.43.09fabSearch in Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 2001. “Thoughts about thought”. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 15–45.10.1515/cogl.12.1.15Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, B. 1976. The verb-particle combination in English. New York. Academia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, D. 2009. “Polysemy, syntax, and variation”. In: Evans V.and S. Pourcel (eds), New directions in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–104.10.1075/hcp.24.08glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, D. 2010. “Corpus-driven Cognitive Semantics: Introduction to the field”. In: Glynn D. and K. Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–42.10.1515/9783110226423Search in Google Scholar

Goddard, C. 2003. “Thinking across languages and cultures: Six dimensions of variation”. Cognitive Linguistics 14. 109–140.10.1515/cogl.2003.005Search in Google Scholar

Janda, L.A. 2015. “Russian aspectual types: Croft’s typology revised”. In: Shrager, M., G. Fowler, S. Franks and E. Andrews (eds.), Studies in Slavic linguistics and accentology in honor of Ronald F. Feldstein. Bloomingtom: Slavica Publishers. 147–167.Search in Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1994. “Analysability and idiomaticity: Phrasal verbs in focus”. In: Gussmann, E. and H. Kardela (eds.), Papers from the 2nd Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English, Kazimierz ’93. Lublin: Maria-Curie-Skłodowska University Press. 139–152.Search in Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 1997. “Telicity as a perfectivising category: Notes on aspectual distinctions in English and Polish”. In: Hickey, R. and S. Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modeling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1473–1492.Search in Google Scholar

Kardela, H. 2000. Dimensions and parameters in grammar: Studies in A/D asymmetries and subjectivity relations in Polish. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, S. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23Search in Google Scholar

Kochańska, A. 2007. “Conflicting epistemic meanings of the Polish aspectual variants in past and future uses: Are they a vagary of grammar? In: Divjak, D. and A. Kochańska (eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 149–180.10.1515/9783110198799.2.149Search in Google Scholar

Kokorniak, I.. 2018. Aspectual modeling of mental predicates in English and Polish: A cognitive linguistic perspective. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Konieczna, E. this volume. “Between spatial domain and grammatical meaning: The semantic content of English telic particles”.Search in Google Scholar

Kreitzer, A. 1997. “Multiple levels of schematization: A study of the conceptualization of space”. Cognitive Linguistics 8. 291–325.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.291Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1982. “Remarks on English aspect”. In: Hopper, P.J. (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 265–304.10.1075/tsl.1.17lanSearch in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1990. “Subjectification”. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1995. “Possession and possessive constructions”. In: Taylor, J.R. and R.E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 51–79.10.1515/9783110809305.51Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lindner, S. 1983. A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb-particle constructions with ‘up’ and ‘out’. Trier: LAUT.Search in Google Scholar

Lindstromberg, S. 1997. English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.88Search in Google Scholar

LDOCE = Summers, D. (ed.). 1995. Longman dictionary of contemporary English. (3rd edition). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Persson, G. 1993. “Think in a panchronic perspective”. Studia Neophilologica 65(1). 3–18.10.1080/00393279308588103Search in Google Scholar

Radden, G. 1989. “Figurative use of prepositions”. In: Dirven, R. (ed.), A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 551–576.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, S. 1999. “Aspects of prepositions and prepositional aspect”. In: de Stadler, L. and Ch. Eyrich (eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics: 1993 Proceedings of the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Berlin: De Gruyter. 225–247.10.1515/9783110811933.225Search in Google Scholar

Rudzka-Ostyn, B. 2003. Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197235Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000a. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, A. and V. Evans. 2001. “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over”. Language 77(4). 724–765.10.1515/9783110895698.95Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, A. and V. Evans. 2003. The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486517Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. 1957. “Verbs and times”. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160.10.7591/9781501743726-005Search in Google Scholar